Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

Limpics
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10807
Page 2 of 7

Author:  MaliA [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Yesterdays crash looked horrific. I hadn't seen any of the crashes on Saturday, just the aftermaths of people sat in the gutter. In fact I wasn't even aware until after yesterdays race that Nibbles broke both his collarbones when he crashed.


Not sure the course should be to blame. "Going to fast for conditions," maybe, I dunno. It's tricky.

Author:  MaliA [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Mr Russell wrote:
Zardoz wrote:
I watch about 10 minutes of the opening ceremony and 5 minutes of "diving in pairs" last night. No crashes.

Watch the French gymnastics instead.


Fuck, no.

Author:  Kern [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:54 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Mr Russell wrote:
French gymnastics


That really should be a euphemism for something.

Author:  KovacsC [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:00 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

MaliA wrote:
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Yesterdays crash looked horrific. I hadn't seen any of the crashes on Saturday, just the aftermaths of people sat in the gutter. In fact I wasn't even aware until after yesterdays race that Nibbles broke both his collarbones when he crashed.


Not sure the course should be to blame. "Going to fast for conditions," maybe, I dunno. It's tricky.


Could be, they did a few laps, so should have known the course.

Author:  DavPaz [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

The design of the road on the decent is brutal! 12 inch drop offs and no verge. Pretty much one mistake and you're done

Author:  devilman [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

TheVision wrote:
Despite having a job that's to do with Sport, so far I have managed to watch zero minutes of the Olympics. I wonder if I can keep it up?


Just as long as you're not a cameraman in Rio.

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

MaliA wrote:
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Yesterdays crash looked horrific. I hadn't seen any of the crashes on Saturday, just the aftermaths of people sat in the gutter. In fact I wasn't even aware until after yesterdays race that Nibbles broke both his collarbones when he crashed.


Not sure the course should be to blame. "Going to fast for conditions," maybe, I dunno. It's tricky.

Boardmans argument primarily appeared to be that there was no crash protection, not the road itself. Also, that segment was under canopy so you can't see the road surface well enough to identify the risks due to the dappled sunlight.

Author:  markg [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

I know nothing about bicycle racing but if there's an unusually high number of crashes/injuries then surely it has to be something to do with the course.

Author:  MaliA [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:29 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
MaliA wrote:
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Yesterdays crash looked horrific. I hadn't seen any of the crashes on Saturday, just the aftermaths of people sat in the gutter. In fact I wasn't even aware until after yesterdays race that Nibbles broke both his collarbones when he crashed.


Not sure the course should be to blame. "Going to fast for conditions," maybe, I dunno. It's tricky.

Boardmans argument primarily appeared to be that there was no crash protection, not the road itself. Also, that segment was under canopy so you can't see the road surface well enough to identify the risks due to the dappled sunlight.


Furry muff.

Author:  KovacsC [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

markg wrote:
I know nothing about bicycle racing but if there's an unusually high number of crashes/injuries then surely it has to be something to do with the course.


There was not a high number, but they were serious.

Author:  MaliA [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

markg wrote:
I know nothing about bicycle racing but if there's an unusually high number of crashes/injuries then surely it has to be something to do with the course.


Possibly. Nibbles is usually pretty good at going downhill, so it was a surprise to me when I heard he went down. Had it been Pinot I think (STOP IT - All). The difference in skill at going dowhill in the pro peleton is huge

Author:  MaliA [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:42 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

markg wrote:
I know nothing about bicycle racing


It is the most important thing in the world

Author:  DavPaz [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:46 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

MaliA wrote:
markg wrote:
I know nothing about bicycle racing


It is the most important thing in the world

For fans of really slender men in translucent spandex

Author:  MaliA [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:45 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
MaliA wrote:
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Yesterdays crash looked horrific. I hadn't seen any of the crashes on Saturday, just the aftermaths of people sat in the gutter. In fact I wasn't even aware until after yesterdays race that Nibbles broke both his collarbones when he crashed.


Not sure the course should be to blame. "Going to fast for conditions," maybe, I dunno. It's tricky.

Boardmans argument primarily appeared to be that there was no crash protection, not the road itself. Also, that segment was under canopy so you can't see the road surface well enough to identify the risks due to the dappled sunlight.

The Innr Ring sez

Quote:
Was the descent too dangerous? It had been freshly surfaced and some rain was falling on Sunday but van Vleuten’s crash was her accident, a compound error of risk, speed, trajectory and braking. What followed though was not self-inflicted, the drainage channel and the kerb meant that an exit from the road came with a high price. It’s easy to type that the road should have been secured but how? Fill in all the ditches and to remove the kerb? Ideally yes but Brasil doesn’t have the money and if they did and it rained what chance everyone would be aquaplaning their way to hospital too.

