Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

Political Banter and Debate Thread
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10024
Page 226 of 287

Author:  Kern [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Quite possibly the worst defence of an underage sex scandal I've come across.

Quote:
Alabama's state auditor Jim Zeigler came under fire on Thursday for his remarks defending Mr Moore.
He was quoted as saying that even if the Washington Post report were true, "it's much ado about very little".
Mr Zeigler told the Washington Times newspaper: "Also take Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus.

BBC

Ray Moore is not the Messiah, he's just a very naughty boy.

Author:  Mr Dave [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

The sad thing is that he could probably admit it, and he'd still get the votes because he's not a democrat.

Alabama...

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

https://twitter.com/KEBrightbill/status ... 0679859200




Very good Twitter thread at why American evangelical Christians are just fine with this stuff.

Author:  MaliA [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:33 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

As we talked about a while back, on
past things being pulled up.

Author:  GazChap [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

One of our local Tory MPs is again facing a backlash after being caught lying (again) about not being invited to several Remembrance services being held by the (Labour) unitary authority.

Author:  Cras [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

That's not so much mendacious as just plain dumb

Author:  Mr Dave [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:18 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Cras wrote:
That's not so much mendacious as just plain dumb

Or relies on PAUL to tell her things like this and didn't get told.
And daftly didn't check before getting stupidly OUTRAGED.

Author:  Kern [ Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:36 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Looks like Mugabe's on his way out.

Author:  markg [ Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Booted out or swinging from a lamp post out?

Author:  Mr Russell [ Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
Booted out or swinging from a lamp post out?

"Bloodless transition".

He's 93.

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Unsure. Army playing it coy it seems at present.

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Nov 15, 2017 15:28 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Equality News Hour!

Quote:
SHIPLEY MP Philip Davies said men and women should be treated the same when they commit a crime.

He said a crime was the same regardless who committed it and there was no justification for treating people differently based on their sex. ...He said: “It is fair to say that I am often pilloried for arguing that men and women should be treated equally.

"I do not see that there is anything particularly controversial in that, but it never ceases to amaze me how often I am accused of being a misogynist, sexist, or some other term of abuse, merely for saying that men and women should be treated equally before the law."

Author:  myp [ Wed Nov 15, 2017 15:47 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Women are treated differently in court because a patriarchal society deems them to be the main caregiver when it comes to children and the judge will think about the children's lives when sentencing. If Davies spent more time trying to smash those misconceptions then everything else would fall into place. He's putting the cart before the horse.

That's being kind to him really. He's actually a disingenuous cunt.

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Nov 15, 2017 16:28 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

A brief look see suggests that "Main carer/has caring responsibilities " was used by 30% of women, and 9% of men, in cases of theft, dishonesty or fraud during a study period.

Author:  Kern [ Fri Nov 17, 2017 15:47 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MPs to slam door in woman's face.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Sat Nov 18, 2017 17:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

The ever-excellent Michael Deacon
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11 ... easy-tips/

Quote:
On Wednesday, the Chancellor Philip Hammond is expected to use his Budget to help young people get on the property ladder. But should this really be the responsibility of the State? Isn’t there more that the young could do to solve their problems themselves?

Here we present seven simple tips for millennials on how to buy a house.

Be born earlier. All too many young people today didn’t get round to being born until the late 1980s, or even the 1990s. As a result of their tardiness, they were much too late to take advantage of low house prices. Those who had the foresight to be born in the 1950s and 60s, by contrast, have been justly rewarded for their “get-up-and-go”. If you were born too late, be sure not to make the same mistake again.

Inherit wealth. Inheriting wealth is an excellent way to pay for that first big deposit. Increasing numbers of young people, however, commit the textbook error of growing up in a poor family. Carry out a detailed assessment of your parents’ income. If it’s less than £250,000 per annum, are you sure they’re the right parents for you? Shop around for the best deal. Ideally, look for parents approaching retirement with no other offspring and a medium-sized buy-to-let portfolio.

Make sacrifices. To help you save for a deposit, avoid wasting money on trivial inessentials, such as foreign holidays, new iPhones, nights out, taxis, coffees, takeaways, alcohol, clothing, heating, rent and food.

Make your savings work harder. With interest rates low, high street banks are currently delivering little for savers. Instead, try funnelling £20million into an offshore tax haven.

Boost your earning power. Struggling financially? Consider making some extra cash on the side by becoming a 1960s rock star, Russian oligarch, chief executive of Walmart or monarch.

