Alien and Aliens
I know people like this here.
Reply
Or perhaps I could just tie my chestburster plushie to my nether regions, for the added bulge-factor.
Fans would do well to check this out, if they haven't done so already.
Grim... wrote:
Fans would do well to check this out, if they haven't done so already.

Wow. 8)
Did GazChap get his cock tattooed in the end then?
Watching A3 again, which is nice. The music after the fire is beautiful.
Christ, that's one Hell of a film. Such a shame Fincher wasn't given more time to get that cut to the cinema - if nothing else, it would have changed Alien Vs Predator a fair bit.

The acting is pretty much top drawer as well - chap from The Vicar Of Dibley phoned it in, as did (sadly) Glover, but Weaver and the two Charles' (Dutton and Dance) knocked it out of the park.

And I still think this is one of the most iconic images of cinema, ever:
Image
Grim... wrote:
Christ, that's one Hell of a film. Such a shame Fincher wasn't given more time to get that cut to the cinema - if nothing else, it would have changed Alien Vs Predator a fair bit.

The acting is pretty much top drawer as well - chap from The Vicar Of Dibley phoned it in, as did (sadly) Glover, but Weaver and the two Charles' (Dutton and Dance) knocked it out of the park.


Yep they do a great job. I rather liked the guy who played Aaron/Eighty-Five as well.
I like that film more every time I see it.
I'm not even going to call the new prequel an Alien film.

Oh wait. It isn't anymore.

Ridley Scott’s ‘Alien’ Prequel Morphs Into ‘Prometheus,’ Starring Noomi Rapace
Good move there, I think.
Alarm wrote:
Good move there, I think.


Definitely. I might actually want to see this now. A prequel was the worst hollywood idea since the last time someone gave Michael Bay money.
This is good news I think. However, it sounds a bit odd that they'd just morph a movie from one thing to another. I'm sure it's happened before but I can't see how you start writing an Alien movie and end up with something else.
Blucey wrote:
This is good news I think. However, it sounds a bit odd that they'd just morph a movie from one thing to another. I'm sure it's happened before but I can't see how you start writing an Alien movie and end up with something else.


There was the writer who write a screenplay about a man who, with others, was resisting Castro in Cuba. He meets and falls in love with the daughter of an Anerican diplomat who gets involved in the seditious activities. The film was made. It was called "Dirty Dancing 2: Havana Nights".

So it is fairly common for things to change.
Blucey wrote:
However, it sounds a bit odd that they'd just morph a movie from one thing to another.

Die Hard With a Vengeance was originally conceived as a sequel to Lethal Weapon, and Die Hard itself was originally supposed to be a sequel to Commando - it was only when Arnie passed on it that they re-tooled it into Die Hard!
I love that story about Dirty Dancing 2. Did you hear that on This American Life, MaliA? I think that's where I heard it first.
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
I love that story about Dirty Dancing 2. Did you hear that on This American Life, MaliA? I think that's where I heard it first.


It was either on that or The Nerdist. It was very well told on the podcast, mind.

IEDIT: If you could remember, let me know as I might listen to that program again. Also, if you don't listen to the Netdist then it must be TAL as it crosses on our venn.
I don't listen to Nedtist. It's definitely been on TAL - they interviewed the scriptwriter. I can't recall the episode theme though.
Now there's no prequal, all I can think is... Alien 5!
Aliens is on repeat in the Pit and Pendulum in Nottingham tonight. Watched the last 20 mins followed by the first 10 :)
Today the Brothers Strause (AVP:R, Skyline) are proud to accept duties for the forthcoming movie 'Alien 5'. (My friend Duncan dies)
Nirejhenge wrote:
AVP:R,

you say that like its's a bad thing.
MaliA wrote:
Blucey wrote:
This is good news I think. However, it sounds a bit odd that they'd just morph a movie from one thing to another. I'm sure it's happened before but I can't see how you start writing an Alien movie and end up with something else.


