| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| The Movie topic https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3817 |
Page 347 of 423 |
| Author: | Satsuma [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 10:24 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Grim... wrote: Satsuma wrote: Also no one ever says that Tokyo was evacuated so it’s fun to play “how many tens of thousands just died in that scene”. They do say that everyone was in secure shelters. What a shame. I was half looking at my phone during the talking though. Quote: I thought it was utter wank I did say it was shit. Still, them robots, aye? |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 10:38 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
I hope you weren't looking at your phone in the cinema... |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 10:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Satsuma wrote: Quote: I thought it was utter wank I did say it was shit. Still, them robots, aye? Yeah, some were cool, but Gypsy Avenger was by far the most boring one, and took up 90% of the screen time. |
|
| Author: | MrChris [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 15:19 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
The kids enjoyed the first Pacific Rim, and we saw the trailer for the new one in the subway and it looked vaguely interesting. We didn't bother going to the cinema to watch it. We might watch it if it's on at our local multiplex at some point, but otherwise from the look of it we're better off watching the 2014 Godzilla and Kong: Skull Island again. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 15:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Trooper wrote: I hope you weren't looking at your phone in the cinema... I wouldn’t pay money to see it, lord no. |
|
| Author: | Zardoz [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 15:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Ooh, we've not seen Kong: Skull Island. I'll have to see if there are tickets available for a showing at my local cinema. |
|
| Author: | Pundabaya [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 18:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
How to make Pacific Rim films much better: increase giant robot/monster biffage by about 200%. I'm still disappointed we didn't really get to see Cherno Alpha properly in the first film. In fact Gipsy Danger was the most boring of the robots in that film... |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 19:37 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
MrChris wrote: We might watch it if it's on at our local multiplex at some point I watched it from someone else's, so you might be waiting a while. |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 20:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Wreck It Ralph may just be the perfect film. Loads of story without feeling rushed or bloated. Fleshed out, complex characters that grow and develop throughout the story. Great visuals, kicking soundtrack and just the right amount of humour. There's even a romantic sub plot that feels natural, for goodness sake! Perfect. Fight me. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 20:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
DavPaz wrote: Wreck It Ralph may just be the perfect film. Loads of story without feeling rushed or bloated. Fleshed out, complex characters that grow and develop throughout the story. Great visuals, kicking soundtrack and just the right amount of humour. There's even a romantic sub plot that feels natural, for goodness sake! Perfect. Fight me. 1) Point Break (original) 2) days of thunder 3) point break (original) 4) swingers 5) nightmare before Christmas .... 18675)wreck it ralph |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 20:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Pffft. Not even Mean Girls in that Top 5? Be ashamed of yourself. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 20:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
DavPaz wrote: Wreck It Ralph may just be the perfect film. Loads of story without feeling rushed or bloated. Fleshed out, complex characters that grow and develop throughout the story. Great visuals, kicking soundtrack and just the right amount of humour. There's even a romantic sub plot that feels natural, for goodness sake! Perfect. Fight me. Great game references, really enjoyed first half hour, next hour is about a completely made up game for the film. Was disappointment. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 21:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
The Incredibles and Kung Fu Panda constantly fight for "best CGI film" in my brain. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 21:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Well, not constantly. |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Fri Jun 22, 2018 21:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Kung Fu Panda 3 remains the most visually stunning movie I've ever seen. I saw it in 3d and in parts my jaw literally dropped |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Sun Jun 24, 2018 21:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
I’m about 40 minutes into the new Tomb Raider and my phone has been out for about 30 minutes. It’s a load of trite cliched shit. |
|
| Author: | Bamba [ Sun Jun 24, 2018 21:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Satsuma wrote: I’m about 40 minutes into the new Tomb Raider and my phone has been out for about 30 minutes. It’s a load of trite cliched shit. It's not great for sure. I did manage to enjoy it but yeah, literally every part of its been done before and much better. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Sun Jun 24, 2018 22:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Bamba wrote: I did manage to enjoy it but yeah, literally every part of its been done before and much better. Title |
|
| Author: | Bamba [ Sun Jun 24, 2018 23:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Grim... wrote: Bamba wrote: I did manage to enjoy it but yeah, literally every part of its been done before and much better. Title I genuinely laughed out loud in actual real life at this. Congratulations. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Sun Jun 24, 2018 23:12 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Satsuma wrote: I’m about 40 minutes into the new Tomb Raider and my phone has been out for about 30 minutes. It’s a load of trite cliched shit. I couldn’t even finish it to see whether Walton Goggins was a decent villain. What a load of old shit. |
