Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 385 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:40 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
OK, I've reread the thread more slowly. My take on all this:

We have two power groups working against each other. One of them is likely to contain some Mafia. I initially thought it unlikely the Mafia would be too public this early in the game, but Poison Ivy is a ticking time bomb that changes everyone's play styles. Statistically, if they started with, say, only four members and reckon on losing perhaps one during the game they need 20 deaths to win then -- that would force their hand and make them play hard for lynchings. If I were them I would do this by only exposing a couple of members of the team, so I reckon there are at most three mafia on one of the sides.

One group is Dudley, Spinglo Sponglo!, LaceSensor -- currently all voting for Pundy. ComicalGnomes would look like he was allied to these, based on his defense of LaceSensor yesterday; his current vote for Dudley could be an attempt to put some distance between them. I think it was made early on when there was little chance of Dudley hanging. This is a scum tell, for sure.

The other group is vegetables, zardoz, Runcle.

Note that both groups contain a roleclaim, who is currently looking like they might swing, and both groups have a very very vocal "proven good" Mafia player who is making long, solid arguments against the other group.

I think we urgently need to lynch one of these two groups so we can figure out which group has bad 'uns in it. I also think the Emo Teen is less important to the town than the Penguin (as even if the Emo Teen becomes Robin, and saves Batman's life on night, whoever targetted Batman will know the next day who he is, and just come back for him). Whereas the Penguin is a good mafia hunting machine -- fingers crossed we have a doctor. Of course, either roleclaim could be a lie, and one of them is certain to be.

Hence, [vote:pundabaya].


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:02 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11006
Location: Devon
I know myself and although I can't prove myself 100% (which I have already said) there is a way in which we can test what I am saying.

People like runcle and vegetables seem not to want to do that, which really does make me suspicious of them.

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:30 
User avatar
Ticket to Ride World Champion

Joined: 18th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11845
Three things:
1) Yes, I am going to vote for someone, I am just waiting for the next vote count.
2) If Penguin investigates a voted person, that voted person is going to know Penguin is going to investigate, and therefore will not do a night action. Will Penguin still learn their night action if they don't perform it?
3) LaceSensor, as you have commented Re Pundabaya, I agree, however, a certian caped crusader will also have picked up on this, so I reckon this will be sorted out tonight anyway. Basically, voting for Pundabaya is a pointless vote at this time, as he will either be in the Asylum tomorrow, or not. Unless Batman doesn't approach.
Is there any specific block roles, eg the doctor can protect, can someone block the emo to Robin metamorphosis by targeting Robin, rather than Batman?

_________________
No, it was a giant robot castle!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:40 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 3137
Good points Bobbyaro.

So, is there a suspect in the mooted "dodgy" groups the town can converge upon apart from Pundabaya. Dudley has CGs suspicions and I'm inclined to trust CG as he trusted me.

Malc is still a wild, wild card. I say let him do his investigating, then learn something from it.
IF he is deceiving us, we still will get a decent kill when we do him the next day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:44 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
Vote Update

craster: 1 vote (grim...)
dudley: 4 votes (comicalgnomes, craster, curiosity, mr russ)
pundabaya: 8 votes (dudley, goddess jasmine, kevr, lacesensor, mr dave, pundabaya, richardgaywood, spinglo sponglo!)
spinglo sponglo!: 3 votes (runcle, vegetables, zardoz)

Not voted: bobbyaro, craig, mimi, plissken, rodafowa, sheepeh, tsumuch

With 21 players alive and free, 11 votes are required for a lynch and 16 votes for there to be no lynch.

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:52 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Bobbyaro wrote:
2) If Penguin investigates a voted person, that voted person is going to know Penguin is going to investigate, and therefore will not do a night action. Will Penguin still learn their night action if they don't perform it?


He finds out their win condition, not their night action. Assuming he's honest and CG is town (the cop so CG claims) he doesn't HAVE a night action.

Also, if people are saying Pundy is roleclaiming as the emo teen, firstly he's not pretending to be a teen, he's pretending to a member of an awful, awful band. Secondly, role claiming would not be playing to his CURRENT win condition (but then by voting for himself he's almost certainly not doing so anyway). It'll be interesting to see if this attacks modkillness.... if it doesn't, maybe he's not who you think he is.

