Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 160 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 14:34 
User avatar
Heavy Metal Tough Guy

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 6515
If you pay the Fire Train drivers more, then you'll have to do the same for the drivers of the Earth, Water and Air Trains as well. That's one area you really don't want falling out of balance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 14:36 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Grim... wrote:
There are 400,000 nurses alone in the UK. If you want them to get them (say) another £5k pa each, you need to find an extra 2 billion. And that's just the nurses.

Depending on how much the nurses earn, they may have to take a pay cut to bring up the pay for, say, cleaners.

There will be winners and losers under this plan, true.


Nursing pays terribly. There are also many terrible nurses, as the system is very easy to 'game'. The stuff some of the wife's colleagues get away with borders on the criminal.

That said, she might get another promotion soon, to take her to the level of a decent sized ward manager or something, and she's still paid significantly less than I get for posting on here.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 14:41 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
Curiosity wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
markg wrote:
So what metric are you using to determine that they aren't worth £60k?

Only that teachers and social workers are paid less. Ideally they should all be paid more.

Social workers get paid more than you'd think.

They certainly don't.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 14:43 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Curiosity wrote:
… and she earns less than the attached social worker, who has eff all qualifications and is essentially crap at her job.


One of Miss Malabar's friends gets paid £30k (a fair bit up here) for watching a robot all day at Airbus. If it goes wrong, he occasionally has to drill a hole, but nothing more complicated than that. He's 20 years old, with nothing more than a few GCSEs and the apprenticeship.

:(

Very jealous, though it sounds boring as fuck. I quite enjoy my work, earning half as much as he does.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 14:43 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
I'm starting to see a pattern emerge here :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 14:54 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16560
Curiosity wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Grim... wrote:
There are 400,000 nurses alone in the UK. If you want them to get them (say) another £5k pa each, you need to find an extra 2 billion. And that's just the nurses.

Depending on how much the nurses earn, they may have to take a pay cut to bring up the pay for, say, cleaners.

There will be winners and losers under this plan, true.


Nursing pays terribly. There are also many terrible nurses, as the system is very easy to 'game'. The stuff some of the wife's colleagues get away with borders on the criminal.

That said, she might get another promotion soon, to take her to the level of a decent sized ward manager or something, and she's still paid significantly less than I get for posting on here.

There are increasing numbers of nurse specialist type posts that pay fairly well, but as with teaching it does seem that a lot of the best nurses are destined to stop nursing in all but job title and effectively become managers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 14:58 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Don't forget that a large amount of NHS nurses are 3rd party contractors.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:03 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16560
I don't think that's particularly common is it? I know that most cleaners and some other ancillary staff often work for contractors but as far as I know the massive majority of nurses are NHS staff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:04 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Don't know about outside London, but I've spend a good amount of time in London hospitals and every nurse below the duty sister is agency.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:07 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16560
I wonder what happens to all the newly qualified nurses then. I assume that the government doesn't provide nursing training only to let them immediately work for contractors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:09 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Craster wrote:
Don't know about outside London, but I've spend a good amount of time in London hospitals and every nurse below the duty sister is agency.


How many nurses did you meet who genuinely seemed to enjoy their jobs? I've had some bloody miserable nurses look after me in my time, and I've been pretty self-sufficient in my hospital stays. The bitching and complaining some of them had in-front of patients when having to help them out was disgusting.

edit: there have been a handful of lovely, excellent people, though. More nurses like this, please. And people in general, really.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:12 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Most of them seem pretty friendly and happy to be there. I guess it helps that I always see the same ones.

Also my consultant is a stunning aussie lady. The NHS is ace.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:14 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16560
Malabar Front wrote:
Craster wrote:
Don't know about outside London, but I've spend a good amount of time in London hospitals and every nurse below the duty sister is agency.


How many nurses did you meet who genuinely seemed to enjoy their jobs? I've had some bloody miserable nurses look after me in my time, and I've been pretty self-sufficient in my hospital stays. The bitching and complaining some of them had in-front of patients when having to help them out was disgusting.

edit: there have been a handful of lovely, excellent people, though. More nurses like this, please. And people in general, really.

A lot of the time it's different from one ward to the next. Each one having its own manager and its own little culture.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:18 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
markg wrote:
A lot of the time it's different from one ward to the next. Each one having its own manager and its own little culture.


