Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 21114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336 ... 423  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:50 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48642
Location: Cheshire
Mimi wrote:
Gang bang in which sense? Sex or a brawl?


Sex.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 14:57 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
The kids figure that virgins are all more vulnerable to Pennywise, so they all line up and take turns with Bev.

Not overly surprised that it didn't make it into the movie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 15:11 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
DavPaz wrote:
The kids figure that virgins are all more vulnerable to Pennywise, so they all line up and take turns with Bev.

Not overly surprised that it didn't make it into the movie

If it had been directed by Woody Allen it might have.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 15:57 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
DavPaz wrote:
The kids figure that virgins are all more vulnerable to Pennywise, so they all line up and take turns with Bev.

Not overly surprised that it didn't make it into the movie

The fuck?! How don't I remember that?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 16:22 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
MrChris wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
The kids figure that virgins are all more vulnerable to Pennywise, so they all line up and take turns with Bev.

Not overly surprised that it didn't make it into the movie

If it had been directed by Woody Allen it might have.


Or Roman Polanski.
Or Luc Besson.
Or Bryan Singer.
Or Victor Salva.

I think Hollywood might have a problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 16:36 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Grim... wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
The kids figure that virgins are all more vulnerable to Pennywise, so they all line up and take turns with Bev.

Not overly surprised that it didn't make it into the movie

The fuck?! How don't I remember that?


I don't know? It's really jarring and weirdly out of place in the book.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 19:42 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
Did it get taken out in later revisions?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 19:44 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
Apparently not. Maybe I'll read it again.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 20:11 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4299
Grim... wrote:
Apparently not. Maybe I'll read it again.


Read what again?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 20:18 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
Findus Fop wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Apparently not. Maybe I'll read it again.


Read what again?

It


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 21:21 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Grim... wrote:
Apparently not. Maybe I'll read it again.


Because you’re into child sex?

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 23:44 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
Curiosity wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Apparently not. Maybe I'll read it again.

Because you’re into child sex?

Who isn't?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 23:46 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
Grim... wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Apparently not. Maybe I'll read it again.

Because you’re into child sex?

Who isn't?

The children


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 23:48 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4299
DavPaz wrote:
Findus Fop wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Apparently not. Maybe I'll read it again.


Read what again?

It


Fine, be that way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 0:05 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
Giphy "pennywise":
https://media3.giphy.com/media/IdWGz4ZLyP6Fi/giphy-loop.mp4


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 3:07 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
LewieP wrote:
MrChris wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
The kids figure that virgins are all more vulnerable to Pennywise, so they all line up and take turns with Bev.

Not overly surprised that it didn't make it into the movie

If it had been directed by Woody Allen it might have.


Or Roman Polanski.
Or Luc Besson.
Or Bryan Singer.
Or Victor Salva.

I think Hollywood might have a problem.

When did Luc Besson have sex with kids? I picked woody because he'd actually done it (allegedly).

I'm not sure Leon was in any way inappropriate, if that's what you're referring to? Then again I haven't watched it for years.

He can fuck off for Valerian though.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 10:14 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Leon was a bit more inappropriate in the 'international version'.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110413/alternateversions


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 10:48 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
There's also the fact that her parents totally objected to shooting a lot of that stuff, but he went ahead and shot it anyway. I didn't mean to suggest he had sex with a child, but it's absolutely inappropriate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 10:52 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Those crazy Frenchmen!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:16 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
LewieP wrote:
There's also the fact that her parents totally objected to shooting a lot of that stuff, but he went ahead and shot it anyway. I didn't mean to suggest he had sex with a child, but it's absolutely inappropriate.


Still, kind of harsh to put him in such an "illustrious" company.

Besides, do you think writers or movie directors should never tell immoral stories at all? Besides, it's not uncommon for a grown child/early teen girl to have a crush on a grown adult. There's the question on how did he protect the underage actress in this instance of the story he was about to tell. I do remember that the fake name "Natalie Portman" came into being to protect her, but i don't know if it was the director's or the parents idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:52 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14145
Location: Shropshire, UK
Jem and I took the kids to watch Paddington 2 yesterday - we've not seen the first one though.

Great film, and I was in tears for a lot of it (not through laughter either!) - they really went for my heartstrings. I'm getting soft.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:15 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22543
Location: shropshire, uk
GazChap wrote:
Jem and I took the kids to watch Paddington 2 yesterday - we've not seen the first one though.