Quote:
So, is there a suspect in the mooted "dodgy" groups the town can converge upon apart from Pundabaya. Dudley has CGs suspicions and I'm inclined to trust CG as he trusted me.

Malc is still a wild, wild card. I say let him do his investigating, then learn something from it.
IF he is deceiving us, we still will get a decent kill when we do him the next day.


I'm not going to roleclaim, but I can certainly assure you I'm part of no group here at all. It is however occasionally possible that smart people with common interests reach similar conclusions. Clearly Vegetables has never found anyone of a similar intelligence level to him before ;)

Malc deserves a night or two, if he does keep hitting townies then that's going to be too bad for him, because he'll be done for. He hasn't got to piss off the town, just the doctor, and that's assuming there is one.

I obviously don't KNOW Pundy, Runcle and Zardoz are scum. However Pundy presents a case and looks like the best bandwagon, I'm not sure I'd have gone for him first, Zardoz is horribly quiet for instance but hey, if there's going to me an information gathering lynch it's not going to be one of the other two it seems and a no lynch leaves any potential Ivy in pole.

Bobbs, here's that vote update.

Vote Update

craster: 1 vote (grim...)
dudley: 4 votes (comicalgnomes, craster, curiosity, mr russ)
pundabaya: 8 votes (dudley, goddess jasmine, kevr, lacesensor, mr dave, pundabaya, richardgaywood, spinglo sponglo!)
spinglo sponglo!: 3 votes (runcle, vegetables, zardoz)

Not voted: bobbyaro, craig, mimi, plissken, rodafowa, sheepeh, tsumuch

With 21 players alive and not making excellent 70s comedies, 11 votes are required for a lynch and 16 votes for there to be a mass Forza sesh instead.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:27 
User avatar
Ticket to Ride World Champion

Joined: 18th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11845
[vote:runcle]

_________________
No, it was a giant robot castle!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:30 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
[vote:dudley]

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:30 
User avatar
Ticket to Ride World Champion

Joined: 18th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11845
Runcle's arguements against Malc make no sense, and his comments yesterday also didn't. Both him and Vegetables are saying the same thing, which seems to be against the town's best interests. I am also now quite suspicious of Dr Benttwig. His comments about what the mafia "could" be doing, sounded a lot like what the mafia "are" doing, and I know cos I am one. Then he voted not with Runcle and Vegetables.

_________________
No, it was a giant robot castle!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:34 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Dudley wrote:
Also, if people are saying Pundy is roleclaiming as the emo teen, firstly he's not pretending to be a teen, he's pretending to a member of an awful, awful band. Secondly, role claiming would not be playing to his CURRENT win condition (but then by voting for himself he's almost certainly not doing so anyway). It'll be interesting to see if this attacks modkillness.... if it doesn't, maybe he's not who you think he is.


Voting for him makes no sense. He's guarenteed to pick up Batman's action this evening, so if he's a bad guy, he goes into Arkham and we can lynch him at leisure.

You're dirty, Duds. You're a bad guy, sure as sure.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:36 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11006
Location: Devon
Bobbyaro wrote:
His comments about what the mafia "could" be doing, sounded a lot like what the mafia "are" doing, and I know cos I am one. Then he voted not with Runcle and Vegetables.


What!?!?!?!

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:37 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
Bobbyaro wrote:
His comments about what the mafia "could" be doing, sounded a lot like what the mafia "are" doing, and I know cos I am one.


I'm sorry. Did you just roleclaim membership of the Cosa Nostra?

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:38 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
Vote Update

craster: 1 vote (grim...)
dudley: 5 votes (comicalgnomes, craster, curiosity, mr russ, plissken)
pundabaya: 8 votes (dudley, goddess jasmine, kevr, lacesensor, mr dave, pundabaya, richardgaywood, spinglo sponglo!)
runcle: 1 vote (bobbyaro)
spinglo sponglo!: 3 votes (runcle, vegetables, zardoz)

Not voted: craig, mimi, rodafowa, sheepeh, tsumuch

With 21 players alive, 11 votes are required for a lynch and 16 votes for there to be no lynch.

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:39 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Heh - I think Bobby's 'I' was meant to be RichardGaywood.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:40 
User avatar
Ticket to Ride World Champion

Joined: 18th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11845
Plissken wrote:
Bobbyaro wrote:
His comments about what the mafia "could" be doing, sounded a lot like what the mafia "are" doing, and I know cos I am one.


