Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

Tuesday 5
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=9812
Page 2 of 4

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Saturnalian wrote:
BUT

I'll only kill TheVision if I see FOUR VOTES for Kov on the board.

Those are the terms... [/size]


So far no takers.

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Curiosity wrote:
You kill me and everyone will see I'm a goodie and will immediately lynch you.

Let's have some fun first before the inevitable carnage :)


It'll be fun to shut you up, plus there's no guarantee that you're not Anyanka (mods - spell check) by now.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:15 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Saturnalian wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
You kill me and everyone will see I'm a goodie and will immediately lynch you.

Let's have some fun first before the inevitable carnage :)


It'll be fun to shut you up, plus there's no guarantee that you're not Anyanka (mods - spell check) by now.


Bobby is way dodgier than me.

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

So are you going to vote Kov or not?

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

No!!

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:22 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

I don't like being held to ransom, and it's all set up in a way to doom the Town.

But!

I'm also kinda bored.

[vote:KovacsC]

And I am totally expecting you to double cross me. :D

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

If 4 of you vote for me. You will be giving willow two kills today.

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:29 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Bobbyaro wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
The note about The Vision was lying, as it said it was the same person who called out Silent Elk.

It wasn't, as I was the person who called out Silent Elk, for the LOLs.

I'm very suspicious of you, Bobby. Who do you claim to be?

Well, there is no reason not to say now Giles is dead. I am Olivia (who apparently doesn't have a surname). If Giles and I "hook up" we work together as a team to make investigations occur quicker. That's it, I don't have an active role, but I was helping Giles in his investigations. (We could not talk outside of the game - in fact I am not even sure that Malc was told why his investigations were quicker)


Right, so we know this is utter bollox, because Giles role specifies it's Dawn who makes his investigations quicker.

SUPER FOS!

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:33 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Do you have any other powers, Dawn?

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

KovacsC wrote:
If 4 of you vote for me. You will be giving willow two kills today.


Agreed.

Plus I don't like this Sat and Curio pally game crap at all. Curio, you're bored so that's why you're going to off Kov? Er. Right.

I am suss of both of you, and Bobby, Kov I have no idea about, TheVision seems genuinely confused about WTF is going on, I suppose I believe Nick kinda because no one else has claimed to be Cordelia, although the outing of SDG seemed rash (and no one has bothered to discuss it at all?! I thought we were all desperate to find Jonathan!!)

Also. Nearly all of the 'goodies' happy endings have involved being with someone at the end of the game. Why would Cordelia out Jonathan if her super-happy ending was to be together with him?

Author:  Bobbyaro [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

TheFireFaerie wrote:
Bobbyaro wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
The note about The Vision was lying, as it said it was the same person who called out Silent Elk.

It wasn't, as I was the person who called out Silent Elk, for the LOLs.

I'm very suspicious of you, Bobby. Who do you claim to be?

Well, there is no reason not to say now Giles is dead. I am Olivia (who apparently doesn't have a surname). If Giles and I "hook up" we work together as a team to make investigations occur quicker. That's it, I don't have an active role, but I was helping Giles in his investigations. (We could not talk outside of the game - in fact I am not even sure that Malc was told why his investigations were quicker)


Right, so we know this is utter bollox, because Giles role specifies it's Dawn who makes his investigations quicker.

SUPER FOS!

Apart from the fact that Dawn wasn't in the game at the start and as far as I know may not have come into the game unless certain events occur.

[vote:KovacsC]

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:42 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Her super happy ending is unlikely to be with Jonathan, more with Xander or someone slightly cooler.

We want to find Jonathan, but if he's not causing the deaths then he's arguably less important right now.

But, yeah, my main suss people are Kov, Bobby and TheVision.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Bobby joins the move to lynch anyone but him.

He's a bad one!

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:44 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Bobbyaro wrote:
TheFireFaerie wrote:
Bobbyaro wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
The note about The Vision was lying, as it said it was the same person who called out Silent Elk.

It wasn't, as I was the person who called out Silent Elk, for the LOLs.

I'm very suspicious of you, Bobby. Who do you claim to be?

