Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 214 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 19:13 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32624
Grim... wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
Basically, the UK is a backwards place when it comes to rail travel. Which, given it's history, is a disgrace.
"It's" history is the reason the trains here are so backwards, of course.
This, of course, is exactly correct. I remember watching Britain From Above's bit about trains -- they showed a number of major train lines around the country. There's literally no room on either side of any urban train line to expand, because the line routes were laid down a century or more ago and the cities grew tightly around them like a tree growing around a fence. Coupled with us making decisions about track gauge, bridge clearance, and so forth that seemed like a good idea at the time but bloody well aren't in hindsight and you have a situation where, if you wanted a truly world-class mass transit system in the 21st century, you were far better off waiting until well into the 20th to build it.

Similarly, I remember The Egg working on a route for the fabled Bristol tram they talk about every few years. It passed through (and hence required demolition of) several hundred-year-old trees, half a dozen listed buildings, a few cemeteries, and countless water, gas, and electric mains. This was the least controversial route a large group of skilled architects could devise. Our cities are simply too densely packed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 19:30 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49247
We could do with about a dozen properly designed new towns, really. Ones where the planners really thought about everything that you could do if you were building a town from scratch, rather than just building the same shitty old buildings and infrastructure but with more roundabouts.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 19:35 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
krazywookie wrote:
make a circular track and a really long train, join it up at the ends, job done.


Why would this succeed where the M25 and M60 failed?

richard woody glerndgay wrote:
This, of course, is exactly correct. I remember watching Britain From Above's bit about trains -- they showed a number of major train lines around the country. There's literally no room on either side of any urban train line to expand, because the line routes were laid down a century or more ago and the cities grew tightly around them like a tree growing around a fence. Coupled with us making decisions about track gauge, bridge clearance, and so forth that seemed like a good idea at the time but bloody well aren't in hindsight and you have a situation where, if you wanted a truly world-class mass transit system in the 21st century, you were far better off waiting until well into the 20th to build it.


Being completely blown to bits in WW2 did Mainland Europe a favour in this regard. I can think of a number of things off the top of my head that the rail industry in the UK has come to regret, including:
-Parliament forcing Brunel to adopt 'standard gauge' over broad gauge
-the late 80s/early 90s obsession with multiple units
-the current obsession with direct services, which means diesel trains running under the wires for the majority of their journeys
-abandoning the APT
-re-privatization

Beeching is obvious, in the same way cities in both the UK and North America are now wishing they hadn't scrapped their tram/streetcar networks in the 50s and 60s in favour of diesel buses.

Quote:
Our cities are simply too densely packed.


And politicians too spineless, and the electorate too aware of this. For fear of angering the electorate and getting the vile press on their back, any new proposals end up so watered down they're often pointless. Europeans love grand projects like huge bridges and fast railways but the British find a reason to complain and scupper or neuter them. While Britain was building the Class 43 (Intercity 125), France was building the TGV, and Japan already had the Shinkansen. 30 years after the TGV is a long time to wait to finally build a domestic high speed rail network.

Britain is unique in being very compact and also comparatively uneven which is why stuff like the APT would have sufficed, but as even political will (often under media pressure) is lost and stuff ends up half finished. I'm quite surprised that simply putting some pretend grass on top of HS2 is one of the only concessions they've made.

As anyone who's played Transport Tycoon knows, bottlenecks jam any rail network up. While much has been spent in recent years improving on this, you can't ignore the fact that in so many areas, quadruple tracks are needed. Tile Hill is near Network Rail's huge training centre, and is on the WCML. The track is double, which means that the schedule has to be timed to accommodate the occasional stopping train calling at the station in between express services which want to go 125mph. The sensible solution, as it is out of London, is to have separate 'fast' tracks that allow the expresses to hammer past the local stoppers. Unfortunately, as per DocG's comments above, widening the railway would now likely upset the nesting pattern of the yellow-bollocked car shitter wrens which are so timid and might become stressed don't you know.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 21:02 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17977
Location: Oxfordshire
DavPaz wrote:
Once Scotland landmine Hadrian's Wall after independence, they're going to use their massive oil wealth to dig a tunnel to europe anyway.