I'm sorry. Did you just roleclaim membership of the Cosa Nostra?


Sorry, that was supposed to be talkiong as Dr Gaywood. I put the quotes in the wrong place.

Quote:
mafia "could" be doing, sounded a lot like what the mafia "are doing, and I know cos I am one."

_________________
No, it was a giant robot castle!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:06 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Don't vote for Pundy - annoying or not, he's not evil I don't think.

On the other hand, I'm convinced of Dudley being scum. He's far too hyperbolic to be a useless townie role. In conclusion, vote for Dudley, thx.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:06 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Bobbyaro wrote:
Quote:
mafia "could" be doing, sounded a lot like what the mafia "are doing, and I know cos I am one."
Well, I take your point, but then again if you were right that's not what I would do is it? I'd stay out of it much more, or vote for someone random on the sidelines like Runcle.

The nature of this game is that you can't make a move without attracting some suspicion from someone, but you can't play the game without making some moves. I stand by my reasoning in my previous post; we have to lynch one of these two groups (before we get another day timeout) to figure out which group has some rottens in it. I feel Pundy is the right lynch, and he's way ahead in votes. If we don't lynch anyone tonight, and Batman doesn't target Pundy for some reason (perhaps he is roleblocked, or in the Asylum already, or has a strong feeling about a bad guy he thinks takes priority) we'll be no further along tomorrow than we are today.

Hmmm. Looking at an updated vote count, perhaps we should be going after Dudley. He hasn't roleclaimed as anything valuable to the town, is looking like he might have enough votes to get lynched, and has been vocal enough in his condemnation of Pundy/vegetabkes and support of Spinglo Sponglo that he is a likely candidate for scum on the other side. I'll see how it goes -- I'm amenable to changing my vote to Dudley if there is a bandwagon. I just think it's important we lynch one of those guys, not so worried about which one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:16 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
SUSPICIONS UPDATE:

Dudley's looking like he may be headed for a lynch, so now the bad guys are moving to sacrifice him for the greater good.

RichardGaywood
ComicalGnomes

and from before:

Spinglo Sponglo!
LaceSensor.

Lynch Dudley, then we go for the rest of these guys one by one.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:19 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Craster wrote:
Dudley wrote:
Also, if people are saying Pundy is roleclaiming as the emo teen, firstly he's not pretending to be a teen, he's pretending to a member of an awful, awful band. Secondly, role claiming would not be playing to his CURRENT win condition (but then by voting for himself he's almost certainly not doing so anyway). It'll be interesting to see if this attacks modkillness.... if it doesn't, maybe he's not who you think he is.


Voting for him makes no sense. He's guarenteed to pick up Batman's action this evening, so if he's a bad guy, he goes into Arkham and we can lynch him at leisure.

You're dirty, Duds. You're a bad guy, sure as sure.


An excuse you've used as scum before. "we can lynch him whenever, he's bound to be killed tonight". How many games has CG won on that premise again?

Quote:
Hmmm. Looking at an updated vote count, perhaps we should be going after Dudley. He hasn't roleclaimed as anything valuable to the town, is looking like he might have enough votes to get lynched, and has been vocal enough in his condemnation of Pundy/vegetabkes and support of Spinglo Sponglo that he is a likely candidate for scum on the other side. I'll see how it goes -- I'm amenable to changing my vote to Dudley if there is a bandwagon. I just think it's important we lynch one of those guys, not so worried about which one.


Fair enough, if it gets close, as I said, I will spill all knowledge I have in support on my win condition. I am not scum, if you lynch me I can still "win". I'm playing a game purely to my win condition, Pundy isn't, unless he's the joker or scum. If the rules are to be ignored in that respect I've clearly made a (probably fatal) error in my tactics but I'm not going to change them now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:25 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Dudley wrote:
An excuse you've used as scum before. "we can lynch him whenever, he's bound to be killed tonight". How many games has CG won on that premise again?


But in this game, there is NO POSSIBLE REASON for the Batman not to go for Pundy tonight. It's not a case of "leave it, someone else will do it", there is one person - Batman.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:41 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Unless of course batman doesn't think the he's the emo teen or evil and would rather go for someone he finds suspicious, could well be me in fact.

