Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com:443/forum/

Political Banter and Debate Thread
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com:443/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10024
Page 212 of 239

Author:  MrChris [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 15:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MaliA wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
Of course, if souls don't exist and there's no afterlife, what are we but crudely animated sacks of meat?


I have the grace of a gazelle.

Monorail!

Author:  Zardoz [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 15:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
...our consciousness is little more than a rollercoaster ride and free will is an illusion.

Yeah, that whale was totally CG.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 15:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
I don't like teleporters. I subscribe to the theory that teleporters kill you, from the moment you use one you will experience nothing ever again, but nobody else will be able to tell.

It's one of the ways they might work, for sure - scan you down to your atoms, break you down into mulch, and build a new you somewhere else.

The important thing to consider here is that what's stopping it not destroying the original, or building fifty copies? Serious restrictions and rules, I guess, but hackers will get in there eventually.

Also there's the religious angle to consider - if you're dying, what does that mean for, well, practically every religion that exists? Can you teleport a soul?

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 15:42 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

I appear to have missed, well, lots of posts. I'm not entirely sure how.

Author:  devilman [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 15:53 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Grim... wrote:
I appear to have missed, well, lots of posts. I'm not entirely sure how.


Your teleporter seems to do time travel too.

Author:  markg [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 15:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Grim... wrote:
markg wrote:
I don't like teleporters. I subscribe to the theory that teleporters kill you, from the moment you use one you will experience nothing ever again, but nobody else will be able to tell.

It's one of the ways they might work, for sure - scan you down to your atoms, break you down into mulch, and build a new you somewhere else.

The important thing to consider here is that what's stopping it not destroying the original, or building fifty copies? Serious restrictions and rules, I guess, but hackers will get in there eventually.

Imagine if you had a machine in your house and you kept getting spammed with Ed Sheerans.

Author:  Squirt [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 17:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Imagine a horrific real life version of "The Fly" where you and Ed Sheeran accidentally get into a transporter together and your DNA is fused.

Author:  Curiosity [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 18:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Lonewolves wrote:
markg wrote:
I don't like teleporters. I subscribe to the theory that teleporters kill you, from the moment you use one you will experience nothing ever again, but nobody else will be able to tell.

It's a good philosophical question.


In the China Mieville book, 'Kraken', there's a character who has the ability to teleport a la Star Trek, and he is permanently haunted by the ghosts of his dead past selves, as every time he transports it does indeed kill him and build a new 'him'.

Author:  markg [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 19:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

What if that happens every time you fall asleep. If every time your stream of consciousness is broken it ends and then another one takes over just with the same memories. When you go to sleep you actually die.

Author:  Lonewolves [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 19:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
What if that happens every time you fall asleep. If every time your stream of consciousness is broken it ends and then another one takes over just with the same memories. When you go to sleep you actually die.

In the same body?

Author:  Lonewolves [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 19:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Curiosity wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
markg wrote:
I don't like teleporters. I subscribe to the theory that teleporters kill you, from the moment you use one you will experience nothing ever again, but nobody else will be able to tell.

It's a good philosophical question.


In the China Mieville book, 'Kraken', there's a character who has the ability to teleport a la Star Trek, and he is permanently haunted by the ghosts of his dead past selves, as every time he transports it does indeed kill him and build a new 'him'.

Sounds interesting. I may have to read it.

Author:  markg [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 19:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Lonewolves wrote:
markg wrote:
What if that happens every time you fall asleep. If every time your stream of consciousness is broken it ends and then another one takes over just with the same memories. When you go to sleep you actually die.

In the same body?

Yeah, what is individual consciousness except the experience of having had an unbroken stream of experiences, of always having been you. What if every time the activity within the bits of the brain that cause consciousness stops and then starts up again it's like rebooting a computer the actual "you" stopped when you nodded off, then some other identical cunt wakes up the next day with all the same memories utterly convinced that all that stuff happened to them.

Author:  MrChris [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 19:39 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

I do like China Mieville, but haven't read any of his stuff for a while - will give that a go!

Author:  BikNorton [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 19:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Grim... wrote:
I appear to have missed, well, lots of posts. I'm not entirely sure how.

The same way I lost a post yesterday? ”there are new posts, check them!" "Yes yes, post" "here is the thread without your post!"

Author:  DavPaz [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 20:24 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
markg wrote:
What if that happens every time you fall asleep. If every time your stream of consciousness is broken it ends and then another one takes over just with the same memories. When you go to sleep you actually die.

In the same body?

Yeah, what is individual consciousness except the experience of having had an unbroken stream of experiences, of always having been you. What if every time the activity within the bits of the brain that cause consciousness stops and then starts up again it's like rebooting a computer the actual "you" stopped when you nodded off, then some other identical cunt wakes up the next day with all the same memories utterly convinced that all that stuff happened to them.