There was the writer who write a screenplay about a man who, with others, was resisting Castro in Cuba. He meets and falls in love with the daughter of an Anerican diplomat who gets involved in the seditious activities. The film was made. It was called "Dirty Dancing 2: Havana Nights".

So it is fairly common for things to change.


It's easy to do. You start off with a vague idea or character or scene or concept or whatever, and gradually realise that as you've taken bits out and added new bits, what's left is actually so different to what you intended to do when you started that you might as well call it something else entirely.

I'd imagine most large-scale creative things happen like that, to be honest.
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Nirejhenge wrote:
AVP:R,

you say that like its's a bad thing.


I've watched the Alien films countless times, overlooking the faults of all four films because I love them blindly. I was appalled by AvP but somehow managed to watch it a couple of times since for the good bit(s). I saw AvP:R in the cinema and wouldn't watch it again if you promised me the entire 3hr original cut of Alien as a reward. It is absolutely a film without merit. It fails in every aspect as a film let alone an Alien one.
Blucey wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Nirejhenge wrote:
AVP:R,

you say that like its's a bad thing.


I've watched the Alien films countless times, overlooking the faults of all four films because I love them blindly. I was appalled by AvP but somehow managed to watch it a couple of times since for the good bit(s). I saw AvP:R in the cinema and wouldn't watch it again if you promised me the entire 3hr original cut of Alien as a reward. It is absolutely a film without merit. It fails in every aspect as a film let alone an Alien one.

The bit with the kid being chestbursted makes it worth watching JUST FOR THAT. It's a horrible, horrible film, being needlessly unpleasant. And that's excellent.
I liked AVP2 more than AVP1. Probably because it gang-raped the canon (cannon?) a little less.
I was considerably less bothered by AVP:R than my friend (and co host of my podcast) Duncan. He was completely livid about it afterwards. He was pretty much the same after Skyline. So to him it would be the worst thing ever.
Grim... wrote:
I liked AVP2 more than AVP1. Probably because it gang-raped the canon (cannon?) a little less.

Also, the callback to Alien was good.

You know, the callback where the teenage girl in AVP:R wanders around in just her smalls, like Ripley did at the end of Alien.

;)
fuck me i am so disappointed

Prometheus can get to fuck

Also, the second female role is currently considering casting Charlize Theron, or ...ffs...Angelina Jolie.

If Angelina Jolie scores a part in the film I will boycott it.

With this I believe Scotts days are numbered.
LaceSensor wrote:
With this I believe Scotts days are numbered.
True dat. His last big sci-fi action flick was a box office disappointment, so I'm sure you're right.
Scott's problem over the past few years seems to be that he tries to stick his fingers into far too many pies.

When he started with The Duellists, Alien and Blade Runner he was concentrating on one film at a time and, as a result, he made some masterpieces.

As he's become more mainstream he's tried to develop multiple films simultaneously and produced many others - he always has a number of things on the go at once and, as a result, he doesn't put all of his efforts into just one film, leading to a lot of lacklustre films.

His chances of repeating the excellence of Alien are almost zero.
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
LaceSensor wrote:
With this I believe Scotts days are numbered.
True dat. His last big sci-fi action flick was a box office disappointment, so I'm sure you're right.

Was that Blade Runner?

God, he did GI Jane. Really?
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
LaceSensor wrote:
With this I believe Scotts days are numbered.
True dat. His last big sci-fi action flick was a box office disappointment, so I'm sure you're right.


Many of his recent films have been poorly received.
The fact he made Alien and Bladerunner 20+ years ago count for little nowadays.

From what I can see on IMDB he is only producing this new "prometheus" now, not directing...sigh.
A Good Year and Robin Hood were the most poorly-received of recent times, but only critically - they still average a 6.9 on IMDB - and he knocked it out of the park with American Gangster.
Grim... wrote:
A Good Year and Robin Hood were the most poorly-received of recent times, but only critically - they still average a 6.9 on IMDB - and he knocked it out of the park with American Gangster.


