Shin wrote:
Plus...didn't the Victorians or something take picture of the dead too? And add it to photo albums and things of them? Creeeeeepy
Yes, dead babies. The cameras in those days had such long exposure times it was impossible to photograph a very young child - they just wouldn't hold still. Couple this with a very heavy infant mortality rate, and quite frequently a child would die long before he or she could be photographed, so taking a picture of the corpse was the only option. There were photographers who specialised in taking pics of dead toddlers, arranging their bodies to make it look like they were asleep, painting eyes on their eyelids, etc.
Incidentally, that's why Victorians frequently look grumpy in pictures. It was simply easier to hold a formal pose with no smile for the minute or two it took to expose the frame.