Giphy "woah":
https://media4.giphy.com/media/3o6ZsWDJzc8NlMG8zm/giphy-loop.mp4

Author:  DavPaz [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 20:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Seriously though, thread split

Author:  Lonewolves [ Wed Jul 26, 2017 20:53 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

markg wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
markg wrote:
What if that happens every time you fall asleep. If every time your stream of consciousness is broken it ends and then another one takes over just with the same memories. When you go to sleep you actually die.

In the same body?

Yeah, what is individual consciousness except the experience of having had an unbroken stream of experiences, of always having been you. What if every time the activity within the bits of the brain that cause consciousness stops and then starts up again it's like rebooting a computer the actual "you" stopped when you nodded off, then some other identical cunt wakes up the next day with all the same memories utterly convinced that all that stuff happened to them.

I'm not sure it matters, effectively. However if my life stops because my atoms have been incinerated and someone else takes over at the other end, that's when I'd be annoyed.

Author:  MaliA [ Thu Jul 27, 2017 12:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

http://www.melaniephillips.com/cruel-ignorant-campaign/

Melanie Phillips on the, frankly, fucking awful Gard case. Worth a read.

Author:  LewieP [ Thu Jul 27, 2017 12:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Freedom of movement to end in March 2019.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/40734504

Author:  MrChris [ Thu Jul 27, 2017 12:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MaliA wrote:
http://www.melaniephillips.com/cruel-ignorant-campaign/

Melanie Phillips on the, frankly, fucking awful Gard case. Worth a read.

Melanie.Phillips.

Author:  Kern [ Thu Jul 27, 2017 12:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MaliA wrote:
http://www.melaniephillips.com/cruel-ignorant-campaign/

Melanie Phillips on the, frankly, fucking awful Gard case. Worth a read.


This. Rare to point people to one of her articles with her, but on this she's spot on.

Author:  Kern [ Thu Jul 27, 2017 12:21 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

LewieP wrote:
Freedom of movement to end in March 2019.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/40734504


I wouldn't be too surprised if the commission Angela Rudd's setting up to look into the matter ends up recommending more-or-less what we've got now, but with token 'controls'.

Author:  MaliA [ Thu Jul 27, 2017 12:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MrChris wrote:
MaliA wrote:
http://www.melaniephillips.com/cruel-ignorant-campaign/

Melanie Phillips on the, frankly, fucking awful Gard case. Worth a read.

Melanie.Phillips.


Yeah. I know. Christ i feel dirtyl

Author:  Curiosity [ Thu Jul 27, 2017 13:24 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MrChris wrote:
I do like China Mieville, but haven't read any of his stuff for a while - will give that a go!


It's only a very minor character, from what I remember.

His best book remains Embassytown, with the Perdido Street Station - Scar - Iron Council 'trilogy' the best after that (IMHO of course).

Author:  MrChris [ Thu Jul 27, 2017 16:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Curiosity wrote:
MrChris wrote:
I do like China Mieville, but haven't read any of his stuff for a while - will give that a go!


It's only a very minor character, from what I remember.

His best book remains Embassytown, with the Perdido Street Station - Scar - Iron Council 'trilogy' the best after that (IMHO of course).

Those are the ones I've read :)

And The City and The City, which is less good.

Author:  Warhead [ Tue Aug 01, 2017 7:25 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Mooch has gone already and I'm not at all surprised. Trump must be an atrocious judge of character.

Author:  Kern [ Tue Aug 01, 2017 8:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

He's also said to have written his son's statement about the Russian stuff. Mr Trump is, after all, clearly the best lawyer in the land and the best client too.

Author:  Kern [ Tue Aug 01, 2017 8:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Warhead wrote:
Trump must be an atrocious judge of character.


Making decisions based on how much people say they love you is seldom a wise strategy. Just ask King Lear.

Author:  Kern [ Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

With Mr Trump, sometimes you get the feeling he's been given a 'Big Bumper Book of Facts' for Christmas and is insistent on sharing his new-found knowledge with every adult he comes across.
Here's a couple of excerpts from a recent interview:

Quote:
So, you know, and these are like countries, you know, fairly large, like 300 million people. You know, a lot of people say — they say, well, but the United States is large. And then you call places like Malaysia, Indonesia, and you say, you know, how many people do you have? And it’s pretty amazing how many people they have.


Quote:
I can say that we’re going to be very involved with the U.K. I mean, you don’t hear the word Britain anymore. It’s very interesting. It’s like, nope.


Quote:
One little thing, what would they do with the British Open if they [Scotland] ever got out? They’d no longer have the British Open.

Author:  Trousers [ Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Kern wrote:
With Mr Trump, sometimes you get the feeling he's been given a 'Big Bumper Book of Facts' for Christmas and is insistent on sharing his new-found knowledge with every adult he comes across.


