Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

Saville Dead!
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8000
Page 1 of 11

Author:  GovernmentYard [ Sat Oct 29, 2011 16:55 ]
Post subject:  Saville Dead!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15507374

Bet a few had him in the pool...

Author:  Mr Dave [ Sat Oct 29, 2011 17:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

GovernmentYard wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15507374

Bet a few had him in the pool...

He didn't visit Michael Barrymore, did he?

Author:  Wullie [ Sat Oct 29, 2011 17:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Mr Dave wrote:
GovernmentYard wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15507374

Bet a few had him in the pool...
He didn't visit Michael Barrymore, did he?
Nah, Sutcliffe got him.
Image
Chinny had that picture hidden up his sleeve somewhere.

Author:  Curiosity [ Sat Oct 29, 2011 19:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Junkie bitch had it coming.

[/APOD]

Author:  Bobbyaro [ Sat Oct 29, 2011 19:21 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

paedophile.

Author:  Decca [ Sat Oct 29, 2011 19:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

:( 40 million raised for charity, lived in his mum's council flat. :rip:

Author:  asfish [ Sat Oct 29, 2011 22:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Wullie wrote:
Mr Dave wrote:
GovernmentYard wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15507374

Bet a few had him in the pool...
He didn't visit Michael Barrymore, did he?
Nah, Sutcliffe got him.
Image
Chinny had that picture hidden up his sleeve somewhere.



I thought you had done that pciture yourself until I googled it

What on earth where they doing shaking hands with him? Have we forgotton how many women he killed?

Author:  Plissken [ Sun Oct 30, 2011 0:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

You're being a bit harsh on Our Frank there.

Author:  MrChris [ Sun Oct 30, 2011 0:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Plissken wrote:
You're being a bit harsh on Our Frank there.

I think he confused him with Tyson.

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:36 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Curiosity wrote:
Junkie bitch had it coming.

[/APOD]

Damn. Stupid no reception in pub

Author:  Grim... [ Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

asfish wrote:
Wullie wrote:
Mr Dave wrote:
GovernmentYard wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15507374

Bet a few had him in the pool...
He didn't visit Michael Barrymore, did he?
Nah, Sutcliffe got him.
Image
Chinny had that picture hidden up his sleeve somewhere.



I thought you had done that pciture yourself until I googled it

What on earth where they doing shaking hands with him? Have we forgotton how many women he killed?

Who is it?

Author:  Wullie [ Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Peter Sutcliffe AKA The Yorkshire Ripper.

Here's the story Chinny linked after my WTF moment at the picture. It's still a bit WTF, but if the story's to be believed then fair play to Frank.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... 270180.ece

Author:  Malc74 [ Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:55 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Wullie wrote:
Peter Sutcliffe AKA The Yorkshire Ripper.



Looks more like Demis Roussos.

Author:  kalmar [ Sun Oct 30, 2011 21:38 ]
Post subject:  Saville Dead!

Savile.

RIP

Author:  MaliA [ Sun Oct 30, 2011 23:01 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Sutcliffe was born in Bingley. Probably lived in this house.

Author:  Pundabaya [ Mon Oct 31, 2011 19:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

*looks at title* shittest zombie movie ever.

Author:  myp [ Mon Oct 31, 2011 19:29 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

The Communards were ok, but I could never get on with his solo stuff.

Author:  Dimrill [ Thu Oct 11, 2012 23:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Good enough place. Sadowitz. 2011. Genius.

Author:  Morte [ Thu Oct 11, 2012 23:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

The concrete entombed coffin takes on greater significance now.

Author:  Curiosity [ Thu Oct 11, 2012 23:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Bobbyaro wrote:
paedophile.


Good call.

Author:  asfish [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

You would think there would be a better time to sell this!

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/150919044335? ... 1438.l2649

Author:  markg [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Dimrill wrote:
Good enough place. Sadowitz. 2011. Genius.

Amazing!