Aye, I noticed that. Moving from one area to the next, there were some definite changes in atmosphere and friendliness.

I've always had a fairly nice experience, if there can be such a thing when you're stuck in hospital, though. I guess it's a pretty thankless line of work, and nurses can quickly become jaded – I've always been incredibly polite to people helping me, but no doubt there are many tossers around.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:18 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
Pod wrote:
Morte wrote:
So what's brought about this Train Driver hate Pod?


OpenTTD is the new lunch-time game, and someone mused "Why aren't all trains computer controlled?".


Oho. I'm playing OpenTTD at the moment, ridiculously modded up with a huge quantity of .grfs. Trams, proper tractor-trailer trucks, proper signalling, tis marvellous.

Incidentally, the appalling sequel to TTD, Locomotion, had a 'manual control' mode where you could drive one of your trains... yes, sliding a lever back and forth to control the speed. And it was BLOODY hard.

kalmar wrote:
I say Fire Train drivers should be paid even more than lawyers. It's an important job.


That's a Canadian Pacific engine...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 15:28 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
myoptikakaka wrote:
You think nurses ought to be paid less? Yikes.

As should have been reasonably self-evident given the rest of my posts on this thread, I think they should be paid more, and that post was a joke.

The average public sector pay is disgustingly low - I cannot believe there isn't scope for reducing the top end (and STOPPING USING HUGELY EXPENSIVE CONSULTANTS TO ACT AS FULL TIME STAFF ALTERNATIVES SO YOUR HEADCOUNT STAYS UNDER THE AMOUNT REQUIRED AFTER THE GERSHON* REVIEW, FFS), getting rid of some overpaid public sector employees entirely (e.g. half the pointless quangos we have - thanks for bringing most of those in as jobs for your mates, The Tories!) and using that money to pay for pay increases for the less well paid.


*I think. That one that said we had to trim the workforceby 80,000 or something.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 16:52 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
myoptikakaka wrote:
You think nurses ought to be paid less? Yikes.

As should have been reasonably self-evident given the rest of my posts on this thread, I think they should be paid more, and that post was a joke.

I'm not reading twelve posts. Especially not yours.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 16:55 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
myoptikakaka wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
myoptikakaka wrote:
You think nurses ought to be paid less? Yikes.

As should have been reasonably self-evident given the rest of my posts on this thread, I think they should be paid more, and that post was a joke.

I'm not reading twelve posts. Especially not yours.

I'm so not buying you a drink next month, you cheeky cunt.

:p

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 17:01 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
I'm so not buying you a drink next month, you cheeky cunt.

:p


It'd be flat by the time you shipped it up to Manchester anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 17:05 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Malabar Front wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
I'm so not buying you a drink next month, you cheeky cunt.

:p


It'd be flat by the time you shipped it up to Manchester anyway.

Or you, you lippy young whippersnapper.

I'm going to have a cheap night.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 21:38 
User avatar
MR EXCELLENT FACE

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2568
Craster wrote:
Well, indeed. But people aren't paid on the basis of the responsibility they have, they're paid on the basis of how easy it is to attract people with the right skills into the job.


Except for tube drivers?

_________________
This man is bound by law to clear the snow away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 22:03 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Is it easy to be a tube driver? I know that I'd freak the fuck out if I was just staring at tunnel walls rushing past my face all day.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 23:35 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Craster wrote:
Is it easy to be a tube driver? I know that I'd freak the fuck out if I was just staring at tunnel walls rushing past my face all day.

Easy. Close your eyes.

Or, you know, pretend you're playing Descent.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:42 
User avatar
Participant in dramatic games

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 4148
Location: United Provinces
5 pages without somebody mentioning the VAL?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%A9hic ... L%C3%A9ger

_________________
XBL: Romanista WiiU: Romanista77 Gamecenter: Romanista345 3DS 0318 8943 6467
Steam: Romanista345 PSN: Romanista345 Switch: 5098 6135 1325 RetroAchievements: Romanista

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:48 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
CDGVAL is awesome, but the system is tiny. I haven't ridden on any of the others.

There's no reason a system like this couldn't work for undergrounds, especially simple ones like Glasgow and Newcastle, or the smaller London tube lines.
But when the train is out in the open, has to interact with existing infrastructure and human controlled vehicles (and actual humans) I think it will be a long time before we robotise it.

