Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:50 
User avatar
Kinda Funny Lookin'

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3276
Location: Sheffield or Baku
ARGGGHHH...why do I get the feeling we're all being manipulated?

[vote:Goddess Jasmine]

_________________
If work was so rewarding the rich would have bought it all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:51 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
The Rev Owen wrote:
Rodafowa wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
I'm sticking with my vote for Runcle.

You were desperate for a lynch a page ago. You'd rather lynch no-one than Jazzy G?


No. I want to lynch Runcle and this whole "OH NOES! WE CAN'T LYNCH RUNCLE JUST IN CASE HE'S A GOODIE! LET'S LYNCH SOMEONE ELSE WE HAVE EVEN LESS INFORMATION ABOUT!" thing is deeply, deeply, deeply suspicious.


I agree with this, and whoever you find out to be the real Iron Man, he's voting for Runcle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:51 
User avatar
What's this bit for exactly?

Joined: 6th Dec, 2008
Posts: 880
Location: Caerdydd
Morte wrote:
Where did all this GJ voting come from...rapidly searches through last few pages of the thread.

It came from the 2 iron men debacle...
basically - one is a scummy liar, but they both vote Runcle - therefore Runcle is neither a DrDoom-ite, or a SuperGoodie (except venom).
GJ was the next in line for perusal so she is getting the FoD now.

Interestingly, Joans has not said anything against voting for GJ, Craster has been silent (which, if he is a baddie does point to being on GJs side maybe?)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:51 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14495
The Rev Owen wrote:
Rodafowa wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
I'm sticking with my vote for Runcle.

You were desperate for a lynch a page ago. You'd rather lynch no-one than Jazzy G?


No. I want to lynch Runcle and this whole "OH NOES! WE CAN'T LYNCH RUNCLE JUST IN CASE HE'S A GOODIE! LET'S LYNCH SOMEONE ELSE WE HAVE EVEN LESS INFORMATION ABOUT!" thing is deeply, deeply, deeply suspicious.


So your total reasoning for Runcle was "what the SK posted" - and you backed away from your earlier comments - otherwise i think he'd have been gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:51 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Curiosity wrote:
I think I'm happier with no lynch than with a lynch.

As of tomorrow we're one more bad guy down. That's two in two days. The SK is still a danger, but will probably stop at 5, and that leaves us time to catch the remainign 1 or 2 villains.


A lynch means we have a 1 in 20 or so chance of killing a town vigilante. It also means we have a 2 in 20 or so chance of activating a SECOND town vigilante. Those are good sodding odds.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:51 
User avatar
PC Gamer

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3084
Location: Watford
It's got to be Runcle.

Not because he's probably guilty, but because of the number of people it implicates as scum if he's innocent.

Craster and Owen are both desperate for a lynch but neither are willing to switch candidates. If Runcle's not a wrong 'un, they can swing next.

[vote: Runcle]

_________________
XBox Live, Steam: Rodafowa, Wii code - 2196 4095 4660 7615
Blue Man Sings The Whites II - Judgmental Day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:51 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
I'm massively flip-flopping here.

[vote:Runcle]

Just in case he's the SK.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:52 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14495
Rodafowa wrote:
It's got to be Runcle.

Not because he's probably guilty, but because of the number of people it implicates as scum if he's innocent.

Craster and Owen are both desperate for a lynch but neither are willing to switch candidates. If Runcle's not a wrong 'un, they can swing next.

[vote: Runcle]


Fine - [vote:Runcle]

7 minutes


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:52 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14495
SuperScum Issue #2
VOTE UPDATE

kalmar: 1 (Mr Dave)
curiosity: 2 (Runcle, Mr Russell)
goddess jasmine: 5 (JBR, Bobbyaro, Morte, kalmar, superdupergill)
runcle: 8 (The Rev Owen, Rodafowa, Doctor Glyndwr, Craster, LaceSensor, zaphod79, Joans, Curiosity)

Not voted: 2 (goddess jasmine, mr dom)

With 18 players alive, 10 votes are required for a lynch, and 14 nolynch votes are required to not lynch anybody.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
2 more.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
User avatar
What's this bit for exactly?