I like Ridley Scott but I think some of his films have been poor, especially the theatrical cuts.
I cant see Fox really allowing this film to be done justice, and that was when it was proposed as an actual Alien film.
Now we are talking some original story with some patchy references to Alien, then I feel even less enthused by it all.
I'd like to see Son of Alienz, where some children try and re-enact Aliens and throw acid around from the school lab.
http://movies.sky.com/exclusive-prometh ... -are-in-it
Quote:
Mere hours after the announcement that Michael Fassbender is locked in to play an android with rumoured links to Aliens' Bishop series, our insider sources have revealed that he's not the only one with strong links to the series' past.

"They’ve built the ‘space jockey’ cockpit at Pinewood as seen in the original Alien film, so it definitely takes place in the same world as Alien", they told us.

"Despite that press release that seemed to indicate there were no aliens in the movie, the familiar HR Giger-style aliens do appear. Big ones apparently."

And as for Scott's comments noting that "keen fans will recognise strands of Alien's DNA"?

It turns out there was the slightest hint of misdirection - apparently the actual DNA of the xenomorphs is integral to the plot - and will see the cast jet off to the alien homeworld itself.

"Part of the film will be shot in Morocco. I’ve heard that some sort of archaeological dig where they discover alien DNA takes place there and that DNA gives them the coordinates for an alien world. I’ve also heard Morocco is being used for alien planet landscapes so I’m not sure if it’s an archaeological dig on another planet," they revealed.

It gets weirder too, with Damon Lindelof's script set to crank up the sci-fi angle to maximum effect.

"The main spaceship in the film will be piloted by an enormous head which I assume will be CGI. Yep, sounds weird but I assume some of the technology will be sort of biomechanical."
Fuck me, DavPaz is a film star?
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
http://movies.sky.com/exclusive-prometheus-plot-reveal-aliens-are-in-it
Quote:
Mere hours after the announcement that Michael Fassbender is locked in to play an android with rumoured links to Aliens' Bishop series, our insider sources have revealed that he's not the only one with strong links to the series' past.

"They’ve built the ‘space jockey’ chicken* at Pinewood as seen in the original Alien film, so it definitely takes place in the same world as Alien", they told us.

"Despite that press release that seemed to indicate there were no aliens in the movie, the familiar HR Giger-style aliens do appear. Big ones apparently."

And as for Scott's comments noting that "keen fans will recognise strands of Alien's DNA"?

It turns out there was the slightest hint of misdirection - apparently the actual DNA of the xenomorphs is integral to the plot - and will see the cast jet off to the alien homeworld itself.

"Part of the film will be shot in Morocco. I’ve heard that some sort of archaeological dig where they discover alien DNA takes place there and that DNA gives them the coordinates for an alien world. I’ve also heard Morocco is being used for alien planet landscapes so I’m not sure if it’s an archaeological dig on another planet," they revealed.

It gets weirder too, with Damon Lindelof's script set to crank up the sci-fi angle to maximum effect.

"The main spaceship in the film will be piloted by an enormous head which I assume will be CGI. Yep, sounds weird but I assume some of the technology will be sort of biomechanical."


Sounds like its getting back on track. Somewhat.
Glad to hear that the Aliens are actually in the film.
That sounds terrible to me.
All the best films sound terrible if you explain the plot to someone else.
Snakes on a Plane.
"A man is stuck in a canyon with his arm pinned under a rock for 127 hours."

Not the most exciting of synopses.
Didn't we do this before?
DavPaz wrote:
Didn't we do this before?

Are you describing Groundhog Day?
GazChap wrote:
"A man is stuck in a canyon with his arm pinned under a rock for 127 hours."

Not the most exciting of synopses.


FUCKING SPOILERS MUCH?!?!??!!!

RAGE QUIT!
Pundabaya wrote:
All the best films sound terrible if you explain the plot to someone else.


It just doesn't sound claustrophobic if they've a whole new planet to explore.
GazChap wrote:
"A man is stuck in a canyon with his arm pinned under a rock for 127 hours."


Film running times are getting ridiculous.
It might be a small planet. In a corridor?
Page 5 of 21 [ 1045 posts ]