Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 1659 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 34  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 15:14 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
DBSnappa wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
People are allowed to think anything about it that they want.

I thought this series was good and Negan coming in was ace. Carol's story throughout the season was excellent, as was her acting.

I also think that there are plenty of very likeable characters in it too. Darryl, Abraham, Morgan, Carol, Maggie, etc. It's a criticism that was aimed at it about four seasons ago, since which there's been a tremendous amount of character development and growth.

But you're more than allowed to disagree.


Are they still collectively stupid though?


Oh god yes.

Apart from when they're cunning geniuses.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 15:14 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48642
Location: Cheshire
DBSnappa wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
People are allowed to think anything about it that they want.

I thought this series was good and Negan coming in was ace. Carol's story throughout the season was excellent, as was her acting.

I also think that there are plenty of very likeable characters in it too. Darryl, Abraham, Morgan, Carol, Maggie, etc. It's a criticism that was aimed at it about four seasons ago, since which there's been a tremendous amount of character development and growth.

But you're more than allowed to disagree.


Are they still collectively stupid though?


Imagine a University Challenge. Walking Dead vs The 100

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 15:30 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10932
Location: Devon
I think

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
It was Aarron, as they seem to like to get rid of the newer characters, and he was the only newer one there.

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 16:07 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49136
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
It's RuySan.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 16:09 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
MaliA wrote:
Imagine a University Challenge. Walking Dead vs The 100


Yes! That was the comparison I should have made. Every single time there's a choice to be made you can absolutely guarantee they'll choose the glaringly obviously stupid one.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 16:16 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Malc wrote:
I think

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
It was Aarron, as they seem to like to get rid of the newer characters, and he was the only newer one there.


Apart from
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Abraham, Sasha, Rosita and Eugene, unless you count them as veterans.

Losing Aaron would be ridiculously anticlimactic, and also he's a good actor. His nano-impressions are ace.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 16:19 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48642
Location: Cheshire
Cras wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Imagine a University Challenge. Walking Dead vs The 100


Yes! That was the comparison I should have made. Every single time there's a choice to be made you can absolutely guarantee they'll choose the glaringly obviously stupid one.


Or the xtal maze

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 17:08 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
It was either a zombie or a badger that was walking by, or next season starts like nothing happened and no one died. That's usually how they solve the cliffhangers in the show.

And every character is more annoying than the other, except for Michonne, she's still fine.

And what's up with Carol? "Buhhh, i don't want to love people any more, because then i would have to kill more people". Then she kills all those men without any issues. Incredibly stupid scene btw. This show has the subtlety of a roundhouse kick to the face.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 17:19 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10932
Location: Devon
Curiosity wrote:
Malc wrote:
I think

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
It was Aarron, as they seem to like to get rid of the newer characters, and he was the only newer one there.


Apart from
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Abraham, Sasha, Rosita and Eugene, unless you count them as veterans.

Losing Aaron would be ridiculously anticlimactic, and also he's a good actor. His nano-impressions are ace.


ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
I think they are more established than Aaron, I think it could be anyone (other than Rick or Karl because of the mention of feeding Karl's eye to Rick) but if I had to bet, it would be Aaron

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 17:21 
Filthy Junkie Bitch

Joined: 17th Dec, 2008
Posts: 8293
If it's Myp doing the kicking, a roundhouse kick can be extremely subtle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 17:35 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48642
Location: Cheshire
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
If it's Myp doing the kicking, a roundhouse kick can be extremely subtle.


He's a lad that struggles to get his leg over

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 18:14 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
RuySan wrote:
It was either a zombie or a badger that was walking by, or next season starts like nothing happened and no one died. That's usually how they solve the cliffhangers in the show.

And every character is more annoying than the other, except for Michonne, she's still fine.

And what's up with Carol? "Buhhh, i don't want to love people any more, because then i would have to kill more people". Then she kills all those men without any issues. Incredibly stupid scene btw. This show has the subtlety of a roundhouse kick to the face.


Without any issues?

Other than the complete mental breakdown she had?

Yeah, cutting herself off from those she loves and walking off to die so she doesn't have to be a killer. No issues at all.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2016 9:06 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Anyone watching Season 2 of FEAR THE WALKING DEAD?