Author:  Trooper [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:38 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Oops

http://news.sky.com/story/996611/buyer- ... yce-gutted

Author:  YOG [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:53 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Sounds like a solipsistic, frivolous berk. "Grr, stupid 'child abuse' story messing up my speculation opportunity!"

Author:  markg [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:56 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Bit harsh. It was a charity auction, they aren't generally places to go to pick up a bargain.

Author:  Bamba [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Quote:
but now his plans to hire it out for weddings and children's parties are ruined.


Well, yes; yes they are.

Slightly more seriously, what kind of fucking idiot plans could they be anyway? His entire idea and the worth he placed on the thing was based on it being known as being Jimmy Saville's car. Even if all this stuff hadn't come out, what little cachet such a thing would have brought would've dwindled massively over time because (a) young kids don't know or give a shit who Jimmy Saville is and (b) few people who're at the time in their life to be likely to be getting married over the next few years would see any value in a Jimmy Saville themed car. He's basically bought a quite nice, slightly customised Rolls Royce; which could indeed be hired out for things like weddings but not for a much higher price than any other Rolls Royce would command. He'll make pretty much the same with it when he drops all connections to Jimmy Saville as he would've anyway; the only difference is that he's massively over-paid to buy the thing in the first place because he's a fucking idiot.

Author:  MaliA [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

:this:

Author:  markg [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:28 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Right, so he was obviously just a "fucking idiot" with a shit business plan, there was no element of philanthropy involved in his decision to buy the car at the charity auction. I think trying to get any money back is a fool's errand but I can't help but feel a bit sorry for him.

Author:  Zardoz [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

He should see if Matthew Kelly wants to buy it.

Author:  Bamba [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

markg wrote:
Right, so he was obviously just a "fucking idiot" with a shit business plan, there was no element of philanthropy involved in his decision to buy the car at the charity auction.


I only commented about the awfulness of his business plan so I don't know why you're making assumptions about things I didn't say or even imply about any other motives he might have had. I'm also not sure why you feel the need to put fucking idiot in quotes or why the hostility in general here.

Now that you've brought it up though, from the article alone he's rocked up to moan purely and only about the potential money he's lost; and to talk about how he can't tell his wife about the money he spent because she'll go mad. Oh, and to threaten legal action to try and recover some of what he spent of course. Neither you or I have any idea how much "philanthropy" was actually involved in his decision but does any of that sound to you like a man interested in charity?

Author:  markg [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:54 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Bamba wrote:
I only commented about the awfulness of his business plan so I don't know why you're making assumptions about things I didn't say or even imply about any other motives he might have had. I'm also not sure why you feel the need to put fucking idiot in quotes or why the hostility in general here.

Probably because I just thought it seemed like something of a bile-filled post with pretty much no justification. I don't care especially, it's not like I know the guy or he will ever read any of this but I was really just pointing out a slightly different interpretation of the facts. He bought the car as he says "on a whim" not as some sort of hard-headed business decision which he deserved to have backfire on him. I'd tend towards the view that his motives were probably, at least in part, charitable.

Author:  asfish [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:15 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

He is lucky the Police hasn't made the car a crime scene!

Author:  asfish [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 20:38 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

It just gets worse 100's of people coming forward

Author:  metalangel [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 21:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Jimmy Savile's family have had the gravestone removed along with the flowers as a mark of respect. It just leaves a small hole and no bush around it. Just what he would have wanted.

Dear Jim'll fix it, there's a girl in my class that I really fancy, can you fix it for me to go on holiday with her? Signed Jeremy Forrest, age 30

Also, it's scary how prescient that Jimmy Savile porn turned out to be.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 21:56 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

metalangel wrote:
Jimmy Savile's family have had the gravestone removed along with the flowers as a mark of respect.

Weeeelll, a mark of respect would have been them pissing on it.

Quote:
It just leaves a small hole and no bush around it. Just what he would have wanted.
mega heh

Author:  Achilles [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 23:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Whilst there can be smoke without a fire (eg Matthew Kelly fiasco) obviously lots of evidence has been buried with this and will now be uncovered.


