Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 8687 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 ... 174  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:18 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48662
Location: Cheshire
The Man in the High Castle - 2 episodes in and it is superb. Beautifully shot, real sense of desperation from all sides. I really like it.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:22 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
I've seen two as well, and it's definitely good TV. They seem overly fond of annoying background noises though - hissing TVs, ringing phones...

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:39 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4301
Weirdly we decided to dip our toes into The Man in the High Castle last night as well, and watched Ep 1.

Really nicely realised, it looks great. The rebel chap who got captured was a tad hammy and obvious. Rufus Sewell is nicely unpleasant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:42 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16561
We've seen them all, really good. Can't wait for season 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:48 
Has anyone mentioned Manhattan? The 2nd season is pretty much over now I think, really good slow burner of a show.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:55 
User avatar
Excellent Painter

Joined: 30th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7315
Location: Behind you
Grim-beard... the noisy wrote:
I have episodes 1, 3 and 4 of The Expanse.

That's a bit odd.

Episode 2 is due out in a few hours, though.

Heh. I discovered exactly the same last night. DLed ep 2 this morning.

_________________
twitter || website
Malibu Stacy. Everybody's favourite back seat driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:56 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69512
Location: Your Mum
Cap'n Gingerbeard wrote:
They seem overly fond of annoying background noises though - hissing TVs, ringing phones...

Much like The West Wing.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:14 
User avatar
Decapodian

Joined: 15th Oct, 2010
Posts: 5166
nickachu wrote:
Has anyone mentioned Manhattan? The 2nd season is pretty much over now I think, really good slow burner of a show.


Me. Got the last episode to watch tonight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:19 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Grim-beard... the noisy wrote:
Cap'n Gingerbeard wrote:
They seem overly fond of annoying background noises though - hissing TVs, ringing phones...

Much like The West Wing.


Much, much more noticeable. And they linger on it, too. Guy sitting in a chair puffing on a cigarette, TV crackling away loudly. For like, 30 seconds.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:23 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16561
I never even noticed it, although I'm sure I would now you've mentioned it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 23:49 
Dr Zoidbeard wrote:
nickachu wrote:
Has anyone mentioned Manhattan? The 2nd season is pretty much over now I think, really good slow burner of a show.


Me. Got the last episode to watch tonight.


Me too! I wanna see a big kaboom!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:24 
User avatar
Ticket to Ride World Champion

Joined: 18th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11843
Started watching mithc, got to ep5 liked the first two a lot, seems to drift of a bit in the next few. Disappointed to hear that it isn't a single season show with defined conclusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:31 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17782
Location: Oxford
Finally, there's an Amazon Prime app for the Roku, so I can actually access this stuff through my telly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 13:28 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
I've been watching "The Man in the high castle" (4 episodes) and i'm not entirely convinced to the changes they made to the book. I know it's a show and they had to add something so fill it, but:

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Changing the book to a movie can be a good idea, since it's easier to show on the tv, but it just reveals the twist too soon

Same with the Joe Blake character. In the book he was a stone cold nazi that was revealed later on, not the conflicted individual on the show.

But what annoys me most is the existence of a resistance movement. In the book, America had truly lost the war and people were hopeless. It's a much more interesting scenario, and made the books written by the Man in the High Castle so much more important.

There's this need of having every character to be almost an action movie hero. In the original story, Frank was just a common guy who wanted to make a living from doing jewelry, for example. Same with Juliana, which just wanted to have a regular life before accidentaly meeting Joe Blake.


It's still worthwhile though. The cast is good. The main actress is excellent, and is very pretty in a "Hollywood golden-age" kind of way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 13:31 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
She's bloody lovely. I always think with adaptations like this that you're probably better off pretending you've never read the book, however. See also The Walking Dead.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 13:50 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
I'm usually not very picky when it comes to these adaptations, but as a huge Phillip K. Dick fan, i'm kind of annoyed how his works are always adapted to hollywood clichés, when his books are always about the opposite.

For example, in the book Juliana gets intimate with Joe shortly after meeting him, but obviously god forbid having a promiscuous heroine on an american tv show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 13:53 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
BTW, Fargo was excellent. Kirsten Dunst was brilliant as usual.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:58 
User avatar
EvilTrousers

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3073
It's on UK Netflix now but the only mentions I can see of it are in this thread - finished Jessica Jones last night.

That is some damn good telly. The characters are that finely crafted that all the superhero stuff does just seem normal and the reactions to it all are actually what people would say and discuss with other having been confronted by someone with powers. And it deals with how those individuals cope with the power and how isolated it makes them. This is no consequence-free zone - it even talks about people killed by the alien invasion in Avengers - it's a very ground level series.

Tennant and Ritter are both excellent and Kilgrave is a compelling adversary that you can absolutely believe in, not only his powers, but his sociopath nature and what happens when you do live without consequence.

Can't recommend it highly enough.

_________________
Everyone but Zardoz is better than me at videogames.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:03 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69512
Location: Your Mum
Are there boobies? I tend to avoid boobyTV on the train.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:05 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4301
Grim... wrote:
Are there boobies? I tend to avoid boobyTV on the train.


Unlike the journalist in this story.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:08 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69512
Location: Your Mum
I often wonder if I'm breaking any laws when (say) the dancers at Bada Bing are shown waving their bits about in The Sopranos and I'm sat on a train with a tablet in clear view of everyone around me.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:34 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4301
Grim... wrote:
I often wonder if I'm breaking any laws when (say) the dancers at Bada Bing are shown waving their bits about in The Sopranos and I'm sat on a train with a tablet in clear view of everyone around me.