I'm up to date with it now (five episodes so far) and after a fucking appalling first episode it's been..... not too bad I suppose.

It's clearly not got the budget of TWD and it does show with occasionally shonky CGI and a general paucity of SFX, although the actual zombies and gore are up to scratch. (When there are any....)

It's alright, worth the time it takes to watch is about as far as I'd go though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2016 9:17 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48642
Location: Cheshire
I am surprised that you haven't yet complained that the Zombies don't all have their trousers around their ankles in the quest for realism.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2016 9:47 
User avatar
Decapodian

Joined: 15th Oct, 2010
Posts: 5149
I thought the first season was excellent showing the start of the breakdown of civilisation, but the second seems to have rushed too far into total anarchy. Rather than doing something difference you've got more of the same show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2016 19:25 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
TBH I just don't think they've got the budget to do the premise justice. Even Season One very quickly got everyone holed up in the military guarded safe zone so that we could have a load of soap opera stuff instead of VERY EXPENSIVE witnessing the collapse of civilisation.

I mean, they've now got them out on the sea with bad CGI boats. There's a cheap way to do a zombie apocalypse story, put the protagonists in a place where there are no actual zombies.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2016 19:44 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10932
Location: Devon
Cani. Request fear the walking dead talk goes in the thread I have just posted please?

I have Amazon prime, so I can read about season 1, but don't want to read about season -anthem omens. (Anthem omens = at the moment )

Thanks

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 20:36 
User avatar
Decapodian

Joined: 15th Oct, 2010
Posts: 5149
Well, I think that came very close (and probably has) to crossing a line for me. Zombie/human violence can be as gross as you like, but I don't want to watch realistic depictions of humans killing each other as entertainment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 20:55 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
Zombies are humans too, though. Just very ill ones.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 21:38 
Filthy Junkie Bitch

Joined: 17th Dec, 2008
Posts: 8293
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
So much squelching

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Title


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 21:57 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
Dr Zoidberg wrote:
Well, I think that came very close (and probably has) to crossing a line for me. Zombie/human violence can be as gross as you like, but I don't want to watch realistic depictions of humans killing each other as entertainment.


I agree with you, but also Grim makes a good point as well. One of the harder ones to watch!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 22:18 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Fairly harsh stuff but I didn't find it any worse than the throat-slitting capers at Sanctuary.

The whole thing is pretty fucking grim though now, I know not everything one watches has to be 'entertaining' in the traditional sense but I do wonder if there's a point at which an ongoing saga like TWD crosses a line into being gruelling and masochistic.

See where the rest of the season goes I suppose.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 22:40 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14356
Hearthly wrote:
Fairly harsh stuff but I didn't find it any worse than the throat-slitting capers at Sanctuary.


Terminus.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 22:44 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Saturnalian wrote:
Hearthly wrote:
Fairly harsh stuff but I didn't find it any worse than the throat-slitting capers at Sanctuary.


Terminus.


Oh yes, where did I get Sanctuary from I wonder.

The days of having nice chats with Hershel on the porch of the farmhouse seem a long time ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 22:45 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
The whole thing is a series of safe places that end up not being safe places that are pretty much interchangeable and just have different names?

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 22:47 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14356
The episode was called No Sanctuary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 23:16 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Cras wrote:
The whole thing is a series of safe places that end up not being safe places that are pretty much interchangeable and just have different names?


Well yes there is that of course.

I'm trying to get my head around the fundamental issue with TWD as it grinds on, and I'm wondering if it is just that it's basically telling the same story every season, with slightly different characters.

Post-apocalyptic yarns are as old as the hills, but generally speaking they have a defined arc, a beginning, a middle, and an end.

So you have the disaster itself, you have the rebuilding phase, probably some sort of showdown between good and evil, and then some form of closure. I think Stephen King's 'The Stand' is a classic of the genre, and I think the rebuilding phase is the most interesting, but what do we have as our premise for S07 of TWD given how it's just started? Just more of a gratuitous mess of horrendous human-on-human violence and revenge, really.

