My cursor didn't swap to a spinning unicorn, very disappointed.
No spinning envelope or @ sign. 2/10.
Mr Dave wrote:
Mr Chonks wrote:
http://www.matthewcoleman.uk
Always use suitable names to avoid confusion for future you.
I'm particularly looking at
"Handsome-fella.jpg"
I suggest "Budget-Gerry-Adams.jpg"
According to the text, it appears to be his 'coming soon' face.
Very soon
GazChap wrote:
No spinning envelope or @ sign. 2/10.
I’m a complete noob so give me a chance to learn
devilman wrote:
Mr Dave wrote:
Mr Chonks wrote:
http://www.matthewcoleman.uk
Always use suitable names to avoid confusion for future you.
I'm particularly looking at
"Handsome-fella.jpg"
I suggest "Budget-Gerry-Adams.jpg"
According to the text, it appears to be his 'coming soon' face.
Can you not get geocities in the url somewhere?
Mr Chonks wrote:
http://www.matthewcoleman.uk
Serious critique from professionals only please
Serious critique from professionals only please
I look forward to that photo being removed in a little over six months.
Cras wrote:
Mr Chonks wrote:
http://www.matthewcoleman.uk
Serious critique from professionals only please
Serious critique from professionals only please
I look forward to that photo being removed in a little over six months.
GOTEAMMALICRAS
Cras wrote:
Mr Chonks wrote:
http://www.matthewcoleman.uk
Serious critique from professionals only please
Serious critique from professionals only please
I look forward to that photo being removed in a little over six months.
I’ve literally been sat cackling waiting for you to see it
Needs one of those workmen digging with some under construction clip art.
Mr Chonks wrote:
GazChap wrote:
No spinning envelope or @ sign. 2/10.
I’m a complete noob so give me a chance to learn
You need to learn that is not a ‘cumming soon’ face. At least, I hope it’s not.
Jem wrote:
Needs one of those workmen digging with some under construction clip art.
Finally a professional opinion
How am I supposed to know how many clicks you've had without a click counter?
DavPaz wrote:
How am I supposed to know how many clicks you've had without a click counter?
There is one there. Perhaps your browser is blocking it?
Mr Chonks wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
How am I supposed to know how many clicks you've had without a click counter?
There is one there. Perhaps your browser is blocking it?
True story. My browser blocked the counter.
Trooper wrote:
Mr Chonks wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
How am I supposed to know how many clicks you've had without a click counter?
There is one there. Perhaps your browser is blocking it?
True story. My browser blocked the counter.
Can’t really blame it tbh. I had to use CSS for the blinking text as <blink> is deprecated now.
I went to install an SSL cert this morning on my host and found they’d already done it automatically! How far things have come.
Terrible accessibility. No title, no alt tags, no lang attribute, no meta viewport info, poor tap targets. It's like you've not even tried.
Grim... wrote:
Terrible accessibility. No title, no alt tags, no lang attribute, no meta viewport info, poor tap targets. It's like you've not even tried.
But is is a very nice hat.
Grim... wrote:
Terrible accessibility. No title, no alt tags, no lang attribute, no meta viewport info, poor tap targets. It's like you've not even tried.
But I’ve got autism so I’m good at this
Mr Chonks wrote:
I feel ignored.
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Terrible accessibility. No title, no alt tags, no lang attribute, no meta viewport info, poor tap targets. It's like you've not even tried.
But is is a very nice hat.
It is NOT.
Mr Chonks wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Terrible accessibility. No title, no alt tags, no lang attribute, no meta viewport info, poor tap targets. It's like you've not even tried.
But I’ve got autism so I’m good at this
ICWYDT.
Cras wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Terrible accessibility. No title, no alt tags, no lang attribute, no meta viewport info, poor tap targets. It's like you've not even tried.
But is is a very nice hat.
It is NOT.
I think it really suits him.
Grim... wrote:
Terrible accessibility. No title, no alt tags, no lang attribute, no meta viewport info, poor tap targets. It's like you've not even tried.
alt is not a tag
Oh shit son now it’s getting interesting
No SEO either, your google ranking is going to suffer.
Trooper wrote:
No SEO either, your google ranking is going to suffer.
SEO is snake oil, doesn’t exist.
Word of mouth is how search engines work
Jem wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Terrible accessibility. No title, no alt tags, no lang attribute, no meta viewport info, poor tap targets. It's like you've not even tried.
alt is not a tag
Deciding what can and can't be a tag is just sneering elitism.
<alt>so true</alt>
Mr Chonks wrote:
Trooper wrote:
No SEO either, your google ranking is going to suffer.
SEO is snake oil, doesn’t exist.
Word of mouth is how search engines work
Hmmm, I see. I’m learning lots.
Mr Chonks wrote:
<alt>so true</alt>
You could call them "alt attributes" but people would start avoiding you at parties.
Grim... wrote:
You could call them "alt attributes" but people would start avoiding you at parties.
Have I been calling them alt attributes all my life and not noticed
Mr Chonks wrote:
Grim... wrote:
You could call them "alt attributes" but people would start avoiding you at parties.
Have I been calling them alt attributes all my life and not noticed
That's not the only reason to avoid someone at parties.
I just don't understand why you said alt tag but then lang attribute. 
And anyway, I don't know what you're talking about. I'm super popular at parties.
And anyway, I don't know what you're talking about. I'm super popular at parties.
Matt I love your site and wondered if you’d like to do a link exchange?
If not you could join my web ring?
If not you could join my web ring?
Mr Russell wrote:
Matt I love your site and wondered if you’d like to do a link exchange?
If not you could join my web ring?
If not you could join my web ring?
Hit me up on Geocities chat and we’ll sort it out. I’ll be in Silicon Valley.
Jem wrote:
I just don't understand why you said alt tag but then lang attribute.
I copy and pasted it from Lighthouse
So I completed the first freeCodeCamp certification at the end of last week. My projects don't look especially nice, but they passed all the tests as laid out by the user stories required, but I'll go back to prettifying them, adding accessibility, tidying up etc at some point. So that's a yay I guess! https://www.freecodecamp.org/certificat ... web-design
Not sure where they get the 300 hours of coursework from, it took me about 35 hours in total.
However, now I've moved onto javascript and it's blowing my tiny mind.
Not sure where they get the 300 hours of coursework from, it took me about 35 hours in total.
However, now I've moved onto javascript and it's blowing my tiny mind.
I've been making websites for 20 years and JavaScript still blows my tiny mind.
Jem wrote:
I've been making websites for 20 years and JavaScript still blows my tiny mind.
Good to know. I’ll reset my expectations and tackle it with renewed vigour!
Or something
Jem wrote:
I've been making websites for 20 years and JavaScript still blows my tiny mind.
JavaScript is evil, that's why. It's not weapons-grade evil like PHP. But it still contains 180% of your RDA of Weird Stuff.
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
It's not weapons-grade evil like PHP 5 or lower
FeEx.
GazChap wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
It's not weapons-grade evil like PHP 5 or lower
FeEx.
I said what I said
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GazChap wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
It's not weapons-grade evil like PHP 5 or lower
FeEx.
I said what I said
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GazChap wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
It's not weapons-grade evil like PHP 5 or lower
FeEx.
I said what I said
For a start PHP stands for hypertext preprocessor, so that's throwing up red flags before I even begin.
Is it pronounced Fip or Hip then?
GazChap wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GazChap wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
It's not weapons-grade evil like PHP 5 or lower
FeEx.
I said what I said
"The syntax resembled that of Perl, but was simpler, more limited and less consistent."
LESS CONSISTENT THAN PERL
Page 2 of 5 [ 209 posts ]