Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 6503 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 ... 131  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 12:27 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
"Oh, so you say you like Europe? Name three albums by them, then."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 15:24 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
MrChris wrote:
But it's all fine because FTSE100.

I think we can all agree that is the very best metric to judge a country by and much more important than irrelevant piffle like the child poverty rate or number of people who have to use a food back so they can eat dinner. Far more important to optimise for board members and shareholders of the biggest companies so their table has more crumbs to spare for the 99%.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 15:48 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
GazChap wrote:
Cavey wrote:
It matters a lot more that we have nearly 4 million people more in work than 2010;

Even if the work they're doing is paying so little that they can't afford to live comfortably?

Quote:
Yes, food bank use is terrible (and I'm personally doing a lot about it, a lot more than many people here I would wager, and I mean in time, as well as money terms)

Good for you - you almost certainly do more than I do about it, and for that you should be applauded, of course. The point is, however, is that there shouldn't need to be any food banks. It's 2017, we're (supposedly) one of the world's greatest economies, and you continue to "bang the drum" about how well the country's doing.

So when are the little people going to start seeing some of that benefit? Because I see and hear about an awful lot of situations where those who need help are not getting it, while those who don't need help continue to get richer.

Quote:
but do you honestly see lower levels of deprivation in Europe, or the USA? Bullshit you do, and Germany excepted, the former has 10-22% unemployment, not 4%. I travel widely in Europe on business, and I see massive levels of deprivation, breaks my heart! Open your eyes, eh?

Why is any of this relevant? I don't mean this to sound heartless, as obviously deprivation is horrible wherever you go, but of course I don't see deprivation elsewhere - I rarely leave the UK except on holiday jollies where, by definition, I'm unlikely to come across that stuff. I'm one of the lucky ones.

*BUT*, what I do see in this country is a rapidly increasing amount of homelessness, food bank usage, massive strain on public services and just general shittiness. But woop-de-do, the rich corporations continue to get richer and are confident about the future.

To put it another way, let's say you volunteered to hand out food at a local food bank - you may do this already, and again, more power to you if you do. Would you try and convince people using the food bank that actually, things are alright because the FTSE100/250 is at record highs, we have the highest employment rates and lowest unemployment rates (not sure why you separate those out when one implies the other, but whatever) and our manufacturing output is booming?

Didn't think so.

//edit: 37% percent of children will be brought up below the poverty line.
Quote:
Soon more British children will be poor than since records began, back in 1961.

Quote:
More people are in work than for many a year – but never in modern times have so many been paid so relatively little, with families still poor and reliant on benefits even when both parents work


I'm sorry, whether by wilfully perverse choice or simply an inability to assimilate and absorb information that's contrary to your deeply seated belief-system, Gaz, you're simply not getting it, and I find myself repeating myself for the umpteenth time, man it's so tedious.

You talk about food banks (and at least graciously concede that I personally do far more about them than you do, and probably pretty much everyone else here), and their tragically rising use as if in some ridiculous vacuum, and as if:-

(1) Similar levels of deprivation (much worse actually, with massively higher - at least double - levels of unemployment) aren't happening in *Europe*, i.e. within the EU (the very organisation you espouse, and our leaving it is somehow removing some safety net when manifestly none exists now, here as elsewhere)

(2) Things were somehow so much better in either the distant or indeed recent past; as if somehow there was some Golden Age where poverty and gross inequity did not exist in the UK (2008, 2009, 2010 under Labour ring any bells?), or indeed in Europe or the US.

It's just all so naive, and no matter how many times stuff gets pointed out like this, there's this dumbassed, unyielding, default "well your just an evil [toree/capitalist scum] who doesn't care people are using food banks111", like as if very moderate Centrists and Patrician Tories like me, who by even your own admission get off our armchairs and into Round Table, Church and/or other charity actions to make a huge financial and more importantly human kindness improvement for people, directly at the coal face as it were.