A high speed line to the border would ensure constant rotation of troops, and a quick surge in numbers from down south if the Scots get restless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 21:16 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22666
Location: shropshire, uk
metalangel wrote:
krazywookie wrote:
make a circular track and a really long train, join it up at the ends, job done.


Why would this succeed where the M25 and M60 failed?

richard woody glerndgay wrote:
This, of course, is exactly correct. I remember watching Britain From Above's bit about trains -- they showed a number of major train lines around the country. There's literally no room on either side of any urban train line to expand, because the line routes were laid down a century or more ago and the cities grew tightly around them like a tree growing around a fence. Coupled with us making decisions about track gauge, bridge clearance, and so forth that seemed like a good idea at the time but bloody well aren't in hindsight and you have a situation where, if you wanted a truly world-class mass transit system in the 21st century, you were far better off waiting until well into the 20th to build it.


Being completely blown to bits in WW2 did Mainland Europe a favour in this regard. I can think of a number of things off the top of my head that the rail industry in the UK has come to regret, including:
-Parliament forcing Brunel to adopt 'standard gauge' over broad gauge
-the late 80s/early 90s obsession with multiple units
-the current obsession with direct services, which means diesel trains running under the wires for the majority of their journeys
-abandoning the APT
-re-privatization

Beeching is obvious, in the same way cities in both the UK and North America are now wishing they hadn't scrapped their tram/streetcar networks in the 50s and 60s in favour of diesel buses.

Quote:
Our cities are simply too densely packed.


And politicians too spineless, and the electorate too aware of this. For fear of angering the electorate and getting the vile press on their back, any new proposals end up so watered down they're often pointless. Europeans love grand projects like huge bridges and fast railways but the British find a reason to complain and scupper or neuter them. While Britain was building the Class 43 (Intercity 125), France was building the TGV, and Japan already had the Shinkansen. 30 years after the TGV is a long time to wait to finally build a domestic high speed rail network.

Britain is unique in being very compact and also comparatively uneven which is why stuff like the APT would have sufficed, but as even political will (often under media pressure) is lost and stuff ends up half finished. I'm quite surprised that simply putting some pretend grass on top of HS2 is one of the only concessions they've made.

As anyone who's played Transport Tycoon knows, bottlenecks jam any rail network up. While much has been spent in recent years improving on this, you can't ignore the fact that in so many areas, quadruple tracks are needed. Tile Hill is near Network Rail's huge training centre, and is on the WCML. The track is double, which means that the schedule has to be timed to accommodate the occasional stopping train calling at the station in between express services which want to go 125mph. The sensible solution, as it is out of London, is to have separate 'fast' tracks that allow the expresses to hammer past the local stoppers. Unfortunately, as per DocG's comments above, widening the railway would now likely upset the nesting pattern of the yellow-bollocked car shitter wrens which are so timid and might become stressed don't you know.

Yet we can widen motorways

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 21:26 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Because they were built in the 60s with a view to future expansion, which kinda proves Doc's point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 21:30 
User avatar
Skillmeister

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27023
Location: Felelagedge Wedgebarge, The River Tib
kalmar wrote:
Because they were built in the 60s with a view to future expansion, which kinda proves Doc's point.


Don't say that! He's a scientist, so therefore loves you to destroy his arguments so he can make better, more accurate ones.

_________________
Washing Machine: Fine. Kettle: Needs De-scaling. Shower: Brand new. Boiler: Fine.
Archimedes Hotdog Rhubarb Niner Zero Niner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 21:33 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
The UK Rail Network is an living example of evolution, whereas motorways demonstration Creationism at its best.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 22:14 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38681
Elevated trains!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 22:20 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
KovacsC wrote:
Yet we can widen motorways


In much the same way that people will write complaints to the rail industry regardless of whose fault the delay is, but if they're stuck in traffic I doubt they write to the Highways Agency or DFT!

kalmar wrote:
Because they were built in the 60s with a view to future expansion, which kinda proves Doc's point.


