Night One - Containment Faliure!

kalmar · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:18

So there's only 13 votes, out of 20 potential voters. 15 of which have to be good guys, so have little reason not to vote. And it is in our interest to vote, despite the high chance of taking down one of our own.

Let's spook it up a notch, ghosties.

Curiosity · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:20

superdupergill wrote:

Ok, so GazChap and MrChris are the ones who have been most quiet I think. They are on my backup list.
woooo :kiss:

oooo (thoughtful)

How about a bunch of us try to lynch Kissyfur then? Might get him talking...

myp · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:21

I doubt it. He's in ghost hospital today.

Mr Russell · **Joined:** 6th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 12309

[vote:kovacsc] then. I will not have a timeout, and think that he was being guided all along.

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49232

Curiosity wrote:

How about a bunch of us try to lynch Kissyfur then? Might get him talking...

It won't, because he's at the hospital all day.

myp · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:21

It makes me even more suspicious that you haven't read 9 pages.

sdg · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:23

myp wrote:

It makes me even more suspicious that you haven't read 9 pages.

Ah I was just about to suggest we start voting for GazChap then in response to Curio, but that is a very good point.

Curiosity · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:25

myp wrote:

It makes me even more suspicious that you haven't read 9 pages.

I'm not reading nine pages.

Also, I'm massively hungover.

kalmar · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:27

Ghosts can't drink dude.

Curiosity · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:27

kalmar wrote:

Ghosts can't drink dude.

I was on spirits.

Arf.

Cpt_Droman · **Joined:** 12th May, 2009 **Posts:** 597

myp wrote:

Curiosity wrote:

Fuck off. You always vote for me!

Aggressive, shame. I was just about to unvote, as well. It's obvious it touched a nerve and you've got something to hide. After all, ghosts don't have nerves as they're dead.

That was quite an aggressive interjection wasn't it? Hmm
Your cheeks must be flushed, yet Curio is a somewhat pale fello.

KovacsC · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:28

I am a ghost, so by killing me you are one step closer to a GB win

Curiosity · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:29

KovacsC wrote:

I am a ghost, so by killing me you are one step closer to a GB win

TBF, I don't really want to vote for you, but I'd rather you were possessed than me, as you might be on the side of teh ghosts, but I know I'm on the ghostly side.

Cpt_Droman · **Joined:** 12th May, 2009 **Posts:** 597

Curiosity wrote:

KovacsC wrote:

I am a ghost, so by killing me you are one step closer to a GB win

TBF, I don't really want to vote for you, but I'd rather you were possessed than me, as you might be on the side of teh ghosts, but I know I'm on the ghostly side.

Why all the aggression "Doc"?
As in, Dr Peter Venkman!!!

[vote:Curiosity]

Curiosity · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:37

Cpt_Droman wrote:

Curiosity wrote:

KovacsC wrote:

I am a ghost, so by killing me you are one step closer to a GB win

TBF, I don't really want to vote for you, but I'd rather you were possessed than me, as you might be on the side of teh ghosts, but I know I'm on the ghostly side.

Why all the aggression "Doc"?
As in, Dr Peter Venkman!!!

[vote:Curiosity]

That wasn't aggression... how do you read aggression into that? I was saying I'd rather not vote for him, but I did so to try and save my own ethereal ass.

Right, I'm off to go haunt a restaurant for a bit. Please don't vote me out. I promise to you that I'm a ghost.

Runcle · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:40

Before everyone is finished voting, what are we going to find out from the person we are lynching? would it not be wise to vote for someone whos pointed their ghostly hand around.
Also I noticed Zaphod is being helpful again, with a massive post on page 6, didnt he do that last game and ended up dirty as hell?

KovacsC · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:42

Runcle wrote:

Before everyone is finished voting, what are we going to find out from the person we are lynching? would it not be wise to vote for someone whos pointed their ghostly hand around.
Also I noticed Zaphod is being helpful again, with a massive post on page 6, didnt he do that last game and ended up dirty as hell?

How can the newbies know what has happened in previous games?

KovacsC · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:43

Curiosity wrote:

KovacsC wrote:

I am a ghost, so by killing me you are one step closer to a GB win

TBF, I don't really want to vote for you, but I'd rather you were possessed than me, as you might be on the side of teh ghosts, but I know I'm on the ghostly side.

but If you were a ghost why would be lynching a ghost...

Runcle · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:43

Read them?

GazChap · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:46

Previous games are available in The Dead Zone, which surely us ghosts should have access to from the start anyway?

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49232

GazChap wrote:

Previous games are available in The Dead Zone, which surely us ghosts should have access to from the start anyway?

Heh.

And no, they're in 'Old Games'.