You're also catastrophically missing the point I am making. I am NOT (repeat, NOT) suggesting that Brexit, even as it is currently unfolding, is good, merely that it is nowhere near as bad, so far, as has been predicted, and actually - by any measurable metric (number of people working, number of unemployed, business confidence, manufacturing output and investment, GDP growth, inflation, interest rates, FTSE100, FTSE250 etc.) - the UK is doing *well*, and therefore in no sense deserving of all the increasingly absurd, bitter, supremely resentful doom merchant/grievance-chimpery crap that's repeated here and elsewhere, like somehow people are willing things to go wrong. Well, sorry, mock me all you like (just as I assuredly mock you), but that's not where I am at; I like to look at realtime information and I reserve the right to amend or outright change opinions where this is appropriate, in the face of actual facts unfolding and hard data. There are no sacred cows for me, I have absolutely no time for it.

Your argument, aside from its frankly dishonest dual premise that things are somehow better and more socially equitable across the Channel in most of our comparably sized EU peer States (or indeed in the US), or that there was hitherto some Golden Age in the UK for that matter, also totally ignores the fact that things ARE getting much better for a huge proportion of the working population. Instead of endlessly looking at extremes and outerliers as those of your ilk obsessively - and exclusively - do, presumably in ever more desperate attempts to fuel eons-held, unyielding political grievances, may I invite you to remove the blinkers just for a minute and understand that, with 4 million more people working and an economy that's grown every quarter pretty much for 7 years, with the value of British business increased four-fold and manufacturing in rude health, the best for a generation, this IS going to mean improved prosperity for median and upper quartiles in particular. I cannot even recognise the business climate now, as compared to even 5 years ago, and in fact I would go so far as to say "we've never had it so good". Bear in mind, that we are a tiny little Engineering consultancy (In the North of England), hardly some giant PLC. If you're prepared to work, the work is there, now, where there was precious little before.

Of course, though, it's just so much easier to ignore the inconvenient truths of all those economic parameters that I mention, whether it's manufacturing output, levels of investment or confidence, unemployment lowest for more than four decades, employment highest ever, FTSE100 and FTSE250 etc., just because there ARE still bad things which must be dealt with (social inequity, but ignoring this has always been there) - and just cling ONLY to the bad stuff, totally ignoring all the good, at all costs. Apart from being absurd, it must be so miserable. If your benchmark for success is a never before achieved economic and social Utopia, then guess what Gaz: you are going to have one disappointed political outlook my son. (Guess what also: if you're so, so disappointed with all this manufacturing renaissance, record unemployment and GDP/FTSE growth etc., well, my word, you would be REALLY PISSED with a few years of Corbyn.... or would you? Maybe you would do what you do now in reverse; refuse to see the sacking of Rome as it were, because, heck, such swivel-eyed Socialism is *your* football team? :shrug: )

As for your final point about me saying stuff about the FTSE100/250 in the food bank, and my not doing so somehow proves jack shit, well that's a very weak effort. No, I wouldn't talk about why I think people resort to using food banks to those people, I just lend them a helping hand and tinned goods, stuff that they need. But I *do* talk about this kind of thing in the Politics debate thread on Beex, because you know (and difficult as it is to believe), I have some vain hope that amongst all the snarking and years out of date cut and pasted graphs idiocy etc., there may yet be decent, intelligent discussion to be had, like back in the day. But then that's me I guess: an optimist... ;)

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 15:56 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
TheCookie197 wrote:
Cavey wrote:
FTSE100 and FTSE250 both at record highs this morning, and both sharply up. Again. Highest employment levels ever and still rising. Lowest unemployment for 40 years and still falling. Historically low inflation and interest rates. Manufacturing on a high, with 15 consecutive growth periods, trending still further upwards.


Oh? At record highs this morning because the pound dropped yesterday after the BoE announcement

From the bottom of that article:
Quote:
The FTSE 100 index of the UK’s biggest public companies finished the day up 0.9 per cent at 7,555.32.

Due to a majority of the companies in the index having a large share of revenues in foreign currency, it tends to rise when the pound falls.


You know I hate to spoil the grievance-fest here, but actually the Pound was rock solid steady the entire day, the FTSE100 rose and the FTSE250 positively rocketed nearly 100-points by Friday close, so quite where all this sits in your whining 'analysis' is anyone's guess.

