Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 14:59 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5318
She's earned her own thread now

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7970731.stm

Downloading porn then blaming it on her husband - for shame. Not only that - OCEAN'S FUCKING THIRTEEN AND SURF'S UP! Tasteless cow.

I like how her excuse was she needed to claim for internet. Why's she claiming for that? We all might do work from home on the internet, I can't imagine why she should be claiming her BB connection as an expense! Unless she's illegally downlodinng stuff she'll not need much more than a tenner per month basic 1 meg package - and it is rather disingenuous to ask the recession-hit masses to fork out for that when she's on however many tens of thousands a year.

Most importantly though, she now knows how it feels to have private business known by others when you've no control of that. Almost as if God is trying to tell her something.....?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 15:06 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 36701
and she's clearly not putting out at home :)

Malc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 15:11 
User avatar
Peculiar, yet lovely

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 7046
Quote:
Mr Timney said outside the couple's home in Redditch, Worcestershire: "I'm really sorry for any embarrassment I have caused Jacqui."


"I know she prefers to do it herself," he added.

_________________
Lonely as a Mushroom Cloud


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 15:28 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5978
What with this and her house, it seems there is a real campaign to dig up all the dirt on her private life and so on to give her a taste of her own medicine.

It is quite wonderfully karmic.

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 16:50 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
Half of these politicians are mandarins anyway. I'll never forget being at an event that Harriet Harmon spoke at. She was wheeled in with a huddle of assistants, gave a 5 minute speech full of soundbites and buggered off again. Hardly seemed worth having her there.

She looked like she had no idea where she was or what she was doing, she just read a speech from a piece of paper and we were supposed to be intently listening to this bullshit, not aimed at us but aimed at getting news coverage.

You know how some pop stars look back on their touring career and say sometimes they didn't know what city they were in, they just got shoved on stage and performed their standard routine? That's how this looked!

However I'll never forget the story I read about some students setting up a hall for a event. A lady pottered in on her own and asked if she was early. She was indeed early so she started to help set out the chairs.

Only when the event began did the students realise who this lady was. It was Mo Mowlam!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 17:15 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
One thing I don't understand. Well two...

It was reported that he had watched 2 "adult" films. Now most people would assume "adult"="pron". But he watched Ocean's 13 and a fulm called Surf's Up. Both of which are "18", but neither of which is "adult" in the way the Daily Express meant to suggest.

Second thing is that the silly cow has made the husband apologise and has told him off. Why exactly? Poor sod is sitting at home and decides he wants to watch a couple of PPV films on Sky Movies. As far as he knows he's paying for this. Then he gets dragged into the media and made to apologise.

The fault here lies with the silly cow who was claiming for her Sky/Virgin package on expenses. If her poor husband decides to watch a film, it's not his fault.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 17:25 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 36701
Hang on, Surf's up?

This one?

That's not even slightly 'adult'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 17:43 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5978
chinnyhill10 wrote:
One thing I don't understand. Well two...

It was reported that he had watched 2 "adult" films. Now most people would assume "adult"="pron". But he watched Ocean's 13 and a fulm called Surf's Up. Both of which are "18", but neither of which is "adult" in the way the Daily Express meant to suggest.

Second thing is that the silly cow has made the husband apologise and has told him off. Why exactly? Poor sod is sitting at home and decides he wants to watch a couple of PPV films on Sky Movies. As far as he knows he's paying for this. Then he gets dragged into the media and made to apologise.

The fault here lies with the silly cow who was claiming for her Sky/Virgin package on expenses. If her poor husband decides to watch a film, it's not his fault.


I think it's more about a person who thinks they should have access to everything digital that flows into everyones house, having the things that flow into her house made public.

If you've done nothing wrong, which he didn't, you've nothing to fear. Except humiliation, extortion and a lack of privacy. Which maybe she is realising a little.

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 17:48 
User avatar
Ticket to Ride World Champion

Joined: 18th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11699
chinnyhill10 wrote:
Half of these politicians are mandarins anyway.


Unless she is claiming back a huge make-up bill as well, I am going to hazard a guess she isn't Mandarin.

_________________
No, it was a giant robot castle!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 18:13 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
chinnyhill10 wrote:
It was reported that he had watched 2 "adult" films. Now most people would assume "adult"="pron". But he watched Ocean's 13 and a fulm called Surf's Up. Both of which are "18", but neither of which is "adult" in the way the Daily Express meant to suggest.