Great film, and I was in tears for a lot of it (not through laughter either!) - they really went for my heartstrings. I'm getting soft.


Yes I cried a lot.. they hit that well.

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 14:12 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
I'm not sure if this follows from the previous posts - did Paddington boff a kid?

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 14:19 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
RuySan wrote:
LewieP wrote:
There's also the fact that her parents totally objected to shooting a lot of that stuff, but he went ahead and shot it anyway. I didn't mean to suggest he had sex with a child, but it's absolutely inappropriate.


Still, kind of harsh to put him in such an "illustrious" company.

Besides, do you think writers or movie directors should never tell immoral stories at all? Besides, it's not uncommon for a grown child/early teen girl to have a crush on a grown adult. There's the question on how did he protect the underage actress in this instance of the story he was about to tell. I do remember that the fake name "Natalie Portman" came into being to protect her, but i don't know if it was the director's or the parents idea.


I think it is child abuse to force them into sexual situations explicitly against the parents wishes, and that includes acting.

Main point isn't really to condemn him, but to condemn the movie industry for not giving a shit about this kind of thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 14:39 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
It's a real shame that they switched from Katie Holmes to Maggie Gyllenhaal in the Batman films.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 15:54 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
LewieP wrote:
RuySan wrote:
LewieP wrote:
There's also the fact that her parents totally objected to shooting a lot of that stuff, but he went ahead and shot it anyway. I didn't mean to suggest he had sex with a child, but it's absolutely inappropriate.


Still, kind of harsh to put him in such an "illustrious" company.

Besides, do you think writers or movie directors should never tell immoral stories at all? Besides, it's not uncommon for a grown child/early teen girl to have a crush on a grown adult. There's the question on how did he protect the underage actress in this instance of the story he was about to tell. I do remember that the fake name "Natalie Portman" came into being to protect her, but i don't know if it was the director's or the parents idea.


I think it is child abuse to force them into sexual situations explicitly against the parents wishes, and that includes acting.

Main point isn't really to condemn him, but to condemn the movie industry for not giving a shit about this kind of thing.


Indeed, it's just a matter on how it was done. We don't know for certainly what occurred behind the scenes and how the director and parents explained to her the script and what the movie was about. For example afaik, the kid from the shining didn't know he was acting in an horror film at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 15:57 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
MrChris wrote:
It's a real shame that they switched from Katie Holmes to Maggie Gyllenhaal in the Batman films.

Nah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 16:00 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
DavPaz wrote:
MrChris wrote:
It's a real shame that they switched from Katie Holmes to Maggie Gyllenhaal in the Batman films.

Nah
´

Maggie is way more charismatic imo, and a better actress. Katie is prettier but too vanilla.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 16:01 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
RuySan wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
MrChris wrote:
It's a real shame that they switched from Katie Holmes to Maggie Gyllenhaal in the Batman films.

Nah
´

Maggie is way more charismatic imo, and a better actress. Katie is prettier but too vanilla.

Should've gone with Jennifer Connelly, am I right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2017 16:02 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
DavPaz wrote:
RuySan wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
MrChris wrote:
It's a real shame that they switched from Katie Holmes to Maggie Gyllenhaal in the Batman films.

Nah
´

Maggie is way more charismatic imo, and a better actress. Katie is prettier but too vanilla.

Should've gone with Jennifer Connelly, am I right?


That's the right answer for every question in life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:37 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
It's going to be a little weird if Jake is cast as Batman though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:48 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
Watched the first 10 minutes of the new IT film last night, it covered the scene where Georgie meets Pennywise in the drain with his paper boat.

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
The "new" Pennywise is even more creepy looking, he looks nicer than the 1990's one but you know that he is a evil bastard.

Then the whole arm getting bitten off is shown as is Georgie been pulled down the drain, as the same time this is going on an old women watches him playing from her house and sees the pool of blood on the road thats left behind. She just ignores it and goes back into her house.


So far looks to be good!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:58 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14145
Location: Shropshire, UK
asfish wrote:
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
The "new" Pennywise is even more creepy looking, he looks nicer than the 1990's one but you know that he is a evil bastard.

See, I don't like this.
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
The whole reason that Pennywise manifests as a clown for kids is because clowns are supposed to be funny looking and amusing, to make a kid laugh and to draw them in. Yes, they look creepy to adults (and some kids) but most kids love a good clown.