My favourite of those remains;

Quote:
You been hearing the word unmasking, a word you’ve probably never heard before, so you never know what’s out there and I didn’t tape and I don’t have any tape and I didn’t tape


1) You've probably only been hearing the word unmasking if you've been glued to Fox
2) Nope, it's a word you've not heard before
3) That last half of the sentence has no relation to the beginning of it

Author:  Kern [ Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Superb. Whenever I learn a new word I try to use it three times that day. The unmasking of Jim Carey was the 'Truman Show'.

Author:  Kern [ Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

And today's annoying clickbait article on the Guardian website is the one where the journalist has to travel by train at short notice and discovers it's a bit pricey.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Kern wrote:
Superb. Whenever I learn a new word I try to use it three times that day. The unmasking of Jim Carey was the 'Truman Show'.

Surely it was the end of The Mask?

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Er, spoilers.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:22 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Kern wrote:
And today's annoying clickbait article on the Guardian website is the one where the journalist has to travel by train at short notice and discovers it's a bit pricey.
Quote:
The A1 has its own landmarks – the old Little Chefs that are now sex shops and, erm, the roundabouts – but oddly, it doesn’t compare.

That's right near where I live - in fact, it's literally next door the barbecue shop that I use (which gave Gaywood and Craster more of a hard on when we visited than any sex shop ever could).

I like the way she missed out actual landmarks. I mean, there's even a book.

Author:  Kern [ Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

One of the joys of driving in the southern US is that the sex shops tend to be right next to churches, suggesting a natural order to one's visits.

Author:  JBR [ Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Kern wrote:
One of the joys of driving in the southern US is that the sex shops tend to be right next to churches, suggesting a natural order to one's visits.

See also West Reading. Chippy, flower shop, sex shop, church.

Author:  Pundabaya [ Thu Aug 03, 2017 13:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

West Reading: Best weddings in the country!

Author:  MaliA [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 19:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

crime time!

Quote:
WEST Yorkshire Police officers had to resort to using force more than 7,500 times over a three month period this year.

Data released for the first time shows tasers were used 62 times, an irritant spray was used 132 times and police dogs bit offenders four times in the period April 1 to June 30.

Spit guards were used on 14 occasions, ground restraint was used on 216 occasions and there were 1,092 occasions of non-compliant handcuffing.

Compliant handcuffing amounted to 2,147 incidents.
A shield was used once and a baton ten times.

Tactical (verbal) communication was used on 2,554 occasions to resolve an incident.

In all, force was used by officers 7,680 times in order to carry out their duties and there were 218 occasions when police staff were physically injured.


Ruff stuff

Author:  Squirt [ Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Does Tactical Verbal Communication mean "talking"?

Author:  Trousers [ Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Squirt wrote:
Does Tactical Verbal Communication mean "talking"?


Sort of.

The police shout "Look behind you" and when they do, on go the cuffs. Tactical.

Author:  Zardoz [ Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:44 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Squirt wrote:
Does Tactical Verbal Communication mean "talking"?

They shout "Bang! Bang!".

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Aug 09, 2017 13:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

"It's the Goodyear blimp!"

Author:  Dr Zoidberg [ Wed Aug 09, 2017 15:47 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Squirt wrote:
Does Tactical Verbal Communication mean "talking"?


Yep, starts at talking and goes up to shouting that you have a police dog/taser/gun that you'll use if needed.

https://www.westyorkshire.police.uk/sit ... olicy2.pdf

Author:  Trousers [ Wed Aug 09, 2017 16:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Dr Zoidberg wrote:
police dog/taser/gun


Attachment:
dawg.jpg

Author:  MaliA [ Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... t-backlash

Oh, Owen.

Author:  Lonewolves [ Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:22 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

MaliA wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/09/prime-minister-corbyn-very-british-coup-establishment-backlash

Oh, Owen.

Seems pretty reasonable if you read the whole thing.

Author:  MaliA [ Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Lonewolves wrote:
MaliA wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/09/prime-minister-corbyn-very-british-coup-establishment-backlash

Oh, Owen.

Seems pretty reasonable if you read the whole thing.


The government is a puppet to a shadowy cabal that would endeauvour to stop a Labour Land of Milk and Honey?

Author:  Kern [ Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:47 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

Ah, I love Harold Wilson conspiracies. The stories get a bit murky, but whilst it seems likely that whilst there were some right-wing fantasists, there were never enough to be taken seriously. There's also the issue of his Alzheimer's and how far it had progressed by then. Never really know how to take the story about him seeing tanks at Heathrow.

Of course, they just want you to think that it was the real Harold Wilson Prime-Ministering from 1974-1976.

Author:  Cavey [ Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread

I got halfway through the first paragraph where he describes himself as a 'Corbyn supporter', snorted, LOLed for real, then closed the browser page.

Brass neck doesn't even begin to cover it; who honestly still listens to what this twerp has to say, even on the "googly eyed" [(c) Ross Greer] Left?

Page 212 of 239 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/