KovacsC · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:50

GazChap wrote:

Previous games are available in The Dead Zone, which surely us ghosts should have access to from the start anyway?

Yes I get they are available, but why should they be reevent?

GazChap · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:51

Curiosity wrote:

TBF, I don't really want to vote for you, but I'd rather you were possessed than me, as you might be on the side of teh ghosts, but I know I'm on the ghostly side.

[vote:Curiosity]

I understand what you mean with this sentence, but it still reads far too suspiciously for my liking.

GazChap · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:52

KovacsC wrote:

Yes I get they are available, but why should they be reevent?

Strictly speaking, old games are "metadata" and so shouldn't be relevant, but people still refer to them anyway. Although usually in a "my cousin in another village" kind of way, rather than an explicit "didn't we do this in the last game?"

TheAlbin0Kid · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:53

In case I don't get time to pop on again before voting closes, [vote:Curiosity]. I'm not sure I really suspect him that much, but we do need to lynch someone and at this short notice I'm unlikely to be able to drum up any support for any of my real suspects, and it'll just put me in the phaser firing line even more.

And as someone said, us noobs pretty much just want to join in, that's why we're loud when we should be quiet.

Grim... · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:56

VOTE UPDATE

thealbin0kid: 1 (Runcle)
mr russell: 1 (Joans)
kalmar: 1 (Malc)
kovacsc: 5 (Curiosity, The Rev Owen, Mr Dom, Bobbyaro, Mr Russell)
curiosity: 7 (Craster, TheAlbin0Kid, superdupergill, kalmar, myp, Cpt_Droman, GazChap)

Not voted: 5 (kovacsc, mimi, mr chris, mr dave, zaphod79)

With 20 players alive, 11 votes are required for a lynch, and 15 nolynch votes are required to not lynch anybody.

http://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/counter/

Mr Russell · **Joined:** 6th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 12309

Craster wrote:

GazChap wrote:

Previous games are available in The Dead Zone, which surely us ghosts should have access to from the start anyway?

Heh.

And no, they're in 'Old Games'.

Hah! I hope it's called The Live Zone this time around.

KovacsC · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:57

[vote:Curiosity] as he is trying to lynch me...

Mr Russell · **Joined:** 6th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 12309

Bobbyaro, would you consider changing your vote to Curiosity?

Cpt_Droman · **Joined:** 12th May, 2009 **Posts:** 597

Hang on....

Runcle · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 13:05

GazChap wrote:

KovacsC wrote:

Yes I get they are available, but why should they be reevent?

Strictly speaking, old games are "metadata" and so shouldn't be relevant, but people still refer to them anyway. Although usually in a "my cousin in another village" kind of way, rather than an explicit "didn't we do this in the last game?"

I wouldn't say it was metadata at all. Its all part of the same game and it would be foolish to disregard how people acted in previous games.

Joans · **Joined:** 31st Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 8648

Mr Russell wrote:

Bobbyaro, would you consider changing your vote to Curiosity?

Or your identity, so as not to confuse poor Grim...

Mr Russell · **Joined:** 6th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 12309

Runcle wrote:

I wouldn't say it was metadata at all. Its all part of the same game and it would be foolish to disregard how people acted in previous games.

I agree, but when there are people who are new to the forum or the game (of which there are two in this case) it does seem slightly unfair.

Still, them's the breaks I guess.

kalmar · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 13:12

Mr Russell wrote:

Bobbyaro, would you consider changing your vote to Curiosity?

Are you saying that because you would also consider it? Because that would take us up to 10 votes and I'm sure someone will come in and swing it then.

Sorry Curiooooo...

Mr Russell · **Joined:** 6th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 12309

I'm saying it because I find Bobbyaro slightly suspicious, and wondered whether he would change it to Curiosity or not.

I'm just poking at people a bit today to see what happens.

Cpt_Droman · **Joined:** 12th May, 2009 **Posts:** 597

Mr Russell wrote:

Runcle wrote:

I wouldn't say it was metadata at all. Its all part of the same game and it would be foolish to disregard how people acted in previous games.

I agree, but when there are people who are new to the forum or the game (of which there are two in this case) it does seem slightly unfair.

Still, them's the breaks I guess.

I think there are more than two new to the game.
Having known some of the players in my past life i'm finding it tricky to discern between how they would play the game and what they were like once they had a few beers in them.

KovacsC · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 13:24

Is there 90 mins left to vote?

Mr Dave · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 13:29

Mmm. I'm not overly keen on voting Curio, but by my previous logic, I'm less keen on going for Kovacs. And no others will make it, and some information beats no information.