Author:  Jem [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 13:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

TheVision wrote:
My eldest was born just a few weeks before the start of the last olympics so 2012 will always hold a special place in my heart. Indeed, our first family outing was to go and see the olympic torch come by our town.


That's cool - my youngest was born the day the torch came to town (well, Ironbridge). I remember we were having record breaking hot weather at the time.

Author:  Malc [ Tue Aug 09, 2016 21:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

What's going on with the men Kiwi rugby sevens? Lost to Japan, losing to Kenya (although they have just taken the lead)

Author:  Warhead [ Sat Aug 13, 2016 0:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Aaaaaand suddenly we're third on the medals table. Superb win for the cycling pursuit team with a 5th gold for Bradley Wiggins and a great unexpected silver for Bryony Page on the trampoline.

Author:  Malc [ Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Go Mo! Gold Mo!

Author:  Warhead [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 22:45 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Team GB cyclists pretty much shitting over all and sundry at the track, with the odd exception.

Shit! Jason Kenny possibly about to be disqualified for overlapping the derny before it peeled off.

Author:  Dr Zoidberg [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 22:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

He was marginally ahead at the white line, but had the Derny left by then?

Author:  Warhead [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 22:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Whew! That was close. Let's hope there are no further fuck-ups.

Author:  Warhead [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 22:55 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

I spoke too soon. At least it wasn't Kenny this time.

Author:  Bobbyaro [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 22:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

This Olympics is a shambles, why is there no camera on the line?

Author:  Warhead [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 22:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Foreigners running it, innit.

And now they're blaming the derny pilot.

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 23:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

He did it

Author:  Warhead [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 23:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Third time lucky. What a ride. Go Kenny, 6th Gold.

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 23:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

How fast will their kids be. :)

Author:  DavPaz [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 23:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Jesus, kid! You're 2! How can you not ride a bike yet?

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 23:55 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Laura Trott :luv:

Author:  Mimi [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 8:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Watching the Olympics, one thing that stands out in the gymnastics Isctgat the men's and women's competitions appear to be further apart from each other than ever before. Obviously they are comprised of different apparatus disciplines, but even in those that cross over both the men's and women's competitions, such as the floor routine, the difference is stark. The men's routine is a matter of fact show of skill and power. It's amazing. If anything, the women's skill at tumbling is even more spectacular to watch, but it's broken up with so much flourish now that they are like prancing dressage ponies. Bum wiggles and a flash of pearly whites, even a theatrical wink. Dance elements have been present for years, but it's like half of the competitors are on Miss World. It seems less about a display of grace and firm, and more about flirty sexual allure.

Add to this the costumes. The men's plainish but functional wear is so different from the sequinned, glittery costumes of the women. One Canadisn girl's leotard was cut so high on the hip that it showed more of her public line than I'd ever want to see in a sports contest, not because it is unattractive, but because it's a shame to think that these athletes should be judged even a tiny bit on beauty (not of form but dress, sexual allure and make up) than the absolutely mind-blowing skill they are there to demonstrate.

And the make-up! Some of them look like they've been done up with Homer's make up gun, set to 'Barbara Cartland'. Big glittery blue eyeshadow, FAKE EYELASHES, bright dis his lips. Again, it's not the aesthetic that bothers me so much, but the fact that these athletes feel the need to paint themselves line dolls, and there is no way that false eyelashes are practical in a gymnastics arena. I've never seen so much make up worn as in this competition.

On a positive note, there's a much wider range of body shapes in the female competition than ever before. There was a standard body shape that Svetlana Khorkina alone, 16 years or so ago, broke with her extremely tall, lithe frame. Now there are tall, short, very slight and very much more muscly and string powerhouse body shapes, and it brings a degree of variety to performance style.

Author:  DavPaz [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:28 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

It's not just the gymnasts that wear makeup though. The footballers, hockey players and even the rugby girls are dolled up to the nines. I think it's a shame that they feel the need to.

Author:  KovacsC [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

DavPaz wrote:
It's not just the gymnasts that wear makeup though. The footballers, hockey players and even the rugby girls are dolled up to the nines. I think it's a shame that they feel the need to.


Some women at my running club wear make up, it is a choice for them.

I just wear eyeliner

Author:  TheVision [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

I did think this last night watching the hockey but then again, if I was to be watched by millions around the world on TV, I'd like to look my best too.

Author:  devilman [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Mimi wrote:
One Canadisn girl's leotard was cut so high on the hip that it showed more of her public line than I'd ever want to see in a sports contest


'public' seems both the wrong and right word in this sentence. :)

Author:  myp [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:38 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

DavPaz wrote:
It's not just the gymnasts that wear makeup though. The footballers, hockey players and even the rugby girls are dolled up to the nines. I think it's a shame that they feel the need to.

