Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 21087 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315 ... 422  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 17:22 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22533
Location: shropshire, uk
It is one thing that annoys me with the Marvel films is all the extra stuff in and after the credits. I only saw 3.. dammit

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:10 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14483


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:25 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
I was ready to be angry because the reloading bit at the beginning is just stupid (how he does it around 2 minutes in seems more like what was described in the books) but holy shit that looks good.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:26 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
That looks really, really good.

Fuck all to do with the books, but I'm ok with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:34 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
It has the potential to be good, but don't see how they're going to cram in the entire story into one film without leaving too much out or changing it completely.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:39 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
Lonewolves wrote:
leaving [stuff] out


that

Quote:
or changing it completely.


and that.

I've read that they've justified it as

[book spoiler]
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
another loop around. Or perhaps an earlier loop. Who knows. Eld bless the multiverse!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:51 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Yeah, this looks like a somewhat changed story - I don't recall Roland being on Earth at any point, other than very briefly (?) but it's a while since I read the books.

It really should be something that's set up as a 3 or 4 film set - you can't do the scope of the story in the books justice in one film. Still, on the plus side I assume this means we will be spared all of King's worst excesses of literary onanism in the books.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:52 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Ah, according to the Wiki it's a sequel to the books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_(2017_film)

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:57 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
He was in New York multiple times in the books. And alternate Topeka.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 11:58 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
DavPaz wrote:
He was in New York multiple times in the books. And alternate Topeka.

In massive gun battles? He was in that chap's office, I remember that. Then there was all that nonsense with Stephen King, but I vaguely recall Roland was ill for that. Or something.
Either way, the trailer doesn't seem to bear a great deal of resemblance to the books. Not that that is necessarily a bad thing of course.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 12:02 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
MrChris wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
He was in New York multiple times in the books. And alternate Topeka.

In massive gun battles?

I remember a shootout in the gun shop where he shot the gun out of the cop's hand.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 12:08 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
Yeah, I remember him noting how slow and fat the gunslingers of our world were.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 12:43 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
Were there any indications of a gimped right hand in there?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 12:54 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4296
MrChris wrote:
Ah, according to the Wiki it's a sequel to the books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_(2017_film)


Is this likely to be overly problematic for someone who has never read the books and has no intention of reading the books?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 12:56 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
Findus Fop wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Ah, according to the Wiki it's a sequel to the books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_(2017_film)


Is this likely to be overly problematic for someone who has never read the books and has no intention of reading the books?

Not at all, because of a specific reason.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 12:56 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4296
Lonewolves wrote:
Findus Fop wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Ah, according to the Wiki it's a sequel to the books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_(2017_film)


Is this likely to be overly problematic for someone who has never read the books and has no intention of reading the books?

Not at all, because of a specific reason.


is it Dimrill?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 13:13 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
DavPaz wrote:
Were there any indications of a gimped right hand in there?

Nope.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 13:23 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
Lonewolves wrote:
Findus Fop wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Ah, according to the Wiki it's a sequel to the books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_(2017_film)


Is this likely to be overly problematic for someone who has never read the books and has no intention of reading the books?

Not at all, because of a specific reason.

Wibbly wobbly multiverse


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 13:24 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4296
DavPaz wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
Findus Fop wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Ah, according to the Wiki it's a sequel to the books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_(2017_film)


Is this likely to be overly problematic for someone who has never read the books and has no intention of reading the books?

Not at all, because of a specific reason.

Wibbly wobbly multiverse


Put them together and what have you got, bippity boppity boo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 13:26 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
Findus Fop wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
Findus Fop wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Ah, according to the Wiki it's a sequel to the books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_(2017_film)


Is this likely to be overly problematic for someone who has never read the books and has no intention of reading the books?

Not at all, because of a specific reason.

Wibbly wobbly multiverse


Put them together and what have you got, R'lyeh

FTFY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 13:39 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4296
DavPaz wrote:
Findus Fop wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
Findus Fop wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Ah, according to the Wiki it's a sequel to the books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Tower_(2017_film)


Is this likely to be overly problematic for someone who has never read the books and has no intention of reading the books?

Not at all, because of a specific reason.

Wibbly wobbly multiverse


Put them together and what have you got, R'lyeh

FTFY


OR'LY?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 14:15 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
Cleverer people than me spied these in the trailer:

Image

Image

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 14:21 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
No Choo-choo? Shame.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 14:22 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
I don't recognise the second one, but holy shit the first!

