Curiosity wrote:
You, like, said that investigating took two days, but it didn't.
That's because it doesn't! He can't investigate anyone!
This is so frustrating.
| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| Tuesday 3 https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=9807 |
Page 4 of 4 |
| Author: | Malc [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Kov, there are not 2 watchers, either me or Silent Elk is telling the truth. You (and everyone else) need to decide which one (hint: It's me) Malc |
|
| Author: | sdg [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:26 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
I don't know who to Bieber. I am a schoolgirl but I tink my character is probably daily easy t have guessed. When does the day en? My signal is lathcy. |
|
| Author: | sdg [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Who wrot the note about having an investigator role and baking silent elk was a baddy? |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
KovacsC wrote: Was there two watchers on Buffy at some point? They can't both be telling the truth. One lies; one dies. Or they both die. But one goes first, and even though Malc seems confused over his reading, I still think Elk is bad. |
|
| Author: | Malc [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:35 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
sdg good point, 2 people are saying Silentelk is a baddie. Curiosity, why am I confused? Malc |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Malc wrote: why would I roleclaim as the watcher and claim that SilentElk being the other vampire if I Was the baddie? shortly after Trooper had died? No idea, but that's what you did. Quote: It makes far more sense for me to be telling the truth, and SilentElk to be responding to that. Malc The only reason I responded is because you roleclaimed as Giles and you're not Giles. How do I know that? Because I am! Otherwise I'd have kept quiet. I'm not particularly happy that the vamps now know who I am. |
|
| Author: | Malc [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:39 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
The vamps have always known who you are as you're Spike! Malc |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Malc wrote: The vamps have always known who you are as you're Spike! Malc The first mention of Spike in this game was the note at the beginning of today - I'm guessing that's you? So there's no real proof that he's even in the game other than your say so. I don't believe you at all. There's not going to be Angel, Spike, Drusilla, Evil Willow and another witch. That just seems far too imbalanced. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Malc wrote: sdg good point, 2 people are saying Silentelk is a baddie. Curiosity, why am I confused? Malc You, like, said that investigating took two days, but it didn't. I still trust you more than Elk, but if he dies and is Giles, you're, like, totally dead next. |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Curiosity wrote: You, like, said that investigating took two days, but it didn't. That's because it doesn't! He can't investigate anyone! This is so frustrating.
|
|
| Author: | Malc [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Curiosity wrote: Malc wrote: sdg good point, 2 people are saying Silentelk is a baddie. Curiosity, why am I confused? Malc You, like, said that investigating took two days, but it didn't. I still trust you more than Elk, but if he dies and is Giles, you're, like, totally dead next. Why would I call SilentElk out on his investigation not taking 2 nights, if it wasn't a fact? it would surely harm my case (which it seems to be at the moment) I was surprised to find out the result of my investigation so soon into the 2nd night. But I did. I hadn't sent a message at that point. So I was still able to. Malc |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
SilentElk wrote: Curiosity wrote: You, like, said that investigating took two days, but it didn't. That's because it doesn't! He can't investigate anyone! This is so frustrating. Actually, maybe he can investigate, but he's not Giles. He's either being fed bad info or he's lying. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:55 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Interesting that another note leaver called, like, Elk a bad guy. Another legit investigator or just something for Malc to hang a conspiracy on? |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
sdg wrote: I don't know who to Bieber. I am a schoolgirl but I tink my character is probably daily easy t have guessed. When does the day en? My signal is lathcy. Is that, like, some new slang? Is your night action to 'Bieber' someone? |
|
| Author: | KovacsC [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 15:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Curiosity wrote: sdg wrote: I don't know who to Bieber. I am a schoolgirl but I tink my character is probably daily easy t have guessed. When does the day en? My signal is lathcy. Is that, like, some new slang? Is your night action to 'Bieber' someone? I am hoping it is auto correct, but curious how often she must use Bieber for it to correct to it |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Curiosity wrote: Is your night action to 'Bieber' someone? I don't Belieb it. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Malc/SilentElk, can either of you enter into a relationship with anyone, if asked? |
|
| Author: | Malc [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Saturnalian wrote: Malc/SilentElk, can either of you enter into a relationship with anyone, if asked? I can't Malc |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:03 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Saturnalian wrote: Malc/SilentElk, can either of you enter into a relationship with anyone, if asked? My role description doesn't mention it, so I guess not. |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:04 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
In fact, I was one of the people who was confused about it initially, so I asked for clarification. |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Sorry SilentElk, Malc got their first. I'm sticking with my vote. In any event, if Elk dies incorrectly, I can't see Malc lasting tomorrow. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
SilentElk wrote: Malc wrote: The vamps have always known who you are as you're Spike! Malc The first mention of Spike in this game was the note at the beginning of today - I'm guessing that's you? So there's no real proof that he's even in the game other than your say so. I don't believe you at all. There's not going to be Angel, Spike, Drusilla, Evil Willow and another witch. That just seems far too imbalanced. Uh, Angel's death role says he's on a team with Spike. And if Drusilla existed, she'd be on their team too. So she doesn't. So you're lying. |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:16 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Cras wrote: Uh, Angel's death role says he's on a team with Spike. All I'm guilty of is not reading that properly. Quote: And if Drusilla existed, she'd be on their team too. So she doesn't. That's a good assumption. I was going by the notes left last night with regards to Drusilla. I never said she existed, just said it would be too many people if so. [/quote] Quote: So you're lying. No, I just didn't have my reading glasses on. I'm not lying. |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Thanks to the meta, [vote:SilentElk] |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:25 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
You are, like, so totally lying. So, once Elk is a dead vampire, what next? I hope someone has a power or happy ending to calm down an angry werewolf, or Gaz will kill us all. Likewise, if we have an Evil Willow, we need to, like, stop her. Also, everything going all explodey last night, with all those dead nobodies... totally not been explained yet, you guys. There's got to be more bad things out there. |
|
| Author: | KovacsC [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:27 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
kovacsc: 1 (sdg) malc: 1 (SilentElk) silentelk: 6 (Malc, Saturnalian, GazChap, KovacsC, nickachu, DavPaz) Not voted: 4 (bobbyaro, cras, curiosity, thevision) With 12 players alive, 7 votes are required for a lynch, and 7 nolynch votes are required to not lynch anybody. http://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/counter/work.php |
|
| Author: | sdg [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Curiosity wrote: Interesting that another note leaver called, like, Elk a bad guy. Another legit investigator or just something for Malc to hang a conspiracy on? This was more my point actually. I don't doubt that there is a Giles and that it is either malc or elk. I don't think there would be two good investigators though, and it seems weird that there are two notes saying that elk is bad. Who wrote the second one? Is malc conspiring with someone? |
|
| Author: | Satsuma [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Curiosity wrote: You are, like, so totally lying. Just put the man out of his misery. |
|
| Author: | myp [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
It's a bit worrying that we have people pushing for a lynch when we have until 11am on Monday. Who are you in cahoots with, Malc? Time to fess up. |
|
| Author: | sdg [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
Well we'll find out either way. [vote:SilentElk] |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Fri Nov 08, 2013 16:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tuesday 3 |
"But I'm Giles!" splutters the young-looking blonde guy. You disagree, and get your stake on. Shit gets dusty. SilentElk was Spike. Night actions by 11am Monday! |
|
| Page 4 of 4 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|