Well, there is no reason not to say now Giles is dead. I am Olivia (who apparently doesn't have a surname). If Giles and I "hook up" we work together as a team to make investigations occur quicker. That's it, I don't have an active role, but I was helping Giles in his investigations. (We could not talk outside of the game - in fact I am not even sure that Malc was told why his investigations were quicker)


Right, so we know this is utter bollox, because Giles role specifies it's Dawn who makes his investigations quicker.

SUPER FOS!

Apart from the fact that Dawn wasn't in the game at the start and as far as I know may not have come into the game unless certain events occur.

[vote:KovacsC]


Why didn't you hook up with Giles?

Kill Bobby, Willow!

Or is he controlling you?

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:45 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Bobbyaro wrote:
TheFireFaerie wrote:
Bobbyaro wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
The note about The Vision was lying, as it said it was the same person who called out Silent Elk.

It wasn't, as I was the person who called out Silent Elk, for the LOLs.

I'm very suspicious of you, Bobby. Who do you claim to be?

Well, there is no reason not to say now Giles is dead. I am Olivia (who apparently doesn't have a surname). If Giles and I "hook up" we work together as a team to make investigations occur quicker. That's it, I don't have an active role, but I was helping Giles in his investigations. (We could not talk outside of the game - in fact I am not even sure that Malc was told why his investigations were quicker)


Right, so we know this is utter bollox, because Giles role specifies it's Dawn who makes his investigations quicker.

SUPER FOS!

Apart from the fact that Dawn wasn't in the game at the start and as far as I know may not have come into the game unless certain events occur.

[vote:KovacsC]


Apart from the fact that you knew who Giles was and DIDN'T hook up. Not very pro-town, hey.

{Vote: Bobbyaro]

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Curiosity wrote:
Her super happy ending is unlikely to be with Jonathan, more with Xander or someone slightly cooler.

We want to find Jonathan, but if he's not causing the deaths then he's arguably less important right now.

But, yeah, my main suss people are Kov, Bobby and TheVision.


How do we know he isn't causing the deaths? Actually seems like the most likely person to me at this point!

Willow, no, because she's blowing shit up in the day, that other vampire name I can't remember, possibly (but would there be two totally separate vampire factions? Doubt it). goodies obviously not, so I'd say it's not unreasonable to think that he is doing the killing. Or controlling a vampire to do his killing, which would explain why there is another vampire in the form of TheVision.

So if we believe Nick, the right thing to do here is lynch / ASPLODE SDG, if she's not Jonathan Nick gets lynched, if she is we're a potential killer down. Either way we get a bad guy.

So, actually. Willow, if you're really on our side, please would you ASPLODE SDG? (Sorry if you're not Jonathan SDG, but you'll be helping the goodies either way)

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 17:57 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

That doesn't make sense.

If SDG is not Jonathan, it just means that Nick targeted her last night. He still would be Cordelia and probably good.

More likely, one of Bobby or Kov is Jonathan. Maybe Nick could provide us with a bit more info, the useless schmuck.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Also, TFF, fix yr brackets.

Also, I still don't get how another vampire is around, unless their role lay entirely outside that of Spike/Angel.

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Curiosity wrote:
That doesn't make sense.

If SDG is not Jonathan, it just means that Nick targeted her last night. He still would be Cordelia and probably good.

More likely, one of Bobby or Kov is Jonathan. Maybe Nick could provide us with a bit more info, the useless schmuck.


You've repeatedly argued that Jonathan would have targeted Cordelia (which I agree with, seeing as Cordelia was a 'known'), but now your argument if SDG isn't Jonathan is that in fact Cordelia targeted Jonathan, but that it failed, and therefore he wouldn't have known who SDG was but still outed her as Jonathan, and actually SDG wasn't Jonathan anyway but Cordelia is still good?

What?

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

TheVision? You seem awfully quiet. That's so...boring. I might get bored soon.

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Curiosity wrote:
Also, TFF, fix yr brackets.

Also, I still don't get how another vampire is around, unless their role lay entirely outside that of Spike/Angel.


Which is what I'm suggesting. But ONLY because the deaths are still vampirey in description. I think there's a lone / rogue vampire (someone already suggest Drusilla), who may or may not be controlled by Jonathan.

