Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

Game Of Thrones (TV)
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7029
Page 2 of 46

Author:  asfish [ Sun May 22, 2011 9:54 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Just watched to E5, its a good show.

Not sure why HBO feel the need to have tits and arse in almost every episode though.

Maybe thats why its a premium channel :)

Author:  MaliA [ Mon May 23, 2011 7:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

I'm still really enjoying this.

Author:  spoodie [ Tue May 31, 2011 12:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Episode 7: The Game Is On! I can see things getting very messy now, even messier than before.

Incidentally I noticed on Wiki that screenplay for episode 8 has been written by the author of the books, the only episode of the 10. Perhaps because he's the only one that can handle the incoming shitstorm.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Tue May 31, 2011 12:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

spoodie wrote:
Episode 7: The Game Is On!
Certainly in the excessive nudity stakes!

Author:  Zardoz [ Tue May 31, 2011 13:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Interested now.

Author:  Zardoz [ Tue May 31, 2011 13:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Unless you mean Sean's Bean.

Author:  MaliA [ Tue May 31, 2011 14:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Still really enjoying it.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue May 31, 2011 15:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

As an avid reader of the first three books (didn't read the 4th as I couldn't be arsed to wait 7 years for it), I must watch this.

Stupid Virgin not carrying Sky Atlantic.

:(

Author:  Pod [ Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:29 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Gilly wrote:
Oh also, what is the guy who plays the man in the Kings court who owns the whorehouse been in before?


Queer as folk is where I know him from.

ALSO: This is pretty great. I've been wanting to read the books for ages now, they're on THE LIST. The series is meant to be very close to the books, with GRRM even writing 1 episode a season. So maybe I won't have to bother? ;) But I downloaded the whole thing over the weekend and watched them with the GF. Annoyingly, I must have downloaded Ep7 an hour after it was put up for downloading, or something, so now I have to wait a week. I CANNOT WAIT. I must know what happens to the gammy legged Seen-been.


On-topic-off-topicness: Brandon Sanderson, author of best books ever and something to do with the wheel of time but I haven't read that so I don't care, once wrote an article on his site about 'HATING' Tolkein.

Author:  Trooper [ Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

GRRM has written the next episode I believe

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
there are rumours of a diversion from the book sometime soon, which I expect will come in the next episode.

Author:  Rodafowa [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 16:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

MaliA wrote:
Still really enjoying it.

Yup. It's got a number of annoying flaws but I'm having such a generally good time that I can forgive it with not much more than a reproachful "REALLY, Game Of Thrones?" in the moment. The last two episodes have both been dynamite, to the point that I barely noticed that neither of my two favourite characters had appeared in Episode 7.

In the sixth episode, did anyone else spot that
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
the guy who represented Tyrion in the trial-by-combat was "Robson And" Jerome Flynn?

I certainly didn't. My wife, on the other hand...

Author:  MaliA [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 16:47 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

The imp is by far my favorite character

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 23:21 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Sublime: http://arrestedwesteros.tumblr.com/

(spoilers)

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

MaliA wrote:
The imp is by far my favorite character

He's my favourite character in the books.

I still haven't bloody watched this. I assume I'll be waiting for the DVD boxset >:|

Author:  flis [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:47 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

I like it, but I do think there is starting to be too much nakedness....Also, it's a bit sick and pervy. I find it uncomfortable viewing, at times.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:57 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

flis wrote:
I like it, but I do think there is starting to be too much nakedness....Also, it's a bit sick and pervy. I find it uncomfortable viewing, at times.

It's based on a set of fantasy novels. Fantasy novels tend, by and large, to be sick and pervy. GoT in particular has a lot of sex and unpleasantness in it. Sometimes not even at the same time.

Also "too much" nakedness? I don't recognise this as a concept.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

The faux-lesbian scene in this weeks episode was well past the line of good taste and into "for the sake of it" territory, IMO.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
The faux-lesbian scene in this weeks episode was well past the line of good taste and into "for the sake of it" territory, IMO.

Who and who? I don't recall any faux lesbianism until book 3 or 4.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Who and who? I don't recall any faux lesbianism until book 3 or 4.
The scene was:
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
two of Littlefinger's prostitutes (one of whom was, I think, Roz, from Winterfell) practising on each other in the background while he alternated between berating them for being rubbish and waxing lyrical about his ambitions. The idea for the scene I can understand, the point was his complete lack of interest in the whores as anything other than a moneymaking object was underscored nicely. But the camera kept doing unnecessary lingering and really rather explicit shots of the girls writhing and moaning. Like I said, to me, it felt gratuitous.