Th two adult films weren't named, and were said to be £5 a pop. Ocean's 13 (twice at £3.75 each) and Surf's up (once at £3.50) were two extra films viewed. The article, for some reason, decides to focus more on the fact adult films were watched. Shock horror.

chinnyhill10 wrote:
Second thing is that the silly cow has made the husband apologise and has told him off. Why exactly? Poor sod is sitting at home and decides he wants to watch a couple of PPV films on Sky Movies. As far as he knows he's paying for this. Then he gets dragged into the media and made to apologise.

The fault here lies with the silly cow who was claiming for her Sky/Virgin package on expenses. If her poor husband decides to watch a film, it's not his fault.


Indeed. The excuse doesn't make sense — why would he have to apologise and get "an ear-bashing" when she was the one claiming the films as an expense? Regardless of who watched them, she's responsible for checking her claims.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 18:19 
User avatar
Peculiar, yet lovely

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 7046
Dr Lave wrote:
chinnyhill10 wrote:
One thing I don't understand. Well two...

It was reported that he had watched 2 "adult" films. Now most people would assume "adult"="pron". But he watched Ocean's 13 and a fulm called Surf's Up. Both of which are "18", but neither of which is "adult" in the way the Daily Express meant to suggest.

Second thing is that the silly cow has made the husband apologise and has told him off. Why exactly? Poor sod is sitting at home and decides he wants to watch a couple of PPV films on Sky Movies. As far as he knows he's paying for this. Then he gets dragged into the media and made to apologise.

The fault here lies with the silly cow who was claiming for her Sky/Virgin package on expenses. If her poor husband decides to watch a film, it's not his fault.


I think it's more about a person who thinks they should have access to everything digital that flows into everyones house, having the things that flow into her house made public.

If you've done nothing wrong, which he didn't, you've nothing to fear. Except humiliation, extortion and a lack of privacy. Which maybe she is realising a little.


THis. Given what this mental bitch is trying to do to all of us, this is one of the few times when I think I'll tolerate people lowering themselves to her level. Those films weren't "adult" at all, but if the roles were reversed, she'd be the first one lying through her fucking teeth to make someone look bad.

_________________
Lonely as a Mushroom Cloud


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 18:37 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
The biggest shock to me is that people still actually pay for porn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 18:40 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5978
LewieP wrote:
The biggest shock to me is that people still actually pay for porn.


Proof if ever, that piracy can't kill an industry.

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 19:56 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2046
chinnyhill10 wrote:
It was reported that he had watched 2 "adult" films. Now most people would assume "adult"="pron". But he watched Ocean's 13 and a fulm called Surf's Up. Both of which are "18", but neither of which is "adult" in the way the Daily Express meant to suggest.

It's all a manipulative play on words, to raise the ire of people who just glance on newspaper headlines.

But! Both Ocean's 13 and Surf's Up are in fact certificate PG. Hardly 'adult' in either sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 20:00 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Quote:
The Sunday Express reported that two films, which cost £5 each, were viewed on 6 and 8 April 2008 at Jacqui Smith's constituency home in Redditch.

The claim was also said to include two viewings of the film Ocean's 13 - at £3.75 each - and an additional £3.50 to watch the film Surf's Up.


Ocean's 13 and Surf's up were not the Adult films!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 20:04 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5978
Quote:
The two films, which cost £5 each, were viewed on 6 and 8 April 2008.

It was also said to include two viewings of the film Ocean's 13 - at £3.75 each - and an additional £3.50 to watch the film Surf's Up.


He watched Porn and Shit Films.

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 20:06 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32573
Dr Lave wrote:
He watched Porn and Shit Films.
Hanging isn't not good enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 20:39 
User avatar
Kinda Funny Lookin'

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3193
Location: Sheffield or Baku
Sigh...

It makes you yearn for a simpler time when politicians used public money on hookers and blow.

_________________
If work was so rewarding the rich would have bought it all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 20:57 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
Malabar Front wrote:
Ocean's 13 and Surf's up were not the Adult films!


Ah, the reporting is a little confused and I'm not very up on modern films. For all I know "Surf's Up" could be two hookers pissing on an elderly dwarf.