Club together. If you don’t have enough money to buy a property on your own, think about buying jointly. A two-bed flat in London Zone 4 should be well within your reach if you pool resources with just 60 of your closest friends.

Be patient. Remember that property prices can fall as well as rise. At some point in the next 18-24 months, an economic disaster of unimaginable magnitude should bring houses down to a much more affordable level – and, thanks to your youth and superior physical fitness, you’ll be in an excellent position to fight off competitors in the desperate looting of banks, supermarkets and high-street shops. Good luck!

Author:  Kern [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 8:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

The BBC are saying that the Chancellor is going to announce a railcard for those aged 25-30. I'm far too old to benefit but this is on the whole a good thing. I've never understood, however, why we don't just scrap the panoply of cards and just copy Deutsche Bahn's 'Bahncard' scheme, where discounts are available to everyone who has bought a card rather than targeted groups.

Author:  GazChap [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

I don't get it either. The administration costs of looking after this myriad of railcards would surely be saved by just having one.

Author:  myp [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Or cheaper fares.

Author:  MaliA [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:55 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Lonewolves wrote:
Or cheaper fares.


Unionised labour calls for higher wages, doesn't it?

Author:  Kern [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:57 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Lonewolves wrote:
Or cheaper fares.


Or more subsidies.

Author:  DavPaz [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Robot trains.

Obv.

Author:  myp [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MaliA wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
Or cheaper fares.


Unionised labour calls for higher wages, doesn't it?

Let's nationalise it first.

Author:  myp [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Budget deficit widened to £8bn. Safe hands. Strong and stable. Economically wise.

Author:  MaliA [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Lonewolves wrote:
Budget deficit widened to £8bn. Safe hands. Strong and stable. Economically wise.


TAKING BACK CONTROL

Author:  MaliA [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Lonewolves wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
Or cheaper fares.


Unionised labour calls for higher wages, doesn't it?

Let's nationalise it first.


Not against that idea.

Author:  Kern [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Oddly, it's one where I'm on the fence and probably wouldn't make it a priority. The main benefit would be integrating track (already publicly owned) and the services which should improve efficient planning. Of course let's put aside the issue of buying the rolling stock back from the leasing companies.

Public ownership is not going to solve the ageing infrastructure, overcrowding on certain services (unless we move to reservation only services that cause a whole new world of headaches), or fare costs. Train operating companies aren't that profitable so there's not much of a saving there (around 4% return per annum at best). Many fares are regulated, and the franchise system already means that the government sets out what services it wants running over a set number of years. I don't think that putting the railways into the annual budget round is a good idea as you need some form of long termism, but I wouldn't want an arms-length public body to be able to operate without some form of political direction.

But it's an issue I'm continually playing with when I get bored, and I think there are different priorities between long-distance, regional, and local services.

Author:  Grim... [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

I went back to investigate pre-public ticket prices and was surprised to find there wasn't much difference in the cost of my ticket. If the pricing trend then had continued up to 2016 it would only be about 5% less than it is now.

I don't think the rail problem is one you can solve without literally starting a new network.

Author:  MaliA [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:48 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Kern wrote:
Oddly, it's one where I'm on the fence and probably wouldn't make it a priority. The main benefit would be integrating track (already publicly owned) and the services which should improve efficient planning. Of course let's put aside the issue of buying the rolling stock back from the leasing companies.

Public ownership is not going to solve the ageing infrastructure, overcrowding on certain services (unless we move to reservation only services that cause a whole new world of headaches), or fare costs. Train operating companies aren't that profitable so there's not much of a saving there (around 4% return per annum at best). Many fares are regulated, and the franchise system already means that the government sets out what services it wants running over a set number of years. I don't think that putting the railways into the annual budget round is a good idea as you need some form of long termism, but I wouldn't want an arms-length public body to be able to operate without some form of political direction.

But it's an issue I'm continually playing with when I get bored, and I think there are different priorities between long-distance, regional, and local services.


A lot of that sounds like the NHS

Author:  Kern [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:54 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MaliA wrote:
A lot of that sounds like the NHS


I don't get childishly excited waiting in the JR.

Author:  markg [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 12:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

The top and bottom of it is that if you want better trains or healthcare then you need to pay for it. All the rest is a sideshow.

Author:  Cras [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 12:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

I maintain that any industry where competition is impossible should be nationalised, and that very much applies to the railways.