(this is a very minor spoiler, with no significant plot details)

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Who and who? I don't recall any faux lesbianism until book 3 or 4.
The scene was:
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
two of Littlefinger's prostitutes (one of whom was, I think, Roz, from Winterfell) practising on each other in the background while he alternated between berating them for being rubbish and waxing lyrical about his ambitions. The idea for the scene I can understand, the point was his complete lack of interest in the whores as anything other than a moneymaking object was underscored nicely. But the camera kept doing unnecessary lingering and really rather explicit shots of the girls writhing and moaning. Like I said, to me, it felt gratuitous.


(this is a very minor spoiler, with no significant plot details)

Ah, I see.

Well, I tend to agree with you then. Why would they even be doing that?

Author:  kalmar [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Why would they even be doing that?


See: Fantasy novel.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

kalmar wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Why would they even be doing that?


See: Fantasy novel.

Heh - the irony given that I'd made the same comment.

Still, even within the bounds of the fantasy novel, they tend to at least have a thin reason for things. Two prozzies aren't start going to lex it up with each other unless they're being paid.

Author:  kalmar [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Shrug, you're the expert mate :hat:

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

kalmar wrote:
Shrug, you're the expert mate :hat:

Heh.

Hang on... you didn't mean on fantasy novels, did you?

Author:  Rodafowa [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:14 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
The faux-lesbian scene in this weeks episode was well past the line of good taste and into "for the sake of it" territory, IMO.

Yeah, it's this sort of thing that gets on my nerves. See also: the Dothraki, and the previously mentioned Fat People = Useless And/Or Morally Bankrupt idiocy. Like I said, in general I'm finding it really entertaining but there's enough stupid exploitative reactionary shit (and enough WALLS OF EXPOSITION) to stop me wholehartedly loving it.

Author:  Pod [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Mr Kissyfur wrote:
MaliA wrote:
The imp is by far my favorite character

He's my favourite character in the books.

I still haven't bloody watched this. I assume I'll be waiting for the DVD boxset >:|



Just torrent it?

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:19 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

rodders wrote:
Yeah, it's this sort of thing that gets on my nerves. See also: the Dothraki, and the previously mentioned Fat People = Useless And/Or Morally Bankrupt idiocy. Like I said, in general I'm finding it really entertaining but there's enough stupid exploitative reactionary shit (and enough WALLS OF EXPOSITION) to stop me wholehartedly loving it.


In fairness, in a medieval type setting the fat chaps are quite likely to be the indolent greedy ones, as a whole (see: any member of the clergy). Also, isn't it only the evil eunuch council adviser spy chap who's fat?

Also also, to be fair, most historical type dramas on telly these days have a fair bit of sexy sexy see The Tudors, Rome etc.

Also also also: the WALLS OF EXPOSITION would be annoying in a book, of course, but the lack of a narrator in the telly series means that I'd fully expect some explanation from the characters as to who is who and what the fuck's going on. The books are fucking huge, and the setting is vast and detailed, so I'm not in the least bit surprised

Pod wrote:
Just torrent it?
[/quote]
I don't want to go to jail.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Rodafowa wrote:
See also: the Dothraki
I don't mind the Dothraki portrayal. It's true they are a thinly veiled version of the Mongols, but I like how the leader bloke is clearly very taken with the queen woman and open-minded about her challenging their traditions.

Author:  flis [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:39 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

I just watch some of it and think "Wow, whoever wrote this had real issues." They only seem to do it doggy style, whether they're simulating rape or 'love making' and it's all quite demeaning and there doesn't seem to be any actual need for the constantly aggressive nature of the sex scenes. They're all at it with their brothers and sisters and whilst I get that some of it is about keeping bloodlines pure and that some of it is a major part of the plot,
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
I felt aspects of the relationship between the Tygarian (sp.) siblings didn't need to be sexualised, especially as they didn't have an incestuous relationship, what's the point hinting at it?
The sex is used far to much as a means of portraying power in the show and it is getting to be be off-putting.


It's a shame because everything else about it is good, I like the characters and the relationships between them. I'd probably FF the sex scenes but Ramsea would probably cry :roll:

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:45 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

flis wrote:
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
I felt aspects of the relationship between the Tygarian (sp.) siblings didn't need to be sexualised, especially as they didn't have an incestuous relationship, what's the point hinting at it?


ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
If you mean the Lannister twins, they do have an incestuous relationship. It's a pretty fundamental bit of the ongoing plot.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:53 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

No, Flis means Daenerys and Viserys Targaryen. Although there was a throwaway line from Cersai which mitigated flis's point a little:

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
"The Talgaryens married brothers and sisters for hundreds of years to preserve their bloodline!"

Author:  Rodafowa [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:01 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

flis wrote:
I just watch some of it and think "Wow, whoever wrote this had real issues." They only seem to do it doggy style, whether they're simulating rape or 'love making' and it's all quite demeaning and there doesn't seem to be any actual need for the constantly aggressive nature of the sex scenes.