I'm no photographer, but it's like one of those light filters those guys use. Not some much 'rose tinted' as 'shit tinted', where even hard, irrefutable economic facts such as record low unemployment, soaring markets, rampant manufacturing must appear completely different, or not at all. It's really weird!

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 16:00 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
MrChris wrote:
But it's all fine because FTSE100.


You demean yourself, sir.
I expect this from some quarters, but not you.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 16:35 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
MrChris wrote:
But it's all fine because FTSE100.

I think we can all agree that is the very best metric to judge a country by and much more important than irrelevant piffle like the child poverty rate or number of people who have to use a food back so they can eat dinner. Far more important to optimise for board members and shareholders of the biggest companies so their table has more crumbs to spare for the 99%.



... Whereas conversely, at least with trolling, there are no pesky graphs to cut and paste.

:DD

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 20:47 

Joined: 23rd Sep, 2010
Posts: 729
Cavey wrote:
You know I hate to spoil the grievance-fest here, but actually the Pound was rock solid steady the entire day, the FTSE100 rose and the FTSE250 positively rocketed nearly 100-points by Friday close, so quite where all this sits in your whining 'analysis' is anyone's guess.

I'm no photographer, but it's like one of those light filters those guys use. Not some much 'rose tinted' as 'shit tinted', where even hard, irrefutable economic facts such as record low unemployment, soaring markets, rampant manufacturing must appear completely different, or not at all. It's really weird!


Sorry, but where did you find that it was "rock solid"? From what I've seen the pound dropped substantially on the 2nd of November, the day before the FTSE opened at "record highs", as can be seen here.

Am I misunderstanding the graph? If I am incorrect then I apologise, as that was not my intention.
I suppose if you are referring to its stability on the 3rd, surely the rise of stocks over the day can be attributed to the market re-balancing after the sharp drop of the pound the day before?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:56 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/ ... 6300947457




Quote:
BT CEO Patterson tells Cbi conf if transition Brexit deal isn't agreed by Jan, businesses like his will start activating "hard Brexit" plans

“need to get more certainty/clarity on transition or we’ll need start implementing hard brexit contingency and that won’t be good” #cbi2017


Reminder that Brexit hasn't happened yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 13:09 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14142
Location: Shropshire, UK
You appear to be missing my point, Cavey. I'm not suggesting that all of the stuff you're talking about is bad, that's obviously not true - unemployment being at it's lowest in ages is obviously a good thing, and economic growth and stockmarket growth is obviously good as well.

The problem is that, as Doc alludes to above, is that that's a fucking shit way of measuring relative prosperity. It might be the only way, although I find that hard to believe, but it doesn't stop it being any less shit. More people being in work doesn't mean a thing if more and more people aren't able to find two pennies to rub together. The problem, as always, is that the rich get richer and the poorer get poorer. Interest rates going up might be good for some people, but for many (possibly a majority?) it's going to cause no end of problems and increase poverty further.

I've deliberately avoided bringing party politics into it as much as possible as it's not really a party issue, it's a systemic issue really, I think (and I thought this was the politics thread when I posted above, didn't realise it was the Brexit thread - I'm not blaming any of this on Brexit)

The Tories certainly aren't helping matters, but I'm not convinced that it'd be all sunflowers and rose petals if it had been Labour in charge for the last 7 years either.

I don't know what the answer is either, but it just rubs me up the wrong way when you (and other people I talk to, don't think I'm singling you out :P) use metrics like that when those metrics really are, in my view at least, missing the bigger picture.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 22:51 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17767
Location: Oxford
Looks like the government are churning out all the classic excuses for not handing in their homework:

BBC wrote:
In a letter to Labour MP Hillary Benn, he [David Davis] said the analysis ranged from "very high level overarching" work to specific examinations "of certain product lines in specific sectors".

But, he added "it is not, nor has it ever been, a series of discrete impact assessments examining the quantitative impact of Brexit on these sectors".