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 14:24 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
Lonewolves wrote:
I don't recognise the second one, but holy shit the first!

The first is the Overlook Hotel from The Shining.

edit. Second. Duh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 14:26 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
DavPaz wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
I don't recognise the second one, but holy shit the first!

The first is the Overlook Hotel from The Shining.

edit. Second. Duh.

It did cross my mind after I posted. I thought it was perhaps to do with the the little statuette rather than the picture at first.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 14:28 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Given the nature of the books the film is going to have to be chock full of this stuff.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 14:36 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
On subsequent viewings I'm starting to think this looks a bit too "generic action movie".

For example:
All the clothes are flawless
Jake seems to convince Roland that he has to get to TDT. What?
The dialogue is pretty shit (apart from the bit at the end, which is lifted straight from the books)
It's not a western

I'm going to remain optimistic however, and hope this is a trailer for the non-readers.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 14:52 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
Grim... wrote:
On subsequent viewings I'm starting to think this looks a bit too "generic action movie".

For example:
All the clothes are flawless
Jake seems to convince Roland that he has to get to TDT. What?
The dialogue is pretty shit (apart from the bit at the end, which is lifted straight from the books)
It's not a western

I'm going to remain optimistic however, and hope this is a trailer for the non-readers.

I'm cautiously optimistic. None of the other characters show in the trailer at all apart from the main three.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 12:47 
User avatar
Decapodian

Joined: 15th Oct, 2010
Posts: 5134
Lonewolves wrote:
Grim... wrote:
On subsequent viewings I'm starting to think this looks a bit too "generic action movie".

For example:
All the clothes are flawless
Jake seems to convince Roland that he has to get to TDT. What?
The dialogue is pretty shit (apart from the bit at the end, which is lifted straight from the books)
It's not a western

I'm going to remain optimistic however, and hope this is a trailer for the non-readers.

I'm cautiously optimistic. None of the other characters show in the trailer at all apart from the main three.


Dennis Haysbert is Stephen Deschain, and according to IMDB, Susan Delgado will feature in the film too (might be her in the trailer), so that's spanning plot points from the first four books at least.

I'd love them to get a proper crossover with the new IT movie in there as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 16:56 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Talking of cowboy movies, the remake of The Magnificent 7 was somewhat disappointingly underwhelming.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 17:14 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49104
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
The disappointingly underwhelming 7.

...and were back to GTA online.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 20:37 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
MrChris wrote:
Talking of cowboy movies, the remake of The Magnificent 7 was somewhat disappointingly underwhelming.


I really enjoyed it but I've never seen the original and I appreciate it was mostly coasting on the strength of the cast.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 21:47 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14353
People-movie Ghost in the Shell is absolute garbage.

And I just hated the aesthetics. Avoid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 22:15 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Bamba wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Talking of cowboy movies, the remake of The Magnificent 7 was somewhat disappointingly underwhelming.


I really enjoyed it but I've never seen the original and I appreciate it was mostly coasting on the strength of the cast.

I haven't seen the original either, it just seemed a little lacking in direction.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 0:21 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
Satsuma wrote:
People-movie Ghost in the Shell is absolute garbage.

And I just hated the aesthetics. Avoid.


Aye, it was total fucking gash. And, again, I'm not judging it against the original but just as a standalone film. The bits they showed in the trailer looked lovely and interesting but the overall design was just 'generic futuristic bollocks'. Nonsense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 0:25 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
MrChris wrote:
Bamba wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Talking of cowboy movies, the remake of The Magnificent 7 was somewhat disappointingly underwhelming.


I really enjoyed it but I've never seen the original and I appreciate it was mostly coasting on the strength of the cast.

I haven't seen the original either, it just seemed a little lacking in direction.


Yeah, for sure. But I was relatively happy to just watch the participants ramble around and talk shit at each other because they were pretty much all so charming. I mean shit; anything with Ethan Hawke, Chris Pratt and Vincent D'onofrio is going to have to struggle really hard to not be really watchable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 11:03 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14353
I watched Hostel Part III for a bit last night cause someone reminded me of Hostel. It was a bit shit so I turned it off and not because of the whole torture porn business, because it's terribly comical for some unknown reason. Someone gets killed by cockroaches, for example.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 22:17 
Best
User avatar
Board Mother

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11354
Location: Mount Olympus
Pandemic - don't bother, stick to the board game.