Considering it's probably a yarr'd episode of the Sopranos, probably.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:50 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69512
Location: Your Mum
Findus Fop wrote:
Grim... wrote:
I often wonder if I'm breaking any laws when (say) the dancers at Bada Bing are shown waving their bits about in The Sopranos and I'm sat on a train with a tablet in clear view of everyone around me.


Considering it's probably a yarr'd episode of the Sopranos, probably.

If it's yarr'd then I'm not breaking any laws when I watch it.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:55 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14362
The Sopranos tatties were more like 1980's tatties though. They're not like 2000's tatties [which are more objectionable when viewed] [in public on the train]

Edit: for clarity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:00 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Saturnalian wrote:
[which are more objectionable when viewed]
Hey!
Quote:
[in public on the train]
Oh, right.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:01 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69512
Location: Your Mum
Saturnalian wrote:
The Sopranos tatties were more like 1980's tatties though.

The bada bing ones are entirely unnecessary. WE GET IT IT'S A STRIP CLUB MOVE ON

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:55 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 25594
are 'tatties' breasts? (Rather than... potatoes?)

What's the difference between a 1980s boob/potato and a 2000s boob/potato?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 13:01 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Mimi wrote:
are 'tatties' breasts? (Rather than... potatoes?)

What's the difference between a 1980s boob/potato and a 2000s boob/potato?

Don't try to delve into the mind of Sat - that way lies only madness.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 13:30 
User avatar
EvilTrousers

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3073
Grim... wrote:
Are there boobies? I tend to avoid boobyTV on the train.


There are no boobies although there are a few fairly raunchy sex scenes but no naughty bits on show.

Loads of violence though. Like loads.

_________________
Everyone but Zardoz is better than me at videogames.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 19:25 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14362
Mimi wrote:
are 'tatties' breasts? (Rather than... potatoes?)

What's the difference between a 1980s boob/potato and a 2000s boob/potato?


1980's tatties are formless and genial. 2000's tatties are vulgar and disrespectful.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:10 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 25594
Damn our modern vulgar boobs.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 21:01 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14492
Daredevil S2 trailer



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 21:42 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Gah! I hate trailers that have no new content!

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 19:28 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14492
LewieP wrote:
That looks awful.


Can I interest you in some guest stars then

http://nerdist.com/fireflys-jewel-stait ... -tomorrow/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 20:43 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Hmmm Jewel Staite is on the list.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:38 
SupaMod
User avatar
"Praisebot"

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17021
Location: Parts unknown
I've started watching the man in the high castle and I'm loving it. I don't watch a lot of TV (apart from Cbeebies) but this is excellent so far!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 14:20 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69512
Location: Your Mum
Things that are great (or continue to be great):
Brooklyn 99
Ash vs Evil Dead
Jessica Jones
Expanse
Banshee
House of Cards

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 14:34 
SupaMod
User avatar
"Praisebot"

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17021
Location: Parts unknown
Did anyone watch the American office? If so, you'll know the receptionist... Not Pam, the other one. Erin I think.

Well... I've seen that she had a sitcom playing the lead. Has anyone seen it? I don't know what it's called but a quick Bing should fix that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 14:34 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
TheVision wrote:
Did anyone watch the American office? If so, you'll know the receptionist... Not Pam, the other one. Erin I think.

Well... I've seen that she had a sitcom playing the lead. Has anyone seen it? I don't know what it's called but a quick Bing should fix that.


The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt.

Yes. It is good.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 14:37 
SupaMod
User avatar
"Praisebot"

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17021
Location: Parts unknown
Good work! Almost quicker than Bing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 14:40 
Best
User avatar
Board Mother

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11357
Location: Mount Olympus
TheVision wrote:
Almost quicker than Bing.

Is the name of your sex tape. :P

_________________
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GJ is right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 14:43 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69512
Location: Your Mum
Curiosity wrote:
Yes. It is good.

The best bit is the theme tune.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 15:46 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
I thought House of Cards lost it's way a fair bit in the third season. Some good moments still, but a lot of not so good stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 16:00 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17782
Location: Oxford
LewieP wrote:
I thought House of Cards lost it's way a fair bit in the third season. Some good moments still, but a lot of not so good stuff.


I got bored and gave up about halfway through. 'The Final Cut' was a bit rubbish too, of course, but didn't outstay its welcome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 22:26 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14492


Trailer for 11.22.63 - coming via Hulu in Feb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 22:39 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
A Stephen King adaption eh? Statistically, that doesn't bode well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 22:48 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Pfft. Maximum Overdrive begs to differ.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 23:12 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
Cras wrote:
Pfft. Maximum Overdrive begs to differ.


Apparently Maximum Overdrive doesn't know what statistically implies.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 23:55 
Best
User avatar
Board Mother

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11357
Location: Mount Olympus
I generally find that if I read the book first it isn't too bad. I can't seem to find a Maximum Overdrive book though.

I loved 11.22.63 though; one of the best I'd read by King in ages, will definitely give this a watch.

_________________
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GJ is right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: General Purpose US TV thread
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 0:51 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5979
Anyone seen Making a Murderer on Netflix?

It's fucking incredible.

It's a ten hour documentary about a man who was in jail for 18 years for a sexual assault he didn't commit and then once free (and close to a big cash settlement from the state) gets arrested for another murder.

Trailer:
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!


This will redefine documentaries for years to come (and not all for the better) - but it stands as one of the most compelling and important things I've watched all year.

Oh, just noticed they've put episode one on youtube here:

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 8687 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 ... 174  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Findus Fop and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.