I picked cash value, as it most represents what I believe a review should be like:
<Review of game, mentioning good bits, bad bits, bits that were fun, bits that sucked etc>
<Possibly mention it in relation to its contemporaries>
<Few Word Summary of the game>
<"Score". As in...
"Buy this game if you like x, y, z" or "Buy this only if you don't have x, y, or z, because it's nowhere near as good. But if you don't have those, have never played them, but would like to in the future, then it wouldn't be that bad of you to get this" or eve perhaps "Buy this and you're a fucking idiot".
>
I really like that "BIG LIST OF GAMES YOU SHOULD BUY, IN THE ORDER YOU SHOULD BUY THEM (adjusted for age)" idea that came up on WOS a few months back, even if it was unthinkable. The site should definatley have a "Big GAme Hunt" as PC Gamer did (basically the 3 best examples of 6 different genres) that they kept at the back of the mag. I think Amiga Action and Power had very similiar things.
that or bananas.