Whereas Pennywise in this IT is so obviously evil and creepy that it completely defeats the point of being a clown, he may as well just manifest as some sort of hell-demon or something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:36 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
Watched 'The Autopsy of Jane Doe' on Netflix last night. The description of it was deliberately vague.
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
I was hoping for some dark, murder mystery type thing where there was tiny CSI-type clues that unravelled the whole story. Turned out to be some supernatural bollocks instead.

A 1 on the Craster scale even from just within the Netflix app without even watching the film.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2017 22:35 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
Rather enjoyed the Will Smith film, 'Bright' on Netflix, although it felt like a mix of End of Watch, Alien Nation and Warcraft. There are stormtrooper-levels of bad guy shooting though.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:42 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
End of Watch is one of my very favourite films.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 10:20 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Bright was directed by David Ayer, who directed End of Watch.

I very much liked End Of Watch too, I will watch Bright soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 10:24 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Bright’s reviews have been incredibly bad. And the trailer looked bad. And I say this as someone who played Shadowrun for many years, so I’m down with urban fantasy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:17 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
There's also this about Bright

Edit: How am I supposed to link to a post? I mean the stuff I posted in that other thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:25 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Bright’s reviews have been incredibly bad. And the trailer looked bad. And I say this as someone who played Shadowrun for many years, so I’m down with urban fantasy.


The Guardian gave it 3/5, by all accounts they tried to cram too much into not enough running time.

Since it's on Netflix I'll give it a watch, I like Will Smith anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:58 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 25588
LewieP wrote:
There's also this about Bright

Edit: How am I supposed to link to a post? I mean the stuff I posted in that other thread.


I think you usually click the time stamp?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:01 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Mimi wrote:
LewieP wrote:
There's also this about Bright

Edit: How am I supposed to link to a post? I mean the stuff I posted in that other thread.


I think you usually click the time stamp?

That's what I did, but then the link seems to be broken when I post it into a url tag. It looks correct in preview but then looks broken in the actual post. Or is it just looked broken on my end?

:shrug:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:19 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
I think it's Grim's auto-hashtagging thing getting in the way rather than anything you're doing wrong.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:19 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
Hearthly wrote:

Since it's on Netflix I'll give it a watch, I like Will Smith anyway.


That was pretty much my reasoning too. It's not a classic by any means, but it's better than some stuff I've watched this year.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 16:21 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22543
Location: shropshire, uk
devilman wrote:
Hearthly wrote:

Since it's on Netflix I'll give it a watch, I like Will Smith anyway.


That was pretty much my reasoning too. It's not a classic by any means, but it's better than some stuff I've watched this year.


Yes this.

Watched it last night. Some good ideas in there.

A bit signposted towards the end.

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 20:34 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
devilman wrote:
I think it's Grim's auto-hashtagging thing getting in the way rather than anything you're doing wrong.

Yeah, it is. I'll fix it.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 21:17 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
From what I’ve read, the reviews seem to go from awful to decent romp. Apparently the original screenplay was meant to be good but hasn’t translated so well. But then there are a load of sexual assault allegations coming out about the writer anyway, so ugh.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 3:40 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
I'd also say that the writer has a habit of saying that they didn't do his screenplay justice for two previous movies (American Ultra and Victor Frankenstein). Obviously a lot of this goes on with making movies, where the final work is only loosely based on the screenplay, but it's pretty telling that very few writers air this concern publicly before a movie comes out.

Closest other recent example I can think of is Fantastic Four where director Josh Trank disowned the movie a few days before release, and ironically Max Landis & Josh Trank both worked together on the somehow excellent Chronicle.

I've never written a screenplay, but I'd imagine a big part of the skill is to balance giving the studio what they want with telling an interesting story.

Reminds me of what Scorsese says. Studios can now do anything they want with modern technology, and the skill a good filmmaker needs is to navigate the studio system effectively enough to be able to tell a personal story.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 11:56 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
All that’s true, though it was other people mentioning the screenplay quality, as Landis hasn’t posted on Twitter since he was outed as a sexual assaulting dipshit.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 13:53 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
I'm about halfway through Bright. It's... okay. Some heavy handed race relations allegories, and largely carried by Mr Smith.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 21114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336 ... 423  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.