I bought a pair of ultra-thin (width wise, not thickness) glasses specifically to use with the Rift. Much better.
Although I've also kickstarted a pair of VR Lens Lab adapters for it which should be arriving soon.
Yes, they do look like Harry Potter glasses.
Although I've also kickstarted a pair of VR Lens Lab adapters for it which should be arriving soon.
Yes, they do look like Harry Potter glasses.
Yeah, I'm due an eyetest in the autumn so I'll be buying two pairs, one for the Rift.
One of the BEST GAMES EVER*, fruit ninja, is coming to motion controlly VR (in early access, no less).
It does look a bit better than the mobile version, to say the least.
But when are they going to release Try not to fart VR?
* - as chosen by a cheesecake.
It does look a bit better than the mobile version, to say the least.
But when are they going to release Try not to fart VR?
* - as chosen by a cheesecake.
No Rift support 
I think that Fruit Ninja looks ace!
I enjoyed Try Not To Fart
Sir Taxalot wrote:
I enjoyed Try Not To Fart
Did you think it was one of the 71 best ever games released up to that point?
Mr Dave wrote:
Sir Taxalot wrote:
I enjoyed Try Not To Fart
Did you think it was one of the 71 best ever games released up to that point?
Yeah, of course, I mean who wouldn't have? Right?
One of our regular Saturday night crew now has one of these and is apparently loving it long time, if his excited ejaculations on Whatsapp and Facebook are anything to go by, he even binned off GTAV with us last night so him and his wife could palpate each other's genitals in VR cyberspace or whatever bizarre perverstities it is people get up to in there.
We are all going to go round to his house to have a go and see what the all the fuss is about.
I'm a speccy-four-eyes though so I hope my face fits into it alright, previous comments in this thread suggest it may be a sub-optimal experience.
We are all going to go round to his house to have a go and see what the all the fuss is about.
I'm a speccy-four-eyes though so I hope my face fits into it alright, previous comments in this thread suggest it may be a sub-optimal experience.
Yep. It's £800 for a new PC, £500 for the rift and £2k for the laser eye surgery
HTC are charging $140 for additional lighthouses and $120 for additional wands (each I think, not as a pair) which is fucking ludicrous.
Just had a quick go on a DK2 at work. Seated.
No limits rollercoaster demo. Nearly spewed my ring up on the first loop. Not pleasant
No limits rollercoaster demo. Nearly spewed my ring up on the first loop. Not pleasant
Like a real rollercoaster then
Lonewolves wrote:
Like a real rollercoaster then
Weirdly, no. I've never felt ill on a real 'coaster. It just felt like my stomach was going to flip over in my body.
I've had the same feeling even with the Google Cardboard rollercoaster type things. I never get sick at all on rollercaosters in real life but swings make me feel awful and it did that.
I think it is because although your eyes see the movement and your brain interprets it as such, the balance sensors in your ear aren't reporting movement so your brain gets confused as to which one is wrong and something somethi ng
Much like being on a ship I guess.
I guess it's all to do with being in control too. I've put probably about 100 hours into iRacing on the Rift and not once have I felt a twinge of sickness.
MaliA wrote:
I think it is because although your eyes see the movement and your brain interprets it as such, the balance sensors in your ear aren't reporting movement so your brain gets confused as to which one is wrong and something somethi ng
That's exactly what is happening. The brain knows there's a disconnect and it's trying to compensate for physical movement which isn't happening.
MaliA wrote:
I think it is because although your eyes see the movement and your brain interprets it as such, the balance sensors in your ear aren't reporting movement so your brain gets confused as to which one is wrong and something somethi ng
Davpaz, can you try the roller coaster demo while sat on an office chair, and have someone spin the chair around please. I'm interested to see how the brain interprets a vision-movement conflict as opposed to a vision-nonmovement conflict.
I'm betting (hoping) it will make you feel even worse.
Oh, the VR unit has wires doesn't it? Don't wrap them round your neck.
MaliA wrote:
I think it is because although your eyes see the movement and your brain interprets it as such, the balance sensors in your ear aren't reporting movement so your brain gets confused as to which one is wrong and...
...your primitive lizard brain assumes you've eaten something poisonous/hallucinogenic that is confusing your slightly less primitive monkey brain, so triggers a nausea reflex to try and get rid of it.
It's not just motion, either. There are theee types of depth cues your brain uses and VR helmets only spoof one of them, so even static scenes can cause sickness from that inconsistency.
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
MaliA wrote:
I think it is because although your eyes see the movement and your brain interprets it as such, the balance sensors in your ear aren't reporting movement so your brain gets confused as to which one is wrong and...
