| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=4620 |
Page 1 of 12 |
| Author: | Grim... [ Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:31 ] |
| Post subject: | GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Hello! |
|
| Author: | Goddess Jasmine [ Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Quiet in here... |
|
| Author: | Plissken [ Thu Aug 27, 2009 18:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Deathly quiet... |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 15:03 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
*sigh* You win a few games, get a reputation as being devious and then always get lynched on the first day after myp votes for you. Bah. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 15:06 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
I liked your spirited (ho) defence, though. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Tue Sep 01, 2009 14:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
I would have defended myself mroe vigorously (possibly by roleclaiming as something, for a laugh), but the boss was looking over my shoulder a lot on that day! A347826547896 kid's idea for Slimer to roleclaim is horrifically bad. If Slimer was successful last night then the GBs could be hamstrung for the entire game. I hope Runcle's asking for clarification if it's a good idea or not isn't him accidentally roleclaiming it. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Wed Sep 02, 2009 16:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Unlucky Albin0. I reckon if you hadn't wavered by switching to Owen you might have survived. The ghosts continue to deplete their numbers. *sigh* |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Wed Sep 02, 2009 16:42 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
If they held a village idiot contest, they'd all win. Most people seemed to lynch me for something they thought I had said but hadn't, bizarrely. If the ghost team wins do we still qualify as winners, even though we personally are out? |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2009 16:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Yup. |
|
| Author: | The Rev Owen [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Bum. |
|
| Author: | The Rev Owen [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:46 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Three possible reasons I was targeted: 1 - My finger-pointing was pointing in the right direction. 2 - I was acting so much like I had nothing to lose that they thought I must have had something to lose. 3 - I was being really annoying and they just wanted me to shut the fuck up. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:09 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
What has really surprised me is that once someone has been eliminated from the game, nobody is thinking about who might have been trying to get rid of them, or why, and whether the people who were eliminated were perhaps on the right track, etc. This 'out of sight, out of mind' mentality is playing in to the hands of the Busters, who will be happily obfuscating their merry little hearts out. |
|
| Author: | The Rev Owen [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Even Mr Dave doesn't seem to want to work out who might have wanted me dead. Hmm. |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 13:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
The Rev Owen wrote: 3 - I was being really annoying and they just wanted me to shut the fuck up. I think this is the primary motivation behind everyone's actions in the game so far, on both sides |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 13:09 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
The Rev Owen wrote: Even Mr Dave doesn't seem to want to work out who might have wanted me dead. Hmm. I'll be honest, I think they busted you purely and simply because they thought you were most likely to be a ghost out of everyone, so they were least likely to hit a human. Even I had come to that conclusion, and I've been pointing the finger at almost everyone  I hope they lynch Craster in my memory, but also a part of me hopes he sticks around till the end and wipes them all out. |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 11:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
If they let today time out then we may as well just end the game now and ban everyone from the board... |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
One bad guy down... |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:06 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
TheAlbin0Kid wrote: I hope they lynch Craster in my memory, but also a part of me hopes he sticks around till the end and wipes them all out.  Rev - we offed you because we thought you were slimer. We thought that because you immediately voted for Kovacs, it looked like you knew something. We figured you roleblocked KC day 1, then when the GBs didn't hit anyone that night, assumed he was a GB. We were wrong, natch. |
|
| Author: | The Rev Owen [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Hooray! My prediction is currently running at 1/3, which is probably my best hit rate ever. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
There's a major problem with these rules, that the town don't appear to have figured out. Once a GB is exposed, killing him is a terrible idea when you can just keep the GBs neutered by roleblocking him. Hence my suicide. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
How would you be exposed, though? |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Well the minute Vigo pipes up or Slimer claims a hit. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Craster wrote: Well the minute Vigo pipes up or Slimer claims a hit. Slimer, maybe. Vigo doens't know if he's found a GhostBuster or a serial killer, as their win conditions are the same until they find each other. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
The rules say that the SKs win condition is SK, unless one of them dies before they make Mr Stay Puft. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Craster wrote: The rules say that the SKs win condition is SK, unless one of them dies before they make Mr Stay Puft. It would appear Vigo hasn't read the rules 
|
|
| Author: | Cras [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Ha! |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Cripes, not much in the way of talk going on in here. Why was I targetted then, any ideas Craster or was that decided upon after you copped it? |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Wow, just when I think the ghosts had a fighting chance, this happens. I assume Vigo didn't find anything worthwhile out, apart from a lot of ghosts and maybe Slimer? They really need me there to re-iterate that Mimi's "I'm a nice sweet girlie, I couldn't possibly do any harm" act is highly transparent, still 
|
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:12 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
He found Craster. |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