Fads, shortsightedness. Much like tearing up tram lines in the 50s to replace with 'more flexible' trolley buses only to immediately start tearing those down in the 60s to replace with diesel buses.

While there are so many rail lines that could do with being redoubled, a great many more are now gone and their right of way exists to provide NIMBYs with a place to walk their pedigree dogs. The thought occurs: how much and what transport infrastructure would we be willing to pay for and build now in 2012 if it didn't already exist? The Chiltern protestors seems to have learned to accept the Chiltern mainline and M40 because they're there, now. Would we build the railway to Holyhead now if it didn't already exist? Of course not, we have airliners now. But so long as it's there, it's nice to have, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 22:51 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Fuck this shit, where are my flying cars? We were promised them by 2015!

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 0:05 
User avatar
Skillmeister

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27023
Location: Felelagedge Wedgebarge, The River Tib
DavPaz wrote:
Elevated trains!

The Rapture!

_________________
Washing Machine: Fine. Kettle: Needs De-scaling. Shower: Brand new. Boiler: Fine.
Archimedes Hotdog Rhubarb Niner Zero Niner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 0:33 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16648
metalangel wrote:
KovacsC wrote:
Yet we can widen motorways


In much the same way that people will write complaints to the rail industry regardless of whose fault the delay is, but if they're stuck in traffic I doubt they write to the Highways Agency or DFT!

kalmar wrote:
Because they were built in the 60s with a view to future expansion, which kinda proves Doc's point.


Fads, shortsightedness. Much like tearing up tram lines in the 50s to replace with 'more flexible' trolley buses only to immediately start tearing those down in the 60s to replace with diesel buses.

While there are so many rail lines that could do with being redoubled, a great many more are now gone and their right of way exists to provide NIMBYs with a place to walk their pedigree dogs. The thought occurs: how much and what transport infrastructure would we be willing to pay for and build now in 2012 if it didn't already exist? The Chiltern protestors seems to have learned to accept the Chiltern mainline and M40 because they're there, now. Would we build the railway to Holyhead now if it didn't already exist? Of course not, we have airliners now. But so long as it's there, it's nice to have, right?

I think the protesters are upset because of where it is going. If someone decided to put a train track behind my house then I'd be a pissed off nimby too. Although I like to think I'd be honest enough to admit that I probably wouldn't give a shit if it was going in someone elses back garden. But whilst these things obviosuly sometimes have to be pushed through for the common good I think it's incredibly disingenuous to go sneering at people who are understandably upset because it will really affect them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:22 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
It's not actually in their back garden or even on the other side of their fence. It's going to be in cuttings and tunnels a lot both to to keep the track straight and level and also to mask the sound and sight of it.

I've lived by (as in, able to easily hear if not see) railway lines in practically every house I've lived in since high school including my current one, and you really honestly get used to it. Yes, "coming to the hazard" where the railway was there first is a bit different to a new one being built but the way these folks are carrying on you'd think it was going to run through their front room and blow the pages of their Daily Mail around and give their Westie piles.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:33 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69734
Location: Your Mum
ElephantBanjoGnome wrote:
Fuck this shit, where are my flying cars? We were promised them by 2015!

It's only 2012, dude.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:56 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16648
metalangel wrote:
It's not actually in their back garden or even on the other side of their fence. It's going to be in cuttings and tunnels a lot both to to keep the track straight and level and also to mask the sound and sight of it.

I've lived by (as in, able to easily hear if not see) railway lines in practically every house I've lived in since high school including my current one, and you really honestly get used to it. Yes, "coming to the hazard" where the railway was there first is a bit different to a new one being built but the way these folks are carrying on you'd think it was going to run through their front room and blow the pages of their Daily Mail around and give their Westie piles.