...your primitive lizard brain assumes you've eaten something poisonous/hallucinogenic that is confusing your slightly less primitive monkey brain, so triggers a nausea reflex to try and get rid of it.
It's not just motion, either. There are theee types of depth cues your brain uses and VR helmets only spoof one of them, so even static scenes can cause sickness from that inconsistency.
I only took neuroscience because of a pretty girl with amazing norks.
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
so triggers a nausea reflex to try and get rid of it.
The sight and sound of which triggers a nausea reflex in other people around you, because your stupid monkey brain thinks that because you're a pack you must have all eaten the same thing.
Grim... wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
so triggers a nausea reflex to try and get rid of it.
The sight and sound of which triggers a nausea reflex in other people around you, because your stupid monkey brain thinks that because you're a pack you must have all eaten the same thing.
The sight and sound of you triggers a nausea reflex in my highly intelligent monkey brain.
Cras wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
so triggers a nausea reflex to try and get rid of it.
The sight and sound of which triggers a nausea reflex in other people around you, because your stupid monkey brain thinks that because you're a pack you must have all eaten the same thing.
The sight and sound of you triggers a nausea reflex in my highly intelligent monkey brain.
Let the Wolfbagging commence!
Sir Taxalot wrote:
Oh, the VR unit has wires doesn't it? Don't wrap them round your neck.
Did you ever see the rotation drum kit that Tommy Lee from Motley Crue used? It could only spin forwards 3 times and then had to spin backwards 3 times to untangle the wires.
Seeing people being sick does't make me feel sick.
Maybe my lizard brain has eaten my monkey brain.
Maybe my lizard brain has eaten my monkey brain.
MaliA wrote:
I only took neuroscience because of a pretty girl with amazing norks.
A major driver of most scientific advances, I think.
MrChris wrote:
MaliA wrote:
I only took neuroscience because of a pretty girl with amazing norks.
A major driver of most scientific advances, I think.
Of most advances in general, I should think. Edmund Hillary only climbed Everest because there was a secretary at the Royal Geographical Society with massive bazongas he wanted to impress.
New, sweet looking official Google VR headset announced! Yes!
Only compatible with the new Pixel phone.
That's going to be a *huge* success then.
/s
Only compatible with the new Pixel phone.
That's going to be a *huge* success then.
/s
It is right now, but it's going to work with others "soon".
The £80 might put you off, though.
The £80 might put you off, though.
Grim... wrote:
It is right now, but it's going to work with others "soon".
The £80 might put you off, though.
The £80 might put you off, though.
As a viable alternative to a Vive... I can stretch to £80
What are the odds that the Nexus 5x will be covered?
That's £80 for a controller and a cap to put your phone in.
Everything is really expensive this time around
Everything is really expensive this time around
Asynchronous Spacewarp announced.
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/10/o ... warp-tech/
Quote:
Due to Asynchronous Spacewarp and NVIDIA+AMD's latest driver VR optimisations, Oculus is reducing the minimum spec to an i3-6100 and GTX 960!
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/10/o ... warp-tech/
Touch pre-orders open on the 10th for those who pre-ordered Rift. End of October for normals. Release in early December.
GazChap wrote:
Touch pre-orders open on the 10th for those who pre-ordered Rift. End of October for normals. Release in early December.
Are you on honeymoon?
Honeymoon!
My take on VR, and certainly this 'current round' of the tech which involves big headset nonsense and loads of wires going everywhere, is that it'll fail to hit the mainstream in any significant way whatsoever, and will ultimately go the way of 3D telly as a tech curiosity.
Even the new 'low price' PC that's supposed to deliver VR spec for £500, and the console iteration of the tech for PS4, won't change that IMO.
Thinking around my 'games circle' we should be pretty much the target market for VR. We love games, we love techy shit, we've all already got VR capable PCs or very close to it, and we've got the disposable income to buy a VR headset (and buy a VR capable PC if we need to).
I know of one single person who's bought themselves an Oculus Rift, a few of us have gone round to the guy's house to have a play with it, no one else has felt the need to buy one. Unscientific? Yes. But if we're not buying into VR I'm not sure who will.
Then you've got the inherent ridiculousness of the tech itself, in a 'wireless world' the headsets are a thoroughly unpleasant proposition in terms of size and cables, they're massively anti-social, and there's no real way for anyone else to share the experience - to other people the VR voyage just looks like a berk doing a bad Stevie Wonder impression with a computer sellotaped to their head.