Anyway, that's a refinement you do once a system is running at peak efficiency and reliability, and the main cost overhead and weak point is the driver. I doubt that the UK train network will *ever* be in that situation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:08 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
The DLR is 95% out in the open. Doesn't share rails though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:15 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Craster wrote:
The DLR is 95% out in the open. Doesn't share rails though.


So is the CDGVAL, what I mean is it's very well separated from everything, no crossings, even the platforms have sliding doors on them which only open when the train doors are lined up.

Real trains, trams, and most above ground railways don't always have that luxury and it must be quite expensive to arrange.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:42 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
kalmar wrote:
There's no reason a system like this couldn't work for undergrounds, especially simple ones like Glasgow and Newcastle, or the smaller London tube lines.


The Glasgow Subway is computer controlled, the chap in the cab only operates the controls when entering and leaving the yard. The rest of the time he just opens and closes the doors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:43 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
MetalAngel wrote:
The rest of the time he just opens and closes the doors.

For 40k a year


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:45 
User avatar
Peculiar, yet lovely

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 7046
DavPaz wrote:
MetalAngel wrote:
kalmar wrote:
The rest of the time he just opens and closes the doors.

For 40k a year


Still better value than your average newsreader.

_________________
Lonely as a Mushroom Cloud


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:47 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
DavPaz wrote:
MetalAngel wrote:
kalmar wrote:
The rest of the time he just opens and closes the doors.

For 40k a year


http://news.scotsman.com/glasgowsubwayd ... 2376172.jp
Quote:
The new drivers will receive a basic salary of £18,000 per year, with top earners receiving about £25,000 with overtime payments.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:51 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
Damn. Trumped again ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:52 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
I did not know that.

Would it be accurate to guess that automation and removal of responsibility (and presumably wage) from the drivers is what caused them all to end up being sacked and replaced?

Cos £18k isn't a lot. Minicab drivers probably make that much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:57 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
kalmar wrote:
Cos £18k isn't a lot. Minicab drivers probably make that much.

I'd say they work harder, though.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
"I press the button, the door opens. I press the button, the door closes. Is it lunchtime yet?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:01 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
He's there in case something goes wrong, has to drive the train at certain stages, and has heaps upon heaps of responsibility upon his shoulders in case he closes the doors upon Hamish MacTavish's wee scottie.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:02 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
DavPaz wrote:
"I press the button, the door opens. I press the button, the door closes. Is it lunchtime yet?"


Heh, one of those articles says that when the drivers threatened to go on strike, the company retrained a bunch of their CCTV operators to press the button (which took, one imagines, one lap of the track and a 10 minute talk on safety procedures). Disgruntlement ahoy!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:03 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
MetalAngel wrote:
He's there in case something goes wrong, has to drive the train at certain stages, and has heaps upon heaps of responsibility upon his shoulders in case he closes the doors upon Hamish MacTavish's wee scottie.

Aye, I know this. But day to day, his job is button pressing. Like many jobs.

Security guards generally do nothing, but can be called upon to do some hairy shit, hence, valuable job. Same for train drivers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:06 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
kalmar wrote:
There's no reason a system like this couldn't work for undergrounds, especially simple ones like Glasgow and Newcastle, or the smaller London tube lines.
But when the train is out in the open, has to interact with existing infrastructure and human controlled vehicles (and actual humans) I think it will be a long time before we robotise it.


Like with that proposed Joe Public CCTV monitoring scheme, a system of webcams and computers attached to Densha de go* controllers with bits of string should do it.



*In Googling that to check the spelling, I stumbled across the Google description for the official site - "Densha de go! is without any doubt one of the most famous videogames ever released." Er.. yeah.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:13 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
devilman wrote:
*In Googling that to check the spelling, I stumbled across the Google description for the official site - "Densha de go! is without any doubt one of the most famous videogames ever released." Er.. yeah.


It's often cited on slow news days when they do a 'ten naffest games ever' list. 'Hey, those craps JAPS play ARCADE GAMES about DRIVING COMMUTER TRAINS! ROTFEL!!!!!111 What a bunch of WEIRD LOSER NERDS. We Western gamers will never sink so low. Now turn to page 57 for our Championship Manager review...'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:15 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
MetalAngel wrote:
devilman wrote:
*In Googling that to check the spelling, I stumbled across the Google description for the official site - "Densha de go! is without any doubt one of the most famous videogames ever released." Er.. yeah.


