Having characters from the Avengers films in does not an Avengers film make. It's thematically different and pits them against each other, rather than together versus a common foe. A subtle but important difference.

(unless it's some five hour long saga, which it'll never be)

It's in two parts for a reason.

(Money)

I really enjoyed BP. Nice to see a well thought out super hero film, that was not saving the galaxy

Like every other recent superhero film beside Guardians of the Galaxy 2?

Edit: Nope, turns out that was just life on some planets.

Ok, slight exaggeration.

I liked BP as it was smaller, the threat was more intimate.

RE: Black Panther, I did sort of wonder why Killlmonger spent all that time working with Klaue only to up and murder him at the last minute. He could've killed him at pretty much any time and presented him to Wakanda as proof of his worthiness so why work with him for so long then turn round and kill him at that precise moment?

I think the idea was that he needed T'Challa to fail to apprehend him to sow the seed of discontent amongst the Wakandans.

It was a bit hamfisted though.

They all already considered it a massive failure of his father to not capture him; he'd have been better taking out Klaue much earlier and off challenging the old king over it.

ETA: And ultimately it was his position as royal family member that meant the challenge was allowed to go ahead so Klaue's death was arguably pointless.

My one, 'huh' moment was when the reinforcements turned up in the final battle... like, they're fighting in a massive open space (yes, rocks and mountains, but you've got sightlines for miles in each direction), where the fuck were they hiding?

See also: the part in The Dark Knight where the Joker gatecrashes Bruce's party for Harvey Dent.

Noted and edited.

I've not seen Black Panther. Does that matter a lot?

I've not seen:
Ant-Man
Doctor Strange
Thor Ragnarok
Black Panther