Some of the girls in my softball team do. As long as they are doing it for themselves and not because they feel they have to, that's fine.

Of course you never know.

Author:  KovacsC [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Lonewolves wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
It's not just the gymnasts that wear makeup though. The footballers, hockey players and even the rugby girls are dolled up to the nines. I think it's a shame that they feel the need to.

Some of the girls in my softball team do. As long as they are doing it for themselves and not because they feel they have to, that's fine.

Of course you never know.


They are not doing it for you my little bearded friend :)

Author:  markg [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:55 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

It's not just the women. Look at the state of the male competitors, they look like they spend every waking minute at the gym. Vain twats.

Author:  MaliA [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:57 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

And in between times, the finest physical specimens of humanity spend it knobbing each other. I hate them all.

Author:  DavPaz [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:01 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

markg wrote:
It's not just the women. Look at the state of the male competitors, they look like they spend every waking minute at the gym. Vain twats.

That Japanese gymnast with the bouffant hair and perfect makeup... Phwoar, he was fit

Author:  Cras [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

markg wrote:
It's not just the women. Look at the state of the male competitors, they look like they spend every waking minute at the gym. Vain twats.


:DD

Author:  Mimi [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 12:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

There's no way to know if the women are doing it for themselves, but the fact that in the space of a few years the competition has gone from bare skin or very minimal makeup to glitter eyeshadow and false eyelashes being pretty much universal perhaps suggests that the competitors feel the need to, unless that generation of athlete is very different from preceding ones?

And I'm skeptical it is for themselves simply because it is impractical. Sweating with make up causes blocked pores, but things like glitter eyeshadow and false lashes? You're about to somersault on a piece of leather wrapped wood and metal, four inches wide. Really, don't get glitter or an errant false lash in your eye...

It's not just basic make up, some look like painted dolls. And are the bum wiggles and theatrical winks for the performers themselves? Maybe they are, but as a spectator I just wish that this window dressing didn't detract from the mind-blowing amounts of skill and hard work of the tumbling and apparatus work itself. In that regards, I wish it were closer to the men's competition.

This is just one of the gymnasts. She's not got the false eyelashes, but she has bright blue glitter all over her eyes.

Author:  KovacsC [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 13:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Just had a quick look at the 1996 photos for gymnastics.

Looks like the uniforms and make up are similar to now.

Author:  MaliA [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 13:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

KovacsC wrote:
Just had a quick look at the 1996 photos for gymnastics.

Looks like the uniforms and make up are similar to now.


"Researching a book"

Author:  KovacsC [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 13:33 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Yes...

Shall we work on it together?

Author:  Mimi [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 13:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Really? I've just read-checked and I simply don't see that at all. Obviously I am not talking about the Rhythmic gymnast disciplines which are a different thing all together.

Author:  KovacsC [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 13:53 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

http://makeuppix.com/2014/08/17/olympic+gymnasts+makeup

There is a web site... google are going to have a field day with my search history

Author:  Mimi [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 14:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

That website does not give a counterpoint to anything I've said, though. There's one picture of a Brazillian gymnast with colourful eye make up that is perhaps close to today's gymnasts, but it is only from a couple of years ago and the article says that the make up should be natural and not detract from the performance, adding (note:Brazil).

Also, even if it had been the case for 20, 50, 100 years, it doesn't in anyway detract room the fact that there is a massive gulf between how practical the men's and women's costumes are and that glitter and fake eyelashes around the eyes are both impractical and (potentially) dangerous if either were to get into the eye mid-performance. The sequins and glitter are a lot more prevalent in gymnastics than, say, marathon running, though both are sports that highlight the human body's amazing abilities at extremes. Endurance of the runner, precision, flexibility and strength of the gymnast.

Author:  KovacsC [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 14:15 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

It was from 1996 wasn't it? so quite a while ago.

I suppose it is the same in ballroom dancing.

The marathon kit is designed to wick, to get rig of sweat. The gym kit not so much

Author:  devilman [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 14:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Mimi wrote:
The sequins and glitter are a lot more prevalent in gymnastics than, say, marathon running, though both are sports that highlight the human body's amazing abilities at extremes. Endurance of the runner, precision, flexibility and strength of the gymnast.


Even it up by adding sequins and glitter to all the events. :)

Author:  MaliA [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 14:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: Limpics

Speaking of sports clothing and accessories, you cannot beat Super Mario, such as turning up dressed as Julius Caesar, or a tiger. Or a flayed petson. Or smoking. Or making phone calls whilst competing.

Page 2 of 7 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/