I do suspect you to be right there, but Pundy is the only one of my 3 suspects that we're likely to lynch, hence my vote. Get a wagon aimed at Runcle or Zardoz and I'm with you, I'd prefer the suspiciously silent Zardoz.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:42 
User avatar
Time Out for Fun

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5039
Location: South Shields
[Vote:Dudley]

mainly because its the majority between him and malc, so a switch to the greater value.
I guess malc can persuade us hes the penguin tomorrow aswell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:42 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
I'm not buying it Duds, I think you need to swing.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:45 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 3137
[vote: Dudley]

If we apply the pressure, maybe you will spill the info, which would be useful.

No offence buddy, I just think you are the most lynchable, and as people seem to want a lynch, lets roll with it.

Im willing to let off Pundabaya for today, but if he doesnt turn up in the asylum tommorow, or admit to being recruited as Robin, I say we do him. He is likely to attaract killing attention for his Emo boy rolecall anyway, so admitting to being Robin will do him no more harm, in the situation that he doesnt end up in the asylum.

Malc is STILL a wildcard.
I would like him to check out vegetables or runcle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:48 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
Vote Update

craster: 1 vote (grim...)
dudley: 7 votes (comicalgnomes, craster, curiosity, lacesensor, mr russ, plissken, runcle)
pundabaya: 7 votes (dudley, goddess jasmine, kevr, mr dave, pundabaya, richardgaywood, spinglo sponglo!)
runcle: 1 vote (bobbyaro)
spinglo sponglo!: 2 votes (vegetables, zardoz)

Not voted: craig, mimi, rodafowa, sheepeh, tsumuch

With 21 players alive and free, 11 votes are required for a lynch and 16 votes for there to be no lynch.

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:54 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
LaceSensor wrote:
[vote: Dudley]

If we apply the pressure, maybe you will spill the info, which would be useful.

No offence buddy, I just think you are the most lynchable, and as people seem to want a lynch, lets roll with it.

Im willing to let off Pundabaya for today, but if he doesnt turn up in the asylum tommorow, or admit to being recruited as Robin, I say we do him. He is likely to attaract killing attention for his Emo boy rolecall anyway, so admitting to being Robin will do him no more harm, in the situation that he doesnt end up in the asylum.

Malc is STILL a wildcard.
I would like him to check out vegetables or runcle.


Assuming he's telling the truth, rather me for a townie win condition than Malc certainly. I'm not that valueable to the town. I have left 2 clues but they're so insanely subtle I didn't expect anyone to get them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:59 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
The town have to lynch somebody tonight. I can't see that much of a benefit in lynching Pundy - I do believe that Pundy is the Emo Teen, not just from the clues but IMO it is a roleclaim that a decent bluffer wouldn't make. It would be pointless to lie about it because if Batman moves to recruit then they'll end up in Arkham anyway, the lie is exposed and that is a one way ticket to the Gotham Cemetary. And if Pundy is lying and Batman doesn't attempt to recruit, then that is also a trip to the gallows.

The fact that despite all this, Dudley is still trying to get us all to point the finger at Pundabaya confirms my suspicions about Dudley. I ask my fellow concerned citizens to vote for Dudley.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:04 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
I'm not trying to get you to point the finger at Pundy at all, as I'm said an almost tiresome number of times now, I voted for him because he was the only one of my 3 suspects who was likely to get lynched. I would prefer to lynch Zardoz but that isn't going to happen.

If Pundy is the emo teen he's not playing to his win condition and should be modkilled, the only win condition he's actually playing to is scum but badly. The error I've made if any is actually following the rules and playing to mine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:09 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Dudley wrote:
I'm not trying to get you to point the finger at Pundy at all, as I'm said an almost tiresome number of times now, I voted for him because he was the only one of my 3 suspects who was likely to get lynched. I would prefer to lynch Zardoz but that isn't going to happen.

If Pundy is the emo teen he's not playing to his win condition and should be modkilled, the only win condition he's actually playing to is scum but badly. The error I've made if any is actually following the rules and playing to mine.


I'm not sure I follow your logic about the Emo Teen not playing to his win condition.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:10 
User avatar
Time Out for Fun

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5039
Location: South Shields
Dudley wrote:
I'm not trying to get you to point the finger at Pundy at all, as I'm said an almost tiresome number of times now, I voted for him because he was the only one of my 3 suspects who was likely to get lynched. I would prefer to lynch Zardoz but that isn't going to happen.