Yeah, it's definitely going for a Deadwood-esque commentary on how sex and sexuality are used to oppress women, but unlike Deadwood it's trying to have its cake and eat it by making the sex scenes titilating for the viewer (as well as repeatedly using sexy-sexy time to EXPOSITION DUMP all over the screen).

My issue with the Dothraki isn't the characters or the obvious Ghengis Khan parallel (blimey, if I had a problem with thinly-veiled metaphor or parallel I wouldn't last long in the fantasy/sci-fi genre!), it's the fact that it's the only place you're seeing non-white characters in the series and they're playing straight to the trope of non-Western people as savages who're "Closer To The Land" than people in more "civilised" cultures. It's tired and cliché and mildly offensive.

Author:  Malc [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

If you liken the 7 kingdoms to Europe, then it makes sense no?

They wouldn't have been many non whites in Europe in the Medieval Times!

Malc

Author:  Malc [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Also the lesbian scene was to "teach" the prostitute from Winterfell how to fuck properly.


ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
We also learnt that he doesn't want to have sex with anyone apart from Ned's wife, and that's why he perhaps betrayed him at the end of the last episode


Only a spoiler if you haven't seen the last episode on sky atlantic

MAlc

Author:  MaliA [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Re: Dothraki

I haven't really seen any race contetations involving the way their society is portrayed, I viewed it more as a society in which to the alpha male go the spoils and everyone else picks the scraps up (see the issue about the ponytails). I reasoned to myself that the reason the other kingdoms were afraid of them is that they represented the way of life that they have so struggled to move from. I suppose representing the wilder side of things which the civilised rulers of the kingdoms were keen to avoid as best they could, given that none of the kings have seemed to be particularly good at fighting. This ties in with the "north of the wall" issues they have, and not wanting to cross it, and keeping the seven kingdoms together.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

You're missing the point on both fronts, Malc. For one, there were plenty of non-white advanced societies in the world; the Egyptians were building pyramids when the Europeans were still trying not to starve to death. There's no reason Game of Thrones couldn't draw on that stuff for a change and give the Dothraki some knowledge or tech that the Westeros folk don't understand. For example, the stirrup was invented in Asia and the Romans had no knowledge of it; it didn't arrive in Europe until Asians imported the design hundreds of years later.

For two, your explanation of the plot in that scene (which I've already acknowledged in an early post) in no way justifies the overdone lingering shots of naked flesh and female-tennis-player grunting soundtrack.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
your explanation of the plot in that scene (which I've already acknowledged in an early post) in no way justifies the overdone lingering shots of naked flesh and female-tennis-player grunting soundtrack.

Honestly, I think that sort of thing is self-justifying. /teenager

Author:  Malc [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

I did think it was a crap scene, but it did make sense in explaining the sort of man that he is. I just thought it was badly done.

As for the Dothraki, if you take them as Mongols pushing West across Europe, then it does make sense.

Yeah, there are other races that could have been used, but if that's what the author/producer wanted to convey they wouldn't choose to use them.

How many non-Europeans have attacked Northern Europe through History? (I'm excluding the Moors attacking Spain/Portugal here)

Malc

Author:  MaliA [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

vikings. They came in boats, not hordes.

Author:  Malc [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:42 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

MaliA wrote:
vikings. They came in boats, not hordes.


They're European.

Malc

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Rodafowa wrote:
flis wrote:
I just watch some of it and think "Wow, whoever wrote this had real issues." They only seem to do it doggy style, whether they're simulating rape or 'love making' and it's all quite demeaning and there doesn't seem to be any actual need for the constantly aggressive nature of the sex scenes.

Yeah, it's definitely going for a Deadwood-esque commentary on how sex and sexuality are used to oppress women, but unlike Deadwood it's trying to have its cake and eat it by making the sex scenes titilating for the viewer (as well as repeatedly using sexy-sexy time to EXPOSITION DUMP all over the screen).

My issue with the Dothraki isn't the characters or the obvious Ghengis Khan parallel (blimey, if I had a problem with thinly-veiled metaphor or parallel I wouldn't last long in the fantasy/sci-fi genre!), it's the fact that it's the only place you're seeing non-white characters in the series and they're playing straight to the trope of non-Western people as savages who're "Closer To The Land" than people in more "civilised" cultures. It's tired and cliché and mildly offensive.

It's exactly what happened in the book though. As malc has pointed out, the Seven Kingdoms is Europe, and the stuff over the Shining Sea or whatever it is is the Middle and Far East. The Dothraki are, and are supposed to be, Mongol-esque. It's all party of Dinarys's character development later on - driven by the contrast between her and her whiney brother's regal background and the culture of the big bad horse botherer she ends up getting given to. A culture which she ends up buying into, and then
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
basically exporting back to Westeros when she invades


In the book you see the Dothraki's interactions with the other pseudo-Arab civilisations over there, most of which are vastly, vastly more advanced than the Kingdoms. And all of whom are looked down on (and pounded on) by the Dothraki. I presume they haven't got round to them yet.