Doubtless it will affect some people a great deal and others hardly at all unless this is gong to be a very curvy trainline. However I still think people who use terms like nimby are big fat hypocrites. To a man they would probably find reasons why whatever was being planned was a bad idea if it affected them rather than someone else.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:05 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
If they ripped up half of my estate and put down train tracks it'd actually improve the place.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:52 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Grim... wrote:
ElephantBanjoGnome wrote:
Fuck this shit, where are my flying cars? We were promised them by 2015!

It's only 2012, dude.

But I'd have expected to have heard of their release date by now.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:52 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
markg wrote:
Doubtless it will affect some people a great deal and others hardly at all unless this is gong to be a very curvy trainline. However I still think people who use terms like nimby are big fat hypocrites. To a man they would probably find reasons why whatever was being planned was a bad idea if it affected them rather than someone else.


Maybe we should apply the same thing we should apply for new windfarms.

"I object to this monstrosity, this eyesore disfiguring the landscape!"
"Fine, fine. We will not build the windfarm there."
"Good!"
"Lads, you heard the man. No more windfarm. We're building a nuclear power station there instead."
"What?"
"Windfarm doesn't sound so bad now, does it?"

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:58 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Discussions of nimbyism has reminded me about the Southampton Biomass Plant that is being proposed at the moment. My mum is part of the 'No to Southampton Biomass' group, but I can't decide whether it's gross nimbyism, or completely valid (or somewhere in between).

Does anyone have any experience with these types of plants?

http://www.southamptonbiomasspower.com/
http://nosouthamptonbiomass.co.uk/

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 13:37 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22666
Location: shropshire, uk
Seems a good way of producing energy.

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 13:55 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
I'm against these now. The concept is flawed for the UK at least, the one in Lockerbie is causing problems, mainly that it soaks up all low grade wood available and then burns it at poor efficiency.
I don't believe the emissions from the plant are especially a problem, either (which is what the Nimbies are probably mostly concerned about).

Without reading up on the issues for this one in particular, here's my hunch:
The clue is that it's in Southampton. That means the wood fuel will be brought in by boat, probably from Canada. That's enough to tell you it's a stupid idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 13:57 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
I was amused to look at the area on Google Maps (look by Millbrook station) and see, just to the north of the site, an utterly colossal British American Tobacco factory.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 13:59 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
kalmar wrote:
Without reading up on the issues for this one in particular, here's my hunch:
The clue is that it's in Southampton. That means the wood fuel will be brought in by boat, probably from Canada. That's enough to tell you it's a stupid idea.

I've also 'heard' that the wood won't be waste, but will be virgin trees. This seems all sorts of wrong, if true. I'm taking what the protesters say with a pinch of salt though.

Emissions is one thing, but apparently the whole thing will be fucking HUGE and dominate the landscape. Also it's not like it's miles out of town in the middle of nowhere - my parents live about two miles from the city centre and this plant will be right next to a busy dual carriageway. :S

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 14:00 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
metalangel wrote:
I was amused to look at the area on Google Maps (look by Millbrook station) and see, just to the north of the site, an utterly colossal British American Tobacco factory.

Even more amusing is that my dad is a research scientist there (for another six months, anyway).

-edit- although there's no factory there anymore (just R&D these days), and even when it was, it was a fraction of the size of what the biomass plant is meant to be.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 14:07 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
myp wrote:
kalmar wrote:
Without reading up on the issues for this one in particular, here's my hunch:
The clue is that it's in Southampton. That means the wood fuel will be brought in by boat, probably from Canada. That's enough to tell you it's a stupid idea.

I've also 'heard' that the wood won't be waste, but will be virgin trees. This seems all sorts of wrong, if true. I'm taking what the protesters say with a pinch of salt though.


I wouldn't argue with that. We recently "hijacked" a 20T load of pine that was destined for the Lockerbie one. It was mostly dead, although freshly felled.
It would previously have gone into making OSB (board) and would have cost half as much. It was being trucked from Inverness to Lockerbie, with the diesel costing nearly as much as the load was worth. Something ain't right somewhere.