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Saturnalian wrote:
TheVision? You seem awfully quiet. That's so...boring. I might get bored soon.


Are you going to respond to my request? *folds arms*

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:13 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Anyone else think that today's subtitle is of meaning or importance?

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

TheFireFaerie wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
That doesn't make sense.

If SDG is not Jonathan, it just means that Nick targeted her last night. He still would be Cordelia and probably good.

More likely, one of Bobby or Kov is Jonathan. Maybe Nick could provide us with a bit more info, the useless schmuck.


You've repeatedly argued that Jonathan would have targeted Cordelia (which I agree with, seeing as Cordelia was a 'known'), but now your argument if SDG isn't Jonathan is that in fact Cordelia targeted Jonathan, but that it failed, and therefore he wouldn't have known who SDG was but still outed her as Jonathan, and actually SDG wasn't Jonathan anyway but Cordelia is still good?

What?


No.
My argument:

J likely targeted Cordy.

If SDG isn't J, then it does not follow that Nick is bad.

Nick, as Cordelia, last night targeted SDG. Today he finds himself hooked up with J. Nick assumes SDG is J.

If SDG isn't J it doesn't mean Nick is bad. It just means J targeted him (the most likely explanation).

I still think Bobby or Kov are J.

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Curiosity wrote:
TheFireFaerie wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
That doesn't make sense.

If SDG is not Jonathan, it just means that Nick targeted her last night. He still would be Cordelia and probably good.

More likely, one of Bobby or Kov is Jonathan. Maybe Nick could provide us with a bit more info, the useless schmuck.


You've repeatedly argued that Jonathan would have targeted Cordelia (which I agree with, seeing as Cordelia was a 'known'), but now your argument if SDG isn't Jonathan is that in fact Cordelia targeted Jonathan, but that it failed, and therefore he wouldn't have known who SDG was but still outed her as Jonathan, and actually SDG wasn't Jonathan anyway but Cordelia is still good?

What?


No.
My argument:

J likely targeted Cordy.

If SDG isn't J, then it does not follow that Nick is bad.

Nick, as Cordelia, last night targeted SDG. Today he finds himself hooked up with J. Nick assumes SDG is J.

If SDG isn't J it doesn't mean Nick is bad. It just means J targeted him (the most likely explanation).

I still think Bobby or Kov are J.


Hmm. Plausible.

And anyway I still agree Bobby is the obvious FOS role claim belm right now, as there's no reason for him not to have hooked up with Giles if it was going to help and he knew who Giles was. And that's only if you believe that he was Giles' helper anyway, which I don't.

So I stick with [vote:Bobbyaro]

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

zaphod79 wrote:
TheFireFaerie wrote:
Anyone else think that today's subtitle is of meaning or importance?


http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Buffy_the_ ... r/Season_6

Quote:
Giles: [Out of breath] I'm fine. I just need to die for a minute.


Thanks.

Now where the HELL did you come from??????

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:36 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

(I assumed you couldn't post if you weren't on the players list, obviously)

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

I would like to lynch Bobby, but then Saturnalian might eviscerate me.

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

[vote:Bobbyaro]

As it is not me

Author:  Bobbyaro [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

You would say that, Johnathon, with your, oooh, look at me, I'm a "writer". Yeah, right, like anyone believes that! FFS, kill this guy.

Also, Why is everyone saying i didn't link up with Giles, I did, on Tuesday! (the third night)

Author:  Grim... [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

sdg: 1 (nickachu)
bobbyaro: 2 (TheFireFaerie, KovacsC)
kovacsc: 2 (Curiosity, Bobbyaro)

Not voted: 3 (saturnalian, sdg, thevision)

With 8 players alive, 5 votes are required for a lynch, and 5 nolynch votes are required to not lynch anybody.

http://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/counter/work.php

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:55 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Bobbyaro wrote:
You would say that, Johnathon, with your, oooh, look at me, I'm a "writer". Yeah, right, like anyone believes that! FFS, kill this guy.

Also, Why is everyone saying i didn't link up with Giles, I did, on Tuesday! (the third night)



Show me where I said I was a writer?

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:57 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

He's had enough chances to speak up and I can't abide non-talkies.