"Given the above, it will take my department - and other departments, since this work draws on inputs from across government - time to collate and bring together this information in a way that it accessible and informative for the committee," he added.

Link

The Speaker's given them until tomorrow night to either come up with the goods or a decent excuse.

Oh David Davis. You used to be a fiery champion of freedom of information, civil liberties, and opponent of poor administration.What a disappointment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:33 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17767
Location: Oxford
The most interesting thing about this farrago, other than watching a government and country undergo an intense and lengthy session of BDSM, is that we're learning so much about all aspects of government and running a country or modern economy that most of us wouldn't have even considered or given a moment's thought on.

Yesterday the House of Lords held a short exchange on how the UK's territorial seas and how they might be patrolled come the glorious day. Admittedly, the former First Sea Lord wasn't particularly optimistic:

Lord West wrote:
Is the Minister willing to look at setting up some group to co-ordinate that study so that we have a snowball’s chance in hell of looking after the waters for which we are responsible?


The Commons, meanwhile, had a short debate on the EEA/EFTA option, with Stephen Kinnock and Anne Soubry both making interesting speeches


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 15:14 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
I see today that David Davis has moved on from his assertion that studies have been performed that cover 85% of the economy, to admitting that they haven’t actually done that and they just lied and hoped nobody would ask.

The City is currently operating with cautious optimism as it expects that there will be a deal made that looks something like Norway, but at this point the government is looking so hopelessly incompetent that I just don’t know.

As someone on Twitter put it, there are so many cabinet members who should resign today, but they keep getting in the way of each other like the Three Stooges trying to get through a door.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 15:21 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17767
Location: Oxford
Curiosity wrote:
I see today that David Davis has moved on from his assertion that studies have been performed that cover 85% of the economy, to admitting that they haven’t actually done that and they just lied and hoped nobody would ask.


This is a joke, right? Whenever I re-read this thread I find it hard to tell when I was being sarcastic and when I was being serious. So we have a referendum with no plan for leaving, activate the leaving protocol with no plan, have an election with no plan, and now don't even have the plans we said we had? Does nobody in this administration feel the slightest bit of shame?

Quote:
As someone on Twitter put it, there are so many cabinet members who should resign today, but they keep getting in the way of each other like the Three Stooges trying to get through a door.


:DD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 15:22 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48640
Location: Cheshire
MaliA wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
If the brexiteers surveyed there are correct, there's no reason not to release the DExEU impact assessments. So even David Davis thinks they are wrong.


I don't think there are any. I have little confidence they were done.

If they do exist, a leak will be on the way, surely?



These ones weren't done?

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 15:24 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17767
Location: Oxford
They're with Lord Lucan.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 15:25 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Kern wrote:
This is a joke, right? Whenever I re-read this thread I find it hard to tell when I was being sarcastic and when I was being serious. So we have a referendum with no plan for leaving, activate the leaving protocol with no plan, have an election with no plan, and now don't even have the plans we said we had? Does nobody in this administration feel the slightest bit of shame?

https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/statu ... 3615109127




Incredible, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 15:30 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48640
Location: Cheshire
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Kern wrote:
This is a joke, right? Whenever I re-read this thread I find it hard to tell when I was being sarcastic and when I was being serious. So we have a referendum with no plan for leaving, activate the leaving protocol with no plan, have an election with no plan, and now don't even have the plans we said we had? Does nobody in this administration feel the slightest bit of shame?

https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/statu ... 3615109127




Incredible, right?



Fucking hell

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 15:34 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17767
Location: Oxford
"57 varieties? Who do they think we are, Heinz ketchup?"

(c) the Now Show, this Friday. Probably.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 15:46 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Kern wrote:
"57 varieties? Who do they think we are, Heinz ketchup?"

(c) the Now Show, this Friday. Probably.


It always amazes me that they just adopted that as a slogan/marketing device in the late 1890s, despite already having more than 57 varieties of product at the time, because the dude in charge liked how it sounded.