Quote:
Emissions is one thing, but apparently the whole thing will be fucking HUGE and dominate the landscape. Also it's not like it's miles out of town in the middle of nowhere - my parents live about two miles from the city centre and this plant will be right next to a busy dual carriageway. :S


Well, I'm sure the busy dual carriageway is by far the greater nuisance than a quiet, gleaming powerplant. No sympathy for that sort of objection, although the number of trucks coulds be a valid concern.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 14:09 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
kalmar wrote:
although the number of trucks coulds be a valid concern.

I believe that is the issue that has been raised.

In any case, I didn't want to jump on the bandwagon without carefully analysing what was happening. I suppose I can look at it more objectively as I don't live there.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 14:13 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
I'm not against Nimbies objecting to stuff if they're honest about it - i.e. it spoils my view or I'm worried about house prices. Then it can be assessed and possibly ignored on that basis. It's when they start dragging up really fucking thin or unproven arguments that they clearly don't care about either to support the case that I lose patience. Like "casting a shadow across a road" FFS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 14:27 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10184
myp wrote:
I've also 'heard' that the wood won't be waste, but will be virgin trees. This seems all sorts of wrong, if true. I'm taking what the protesters say with a pinch of salt though.
The website says that quite clearly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:03 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
BikNorton wrote:
myp wrote:
I've also 'heard' that the wood won't be waste, but will be virgin trees. This seems all sorts of wrong, if true. I'm taking what the protesters say with a pinch of salt though.
The website says that quite clearly.

Indeed it does, I have only skim-read most of the site so far.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:05 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22666
Location: shropshire, uk
That does seem off, but then it will need a lot of stuff to burn..

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:06 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
KovacsC wrote:
That does seem off, but then it will need a lot of stuff to burn..

That's true. We should round up every baby in the world and burn those too. After all, it'll need a lot of stuff to burn. It will also solve the population crisis.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:10 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22666
Location: shropshire, uk
I did not mean that in a flippant way. I guess for every tree harvested a new one is planted ( I can't think of the word) etc...

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:22 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
KovacsC wrote:
I did not mean that in a flippant way. I guess for every tree harvested a new one is planted ( I can't think of the word) etc...

Sustainability?

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:24 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22666
Location: shropshire, uk
Yes.... That is the one.

Brain is a mush been reviewing Tech Docs all day..

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:26 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Your brain's always a mush. :P

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:28 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22666
Location: shropshire, uk
That is a fair point. :DD

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 16:10 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
It seems silly to be burning up trees when they could build a waste-to-energy plant and burn refuse instead.

Alas, the protests would be even stronger over the perceived clouds of black garbage smoke something like that must obviously produce (obviously) and so 'biomass' has to be used to try and placate the ignorant hysteria.

A shame, really, as burning garbage in a modern WTE incinerator means we not only get electricity from it but don't have to use up land to dump it whereupon it biodegrades and releases another greenhouse gas, methane.

Then again, there's an article on the BBC today claiming that the world is anti-nuclear because of James Bond and Dr. No, so there really is no hope for humanity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 16:29 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16648
Plissken wrote:
markg wrote:
Doubtless it will affect some people a great deal and others hardly at all unless this is gong to be a very curvy trainline. However I still think people who use terms like nimby are big fat hypocrites. To a man they would probably find reasons why whatever was being planned was a bad idea if it affected them rather than someone else.


Maybe we should apply the same thing we should apply for new windfarms.

"I object to this monstrosity, this eyesore disfiguring the landscape!"
"Fine, fine. We will not build the windfarm there."
"Good!"
"Lads, you heard the man. No more windfarm. We're building a nuclear power station there instead."
"What?"
"Windfarm doesn't sound so bad now, does it?"

That wasn't the point I was making at all. My point was that these sorts of things obviously have to be done sometimes despite objections but that deriding anyone who does object as a daily mail reading tosspot is just bollocks and shows a complete lack of empathy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 16:34 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
markg wrote:
That wasn't the point I was making at all. My point was that these sorts of things obviously have to be done sometimes despite objections but that deriding anyone who does object as a daily mail reading tosspot is just bollocks and shows a complete lack of empathy.