I hope its not a sign of things to come though "wait for celeb to die, wait a few months then pile shit on them"

Hope you see my P.O.V. here, not playing devils advocate in this particular case.

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 23:39 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Indeed. I've just read the John peel story. On the basis that you can't libel the dead, I fear that we're in for a lot more of this.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 23:48 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Yeah, but didn't john peel marry her, and plus forrins marry 13 year olds still.

Author:  markh [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

I think the peel thing is that he didn't know she was underage/she told him he was older. It was in his biography that came out years ago so it's a bit odd they're dragging it up now. Either way, it seems pretty clear he wasn't out looking for underage girls on purpose....

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

I'm always going to be more inclined to defend peel, and yes I recall that his wife was younger from his biography. However, this appears to be a new story about another 15 year old.

Author:  zaphod79 [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:44 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Hmmm - an ex BBC employee with a sirname of Chinnery ....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19939349

Quote:
One of Sir Jimmy Savile's former bosses at Radio 1 has said he questioned the DJ about rumours over his private life more than 20 years ago.

Derek Chinnery, Radio 1 controller from 1976-85, said he asked the entertainer about "these rumours we hear".

Author:  GovernmentYard [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 12:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Apparently Savile said he wasn't a nonce, thus he could not possibly have been one because paedophiles always tell the truth.

Author:  Hearthly [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 12:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

They should dig up his body and lock him in a room with a necrophiliac.

Author:  Joans [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 16:48 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

AtrocityExhibition wrote:
They should dig up his body and lock him in a room with a necrophiliac.


Where do you find a 13 year old necrophiliac?

Author:  throughsilver [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 16:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Joans wrote:
AtrocityExhibition wrote:
They should dig up his body and lock him in a room with a necrophiliac.


Where do you find a 13 year old necrophiliac?

Slayer concert.

Author:  devilman [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 18:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Joans wrote:
AtrocityExhibition wrote:
They should dig up his body and lock him in a room with a necrophiliac.


Where do you find a 13 year old necrophiliac?


More to the point, what's the lock for?

Author:  Hearthly [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 18:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

devilman wrote:
Joans wrote:
AtrocityExhibition wrote:
They should dig up his body and lock him in a room with a necrophiliac.


Where do you find a 13 year old necrophiliac?


More to the point, what's the lock for?


The lock would be removed once the necrophiliac had sufficiently violated Savile's corpse.

Author:  Mr Russell [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 18:38 ]
Post subject:  Saville Dead!

AtrocityExhibition wrote:
devilman wrote:
Joans wrote:
AtrocityExhibition wrote:
They should dig up his body and lock him in a room with a necrophiliac.


Where do you find a 13 year old necrophiliac?


More to the point, what's the lock for?


The lock would be removed once the necrophiliac had sufficiently violated Savile's corpse.

If they're a necrophiliac why would they need to be locked in? They're going to enjoy it without being forced to do it by locking them in.

Also, how does this punish Savile?

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 18:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

If you're going to lock someone in a room until the sufficiently violate jimmy saviles corpse, I'm not sure that them being predisposed to necrophilia before entering the room would be necessary.

These flaws and questions need to be ironed out before we implement it but they are minor snags in an otherwise excellent proposal.

Author:  Hearthly [ Sun Oct 14, 2012 18:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Saville Dead!

Mr Russell wrote:
If they're a necrophiliac why would they need to be locked in? They're going to enjoy it without being forced to do it by locking them in.

Also, how does this punish Savile?


I'm no expert on necrophilia, but I'd have thought the the recently deceased attractive type would have been their preferred shag, rather than the rancid skeletal corpse of an elderly predatory teeny fucker?

And it punishes Savile by traumatising his spirit, obviously.

I'll ask Mrs AE about it, she's into all that spiritual stuff.

Page 1 of 11 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/