I find it alarming.

To be fair, the other celebrities named aren't really currently high profile, but Rolf Harris is which would have made them nervous. If there was an error in any reporting then Rolf would have had a more valid claim that he'd lost income as he'd no longer be able to go around showing kids his poor injured puppies, than say Jim Davidson.

Don't forget that Davidson was once one of the BBCs top presenters, doing Big Break and the Generation Game.

Broadcaster Stuart Hall has admitted 14 charges of indecently assaulting girls as young as nine years old.

No. Not even with the picture.

Also: I have no idea who Stuart Hall is. Even with the picture.

He did the ninja Warrior commentary.

No. Not even with the picture.

Also: I have no idea who Stuart Hall is. Even with the picture.

I decided Jimmy Savile’s face was shocking enough. I started it in January and looking at his face for that many hours got a bit depressing.

Shit courtroom sketch of the day:

I do find it odd that we still don't allow photos in courtrooms. Is it to protect the jury, or something?

Are you kidding? That's really good, and probably done in about three minutes.

I do find it odd that we still don't allow photos in courtrooms. Is it to protect the jury, or something?

If you've never watched a trial at a Crown Court before, it's worth doing. Free theatre, and very educational.

One fear I've heard is that it might lead to the barristers playing up to the cameras and going for a soundbite on the news rather than playing up to the jury for the whole trial.

I have that on DVD which still needs watching.

Also, the guy at my work who spent over £2000 on original Rolf Harris paintings has gone a bit pale.

I have that on DVD which still needs watching.

Also, the guy at my work who spent over £2000 on original Rolf Harris paintings has gone a bit pale.

It does, it's great. The only downer I have on it is that it's a bit angry and right on.

You reckon? He's not so sure but I'm sure he's happy to be proved wrong.

Mine is that the continuity announcer at the end said they would be 'back in the autumn' or similar and it never returned - I know they went on to do other stuff but I missed seeing them in those characters

I'm also sure a lot of the DVD releases were cut for small things (reading the wikipage its mainly them singing stuff) but it did make for some off jumps at times when you re-watch them now :-(

People who invest in modern paintings are chumps. You go to one of these art gallerys with new stuff in, the second you take it off the gallery wall it's next to worthless.

Rolfs stuff has value because he has a famous name. If that name turns to shit, it ain't gonna be worth jack.

Rolfs stuff has value because he has a famous name. If that name turns to shit, it ain't gonna be worth jack.

The later release isn't cut (the one I have). The earlier release is cut to shreds.

is pretty much what I thought.

I suppose Hitler's paintings are worth quite a bit now.

and also indecent images of children

Do we think he drew them himself?

Wince / Lol

The indecent images of children were alleged to have been made last year.

'Making an image' is a legalese way of saying 'downloaded an image.'

Do we think he drew them himself?

Now, not wanting to be dismissive or anything but 14 and 15-16 are not unusual ages and 'last year' means all sorts of horrible recent 'child' pornography law wording including 16-18 year olds whether or not the offender knows, the 'victim' lies to the 'offender', is a willing participant, the instigator or the photographer.