Obv they now have thousands of varieties.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 23:09 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/ ... 3049744385


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 23:50 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
If this was in an episode of Yes, Minister then you’d laugh, but you’d also think they’d gone a bit too far, especially with having at least two cabinet ministers sacked/resign in the same week, with the Foreign Secretary under fire for being a massively incompetent fuckwit who should also resign before he causes any more damage.

Still, strong and stable.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 23:51 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
But look at the alternative. We can't have Marxists running the country, spending all the money on services and infrastructure etc.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 23:51 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Imagine the chaos we'd have if Ed Milliband had won, Curio!


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 0:16 
Filthy Junkie Bitch

Joined: 17th Dec, 2008
Posts: 8293
So old fashioned with David Cameron


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 0:44 
User avatar
Noob as of 6/8/10

Joined: 6th Aug, 2010
Posts: 5310
Location: , Location, Location.
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/928002263049744385

Just 13 days ago, David Davis says the impact assessments were in such "excruciating detail" that the PM couldn't possibly have read them. You know, the ones that today don't exist.


Just following Trump's lead. Doesn't matter what was said previously, what we say NOW is the truth...... until we change it again. (No one will notice, obviously.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:40 
User avatar
Rude Belittler

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5016
4% unemployment? Do me a lemon. 5-6% is considered "full employment" ie "everyone who wants a job can get a job".

If it was 4% unemployment, wages would be trending upwards. Labour would be a seller's market.

Guess what? Wages are stagnant.

I reckon the real unemployment figures would be much higher. Like 15-22%. Where have I heard those figures before? I dunno.

In other words, the ONS are cooking the books. As usual.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:53 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48640
Location: Cheshire
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/928002263049744385

Just 13 days ago, David Davis says the impact assessments were in such "excruciating detail" that the PM couldn't possibly have read them. You know, the ones that today don't exist.


heh

Heh.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:05 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17767
Location: Oxford
A minister from DExEU in the Commons, yesterday:

Steve Baker wrote:
I think that the public will look at Labour Members today, look at what they are asking for, look at the kind of narrative they are trying to create, and ask, “Whose side are they on?”


I despair.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:10 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Pundabaya wrote:
If it was 4% unemployment, wages would be trending upwards. Labour would be a seller's market.

Guess what? Wages are stagnant.
...

In other words, the ONS are cooking the books. As usual.

Well, ONS actually agree with you that wages are flat: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlab ... ngs/latest ("real" figures there are inflation adjusted, so are the ones you want to look at.)

No idea why wages wouldn't go up if unemployment was so low. Seems like, as you say, competion for labour in an efficient market should increase them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:11 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Kern wrote:
A minister from DExEU in the Commons, yesterday:

Steve Baker wrote:
I think that the public will look at Labour Members today, look at what they are asking for, look at the kind of narrative they are trying to create, and ask, “Whose side are they on?”


I despair.

bloody hellfire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:30 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17767
Location: Oxford
I'm increasingly concerned that as the Tories and the Brexit mob struggle to keep afloat, they're going to take more and more ideas from the US Republicans' playbook and exacerbate divisions by using such language and probably bringing in more dog-whistle anti-establishment crap. I really don't think that would be good for our country or our political system.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:32 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17767
Location: Oxford
In other Brexit news, the head of NHS England is reportedly going to bring back the bus today. I'm sure Mr Johnson and Mr Gove, amongst others, will be delighted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:01 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48640
Location: Cheshire
Kern wrote:
I'm increasingly concerned that as the Tories and the Brexit mob struggle to keep afloat, they're going to take more and more ideas from the US Republicans' playbook and exacerbate divisions by using such language and probably bringing in more dog-whistle anti-establishment crap. I really don't think that would be good for our country or our political system.


I'm inclined to agree with you. There's no longer any debate, it's people shouting and shouting and shouting and there's no reason, just agendas. For or against, and so on and so forth.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:09 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Kern wrote:
A minister from DExEU in the Commons, yesterday:

Steve Baker wrote:
I think that the public will look at Labour Members today, look at what they are asking for, look at the kind of narrative they are trying to create, and ask, “Whose side are they on?”