I have empathy! It doesn't stop me thinking that, in this instance, they're complaining for complaining's sake!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 16:49 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16648
I'm sure some are. Others perhaps not so much. I know if I'd worked to move away into the country and someone was going to put a train line through my bit, giving assurances such as "you'll get used to the noise" then I'd be pretty pissed off too. I'm just trying to be honest really. I'm not comfortable with characterising the objectors as small minded nimbys when I think most people would probably try to fight their own corner too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 17:22 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Neat-o animation of the UK's rail network (and the pointlessness or otherwise of HS2). It's like seeing inside Perkies' mind or something.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog ... -animation


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 18:28 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
markg wrote:
I'm sure some are. Others perhaps not so much. I know if I'd worked to move away into the country and someone was going to put a train line through my bit, giving assurances such as "you'll get used to the noise" then I'd be pretty pissed off too. I'm just trying to be honest really. I'm not comfortable with characterising the objectors as small minded nimbys when I think most people would probably try to fight their own corner too.


You'd be being an irrational, selfish twat then. Sorry, you are completely failing to convince me to feel empathy for these objections because all you have is 'oh, those poor people, I feel so sorry for them.'

What on earth is the noise of a high speed train passing going to prevent them from doing? Here's what one sounds like: link, and for balance, here's another: link. Bear in mind that's standing right next to the tracks! It's a wooshing noise, not unlike the wind, and also not unlike traffic on a road, except it'll be a lot less frequent than road traffic. Plus, about half of it is going to be in cuttings or tunnels. It takes all of three seconds to travel its own length. Are they thinking it's going to be echoing off the hills?

Ignoring the sound, the 'environmental impact'. They already have a motorway, and a mainline railway. Oh, and electrical power corridors too, huge ugly steel eyesores marching across the countryside raping badgers and chipping Royal Doulton figurines. Here's a map of those: linkypoo.

Where will it stop? They'll be coming and paving over my favourite pheasant shooting ground next, I won't stand for it. I don't actually grow anything on my land, that's hardly the point. It must stay entirely untouched, apart from all the infrastructure that already crosses it to supply me with gas, water, sewerage, electricity and roads so that my grandchildren can enjoy it, once they've sat in a traffic jam for two hours trying to get here. And my enormous wall to keep the undesirables out. We need to keep natural land and its scenic beauty as difficult to reach as possible! Now if you'll excuse me, we've booked tickets to travel on the Central Wales line, which I hear is one of the most scenic in the country. I say! Who are you calling an ignorant hypocrite? I have it on good authority that the construction workers will slash and burn the entire Chilterns, not just the path of the railway itself, and will pour acid into badger sets, and punch barn owls in the face, or something. Plus the people who'll travel on it will be sodomites having relations with people from the Asian Subcontinent out of wedlock. You know, wogs. How dare you, some of my best friends are wogs. Yes, off with you. Move your car too, I can't get my Range Rover out. Honestly.

kalmar wrote:
Neat-o animation of the UK's rail network (and the pointlessness or otherwise of HS2). It's like seeing inside Perkies' mind or something.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog ... -animation


It would be a lot better if it was show at the resolution it was originally rendered at, as opposed to blur-o-vision. Watching my area, I was quite impressed that most of the little dots seemed to be stopping as per the actual schedule, though the map eventually obscures most of it, and the remaining bits (mostly the Valley Lines) are so smeared it's all but impossible to tell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 19:41 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16648
I still think that people are behaving in a manner consistent with normal human nature. And it's a lot easier to deride them all as irrational and selfish when you aren't the one who will be affected by the massive civil engineering project which will go right through their area. It will affect them too, this is Great Britain after all, it will therefore be executed with utter incompetence and take about twice as long as anyone reckons.

Expecting that people will warmly welcome their compulsory purchase orders as it is for the common good seems staggeringly naive.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 20:11 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
markg wrote:
I still think that people are behaving in a manner consistent with normal human nature. And it's a lot easier to deride them all as irrational and selfish when you aren't the one who will be affected by the massive civil engineering project which will go right through their area. It will affect them too, this is Great Britain after all, it will therefore be executed with utter incompetence and take about twice as long as anyone reckons.


