| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| Tuesday 4 https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=9811 |
Page 5 of 5 |
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
If Gaz did kill Buffy then we can assume she didn't defend herself due to protecting someone else, which means: She protected someone last night from a baddie attack, which means: Said baddie loses a night action tonight. So, silver linings, etc. |
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
GazChap wrote: Curiosity wrote: Wait, so you DID kill Buffy? Yes. I'm pro-town, but I'm not privy to any knowledge about who I should and shouldn't get rid of. I may be the last killing role left that's pro-town, so that may be a reason to keep me alive. Quote: Also, I have PROVED I am Anya, you daft sod. How? This is where my lack of knowledge comes in I'm afraid. 
|
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
[vote: TheVision] The note said so. |
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Curiosity wrote: If Gaz did kill Buffy then we can assume she didn't defend herself due to protecting someone else, which means: She protected someone last night from a baddie attack, which means: Said baddie loses a night action tonight. So, silver linings, etc. Why would they lose a night action tonight? Surely that was last night when they were actually blocked? |
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Bobbyaro wrote: [vote: TheVision] The note said so. … Seriously? |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
GazChap wrote: Curiosity wrote: Wait, so you DID kill Buffy? Yes. I'm pro-town, but I'm not privy to any knowledge about who I should and shouldn't get rid of. I may be the last killing role left that's pro-town, so that may be a reason to keep me alive. Quote: Also, I have PROVED I am Anya, you daft sod. How? This is where my lack of knowledge comes in I'm afraid. I knew you targeted Willow, and that Xander's revenge wish was for you to say something about the sun being too hot and you needing sunscreen or shades. |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
I was hoping to make it through to tomorrow because then my bloodlust will be gone, and I am just hoping to hit a bad guy tonight as that will at least contribute to my win condition. You would not believe the facepalm when I got rid of Buffy 
|
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Curiosity wrote: GazChap wrote: Curiosity wrote: Wait, so you DID kill Buffy? Yes. I'm pro-town, but I'm not privy to any knowledge about who I should and shouldn't get rid of. I may be the last killing role left that's pro-town, so that may be a reason to keep me alive. Quote: Also, I have PROVED I am Anya, you daft sod. How? This is where my lack of knowledge comes in I'm afraid. I knew you targeted Willow, and that Xander's revenge wish was for you to say something about the sun being too hot and you needing sunscreen or shades. Yeah, but he hasn't confirmed whether that actually happened or not, despite being asked. |
|
| Author: | Malc [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
TheFireFaerie wrote: Curiosity wrote: If Gaz did kill Buffy then we can assume she didn't defend herself due to protecting someone else, which means: She protected someone last night from a baddie attack, which means: Said baddie loses a night action tonight. So, silver linings, etc. Why would they lose a night action tonight? Surely that was last night when they were actually blocked? Spike and Angel's role said that if they targetted someone defended by buffy, then they would take a beating so bad, they would take the next night to recover. Malc |
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
GazChap wrote: I was hoping to make it through to tomorrow because then my bloodlust will be gone, and I am just hoping to hit a bad guy tonight as that will at least contribute to my win condition. You would not believe the facepalm when I got rid of Buffy Do you have to kill someone? |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Curiosity wrote: I knew you targeted Willow, and that Xander's revenge wish was for you to say something about the sun being too hot and you needing sunscreen or shades. Ah yes, sorry. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
TheFireFaerie wrote: Curiosity wrote: GazChap wrote: Curiosity wrote: Wait, so you DID kill Buffy? Yes. I'm pro-town, but I'm not privy to any knowledge about who I should and shouldn't get rid of. I may be the last killing role left that's pro-town, so that may be a reason to keep me alive. Quote: Also, I have PROVED I am Anya, you daft sod. How? This is where my lack of knowledge comes in I'm afraid. I knew you targeted Willow, and that Xander's revenge wish was for you to say something about the sun being too hot and you needing sunscreen or shades. Yeah, but he hasn't confirmed whether that actually happened or not, despite being asked. Plz confirm, Mister Werewolf. |
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Malc wrote: TheFireFaerie wrote: Curiosity wrote: If Gaz did kill Buffy then we can assume she didn't defend herself due to protecting someone else, which means: She protected someone last night from a baddie attack, which means: Said baddie loses a night action tonight. So, silver linings, etc. Why would they lose a night action tonight? Surely that was last night when they were actually blocked? Spike and Angel's role said that if they targetted someone defended by buffy, then they would take a beating so bad, they would take the next night to recover. Malc Ahhh. Cheers. Gottit! Okay, so that IS good. What didn't happen last night that should / could have? Just thinking we could at least narrow down what we might potentially no get whacked by tonight. |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Curiosity wrote: Plz confirm, Mister Werewolf. I can't answer that yet, I'm waiting for confirmation from Grim... on something related to this very issue. I don't want to get modkilled. |
|
| Author: | sdg [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
If we kill Gazchap today, we don't need to block willow tonight as all her kills have happened during the day. I am worried that Anya could become anyanka if suitably annoyed, say by her one true love being killed? Maybe the role blocker should block her? (Curio) |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Hell, even just that post might get me modkilled. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
sdg wrote: If we kill Gazchap today, we don't need to block willow tonight as all her kills have happened during the day. I am worried that Anya could become anyanka if suitably annoyed, say by her one true love being killed? Maybe the role blocker should block her? (Curio) I have to say, I'm thoroughly disappointed not to have received any RAGEKILL powers upon X's death. |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
sdg wrote: If we kill Gazchap today, we don't need to block willow tonight as all her kills have happened during the day. On the other hand, if you kill Willow today, I'll listen to who you guys want me to kill tonight with my last kill, and then I'll just be a normal school boy again. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
I gotta hand it to GazChap, that's a pretty good lie. "I'm bad but I'll be good after three full moon nights and tomorrow is the last full moon, so don't worry about me." This is forgetting one tiny bit of information: IT'S STILL TUESDAY YOU LYING GIT AND HAS BEEN FOR DAYS. |
|
| Author: | Malc [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
That's a point, this is Tuesday 4, so if it was full moon related, it would have been once every 4 weeks or something! Malc |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
 I don't make the rules.
