oh man
| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| bluetooth... https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4669 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | KovacsC [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 19:39 ] |
| Post subject: | bluetooth... |
my bluetooth ear thingy has died. What is better a new ear thingy or a sunvisor one? What do you chaps use? |
|
| Author: | IFeelAsleep [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 19:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
Try holding your phone up to your ear. Old skool. I don't use those things because they make you look like a mad person. I have seen people shopping with them saying things like "No I'm not buying that", and "I don't like those", seemingly to themselves. |
|
| Author: | JohnCoffey [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 19:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
*tries his hardest not to post the Lee Evans Blue tooth sketch* |
|
| Author: | Dimrill [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 22:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
BLuetooth shootooth. I'm not Lieutenant Uhura. |
|
| Author: | chinnyhill10 [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 22:19 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
KovacsC wrote: my bluetooth ear thingy has died. What is better a new ear thingy or a sunvisor one? What do you chaps use? Sunvisor. Bloody brilliant it is as well. Lasts for ages on a single charge and much better sound quality than an earpiece. Can't remember what brand I have. Got it from Carphone Warehouse though. About 35 quid IIRC. |
|
| Author: | KovacsC [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 22:20 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
chinnyhill10 wrote: KovacsC wrote: my bluetooth ear thingy has died. What is better a new ear thingy or a sunvisor one? What do you chaps use? Sunvisor. Bloody brilliant it is as well. Lasts for ages on a single charge and much better sound quality than an earpiece. Can't remember what brand I have. Got it from Carphone Warehouse though. About 35 quid IIRC. That sort of thing... if you find out which oen you have.. |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Thu Sep 03, 2009 23:13 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
i have blootoof gadget that look exactly like an ipod clip but black. You can plug any headphones you like into it. I like it. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
I used to have an ear thingy, but the Tomcat is too loud and the Mundano has all that shit built in (related), and I hardly ever drive my other cars now. |
|
| Author: | markg [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:54 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
Bluetooth earpieces are just the new thing for those blokes who used to go around everywhere with their phones in holsters on their belts. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:54 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
markg wrote: Bluetooth earpieces are just the new thing for those blokes who used to go around everywhere with their phones in holsters on their belts. I used to use them all the time, and I still often do when I'm working on my car. Can't pick up the phone with hands covered in grease. |
|
| Author: | Zardoz [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 11:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
The bluetooth phone features on my Tom Tom are fucking brilliant. |
|
| Author: | KovacsC [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 15:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
markg wrote: Bluetooth earpieces are just the new thing for those blokes who used to go around everywhere with their phones in holsters on their belts. It is better when driving... instead of the wires etc.. just the sunvisor ones look better... just wondered which ones folks had.. |
|
| Author: | markg [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 15:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
It's excusable when driving. I was thinking of people you see walking round the supermarket wearing them, occasionally pressing them into their ears and secretly fantasising that they're in the CIA and engaged in foiling a terrorist plot. |
|
| Author: | chinnyhill10 [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 15:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
Zardoz wrote: The bluetooth phone features on my Tom Tom are fucking brilliant. Problem is that you don't always want the Tom Tom on and in the car. Neat features but it assumes you always have it on. So a visor is better. And no I still haven't looked. Car is too far away. |
|
| Author: | KovacsC [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 15:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
oh man
|
|
| Author: | itsallwater [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 16:11 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
I used to use a Plantronics one, good battery life and sound. Best I've used. I gave up in the end though and just got a wire set instead. Never runs out of power, even when the phone does. |
|
| Author: | Zardoz [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 16:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
chinnyhill10 wrote: Neat features but it assumes you always have it on. So a visor is better. For me it was just a nice bonus to have the bluetooth stuff rather than actively wanting it. Oh that voice though.... when it reads out dirty text messages you send yourself. |
|
| Author: | sinister agent [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 16:25 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
markg wrote: It's excusable when driving. I was thinking of people you see walking round the supermarket wearing them, occasionally pressing them into their ears and secretly fantasising that they're in the CIA and engaged in foiling a terrorist plot. Foiling? |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 16:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
That's....right, isn't it? |
|
| Author: | devilman [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 17:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
Craster wrote: That's....right, isn't it? I assumed he was inferring that the CIA assist with terrorist plots rather than trying to foil them
|
|
| Author: | chinnyhill10 [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 20:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
Just checked mine. It's a Supertooth Visor Go. I have the old version of this: http://www.mobilefun.co.uk/supertooth-visor-voice-bluetooth-car-kit-p14994.htm |
|
| Author: | KovacsC [ Fri Sep 04, 2009 20:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
cheers
|
|
| Author: | sinister agent [ Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:38 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bluetooth... |
devilman wrote: Craster wrote: That's....right, isn't it? I assumed he was inferring that the CIA assist with terrorist plots rather than trying to foil them Actually I was trying to infer that it is more amusing to fantasise about blowing things up than stopping other people from blowing things up. There is far less paperwork, for one thing. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|