It's often cited on slow news days when they do a 'ten naffest games ever' list. 'Hey, those craps JAPS play ARCADE GAMES about DRIVING COMMUTER TRAINS! ROTFEL!!!!!111 What a bunch of WEIRD LOSER NERDS. We Western gamers will never sink so low. Now turn to page 57 for our Championship Manager review...'


I should probably give one of them a chance - I've got the Saturn controller for it, but no game. I did have a little LCD handheld Densha de Go which wasn't bad (as LCD games go).

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:16 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
I did once try a bus driving game where failing to indicate lost you points. I ROFLED at that, a bit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:17 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
I very much enjoyed my time with Railfan on the PS3.

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:18 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
O.M.G

http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-Wii-DENSHA-de-G ... 45f036cb5c

*Is delighted*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:24 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
I have both Densha 1 and 2 for the PSX (no controller, my dad bought them during trips to Japan and didn't have room for a huge pretend combined throttle!) and they're 'alive' in a way no other sim has yet matched in terms of making you feel like you're driving through a busy urban network.

MS Train Sim is a better simulator, though, while Trainz is great fun for building your own railway (but pretty shit when the time comes to drive around it).

RailSim or whatever it's called (and its sequel) is reportedly extremely pants.

Tokyo Bus Guide, meanwhile, was excellent. Once you get to grips with it it's very satisfying. Matron. The bonus disc in which a perky Jap-o-girl with slightly wonky teeth and crossed eyes garbles excitedly about... buses, probably... is nice too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 15:54 

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 6093
The Densha De Go games are really good in my mind. I've got a few of them on the PSP and one for the PS2 (can't remember what it's called, but you drive the bullet train in that one). They're far more than just a boring train driving sim, they're really often properly hard to play, requiring the skills to stop at your destination within seconds of the designated time, within inches of the correct stopping point, whilst making all movements silky smooth so your passengers don't get jolted around. They're great fun.

MS Train Simulator is the best 'proper' sim I've played. It's a shame the proposed sequel never happened, as it's looking very dated now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 17:17 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
MSTS2 has been canned TWICE now, the second iteration was looking really promising. Trainz is just Auran rehashing the same decrepit product over and over and over again (I bought the first ever release in 2001 and in 2004 much of the content was still there and already looking tired, I hate to think how people who bought the 2006 and more recent editions must feel). Rail Simulator (and the sequel, whatever it's called) made a big fuss of how realistic and immersive it was going to be, but instead you had only a few scripted activities, some dodgy gameplay and the railsim community shrugged and just carried on with MSTS.

The result is if you want a UK train driving experience, stick with MSTS and one of Making Tracks' excellent routes (I got my dad the Great Eastern one for Christmas last year and it is quite astonishing what they've managed to make MSTS do) or just drive the Birmingham CrossCity over and over and over again in BVE (which, incidentally, is the daddy for driving the Tube.)

Densha is good, but there's a few annoyances. Unless you drive absolutely perfectly, you'll haemmorage your 'points' (which get deducted when you screw up, run out and game over) at an alarming rate. Go too quickly and you start getting double yellows as you've caught up with the train in front, and this will delay you so much that you'll often ruin your game. Likewise, the stopping point thing is down to the centimetre (I've failed a perfect score because I was off by 30cm) which is infuriating. One Western journo who gave the game a proper review (instead of just laughing) said that in his time living in Tokyo, trains would regularly overshoot the point and reverse, something the game doesn't allow.

I wish there was a DS version, the GBC version is a valiant but ultimately ugly attempt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 17:23 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
Oh, I apparently have the Wonderswan version of Densha de Go too. Here is the exciting cover artwork -

Attachment:
densha.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 17:28 
User avatar
Skillmeister

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27023
Location: Felelagedge Wedgebarge, The River Tib
Ha! Their interests differ from mine! What a bunch of cunts!

_________________
Washing Machine: Fine. Kettle: Needs De-scaling. Shower: Brand new. Boiler: Fine.
Archimedes Hotdog Rhubarb Niner Zero Niner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why aren't trains computer controlled?
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 17:56 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Good god. A thread about driverless trains has actually managed to get even nerdier.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 160 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], MaliA and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.