|
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
The problem is that you're both lying. We just need consensus on which liar to kill first. |
|
| Author: | sdg [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 16:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
http://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/counter/work.php |
|
| Author: | sdg [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Oops. Can someone post the counter? |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Surely if I was going to lie, I'd say that last night was my last kill and that I'm now harmless? |
|
| Author: | sdg [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Curiosity, kovacs and gaz chap the only people voting for willow. Interesting. Why doesn't anyone else think kovacs is well dodgy?! |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
GazChap wrote: Surely if I was going to lie, I'd say that last night was my last kill and that I'm now harmless? That would swiftly be proven false. This way you get to kill again (pref Kov or Bobby or someone) and then we only find out later. Ditto for Willow. If we leave you alive, blow up Kov. His roleclaim was shit. |
|
| Author: | Malc [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
sdg wrote: Curiosity, kovacs and gaz chap the only people voting for willow. Interesting. Why doesn't anyone else think kovacs is well dodgy?! I think he's dodgy, I think willow and oz are dodgier! Malc |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
sdg wrote: Curiosity, kovacs and gaz chap the only people voting for willow. Interesting. Why doesn't anyone else think kovacs is well dodgy?! LOL |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Good point Sat. Also, if we have a Dawn, do we have a Glory? Who may well blow up the universe as she knows who Dawn is and Buffy is dead. Orrr, is TFF Glory and Dawn is already in the game? |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:03 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Curiosity wrote: If we leave you alive, blow up Kov. His roleclaim was shit.  I don't think anyone would complain about that!
|
|
| Author: | Malc [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:04 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
WTF is glory (I've not seen all the episodes of buffy, and I expect I am reaching the limit of my viewing!) Malc |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Glory is the person hunting Dawn (The Key), who buffy protects. If she finds Dawn, she kills her and asplodes the universe (or something equally bad). |
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:09 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Malc wrote: sdg wrote: Curiosity, kovacs and gaz chap the only people voting for willow. Interesting. Why doesn't anyone else think kovacs is well dodgy?! I think he's dodgy, I think willow and oz are dodgier! Malc The Willow-voting crew are getting my FOS. I wasn't sure, but the whole 3 days back to a school boy thing is far, far too convenient. If it's true, fine, I'll happily off Sat tomorrow, but for now [Vote: GazChap]. Curio, you're super keen to keep Gaz alive vs. Sat, so if Gaz gets lynched the outcome totally makes my mind up about you, too. *folds arms* |
|
| Author: | Malc [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Quote: Tuesday 4 VOTE UPDATE thevision: 1 (Bobbyaro) saturnalian: 3 (Curiosity, KovacsC, GazChap) gazchap: 6 (nickachu, TheVision, Malc, Saturnalian, sdg, TheFireFaerie) Not voted: 0 () With 10 players alive, 6 votes are required for a lynch, and 6 nolynch votes are required to not lynch anybody. http://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/counter/ Malc |
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:11 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Oh crap, I didn't realise that was the deciding vote! Oops. Ah well, guess we'll find out now then! |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:12 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Well, it was a good try. |
|
| Author: | TheFireFaerie [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:13 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Wait, what? |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Before GazChap is killed off, the spectre of our heroine appears and delivers a long monologue about how this series became shit once they killed off the main character. It'll probably take about an hour, then we'll be back with the end of the episode... |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 17:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
*continues impassioned rant* |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 18:27 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
Yeah, I'm just doing this to make people think there's a new post in the thread now. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 18:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 4 |
You grab GazChap, and he instantly turns into this eight-foot fucking thing - not a werewolf, but something far scarier. He takes a swing at someone and then scratches himself on a silver bracelet and dies. Phew, eh! GazChap was playing Oz, a schoolboy / werewolf / vampire hybrid. Night actions by 11am tomorrow! |
|
| Page 5 of 5 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|