Joined: 6th Dec, 2008
Posts: 880
Location: Caerdydd
Fair enough.
Its a toss up between the two, but tbh - if the Real Iron Man wants Runcle dead, who am I to disagree?

[vote: Runcle]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
Mr Dom wrote:
Morte wrote:
Where did all this GJ voting come from...rapidly searches through last few pages of the thread.

It came from the 2 iron men debacle...
basically - one is a scummy liar, but they both vote Runcle - therefore Runcle is neither a DrDoom-ite, or a SuperGoodie (except venom).
GJ was the next in line for perusal so she is getting the FoD now.

Interestingly, Joans has not said anything against voting for GJ, Craster has been silent (which, if he is a baddie does point to being on GJs side maybe?)


I have said it was a bad idea on at least one occasion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Come on townies, let's get a lynch in. The people standing around not voting are mostly bad guys, you realise?

And please vote for whoever you think is less likely to be Venom - if we lynch him it's game over, I reckon.

Also, farewell, I feel like I won't be around in the morning :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Any more for the Runclewagon?

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
Best
User avatar
Board Mother

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11358
Location: Mount Olympus
Sorry, guys, been busy *wipes chocolate from mouth*.

I'm going to [vote: Runcle] because if either of J or C are IM, neither of them seem to think he is a definte good guy.

_________________
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GJ is right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
zaphod79 wrote:
So your total reasoning for Runcle was "what the SK posted" - and you backed away from your earlier comments - otherwise i think he'd have been gone.


I never backed away from my earlier comments. I've been saying Runcle might be the killer based on the killing method from the beginning of the day. That's actual evidence, flimsy, yes, but evidence. But what's making me doubt that evidence and is convincing me that Runcle is some other sort of baddie is the number of people who seem absolutely unwilling to see him dead.

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Whew.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:53 
User avatar
Soopah red DS

Joined: 2nd Jun, 2008
Posts: 3232
Curiosity wrote:
I think I'm happier with no lynch than with a lynch.

As of tomorrow we're one more bad guy down. That's two in two days. The SK is still a danger, but will probably stop at 5, and that leaves us time to catch the remainign 1 or 2 villains.

The SK more or less has to stop at 5, though if we get 5 days in (and that's perhaps more likely with a no lynch, depending on who we stop with a lynch) we'll be down to really really tight margins. And there might have been 5 bad guy mates + black sceptre, Dr Doom + four maybes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:54 
User avatar
PC Gamer

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3084
Location: Watford
Well, the die's cast now.

_________________
XBox Live, Steam: Rodafowa, Wii code - 2196 4095 4660 7615
Blue Man Sings The Whites II - Judgmental Day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:54 
Best
User avatar
Board Mother

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11358
Location: Mount Olympus
Threadlock?

_________________
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GJ is right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:54 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
God, I hope I'm right about this...

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 16:55 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69578
Location: Your Mum
The fire goes out.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SuperScum Issue #2
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 17:04 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69578
Location: Your Mum
Someone has a torch, but it's not working too well. In the flashes of light, you see Runcle going down beneath a mass of bodies. It's furious stuff, and Runcle is only a skinny little guy. Every time the torch splutters on you see a snapshot of what is going on - Runcle has his hands out, Runcle curls into a ball, Runcle stops screaming.
The torch snaps on, and stays on. People back away from Runcle's broken body, fists bleeding, out of breath.
She was at the back during the fighting, getting to the accused too late to join in the killing, but now Goddess Jasmine grabs Runcle's wallet. She flips through it, finding the ID, although you hardly need it. It says "August Hoffer".
Runcle was Caliban.


Night guys - get your stuff in before midday tomorrow (Thursday), please.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
cron
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.