I've got an overrunning bicycle lane being built outside my house. It's making the road a bit narrower, there's backhoes and dumptrucks coming and going, and it's been going for months. There was a traffic jam and lots of noise today.

Can I have some empathy please? I mean, the only people who'll use this cycle lane will obviously be lycra-clad cunts who flaunt the Highway Code and never take their flashlight-fitted helmets off even in the bath, plus the noise of their smug will spoil my enjoyment of ArmA2. I tried to block it going through the local council but when I turned up all sour faced in a flat cap they just laughed at me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 23:12 
User avatar
Can you dig it?

Joined: 5th Apr, 2008
Posts: 4854
A bit late, but yes double decker trains are cool.

They have those in Sydney, but the really neat part is that on most of the trains the backs of the seats can be flipped over so that you can choose which direction to face. If you are travelling in a group you can sit face-to-face, and if you are by yourself or in a couple and don't want to see people's ugly faces you can flip the seat over look at the back of their heads instead. It's a simple thing, but when I saw it for the first time i was really impressed.

_________________
rumours about the high quality of the butter reached Yerevan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:52 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16648
metalangel wrote:
markg wrote:
I still think that people are behaving in a manner consistent with normal human nature. And it's a lot easier to deride them all as irrational and selfish when you aren't the one who will be affected by the massive civil engineering project which will go right through their area. It will affect them too, this is Great Britain after all, it will therefore be executed with utter incompetence and take about twice as long as anyone reckons.


I've got an overrunning bicycle lane being built outside my house. It's making the road a bit narrower, there's backhoes and dumptrucks coming and going, and it's been going for months. There was a traffic jam and lots of noise today.

Can I have some empathy please? I mean, the only people who'll use this cycle lane will obviously be lycra-clad cunts who flaunt the Highway Code and never take their flashlight-fitted helmets off even in the bath, plus the noise of their smug will spoil my enjoyment of ArmA2. I tried to block it going through the local council but when I turned up all sour faced in a flat cap they just laughed at me.

Yeah, it's going to be just like a cycle lane :belm: :shrug:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:01 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
Oh, but it's public money being spent on improving infrastructure that's not directly beneficial to me while I can think of things they could spend it on that would benefit me me me!

There's been disruption and noise and inconvenience while the construction, which is overrunning I might add, has been carried out!

I'm sure it will somehow spoil my lifestyle here, it makes the side of the road unsightly and when you walk or ride on it the red grippy coating crunches noisily, not to mention all the ants and other insects, CRUCIAL to the ecosystem, that will be crushed when bicycles start using the path.

Do you fucking see?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:31 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16648
Yes but it depends how much difference it will actually make to you. I've said all along that some people probably are just complaining for the sake of it but I saw someone interviewed for whom the train line would run right behind their house.

But yeah as you've said a few times they probably voted Tory and read the wrong paper so it shouldn't matter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HS2 - pointless?
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:43 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
How close is "right behind"?

From the internal website at work:
Quote:
12/10/1829

Dear Points of View…..

It was with great comedic delight that my family and I listened to the BBC’s coverage of the Rainhill Trials last week.
It appears a man called Stephenson with a contraption called “The Rocket” won.
Like most of the nation I was both disgusted and flabbergasted at the recent decisions allowing construction of a Railway line between Manchester and Liverpool. I must say however the idea is so laughable that we soon learnt to treat the coverage... as a jolly good laugh.
A railway line they say will one day replace the ever so fast canal and track system that currently links the 2 cities!! HA!
This idea will never catch on as it will be far too expensive to transport cotton from Manchester by any other means than the existing canal.
The horse track may well be congested and it may take weeks to get there but we like it, it’s what we’ve always done so why change.

I only wonder whatever will these cheeky young engineers think of next? Electric light? Inside flushing loo's? I like my candle and bucket.

My kindest regards

J R Hartly.
Rainhill


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 214 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo, The Greys, TheVision and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.