Season One of TWD was driven forward by them trying to get to the government facility thingy, there was a purpose. Since then we've had the same thing how many times? The farm, the prison, that place where the governor was, heading for Terminus, Alexandria (have I missed any?).

The zombies are almost irrelevant at this point, they chuck a few of them in periodically but they don't pose much of a threat, so we're left with a decaying world where humans do increasingly horrible things to each other with scarcely a chink of light in the darkness, and no promise or realistic hope that things are ever really going to get better.

Maybe the basic premise of the post-apocalyptic tale is a bad fit for season after season of telly, and is instead a better fit for a film, or a book, or a story that gets wrapped up in a season or two, rather than ending season six on the cliffhanger of 'who got beaten to death with a baseball bat', so we know that going into season seven that's what we'll be presented with.

When was the last time anything really hopeful happened? Even when they found Alexandria Rick was basically plotting a hostile coup right from the off because they were too nice to each other and baked cakes, and then they infiltrated one of Negan's outposts and killed the occupants in cold blood.

Having said all that I will clearly watch S07, but most likely with my jauntiest 'I'M NOT REALLY ENJOYING THIS' hat on. It's no Bojack Horseman, that's for sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 9:12 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49136
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
RuySan wrote:
It was either a zombie or a badger that was walking by, or next season starts like nothing happened and no one died.

Not quite.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 10:50 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
Ah! Indeed. I'd rather it was a badger. That was awful. To late to back now on this show.

And all that cruelty was just to show that negan is even more evil than the governor? This starts to feel like dragon ball z. All the seasons are the same except with stronger/more evil characters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 10:53 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
Doesn't this forum supports Tapatalk? I got eye aids just from writing the previous post


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 10:55 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
RuySan wrote:
Doesn't this forum supports Tapatalk? I got eye aids just from writing the previous post

It did, but we got rid of it because it was shit, and a load of stuff didn't work.

Describe your Eye AIDS and I'll see what I could prescribe.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:00 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
Hearthly wrote:
Cras wrote:
The whole thing is a series of safe places that end up not being safe places that are pretty much interchangeable and just have different names?


Well yes there is that of course.

I'm trying to get my head around the fundamental issue with TWD as it grinds on, and I'm wondering if it is just that it's basically telling the same story every season, with slightly different characters.

Post-apocalyptic yarns are as old as the hills, but generally speaking they have a defined arc, a beginning, a middle, and an end.

So you have the disaster itself, you have the rebuilding phase, probably some sort of showdown between good and evil, and then some form of closure. I think Stephen King's 'The Stand' is a classic of the genre, and I think the rebuilding phase is the most interesting, but what do we have as our premise for S07 of TWD given how it's just started? Just more of a gratuitous mess of horrendous human-on-human violence and revenge, really.

Season One of TWD was driven forward by them trying to get to the government facility thingy, there was a purpose. Since then we've had the same thing how many times? The farm, the prison, that place where the governor was, heading for Terminus, Alexandria (have I missed any?).

The zombies are almost irrelevant at this point, they chuck a few of them in periodically but they don't pose much of a threat, so we're left with a decaying world where humans do increasingly horrible things to each other with scarcely a chink of light in the darkness, and no promise or realistic hope that things are ever really going to get better.

Maybe the basic premise of the post-apocalyptic tale is a bad fit for season after season of telly, and is instead a better fit for a film, or a book, or a story that gets wrapped up in a season or two, rather than ending season six on the cliffhanger of 'who got beaten to death with a baseball bat', so we know that going into season seven that's what we'll be presented with.

When was the last time anything really hopeful happened? Even when they found Alexandria Rick was basically plotting a hostile coup right from the off because they were too nice to each other and baked cakes, and then they infiltrated one of Negan's outposts and killed the occupants in cold blood.

Having said all that I will clearly watch S07, but most likely with my jauntiest 'I'M NOT REALLY ENJOYING THIS' hat on. It's no Bojack Horseman, that's for sure.


ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
I think S07 should be quite good, I can't see Rik and co becoming long term slaves of Negan. although they will have to play along for now as they are completely out numbered.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:05 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14356
Hearthly wrote:
I'm trying to get my head around the fundamental issue with TWD as it grinds on, and I'm wondering if it is just that it's basically telling the same story every season, with slightly different characters.