And tried to hint to it, but no-one (except possibly the Ghostbusters) picked up on it. |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:16 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Grim... wrote: He found Craster. And here's me thinking they lynched Craster because I told them he was a bad guy and they felt bad about lynching me. |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
GazChap wrote: And tried to hint to it, but no-one (except possibly the Ghostbusters) picked up on it. I certainly didn't, but then again I'm not looking as closely as I was when I'm in it. I had you down as a regular ghoulie to be honest. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:20 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
TheAlbin0Kid wrote: GazChap wrote: And tried to hint to it, but no-one (except possibly the Ghostbusters) picked up on it. I certainly didn't, but then again I'm not looking as closely as I was when I'm in it. I had you down as a regular ghoulie to be honest. I picked up on it, if it was his first post after fidning him saying "It would be crass to... etc". Not much chat in here as I know all the roles, so I can't say much. |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:21 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
They should hit one of the quiet ones today. Zaphod's list and logic is good I think, if he's acting then he's very very skilled. |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Curiosity wrote: I picked up on it, if it was his first post after fidning him saying "It would be crass to... etc". Hah, yep, that was it. I was hoping someone would pick up on it, and then someone other than me would suggest that we keep Craster alive and get Slimer to roleblock him. Craster: Did you guys do anything on the first night, then? |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Craster's on Holiday. And no, they didn't. It's obvious they didn't, as the night timed out. Quite why (still!) no-one picked up on that is beyond me. |
|
| Author: | The Rev Owen [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:37 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Grim... wrote: Craster's on Holiday. And no, they didn't. It's obvious they didn't, as the night timed out. Quite why (still!) no-one picked up on that is beyond me. I think I mentioned it. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:38 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
No-one seemed to pay attention, then. |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Well, you said on the first night that day 1 would not start before 9am on Tuesday (as the night ended on a Friday, and we had a bank holiday Monday) so I think we inferred from that that even if everyone had sent in a day action within 10 minutes of the night ending, it still would have started at the same time. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
And what time did night two actually start? |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
No idea why we let it time out, considering we'd decided to do nothing. |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:11 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Grim... wrote: And what time did night two actually start? Fair enough 
|
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Most of the people in the game are being very stupid. None of them are looking back to see what the dead people were up to, who they suspected, if Gaz left any messages, etc. Bah! |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 22:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
I now know who people are... can God please confirm that active participants in the game cannot view this Dead Zone section before I start making comments that give some decent hints? |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 23:27 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
TheAlbin0Kid wrote: I now know who people are... can God please confirm that active participants in the game cannot view this Dead Zone section before I start making comments that give some decent hints? Unless they have a second login, they shouldn't. How do you know who people are? |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Sep 07, 2009 23:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Grim... wrote: TheAlbin0Kid wrote: I now know who people are... can God please confirm that active participants in the game cannot view this Dead Zone section before I start making comments that give some decent hints? Unless they have a second login, they shouldn't. How do you know who people are? I may have told him, after first ensuring that he wouldn't tell anyone... such as by posting that he knew on the self same internet forum. 
|
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:35 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Curiosity wrote: Grim... wrote: TheAlbin0Kid wrote: I now know who people are... can God please confirm that active participants in the game cannot view this Dead Zone section before I start making comments that give some decent hints? Unless they have a second login, they shouldn't. How do you know who people are? I may have told him, after first ensuring that he wouldn't tell anyone... such as by posting that he knew on the self same internet forum. I thought I was only promising not to tell anyone what the roles were... I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to say that I know full stop!!!!!!!!!111! Obviously I have a more esoteric defence to hand as well if needed. And if you're still grumpy that I know, imagine Grim came to the pub with me and I bought him a pint. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
TheAlbin0Kid wrote: imagine Grim came to the pub with me and I bought him an over-proof mojito FTFY. I'm quite peeved that people are suggesting that I offed myself because I was going on holiday, rather than it being a brilliant strategic move to ensure the other GBs were free to act. There's no way Slimer wouldn't block someone who was 1 vote away from a lynch in the closing few seconds. |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:40 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
Craster wrote: I'm quite peeved that people are suggesting that I offed myself because I was going on holiday, rather than it being a brilliant strategic move to ensure the other GBs were free to act. There's no way Slimer wouldn't block someone who was 1 vote away from a lynch in the closing few seconds. Probably because anyone who said something like that wouldn't be given credit for figuring it out themselves and would instead be lynched as a fellow GB, on the grounds that "how else would they know what you were thinking?". Or alternatively, because people don't seem to be very smart in this particular version of the game. |
|
| Author: | TheAlbin0Kid [ Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:16 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GhostlyScum Dead Again Thread |
If the ghosts get their lynch wrong today, they're utterly and irredeemably f$@ked. |
|
| Page 1 of 12 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|