The Seven Kingdoms are viewed by most other civilisations as being a bit backwards, although that obviously hasn't become clear as yet in the telly version. But in any case, the individuals within it who are the main characters of the books (and presumably the telly series) are largely execrable, and when there's a
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
civil war
later the way the common folk are treated by all sides is a real insight into the values (or lack thereof) at the heart of the Kingdoms.

I really don't see where the offense can come from here, unless you're looking for it very hard.

Author:  Rodafowa [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 13:56 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Malc wrote:
If you liken the 7 kingdoms to Europe, then it makes sense no?

They wouldn't have been many non whites in Europe in the Medieval Times!

1) It's not medieval Europe, it's a fantasy story.

2) I understand both what the real-world inspiration for the Dothraki is and what their thematic purpose in the story seems to be. But if the only place you're seeing people who aren't white is as part of the group who're are representing the wild, untamed cultural id that, to me, is both a little icky and a lot of a cliché.

The net result is that in this series we're only being shown people who aren't white as hootin' hollerin' unruly savages with natural rhythm who can only be kept in line by force, whose gatherings look like a cheap strip club and if given the chance would come over here and rape all our women. I don't want to make it sound more serious than it is, or like it's some sort of premeditated hate crime that's being carried out to Keep Darkie Down but it does impact my enjoyment of the series to a degree and I think it's worthy of comment.

Author:  Rodafowa [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 14:00 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Mr Kissyfur wrote:
It's exactly what happened in the book though. I really don't see where the offense can come from here, unless you're looking for it very hard.

Honestly, I don't really care what happens in the book. I'm judging what I've seen, as would the vast majority of the people watching.

I don't see how you can't see why it's a bit offensive, unless you're trying very hard not to understand.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 14:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Rodafowa wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
It's exactly what happened in the book though. I really don't see where the offense can come from here, unless you're looking for it very hard.

Honestly, I don't really care what happens in the book. I'm judging what I've seen, as would the vast majority of the people watching.

I don't see how you can't see why it's a bit offensive, unless you're trying very hard not to understand.

No, I can't see why it's offensive. TV adaptation is done of a book. Adaptation leaves out, due to the exigencies of the medium, some bits of the book. End result is that a dark-skinned culture rides around on horses, generally being scary and awesome, but other dark-skinned cultures aren't (as yet) part of the TV series. If that dark-skinned culture (and the culture is bloody intrinsic to later plot developments) had been changed, as Doc G has suggested, not only would fans of the books be spitting blood, you'd have cocked up the plot.

You really do have to want that to be offensive. Particularly as the one white-skinned culture portrayed is largely populated by ghastly cunts. Just wait until the white-skinned islander culture comes into it - they make the Dothraki look like tea-sipping ladies what lunch.

Author:  Malc [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 14:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Rodafowa wrote:
Malc wrote:
If you liken the 7 kingdoms to Europe, then it makes sense no?

They wouldn't have been many non whites in Europe in the Medieval Times!

1) It's not medieval Europe, it's a fantasy story.

2) I understand both what the real-world inspiration for the Dothraki is and what their thematic purpose in the story seems to be. But if the only place you're seeing people who aren't white is as part of the group who're are representing the wild, untamed cultural id that, to me, is both a little icky and a lot of a cliché.


But it's based on Medieval Northern Europe...

Malc

Author:  Rodafowa [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 14:15 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Mr Kissyfur wrote:
No, I can't see why it's offensive.

I've explained it in really small words, chap. But we've been down this road often enough to know that there's probably no benefit for either of us in belabouring this point any further. So, agree to disagree or whatever.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 14:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Rodafowa wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
No, I can't see why it's offensive.

I've explained it in really small words, chap.


Weeeeelll, no. In all fairness what you've done is just repeat "this is offensive" in progressively more patronising (or just exasperated :)) terms but yeah, agree to disagree. :)

Quote:
But we've been down this road often enough to know that there's probably no benefit for either of us in belabouring this point any further. So, agree to disagree or whatever.


Indeed.

Anyway - I'll be interested to watch this to see how they've dealt with the stuff Over There with the Taragyens in the absence of their original benefactor and his city.

Author:  Pod [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 15:33 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

I'm massively offended that the Wildling people are clearly meant to be Scottish.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 16:18 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

Yay! I just found this streamed online. Score!

Author:  GovernmentYard [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 17:42 ]
Post subject:  Re: Game Of Thrones

I think both the Dothraki and the naked womens are proper ace.

Page 2 of 46 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/