With regard to pricing, you may not get a direct drop in cost, but right now treasury subsidies are basically being turned directly into shareholder profit, and limiting that route indirectly makes the public coffers better off.

Author:  MaliA [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 17:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/ ... of-killing

Rather a sobering read about the state of affairs in Mosul.

Author:  Kern [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 18:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Kern wrote:
Looks like Mugabe's on his way out.


Sic semper tyrannis.

Author:  Kern [ Tue Nov 21, 2017 19:00 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MaliA wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/21/after-the-liberation-of-mosul-an-orgy-of-killing

Rather a sobering read about the state of affairs in Mosul.


Thanks for that. Yes, very sobering

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Remember when we had seven years of grinding austerity, because if we didn't pay back the national debt we were doomed? Good times, good times.

Author:  markg [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:24 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

I'm not a Tory but surely the only bit of that graph which might raise an eyebrow is that last bar. The rest shows the increase in debt levelling off as the deficit was reduced.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:36 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
I'm not a Tory but surely the only bit of that graph which might raise an eyebrow is that last bar. The rest shows the increase in debt levelling off as the deficit was reduced.

It was supposed to do a lot more than just about level off, though. Osborne in 2010:

Quote:
The formal mandate we set is that the structural current deficit should be in balance in the final year of the five-year forecast period, which is 2015-16 in this Budget. This mandate is: Structural – to give us flexibility to respond to external shocks; Current – to protect the most productive public investment; And credible – because the Office for Budget Responsibility, not the Chancellor, will decide on the output gap.

In order to place our fiscal credibility beyond doubt, this mandate will be supplemented by a fixed target for debt, which in this Parliament is to ensure that debt is falling as a share of GDP by 2015-16. I can confirm that, on the basis of the measures to be announced in this Budget, the judgement of the Office for Budget Responsibility published today, is that we are on track to meet these goals.


Year after year, we heard that the pain of austerity -- of welfare cuts, of limited public investment, of public sector pay freezes -- was justified by "paying back our credit card bills." Well, we got the downside, where is the upside?

I increasingly think this is going to turn into an electability crisis for the Tories. Look at this data from Sky. First: "who do you trust to run the economy" across all voters:

Image

Now the same data, broken down by age demographic:

Image

That's pretty dramatic, and I don't think it's a coincidence that those most badly affected by austerity have no confidence in Conservative governance -- combined with a crisis in housing which is entirely bi-partisan but the Conservatives just happen to be in power when the music is stopping so will cop most of the blame. It's quite a hole that Osborne has dug for the party.

Author:  Cavey [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

I was going to post, but really, it’s just all too pathetic for words. I have better things to do with my time than vainly trying to educate the perpetually deluded and/or stupid. Sorry. :)

Author:  Kern [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Cavey wrote:
I have better things to do with my time than vainly trying to educate the perpetually deluded and/or stupid. Sorry. :)


Is that why you're not in Parliament?

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:14 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Part of me hopes Hammond just says "Given for some I don't know why really reason we are leaving the EU, and it is going to negatively impact the economy, we have to prepare ..." and introduce Mega austerity with Mega taxes so people can still enjoy government services provided to the same level but the impact of a brexit means they have to pay for it. And then there are riots and we stay in EU.

Or they just borrow a quajillionbillionty dollars, and invest it all in fracking because does it really make any sense anymore?

Author:  Kern [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

How much of today's budget will be dumped in a week's time?

Author:  myp [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
I'm not a Tory but

This is the new I'm not a racist but. The gentleman doth protest too much!

Author:  markg [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

It's all true. Moggmentum!

Author:  DavPaz [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
It's all true. Moggmentum!

All you NHS types are secret Tories. Admit it!

Author:  markg [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:21 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Definitely. We love them all. Jeremy Hunt is most people's favourite one, though.

Author:  Trousers [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:44 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Cavey wrote:
I was going to post, but really, it’s just all too pathetic for words. I have better things to do with my time than vainly trying to educate the perpetually deluded and/or stupid. Sorry. :)


"You're all too stupid to understand me" is hardly an argument that can be levelled at this forum.

EXCEPT ZARDOZ OBVS.

As regards today's budget I am principally on the look out for further IR35 reforms being rolled out to the private sector effectively ending the industry I currently work in.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 13:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Ahahaaa

https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/ ... 0686605312

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 14:21 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Growth forecasts cut again in the budget. Nice graph with context:

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 14:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Ahahaaa

https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/ ... 0686605312


Image

Page 226 of 287 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/