Image
Two hookers and a elderly dwarf, yesterday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 21:00 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5318
who are they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 21:02 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
GovernmentYard wrote:
who are they?


Ronnie Rosenthal, Duncan Norville and Babs from Pans People.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 21:24 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Dr Lave wrote:
I think it's more about a person who thinks they should have access to everything digital that flows into everyones house, having the things that flow into her house made public.

If you've done nothing wrong, which he didn't, you've nothing to fear. Except humiliation, extortion and a lack of privacy. Which maybe she is realising a little.


Yeah, I alluded to this in bits and bobs and I do think there's a certain amount of, what's the word, schadenfreude? to be enjoyed at her expense..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 23:29 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2046
Malabar Front wrote:
Quote:
The Sunday Express reported that two films, which cost £5 each, were viewed on 6 and 8 April 2008 at Jacqui Smith's constituency home in Redditch.

The claim was also said to include two viewings of the film Ocean's 13 - at £3.75 each - and an additional £3.50 to watch the film Surf's Up.


Ocean's 13 and Surf's up were not the Adult films!

Weren't they? Cripes!

Career over! If there's any justice left in the world.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:57 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5318
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7971221.stm

Good on you, Blues!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:01 
User avatar
What-ho, chaps!

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2121
Quote:
"We are allowed to claim for telly communications and it is vital for work," he said.


Is that when you shake the telly about and yell "What the hell are you talking about?"

_________________
[www.mrdictionary.net]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:14 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 46484
Location: Cheshire
GovernmentYard wrote:
She's earned her own thread now

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7970731.stm

Downloading porn then blaming it on her husband - for shame. Not only that - OCEAN'S FUCKING THIRTEEN AND SURF'S UP! Tasteless cow.

I like how her excuse was she needed to claim for internet. Why's she claiming for that? We all might do work from home on the internet, I can't imagine why she should be claiming her BB connection as an expense! Unless she's illegally downlodinng stuff she'll not need much more than a tenner per month basic 1 meg package - and it is rather disingenuous to ask the recession-hit masses to fork out for that when she's on however many tens of thousands a year.

Most importantly though, she now knows how it feels to have private business known by others when you've no control of that. Almost as if God is trying to tell her something.....?


I think a net connection is a justifiable expense claim.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:38 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
MaliA wrote:
I think a net connection is a justifiable expense claim.


Agreed.

At her main residence. You know, the one in London she claims a five figure sum for.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:10 
User avatar
Excellent Painter

Joined: 30th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7027
Location: Behind you
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Dr Lave wrote:
He watched Porn and Shit Films.
Hanging isn't not good enough.
It's a good job Mypothy is on holiday - his head would explode trying to work out what you mean with that double negative.

_________________
twitter || website
Malibu Stacy. Everybody's favourite back seat driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:15 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
It's a shame thought, because if most other public figures had very nearly managed to get away with expensing porn they'd be a hero.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:17 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48615
Plissken wrote:
MaliA wrote:
I think a net connection is a justifiable expense claim.


Agreed.

At her main residence. You know, the one in London she claims a five figure sum for.


And doing the little bit of maths required to submit just the ADSL connection, not the full Sky package would be a given, you'd think.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:58 
User avatar
PC Gamer

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3084
Location: Watford
Because God knows one viewing of Ocean's Thirteen just isn't enough.

_________________
XBox Live, Steam: Rodafowa, Wii code - 2196 4095 4660 7615
Blue Man Sings The Whites II - Judgmental Day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:03 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 46484
Location: Cheshire
Rodafowa wrote:
Because God knows one viewing of Ocean's Thirteen just isn't enough.


Ocean's Twelve, I think it is, is very Post modern, though.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:11 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Hang on

Quote:
There is no suggestion that the films were watched by Mrs Smith: the fact that she is now said to be "furious" with her husband and paid researcher Richard Timney imply that she was unaware of her partner’s solo late night habits. Smith has said she will now pay back the cost of the films, and presumably dock her husband's pocket money


Furious with her husband and the paid researcher? Was her husband watching porn with another bloke then?

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:12 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 15590
Location: Oxford
Mr Chris wrote:
Furious with her husband and the paid researcher? Was her husband watching porn with another bloke then?


He also works for her.