If Pundy is the emo teen he's not playing to his win condition and should be modkilled, the only win condition he's actually playing to is scum but badly. The error I've made if any is actually following the rules and playing to mine.


technically he hasnt actually role claimed at all, hes just hinted, whereas malc has role claimed and if hes the penguin then hes done it against his win condition and should be mod-killed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:13 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
He's playing to get recruited by the bat, which changes his win condition, Rev made it very clear you had to play to your CURRENT one (a rule I disagreed with but a rule nontheless) to stop people trying to get cult recruited etc.

His CURRENT win condition, which the rules say should be his only concern is.

Quote:
Emo - You win if the mafia wins and you’re still alive at the end of the game to see it.


So he should be trying to lynch townies but keeping a low profile. He's doing neither, he's blatantly trying to get batted if he's the emo teen. (which I doubt he is tbh but we'll find out)

Quote:
whereas malc has role claimed and if hes the penguin then hes done it against his win condition and should be mod-killed.


No, he's asked for doctor protection which would guarantee his survival and thus win, in return for something that benefits a win condition to which he is neutral. That's playing RIGHT into his win condition. It's a gamble but it's directly in line with his win condition.

If he's telling the truth of course.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:14 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49186
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
Dudley wrote:
I would prefer to lynch Zardoz but that isn't going to happen.


[vote: Dudley]

:luv: u 2

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:15 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
An obvious vote, but a bit of a giveaway when it turns out I'm on the town's side donchathink? If Malc clears veg and Pundy ends up in Arkham, I think you just booked a lynching tomorrow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:18 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Can we stop all the micro-analysing of win conditions and asking for modkills please? It's detracting from the bluff/doublebluff/lie/analyse that this game is supposed to be about.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:18 
User avatar
PC Gamer

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3084
Location: Watford
Right, sorry I've been quiet most of the day, but I'm off work today and Monday so haven't got as much time to hang around here as I'd like.

I can't vote, but if Pundy's the Emo Teen, then his win condition's counter to the town's and you should lynch the bugger. If he isn't, then he's a liar (and I'm not sure about you) and you should lynch the bugger. Spinglo Sponglo's role is an easy one to check over the next couple of days (particularly if he ends up floating face-down in Gotham Harbour tomorrow morning) so it seems pointless stringing him up today.

Can I just repeat that I'm more likely to be an innocent role than anyone in the game (with the exception of LaceSensor) and as such I'd really, really, really like to be let out of this bloody asylum?

_________________
XBox Live, Steam: Rodafowa, Wii code - 2196 4095 4660 7615
Blue Man Sings The Whites II - Judgmental Day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:23 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11006
Location: Devon
Runcle wrote:
Dudley wrote:
I'm not trying to get you to point the finger at Pundy at all, as I'm said an almost tiresome number of times now, I voted for him because he was the only one of my 3 suspects who was likely to get lynched. I would prefer to lynch Zardoz but that isn't going to happen.

If Pundy is the emo teen he's not playing to his win condition and should be modkilled, the only win condition he's actually playing to is scum but badly. The error I've made if any is actually following the rules and playing to mine.


technically he hasnt actually role claimed at all, hes just hinted, whereas malc has role claimed and if hes the penguin then hes done it against his win condition and should be mod-killed.



um my win condition is to survive to the end. That is all. I was about to swing earlier, that looks less likely now, I think that's fulfilling my win condition.

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:24 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Quote:
Can we stop all the micro-analysing of win conditions and asking for modkills please? It's detracting from the bluff/doublebluff/lie/analyse that this game is supposed to be about.


Which is partly why it's a stupid rule, but whilst it IS a rule, it's entirely legit to call shenanigans when someone is playing against their condition and it's going to result in my near innocent lynching.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:26 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11006
Location: Devon
Dudley wrote:
Quote:
Can we stop all the micro-analysing of win conditions and asking for modkills please? It's detracting from the bluff/doublebluff/lie/analyse that this game is supposed to be about.


Which is partly why it's a stupid rule, but whilst it IS a rule, it's entirely legit to call shenanigans when someone is playing against their condition and it's going to result in my near innocent lynching.


He's catwoman!