On top of that they're not going to hit critical mass in terms of game support, which I appreciate is a bit chicken and egg when it comes to new tech but VR is going to be on the wrong side of it.
Finally you've got various other issues such as some people not getting on with the tech from a nausea/comfort/practicality (wearing glasses for example) point of view, needing a physical amount of space to use the thing, competing techs in a small marketplace etc etc.
I was saying this over two and a half years ago and my feelings on it haven't changed at all - viewtopic.php?p=806368#p806368
Even the new 'low price' PC that's supposed to deliver VR spec for £500, and the console iteration of the tech for PS4, won't change that IMO.
Thinking around my 'games circle' we should be pretty much the target market for VR. We love games, we love techy shit, we've all already got VR capable PCs or very close to it, and we've got the disposable income to buy a VR headset (and buy a VR capable PC if we need to).
I know of one single person who's bought themselves an Oculus Rift, a few of us have gone round to the guy's house to have a play with it, no one else has felt the need to buy one. Unscientific? Yes. But if we're not buying into VR I'm not sure who will.
Then you've got the inherent ridiculousness of the tech itself, in a 'wireless world' the headsets are a thoroughly unpleasant proposition in terms of size and cables, they're massively anti-social, and there's no real way for anyone else to share the experience - to other people the VR voyage just looks like a berk doing a bad Stevie Wonder impression with a computer sellotaped to their head.
On top of that they're not going to hit critical mass in terms of game support, which I appreciate is a bit chicken and egg when it comes to new tech but VR is going to be on the wrong side of it.
Finally you've got various other issues such as some people not getting on with the tech from a nausea/comfort/practicality (wearing glasses for example) point of view, needing a physical amount of space to use the thing, competing techs in a small marketplace etc etc.
I was saying this over two and a half years ago and my feelings on it haven't changed at all - viewtopic.php?p=806368#p806368
Mr Dave. Being wrong.
MaliA wrote:
Mr Dave. Being wrong.
There were many people being wrong this weekend it seems.
Yes but how many of those people have bought one, or intend to buy one?
People cooing over a shiny toy for a couple of hours does not put money in the coffers of the people who make VR kit.
If anything MaliA's pic may as well be subtitled 'This is why VR won't go mainstream'.
People cooing over a shiny toy for a couple of hours does not put money in the coffers of the people who make VR kit.
If anything MaliA's pic may as well be subtitled 'This is why VR won't go mainstream'.
I prefer the subtitle: Myp's Buttcrack
Hearthly wrote:
Yes but how many of those people have bought one, or intend to buy one?
People cooing over a shiny toy for a couple of hours does not put money in the coffers of the people who make VR kit.
If anything MaliA's pic may as well be subtitled 'This is why VR won't go mainstream'.
People cooing over a shiny toy for a couple of hours does not put money in the coffers of the people who make VR kit.
If anything MaliA's pic may as well be subtitled 'This is why VR won't go mainstream'.
Are you saying Dave should not have brought it to share his fun?
Kov being hipster with a niche device
If I'm honest, it's probably 2 hardware generations away from the mainstream. Wireless headsets, glove control maybe, kinect style body mapping perhaps?
The biggest barrier will always be the sheer cost of the thing
The biggest barrier will always be the sheer cost of the thing
KovacsC wrote:
Are you saying Dave should not have brought it to share his fun?
Not at all, they're great gadgets and most folks love to have a play with one, my point is - (and always has been, going back over two and a half years now) - entirely about how many people are actually going to shell out the cash for one - specifically, nowhere near enough for VR to be a commercial success in its current guise.
If the ps4 one was punted out at 200 notes I would snap it up.
Dave's vive was superb.
Dave's vive was superb.
Hearthly wrote:
KovacsC wrote:
Are you saying Dave should not have brought it to share his fun?
Not at all, they're great gadgets and most folks love to have a play with one, my point is - (and always has been, going back over two and a half years now) - entirely about how many people are actually going to shell out the cash for one - specifically, nowhere near enough for VR to be a commercial success in its current guise.
Prob the same muppets that spend £800 on a graphics card.
MaliA wrote:
If the ps4 one was punted out at 200 notes I would snap it up.
Except it's going to cost £349 and you need to buy a camera on top of that, which is another £40, so basically twice the price you say you'd be keen at.
Plus even Sony are saying that the more expensive Oculus and Vive provide 'better VR' but they're promoting their implementation more on price, and considering the performance deficit between a PS4 and a minimum spec VR-capable PC I can well imagine the PS4's take on it won't be a premium VR experience.