|
| Author: | Hearthly [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:40 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
I watched OUT OF SIGHT last night, I have never seen it before even though it is quite old (1998). It is directed by Steven Sodabread and has George Clooney, Ving Rhames and Jennifer Lopez in it. I guess if you were giving it a genre you'd say it's a sort of crime-caper action film with some comedy and romance and suspense. It's all very well done with a nice Sodabread slickness and efficiency, and it's beautifully shot, there's nothing about the film you could really criticise for being done 'wrong', but even so I wasn't blown away by it. If you're after some very competent but ultimately lightweight fun, you could do a lot worse. 770/1000 |
|
| Author: | Kris [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
We watched the new version of Stephen Kings 'IT' last night. I've not seen the original mini-series and all I knew about the film was that it was about a scary clown. It seems like the film carried the story across really well; all the characters were portrayed excellently and I understood the plot throughout. I'd love to hear from one of you lot if the film matches up to the book and original series well? Edit: I was attempting to put a funny rating of "balloon out of 10" but apparently the board doesn't want me to post a balloon emoji. I've also read the word balloon too many times and it doesn't seem like a real word. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:40 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
The first half of the mini-series is excellent (and covers the same period as the film). |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Grim... wrote: The first half of the mini-series is excellent (and covers the same period as the film). The second half... not so much |
|
| Author: | Kris [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
All I could think when they were all cutting their hands and holding bloody hands was "well that's just unsanitary" |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Kris wrote: All I could think when they were all cutting their hands and holding bloody hands was "well that's just unsanitary" They do worse in the book. Penetration worse. Bom chicka wa wa. Intercourse, I'm talking about intercourse. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Kris wrote: All I could think when they were all cutting their hands and holding bloody hands was "well that's just unsanitary" Okay, you really shouldn't read the book. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
o/ |
|
| Author: | Kris [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
So they have a weird gangbang? Maybe I SHOULD read the book... ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:54 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Grim... wrote: o/ \O |
|
| Author: | Kris [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
I googled it; nice. |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:03 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Kris wrote: I googled it; nice. It's deliberately awkward and gross as the kids are all supposed to be no older than 12 or 13 |
|
| Author: | DBSnappa [ Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:04 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Hearthly wrote: I watched OUT OF SIGHT last night, I have never seen it before even though it is quite old (1998). It is directed by Steven Sodabread and has George Clooney, Ving Rhames and Jennifer Lopez in it. I guess if you were giving it a genre you'd say it's a sort of crime-caper action film with some comedy and romance and suspense. It's all very well done with a nice Sodabread slickness and efficiency, and it's beautifully shot, there's nothing about the film you could really criticise for being done 'wrong', but even so I wasn't blown away by it. If you're after some very competent but ultimately lightweight fun, you could do a lot worse. 770/1000 Out Of Sight is brilliant. Like you I wasn’t blown away on first viewing, but watch it again. Everything about it is brilliant. The cinematography, the acting, the script and the soundtrack. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Wed Jun 27, 2018 9:42 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Im calling it right now: this is going to be fucking dreadful. Ultimate Predator my arse, it’ll be like the human/alien hybrid and make me audibly groan out loud. |
|
| Author: | LewieP [ Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:11 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Yeah I'm not getting my hopes up. I really like Shane Black, so I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt, but hmmmmmm. |
|
| Author: | Zardoz [ Wed Jun 27, 2018 14:43 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
It's going to be gash. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Wed Jun 27, 2018 17:37 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Zardoz wrote: It's going to be gash. Title |
|
| Author: | Pundabaya [ Wed Jun 27, 2018 18:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Shane Black has like a 96% hit rate so I'm still confident. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Thu Jun 28, 2018 17:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
I watched A Quiet Place. Essentially, if you haven’t seen it, it’s a post-apocalypse film about aliens. Very good for the most part and I enjoyed 70% of the film without any complaints whatsoever. Then it seemed like one daft calamity after another in short succession. And it then starts taking some slight liberties with the rules it established earlier in the film. And the tone of the ending is all wrong. AND I can’t believe that no one in the entire world did what they do at the end, prior to them at the ending doing what they do. That was obtuse enough to be spoiler free won’ it. It wasn’t enough to ruin the film but after the “calamities” I was less prepared to be generous. That last 30% of the film was probably as a consequence of studio heads getting involved: “We’ve got these Hollywood stars you must do stuff with them!” “You’ve got to have this kind of ending” “More action! It’s been too slow!” Oh! And the CGI in the end scene was awful. Really took me out of the moment. I’d compare this Hollywood Star horror film with magical horror “It Comes At Night”. The latter being superior because it’s uncompromising. I still had a good time but it made me want to watch It Comes At Night again. |