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:26 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
Dudley wrote:
Quote:
Can we stop all the micro-analysing of win conditions and asking for modkills please? It's detracting from the bluff/doublebluff/lie/analyse that this game is supposed to be about.


Which is partly why it's a stupid rule, but whilst it IS a rule, it's entirely legit to call shenanigans when someone is playing against their condition and it's going to result in my near innocent lynching.


What Gaywood said.

I know the roles. I know the win conditions. I will decide when someone violates these enough to warrant a mod kill.

That's the end of the matter.

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:27 
User avatar
Time Out for Fun

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5039
Location: South Shields
Spinglo Sponglo! wrote:
Runcle wrote:
Dudley wrote:
I'm not trying to get you to point the finger at Pundy at all, as I'm said an almost tiresome number of times now, I voted for him because he was the only one of my 3 suspects who was likely to get lynched. I would prefer to lynch Zardoz but that isn't going to happen.

If Pundy is the emo teen he's not playing to his win condition and should be modkilled, the only win condition he's actually playing to is scum but badly. The error I've made if any is actually following the rules and playing to mine.


technically he hasnt actually role claimed at all, hes just hinted, whereas malc has role claimed and if hes the penguin then hes done it against his win condition and should be mod-killed.



um my win condition is to survive to the end. That is all. I was about to swing earlier, that looks less likely now, I think that's fulfilling my win condition.

Malc


yes but your survival depends on the chances of there actually being a doctor. so if you really are penguin im sure the mafia will go for you tonight since they have a good chance to get rid of the towns last investigative role.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:29 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
A 70% chance of a guarenteed win? I think I'd have taken that in his case.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:29 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11006
Location: Devon
Runcle wrote:
Spinglo Sponglo! wrote:
Runcle wrote:
Dudley wrote:
I'm not trying to get you to point the finger at Pundy at all, as I'm said an almost tiresome number of times now, I voted for him because he was the only one of my 3 suspects who was likely to get lynched. I would prefer to lynch Zardoz but that isn't going to happen.

If Pundy is the emo teen he's not playing to his win condition and should be modkilled, the only win condition he's actually playing to is scum but badly. The error I've made if any is actually following the rules and playing to mine.


technically he hasnt actually role claimed at all, hes just hinted, whereas malc has role claimed and if hes the penguin then hes done it against his win condition and should be mod-killed.



um my win condition is to survive to the end. That is all. I was about to swing earlier, that looks less likely now, I think that's fulfilling my win condition.

Malc


yes but your survival depends on the chances of there actually being a doctor. so if you really are penguin im sure the mafia will go for you tonight since they have a good chance to get rid of the towns last investigative role.



It is a risk, but I was about to swing! so I felt it was a risk worth taking...

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:30 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Dudley wrote:
A 70% chance of a guarenteed win? I think I'd have taken that in his case.


...unless the doctor gets lynched/killed.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:30 
User avatar
Time Out for Fun

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5039
Location: South Shields
Curiosity wrote:
Dudley wrote:
A 70% chance of a guarenteed win? I think I'd have taken that in his case.


...unless the doctor gets lynched/killed.


or put in arkham asylum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:31 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
True. But it's difficult to survive a game, I quite like it as a tactic (and it's already one that saved him from a lynch today).

I wonder if anyone will roleclaim Doctor...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:32 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Actually no, that would be REALLY fucking stupid, the mafia would off you instantly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:32 
User avatar
Time Out for Fun

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5039
Location: South Shields
Dudley wrote:
True. But it's difficult to survive a game, I quite like it as a tactic (and it's already one that saved him from a lynch today).

I wonder if anyone will roleclaim Doctor...


bizarre comment. why would they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:32 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Dudley wrote:
True. But it's difficult to survive a game, I quite like it as a tactic (and it's already one that saved him from a lynch today).

I wonder if anyone will roleclaim Doctor...


Only if they want to die!

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:34 
User avatar
Time Out for Fun

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5039
Location: South Shields
can we lynch dudley already? we need to lynch someone in these two apparent groups, but Im going to laugh if the mafia have just kept away from the whole affair.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Game V Day II: The Laughing Fish
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:35 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Note that Runcle is one of my 3...

So are we going for this, do I need to post my stored roleclaim post? 3 from dead is a touch soon.

Tell you what, I'll keep it there, if we lynch Pundy I'll make it my first post of tomorrow.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 385 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.