*flicks through magic book*

Curio, if I was anti-town I wouldn't have revealed myself.

*dog ears page*

This'll do.

Author:  Grim... [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 18:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

"Bored now."

Author:  Grim... [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:01 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

TheVision. No skin. Innocent dead girl.

TheVision was playing Harmony Kendall.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

You idiot.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

We narrow the bad guy down to Bobby or Kov, and you kill someone else. Yet another innocent/

*shakes head*

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

And you didn't reveal yourself. Gaz accused you and I confirmed it!

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Shit. No-talky, no skinny.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Saturnalian wrote:
Shit. No-talky, no skinny.


:D

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Curiosity wrote:
And you didn't reveal yourself. Gaz accused you and I confirmed it!


I'd suggest you reread yesterday, the train was firmly against Oz. I didn't get close to a majority vote .

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Wtf

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Saturnalian wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
And you didn't reveal yourself. Gaz accused you and I confirmed it!


I'd suggest you reread yesterday, the train was firmly against Oz. I didn't get close to a majority vote .


I never said you did. You had been called out as Mad Willow and were denying it to the ends of the earth until I confirmed it and you admitted your role.

Either way. I still think you're lying, BUT! If so we can still lynch you at any time, as long as there are four people still alive and you're not part of a shadowy cabal.

So, I say we look for Jonathan or a vampire or something. Let's wait to see if Nick has any actual info on SDG before we lynch Bobby or Kov.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Curiosity wrote:
TheFireFaerie wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
KovacsC wrote:
At lease we know who Jonathan is now, if Cordelia tells us.


She won't necessarily know. More likely she was targeted by him.


What makes you say that?


Cordy was known to the group as Nick had roleclaimed.

So if Jonathan has a win condition needing him to hook up (with her or anyone else) then she would be a prime target.

It's not 100%, but it's the most likely explanation.

Also, re: The Vision. It's possible she's a schoolgirl who only becomes evil if she finds Spike.

Equally, she could be evil already.

I think Willow should blow someone up who isn't me, and then we take it from there.


Told you, re: Vision!

Author:  Bobbyaro [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:14 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Okay, so we have someone going around killing people and you are a vengeance goddess who goes around killing people. Remind me why we aren't attempting to lunch you?

This loud play and distraction is exactly the sort of tactic I would expect from him, and he will laugh in our faces with glee, glee! and maybe even Glee when he is revealed as being the murdery person all along. He keeps distracting people, changing tactic and target to keep us all confused while ensuring no one is looking at him too closely. I say it is time to cast this false goddess down!

[Vote:Curiosity]

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Classic "I'm not Scum, you're Scum!"

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:24 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Also, if I had any vengeance powers, I would have used it to killify the woman who killed my boyfriend and only chance at a super happy ending!

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:29 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Curiosity wrote:
Classic "I'm not Scum, you're Scum!"


But I'm pretty damned inclined to believe him. (This does not get rid of my FOS at you bobby, I just reckon you two are opposing for some reason).

Sat, you (or someone else, because I'm not actually convinced it is you) is killing innocents. Gaz called you as Willow but I can't remember why, but doesn't matter because he was bad! Curio then backed up your story and you oh alright then caved in.

Guess what I think? Curio is Willow, Sat is somehow on his side, but has no powers so they agree between them to use Gaz's FOS to their advantage and paint the target on non-willows head. That way if we do lunch sat it actually doesn't matter because more innocents have died and it might take us a while to work out who the real willow is - either way you guys get one more kill in first post of the next day, and given how few of us are left that might be enough to win it for you.

The pair of you have been pissing around pretend FOSing one another but never actually voted or killed each other, so I'm going to go with Bobby to try and get at least one of you dead hopefully.

If you're not Willow, Curio, I still reckon you're bad. Vengeance daemons don't sound good in my world.

So.

[vote:curiosity]

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

Didn't Willow promise not to kill today

Author:  TheFireFaerie [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 19:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Tuesday 5

No, and wouldn't support my request, and is doing nothing at all pro-town. So Willow is who we really need to kill. I don't know which of curio or sat it is, but my money's on curio being scuzzy one way or another.

Page 2 of 4 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/