@DocG
Yeah, that's me told, huh.
Protip: just because someone cannot be arsed to respond, for the nth time, doesn't mean they concede. It just means they can't be arsed.
If you're [now] saying it wasn't Labour's fault because there
was no regulation of the banks anyway and it was all international, well, given the fact remains unaltered that it is the prime responsibility of UK government to effectively and successfully regulate the UK financial sector, then they [Labour] bloody well should've put such a regulatory regime in place. You cannot delegate or ignore responsibility. You need to learn this.
Of course, it's all complete balls anyway; if there was no regulation then it rather does beg the question of what Labour's idiotic tearing down and replacement of the previously broadly effective regulatory regime was all about, and in particular, something called 'The Financial Services Authority" (FSA) created by Labour with much trumpeting in 2001 (the clue's in the name), not to mention something else known as 'The Bank of England'. Honestly; you really actually believe this shit, don't you; even when Corbyn himself apologised the other day for Labour's failure to regulate the Banks, and Miliband before him (and arguably Brown before him) - it's still not enough. It wasn't Labour, honest guv (shortly followed by "I'm not a Labour supporter"
) Again, as I've said before, if you're not going to accept this culpability from two, even three leaders of the Labour Party, you're not going to take it from me - I can't help you. Pure head-in-bucket delusion; desperate stuff. Still, perhaps Corbyn, Milliband et al were being "fatuous" in their respective admissions and apologies...
I totally get that you cannot face up to even the most basic political culpability here; as I've said, this cult-like imbecility; this blinkered, black-is-white doublethink in order to avoid any blame for what is, admittedly, a catastrophe and undoing of all that you hold dear, is a characteristic of the Left. Whereas we, on the Right, can candidly discuss the absurdities and real politik implications of the Poll Tax; the ill-advised Lawson Boom; the catastrophic ERM, you lot can do no wrong. 'Conceited' and 'deluded' don't even begin to cover it, even to the point of denying what governments are even required to do, and what they're responsible for.
I've explained this before to you many, many times, so consider this the last.
_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...
Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but
interestingly wrong