JohnCoffey wrote:
You can point out whatever you want fella. At the end of the day I don't own what you could call a serious VR headset and that is because of the games I want to play, or total lack of them. So yeah, continue on 'til you're blue in the face if you really want to 'cause it isn't going to change anything, man.
It won't change anything for
you, no. But you didn't say, "I'm not interested in VR personally," you claimed the whole thing was a fad. And at the risk of blowing your mind, 'what JohnCoffey wants' simply isn't the yardstick by which the entire success of anything hinges upon. You personally don't have to like a think before that thing can succeed. I'm not sure what part of that you're arguing with?
JohnCoffey wrote:
At the end of the day it needs to appeal to every one, and thus make every one want it, to succeed. If it only has limited scope? it's bound to fail.
Are you sure? I mean I know loads of people that don't own any gaming consoles or equipment and I'm pretty sure that industry is doing very well for itself. I personally don't own a car, yet that continues to not sound the death knell of the entire automotive industry. Bizarre!
Every single thing everywhere has 'limited scope' to some degree because not everything is popular with everyone in the world. Based on the other stuff you keep repeating here I suspect that when you say "it needs to appeal to every one" you really mean "it needs to appeal to JohnCoffey" because the idea that something gaming related could pass you by and still be successful appears to be impossible for you to imagine.
JohnCoffey wrote:
Remember, I am allow my opinion.
You are indeed. But remember it has to not be ill-informed nonsense for it to be taken at all seriously.
JohnCoffey wrote:
Whether it can get through all of that? I doubt it, given it doesn't have what I would consider to be a killer app and the way things are headed with it it won't get one either.
You keep demonstrating that you don't know anything about the state of the platform or anything about any of the games that are around so it's a bit difficult to take seriously what you consider about the way things are headed. And I don't say that intended to be an insult, it's just a statement based on your own posts here.
JohnCoffey wrote:
I do agree that for there to be a serious VR game it needs to be devved from the ground up for VR. And that won't happen, because you then have a product useless for anything else.
Um, there are already loads of games that have been developed exclusively for VR. Seriously dude, it's this kind of genuine ignorance of the current state of play that makes you impossible to take seriously here.