Like most american television drama, y'mean? New season; new end of level baddie.

One of the reasons that TWD is so popular is that it subverts these tropes somewhat. Season 2 didn't have a main baddie at all; season 3 introduced the Gov only to have him rock up again in season 4 and have two entire episodes devoted to just him. Seasons 2 and 3 had the group attempting to fortify a safe place; seasons 1 and 4 had them looking for a safe place; season 5 had them travelling to Washington on a false hope, having that hope dashed before they were found and brought into Alexandria and season 6 had them fortifying Alexandria and coping with the zombie mass and rival groups.

Quote:
Post-apocalyptic yarns are as old as the hills, but generally speaking they have a defined arc, a beginning, a middle, and an end.

So you have the disaster itself, you have the rebuilding phase, probably some sort of showdown between good and evil, and then some form of closure. I think Stephen King's 'The Stand' is a classic of the genre, and I think the rebuilding phase is the most interesting, but what do we have as our premise for S07 of TWD given how it's just started? Just more of a gratuitous mess of horrendous human-on-human violence and revenge, really.


You've just summarised every season so far. You must be enjoying the TWD as it fits with your template for good story telling. Season 7 has started with The Disaster. You can't have the zombie apocalypse start every season so we have the main stars facing a disaster on an epic scale. I imagine we'll get some rebuilding next but it won't be putting up boards on windows; obviously.

I'm not sure exactly what you want from TWD. It's following the comics while still trying to present it in an original way that's interesting for those who know the fiction and those that don't. As I understand, while Negan is the main antagonist for this season his arc won't get resolved over the course of a single season (or half season) so this may satisfy your complaints.

Quote:
It's no Bojack Horseman, that's for sure.


It's hardly comparable but let's just see if that's just as compelling after 7 seasons/umpteen episodes. It already got flat towards the end of season 3.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:08 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14356
RuySan wrote:
All the seasons are the same except with stronger/more evil characters


You're wrong, of course, although recent seasons do have clear half-season change of direction.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:54 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22543
Location: shropshire, uk
Half way through season 6.... I have not read this thread so far, other than Hearthly torturing himself by watching :)

I am enjoying it.

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 20:28 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48642
Location: Cheshire
Good example of man management and leadership, that Kevin.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 23:45 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Christ, that was harrowing.

I'm with Sat on this. Hard watching but I really 'enjoyed' it. Negan is a superbly entertaining evil bastard (Jeffrey Dean Morgan is one of my favourite actors).

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 8:50 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48642
Location: Cheshire
Morgan is superb. He brought real malice to it. As scary as the Governor? Maybe. Not quite as high ranking as Joffy B in the evil stakes, though. We live in a golden time for villains.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:07 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
MaliA wrote:
Morgan is superb. He brought real malice to it. As scary as the Governor? Maybe. Not quite as high ranking as Joffy B in the evil stakes, though. We live in a golden time for villains.


No Rickman, no deal.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:10 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48642
Location: Cheshire
Cras wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Morgan is superb. He brought real malice to it. As scary as the Governor? Maybe. Not quite as high ranking as Joffy B in the evil stakes, though. We live in a golden time for villains.


No Rickman, no deal.


He was pretty evil in Love, Actually

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 12:47 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22543
Location: shropshire, uk
wow..... Caught up now.

Negan, is great

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 14:29 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49136
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
Quite a shift from Lovejoy.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 16:19 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22543
Location: shropshire, uk
Made me chuckle


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 21:39 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
This is just needlessly horrible. Even more than the comics. I'm bordering on giving up about 35 minutes in.

And "Parental discretion"? Who the fuck let's a non adult kid watch this?

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 19:36 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49136
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
Non adult kid?

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 19:51 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
When my kids turn 19 they can watch what they like. I was thinking if I said "who lets their kids watch this" some smart arse would say "my dad doesn't mind" or something.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 20:01 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10932
Location: Devon
I watch this with my 15 year old son.

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 20:01 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10932
Location: Devon
I watch this with my 15 year old son.

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 20:41 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Twice?

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Walking Dead
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 21:05 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
He spends half of it hiding behind the sofa.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 1659 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.