Sorry, but [vote: curiosity]

Grim... · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 13:31

VOTE UPDATE

thealbin0kid: 1 (Runcle)
mr russell: 1 (Joans)
kalmar: 1 (Malc)
kovacsc: 5 (Curiosity, The Rev Owen, Mr Dom, Bobbyaro, Mr Russell)
curiosity: 9 (Craster, TheAlbin0Kid, superdupergill, kalmar, myp, Cpt_Droman, GazChap, KovacsC, Mr Dave)

Not voted: 3 (mimi, mr chris, zaphod79)

With 20 players alive, 11 votes are required for a lynch, and 15 nolynch votes are required to not lynch anybody.

http://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/counter/

The sun is fully up, now. Not long to go...

zaphod79 · **Joined:** 16th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 14497

Runcle wrote:

Before everyone is finished voting, what are we going to find out from the person we are lynching? would it not be wise to vote for someone whos pointed their ghostly hand around.
Also I noticed Zaphod is being helpful again, with a massive post on page 6, didnt he do that last game and ended up dirty as hell?

I think you'll find if metadata is allowed that i've always been on the 'good' / 'town' side of any previous games

I have not voted - we have 90 minutes left and need one more - i'm not sure about pushing curio - can we get a last 'why should we not vote for him' when he returns from his haunting of a resturant ?

myp · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 13:37

zaphod79 wrote:

I think you'll find if metadata is allowed that i've always been on the 'good' / 'town' side of any previous games

To be fair, that's like saying 'I've just rolled five sixes in a row, therefore my next roll will be a six.'

zaphod79 · **Joined:** 16th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 14497

myp wrote:

zaphod79 wrote:

I think you'll find if metadata is allowed that i've always been on the 'good' / 'town' side of any previous games

To be fair, that's like saying 'I've just rolled five sixes in a row, therefore my next roll will be a six.'

I agree , however the comment was 'i was helpful last time and it turned out i was doing it cause i was bad / i'm being helpful again this time therefore i must also be bad' and i was just pointing out the flaw in that argument.

The Rev Owen · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 13:42

KovacsC, myp and Craster for Ghostbusters, that's what my ectoplasmic gut is telling me.

I'm telling you this so you can all point and laugh about how wrong I am later on.

I don't really want to vote for Curiosity, but I'd rather do that than let the day time out.

Hmm.

zaphod79 · **Joined:** 16th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 14497

The Rev Owen wrote:

I don't really want to vote for Curiosity, but I'd rather do that than let the day time out.

I'm also looking sideways at Cpt_Droman who seems to have a very good grasp of what is going on which is unusual for a newb

zaphod79 · **Joined:** 16th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 14497

zaphod79 wrote:

I have not voted - we have 90 minutes left and need one more - i'm not sure about pushing curio - can we get a last 'why should we not vote for him' when he returns from his haunting of a resturant ?

Actually we need 11 votes to off him and we're on 9 so two more are required and just over an hour left - theres no point it letting it go to the very last minute - how long does the haunting of a resturant take on a friday afternoon anyway ?

Cpt_Droman · **Joined:** 12th May, 2009 **Posts:** 597

zaphod79 wrote:

The Rev Owen wrote:

I don't really want to vote for Curiosity, but I'd rather do that than let the day time out.

I'm also looking sideways at Cpt_Droman who seems to have a very good grasp of what is going on which is unusual for a newb

*blush*

Cpt_Droman · **Joined:** 12th May, 2009 **Posts:** 597

Cpt_Droman wrote:

zaphod79 wrote:

The Rev Owen wrote:

I don't really want to vote for Curiosity, but I'd rather do that than let the day time out.

I'm also looking sideways at Cpt_Droman who seems to have a very good grasp of what is going on which is unusual for a newb

*blush*

I've just got nothing better to do.

Bobbyaro · **Joined:** 18th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 11845

Someone pointed out earlier, what does possessing Curiously Quite tell us. TBH, he is on my suss list, but I am not sure what it tells us. Mind you, first day and all that, short of possessing a GB, not much is ever going to be found out. :?

@ Mr Russ, yes, why?

Mr Russell · **Joined:** 6th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 12309

Bobbyaro wrote:

@ Mr Russ, yes, why?

See my reply to kalmar. Jus' having a poke.

[vote:Curiosity]

KovacsC · **Posted:** Fri Aug 28, 2009 14:02

Bobbyaro wrote:

Someone pointed out earlier, what does possessing Curiously Quite tell us. TBH, he is on my suss list, but I am not sure what it tells us. Mind you, first day and all that, short of possessing a GB, not much is ever going to be found out. :?

@ Mr Russ, yes, why?

The same could be said for possessing me..

Be Excellent To Each Other

Night One - Containment Faliure!
"You shut that thing down...

Who is online

Be Excellent To Each Other

Night One - Containment Faliure! "You shut that thing down...

Who is online

Night One - Containment Faliure!
"You shut that thing down...