I despair.

bloody hellfire

Can someone ELI5?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:18 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48640
Location: Cheshire
Grim... wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Kern wrote:
A minister from DExEU in the Commons, yesterday:

Steve Baker wrote:
I think that the public will look at Labour Members today, look at what they are asking for, look at the kind of narrative they are trying to create, and ask, “Whose side are they on?”


I despair.

bloody hellfire

Can someone ELI5?


He's pissed off the opposition are oppositioning, been caught in a tricky position regarding the assessments of this folly, so decides that attacking the opposition is a Good Thing

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:55 
User avatar
Rude Belittler

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5016
Oh, lookie here

http://uk.businessinsider.com/unemployment-in-the-uk-is-now-so-low-its-in-danger-of-exposing-the-lie-used-to-create-the-numbers-2017-7


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:48 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Also the whole idea that you're on the side of The British People or you're not. And you're not the opposition, you're traitors to The British People.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:51 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 1982
"It's great that unemployment has now reached -6%!" :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:52 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Cras wrote:
Also the whole idea that you're on the side of The British People or you're not. And you're not the opposition, you're traitors to The British People.

Quite. It's the "Enemies Of The People" Daily Mail headline, but being spoken by an MP about other MPs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 15:39 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48640
Location: Cheshire
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Pundabaya wrote:
If it was 4% unemployment, wages would be trending upwards. Labour would be a seller's market.

Guess what? Wages are stagnant.
...

In other words, the ONS are cooking the books. As usual.

Well, ONS actually agree with you that wages are flat: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlab ... ngs/latest ("real" figures there are inflation adjusted, so are the ones you want to look at.)

No idea why wages wouldn't go up if unemployment was so low. Seems like, as you say, competion for labour in an efficient market should increase them.


In my experience, staff retention in unskilled work is a problem at present, especially due to the living wage and an abundance of jobs.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 16:09 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Have you considered paying more?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 16:53 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48640
Location: Cheshire
It's not a MaliA specific problem, it seems to be across manufacturing.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 17:00 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
I'm not being flippant, I'm genuinely asking: why aren't wages rising to fix this?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 17:14 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48640
Location: Cheshire
Agency workers, I guess.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 17:32 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
But why? If unemployment is as low as claimed, employers should be competing for skilled staff. Retention should go up, and wages should rise. But it isn't happening. Employers are happily paying the same wages they were 5 years ago. So they're obviously finding applicants. So if unemployment is so low where are all these people happy to work for a pittance coming from?

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 17:34 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Hi!

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 20:59 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Cras wrote:
But why? If unemployment is as low as claimed, employers should be competing for skilled staff. Retention should go up, and wages should rise. But it isn't happening. Employers are happily paying the same wages they were 5 years ago. So they're obviously finding applicants. So if unemployment is so low where are all these people happy to work for a pittance coming from?


Removal of safety nets meaning poverty work is still preferable to no work?

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:41 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41923765

Quote:
EU sources close to the negotiations have told me they believe the UK has only two weeks left to make progress on the Brexit divorce issues.
...
Because that is when the 27 EU capitals start discussing the draft conclusions to the leaders' summit which takes place mid-December. They need those two weeks to more or less agree a position.

"And there's no way they'll agree to talk trade or transition with the UK in December, if the money issue hasn't been put to bed beforehand. Forget it," a high-level contact told me.

"Then the Brexit situation becomes dramatic."

Because if the December summit comes and goes, the earliest talks of a future EU-UK relationship could start would be at the next EU leaders summit in March 2018.

Far too late for businesses on both sides of the Channel which are desperate for some clarity.

March 2018 would also be one year after the UK triggered Article 50 - the formal process to leave the EU.

And it's six months from the time the EU wants to formally close Brexit negotiations in order to be able to vote on any agreement reached.


When you put it that way, that's a pretty tight timetable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:46 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
I'm trying to imagine May successfully selling the country on an agreement to pay a €60bn divorce bill in the next two weeks. It's not going very well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Taking the Brexit
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:50 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16557
Maybe she hammered something out with her boss at his banquet last night.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 6503 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 ... 131  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: markg and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.