Frankly, adult movies or a night with Jacqui Smith? No contest, really.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:15 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 46484
Location: Cheshire
In Soviet Russia, Porn pays for state.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:16 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Seriously, what has he supposed to have done?

Is there some kind of unspoken law of "If you are married to someone in the public eye, you are not allowed to watch porn"?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:17 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
LewieP wrote:
Seriously, what has he supposed to have done?

Is there some kind of unspoken law of "If you are married to someone in the public eye, you are not allowed to watch porn"?

More "you are not allowed to get your wife to expense the porn to the taxpayer".

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:19 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 46484
Location: Cheshire
This government just gets better and better. Not only do we have them staging illegal wars, having members of the opposition arrested, nationalisation of banks, we've also got Minister's spouses cracking one off a the taxpayers expense.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:20 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
MaliA wrote:
This government just gets better and better. Not only do we have them staging illegal wars, having members of the opposition arrested, nationalisation of banks, we've also got Minister's spouses cracking one off a the taxpayers expense.

I for one will be voting to keep them in, as I will miss teh lulz. They have demonstrated very clearly that they're better at this than the Tories, who just shagged people and took bribes which is TEH DULLZORS.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:21 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Mr Chris wrote:
LewieP wrote:
Seriously, what has he supposed to have done?

Is there some kind of unspoken law of "If you are married to someone in the public eye, you are not allowed to watch porn"?

More "you are not allowed to get your wife to expense the porn to the taxpayer".


So was it him in charge of the expenses claim or her?

The news article suggests that it was her "I'm sorry that, in claiming for my internet connection, I mistakenly claimed for a television package alongside it." so what does it matter who watched what? She should have checked before claiming, and she has no right to be furious at him.

Seems to me she's just shifting the blame because she knows if she admitted to it she'd be hanged.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:22 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Yeah, exactly.

All he did was pick up the remote, and decide to watch some porn.

Well, I guess he is also guilty of choosing to marry a moron.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:23 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48615
Malabar Front wrote:
Seems to me she's just shifting the blame because she knows if she admitted to it she'd be hanged.


Precisely this. I'd divorce the bitch if she tried to pin this on me. Man up and admit you fucked up, Smith.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:23 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
She probably does a good line in Dominatrixing.

"I'll lock you up for 42 days without charge you naughty boy"
"No! I demand a lawyer!"
"I'll teach you to watch porn and make me pay for it. Bend over, bitch, and watch *this*"

No, hang on. No. I'm not thinking about this.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:24 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
We taxpayers pay the entire Sky/Virgin* bill. Because the 116K for her second home, her salary of £63,000 as an MP, her additional £78,000 salary as a Minister and the 40 grand a year she pays her husband to be her Parlimentary researcher just isn't enough to cover her fucking Sky subscription.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:24 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48615
Also, your name isn't spelled with a 'q' unless you're a 14 year-old slut from Billaricay.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:25 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Craster wrote:
Also, your name isn't spelled with a 'q' unless you're a 14 year-old slut from Billaricay.

How disappointed must Gordon have been when *she* turned up.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:25 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 46484
Location: Cheshire
Plissken wrote:
We taxpayers pay the entire Sky/Virgin* bill. Because the 116K for her second home, her salary of £63,000 as an MP, her additional £78,000 salary as a Minister and the 40 grand a year she pays her husband to be her Parlimentary researcher just isn't enough to cover her fucking Sky subscription.


How much should ministers get paid then? What would be fair renumeration?

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:26 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
MaliA wrote:
What would be fair renumeration?

I'd renumber her as "6".

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:27 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48615
Every company in the world can handle expenses claims with a view to ensuring their employees aren't taking the piss. Why can't the government?

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Jacqui Smith Thread
PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:28 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
MaliA wrote:
Plissken wrote:
We taxpayers pay the entire Sky/Virgin* bill. Because the 116K for her second home, her salary of £63,000 as an MP, her additional £78,000 salary as a Minister and the 40 grand a year she pays her husband to be her Parlimentary researcher just isn't enough to cover her fucking Sky subscription.


How much should ministers get paid then? What would be fair renumeration?


I am not objecting to her salary. I just happen to think that when you and your husband pull down something in the region of 200 grand a year, then getting your Sky subscription on the taxpayer is a bit fucking much.

Especially when you are a member of a Government who objects to unemployed people getting Sky subs on benefit.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.