|
| Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Thu Jun 28, 2018 18:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
What Hollywood stars are in It Comes At Night? |
|
| Author: | Hearthly [ Thu Jun 28, 2018 18:25 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Doctor Glyndwr wrote: What Hollywood stars are in It Comes At Night? Joel Edgerton is quite famous. Also, not a good film. https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/ ... 25#p963825 |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Thu Jun 28, 2018 18:39 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Doctor Glyndwr wrote: What Hollywood stars are in It Comes At Night? These guys. Joel played the Orc in Bright, people. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Thu Jun 28, 2018 18:46 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Hearthly wrote: Doctor Glyndwr wrote: What Hollywood stars are in It Comes At Night? Joel Edgerton is quite famous. Also, not a good film. https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/ ... 25#p963825 Seems you got upset that the film didn’t explain everything to you outside of the story it was trying to tell. It isn’t The Walking Dead, y’know. |
|
| Author: | Hearthly [ Thu Jun 28, 2018 18:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
So one of us liked the film, and one of us didn't, and we both have our reasons which we articulated in our previous posts. Cool. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Thu Jun 28, 2018 19:26 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Hearthly wrote: So one of us liked the film, and one of us didn't, and we both have our reasons which we articulated in our previous posts. Cool. Yeah but if you both liked the Shawshank Redemption. .. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Wed Jul 04, 2018 19:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Finally finished slogging through the last 40 minutes of New Tomb Raider. Cor that was just awful. Characters, acting, dialogue, visuals (the CGI in that escape sequence looked worse than the video games) (and not even just the looks, it wasn’t as exciting as the video games either) (well, it wasn’t exciting at all, but you know what I mean), cinematography, the generic forgettable score, and the laughably shit ending. Let’s be absolutely honest, the original Tomb Raider film was better than this. Long live Angelina Jolie as the OG Lara. |
|
| Author: | Hearthly [ Sun Jul 08, 2018 22:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Tonight's film was 'You Were Never Really Here' starring The Phoenix Brother you can't spell the name of without Googling it first (Joaquin), and no one else you've heard of most likely. It's only 90 minutes long but it's a pretty devastating, difficult watch. (It's directed by the lady who also directed 'We Need To Talk About Kevin') TBH it's a hard film to like, Joaquin mumbles most of the time and there are all sorts of flashbacks and semi-dream sequences occurring on a regular basis, along with jump cuts to things that don't appear contextually relevant. Even the basic story synpopsis is pretty grim (here's my version): Joaquin plays a traumatized veteran who tracks down young missing girls traded and sold for sex. When he catches the baddies he kills them ruthlessly with a hammer. Then he takes a job that gets him close to the great and the good, and what little world he has is threatened, whilst devastating memories from his own past repeatedly cause him nightmares, be he awake or asleep. I'll let the Wikipedia review summary do the job here. I watched the film twice, as once I'd worked it all out I wanted to see it again with everything contextualised. This isn't a particularly easy watch, but I'd say it's worth it. 860/1000 Quote: Joseph Walsh for The Skinny gave the film a rating of five stars out of five and states "You Were Never Really Here is a brutal, punishing watch, but every minute is a masterclass in filmmaking. It's like a one-inch-punch to the gut, winding you from the start and giving you no respite. This exquisite examination of suffering will leave you staggering from the cinema".[18] Matt Bobkin for Exclaim! gave the film a 9 out of 10 score, describing it as "dizzying, horrifying and utterly compelling."[19]
Sheila O'Malley of RogerEbert.com gave the film 4 stars, saying that the film "is a taut and almost unbearably intense 90-minutes, without an ounce of fat on it. Ramsay doesn't give you a second to breathe."[16] Guy Lodge for Variety said Ramsay may be the world's "greatest working filmmaker", and called it "astonishing... a stark, sinewy, slashed-to-the-bone hitman thriller far more concerned with the man than the hit."[17] |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Last night we watched Hunt for The Wilderpeople, a 2016 New Zealand film by Taika Waititi of Thor: Ragnarok fame. It stars Sam Neill and the kid from Deadpool 2 and it was just majestical. Very basic plot outline: A troubled young kid gets shipped out to a new home in the Kiwi bush and has adventures. I don't want to say any more than that, because it's much better to go in cold. Suffice to say, it's heartwarming, exciting in places and very, very funny. Excellent movie for Sunday evening. 874 Bananas. |
|
| Author: | JBR [ Fri Jul 13, 2018 7:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Ant Man and The Wasp. Great, loved it. I was a little bit meh for the first 10-15 minutes, with no big action drawing me in (plus they forgot to lower the lights in the screen, and the film launched straight in in exactly the same way as the trailers had), but the characters are compelling (I think they've done a great job casting pretty much every character), the plot carries it through, and it's very funny. There's an interrogation scene that is just brilliantly done, and from then on, it's all good stuff. And a really good in-credits scene, then a jokey one right after the credits (which is skippable if you need to get out of there). |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Rampage. It’s watchable, I guess, but it’s terrible and shouldn’t exist. Mind you, it has an amazing line where The Rock gets shot in the gut, comes back and says “I think it missed all the vital organs but let’s not jinx it”. Then he fights a crocodile. |
|
| Page 347 of 423 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|