_________________
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GJ is right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 0:29 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Just got round to watching Kingsman, because I saw the trailer for the sequel and thought it looked good.

What a great fun movie!

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2017 16:03 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14483


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2017 20:02 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
It's such a shame they cast Ryan Gosling.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2017 21:52 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Half way through Logan- I'm not entirely sure what the fuck is going on, but Jesus it's good. Patrick Stewart in particular is giving a fantastic performance, but the three protagonists work really well together. Even Stephen Marchant is not annoying.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 9:21 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
MrChris wrote:
Even Stephen Marchant is not annoying.


Yeah, I was worried he's be too 'Stephen Merchant' for it but he hits the precise right balance of sarcastic and miserable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 15:14 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
Last night I watched 'MANCHESTER BY THE SEA', which is summarised thusly by Rotten Tomatoes:

Quote:
After the death of his older brother Joe (Kyle Chandler), Lee Chandler (Casey Affleck) is shocked to learn that Joe has made him sole guardian of his nephew Patrick (Lucas Hedges). Taking leave of his job, Lee reluctantly returns to Manchester-by-the-Sea to care for Patrick, a spirited 16-year-old, and is forced to deal with a past that separated him from his wife Randi (Michelle Williams) and the community where he was born and raised. Bonded by the man who held their family together, Lee and Patrick struggle to adjust to a world without him.


I'm going to be mega-lazy and just link off to James Berardinelli's (very positive) review because I need to start getting stuff ready for when Jnr gets back from school, save to say that this is a wonderful and deeply moving film, as strong an analysis of crippling grief and trauma as I think I've seen committed to film, with some toweringly good performances and a scene towards the end that is devastatingly upsetting but also in its own way cathartic and perhaps the first step towards healing.

I should also note it's not some sort of relentless grinding miserabilist experience, there's a lot of love and humour in here.

921/1000

http://www.reelviews.net/reelviews/manc ... by-the-sea


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 16:46 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
I really didn't like Manchester By The Sea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 17:51 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
LewieP wrote:
I really didn't like Manchester By The Sea.


Interesting, anything in particular you didn't like about it or just the whole thing?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 18:24 
User avatar
sneering elitist

Joined: 25th May, 2014
Posts: 3991
Location: Broseley
I want to watch Manchester by the Sea but I know the accusations of Affleck's sexual assault on 2 coworkers completely coloured my view of him so it will probably bias my opinion of the film. ?:|

_________________
i make websites


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat May 13, 2017 4:39 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Hearthly wrote:
LewieP wrote:
I really didn't like Manchester By The Sea.


Interesting, anything in particular you didn't like about it or just the whole thing?


Just felt like it spent a lot of the film building towards "What was the tragedy that lead towards this", but then I wasn't really convinced or invested in the characters when the reveal actually happened.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat May 13, 2017 8:37 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
LewieP wrote:
Just felt like it spent a lot of the film building towards "What was the tragedy that lead towards this", but then I wasn't really convinced or invested in the characters when the reveal actually happened.


See now I'd read the film's Wiki article before watching it, specifically because I find that these sorts of narratives are often stronger without pieces of the puzzle missing. (Obviously just watching the film twice would have the same effect, but I think my way is more efficient.)

As such, right from the very first frames I knew exactly what had taken this man to the place we find him in and was able to contextualise everything on screen, and when the 'reveal' came it still had a huge impact.

Might not be the right approach for everyone but from reading the reviews, all of which mentioned the 'reveal' without saying what it was (even the Rotten Tomatoes summary copied and pasted above alludes to it), I knew it was the kind of film where I'd be a lot better off just knowing the whole story upfront.

Jem wrote:
I want to watch Manchester by the Sea but I know the accusations of Affleck's sexual assault on 2 coworkers completely coloured my view of him so it will probably bias my opinion of the film. ?:|


Hmm I wasn't aware of these at all, although having had a quick Google they are allegations and not proven?

Then again, I'll still watch films with Mel Gibson in them because I think he's a mesmerisingly good actor, despite clearly being a pretty fucking awful person.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 21087 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315 ... 422  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.