Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and Royal Babies thread https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6919 |
Page 13 of 21 |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:15 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Brexit brings the Anglosphere closer! |
Author: | Squirt [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:27 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Marrying an American divorcee? I'm not sure that turned out so well last time. |
Author: | Squirt [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:29 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:31 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Squirt wrote: Marrying an American divorcee? I'm not sure that turned out so well last time. And he had dubious Nazi connections... |
Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:45 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. |
Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:49 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Grim... wrote: Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. Disagree. Donna from 2 Pints of Lager and a packet of crisps. |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:51 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
I'm looking forward to Mr Trump posting a message on Twitter claiming to have declined an invite. |
Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:53 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
MaliA wrote: Grim... wrote: Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. Disagree. Donna from 2 Pints of Lager and a packet of crisps. She's Donna, she's not a Donna. Plus I was more of a fan of Janet. |
Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:56 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Grim... wrote: MaliA wrote: Grim... wrote: Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. Disagree. Donna from 2 Pints of Lager and a packet of crisps. She's Donna, she's not a Donna. Plus I was more of a fan of Janet. Louise. Janet just looked filthy all the time. Smith nailed that part. |
Author: | asfish [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:03 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Squirt wrote: Marrying an American divorcee? I'm not sure that turned out so well last time. Charles was technically a widower when he married Camelia, so if the future King can do it, then so can Harry I guess? Nice to see he can marry someone he loves and who isn’t a first cousin Wonder which Dukedom Harry will get? Also will she be still working on Suits? |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:06 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
asfish wrote: Charles was technically a widower when he married Camelia, so if the future King can do it, then so can Harry I guess? Charlie married Camilla in a civil ceremony and had it blessed at a church. Not sure how far things have changed since then, but I guess it wasn't a problem for one of his more notable namesakes. The only other thing I remember from that time was a Youtube parody called 'Camilla Queen', which still makes me smile. |
Author: | devilman [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:09 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
MaliA wrote: Grim... wrote: MaliA wrote: Grim... wrote: Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. Disagree. Donna from 2 Pints of Lager and a packet of crisps. She's Donna, she's not a Donna. Plus I was more of a fan of Janet. Louise. Janet just looked filthy all the time. Smith nailed that part. I like how we've effortlessly moved from a royal engagement to 2 Pints. I went out with someone who used to get compared to Donna a lot, which she hated, although I think it was more down to snobbery than anything else - she didn't like The Royle Family (almost back on thread track) because she didn't like to think people like that actually existed |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:10 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
devilman wrote: (almost back on thread track) What are her thoughts on proportional representation? |
Author: | Squirt [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:13 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
asfish wrote: Squirt wrote: Marrying an American divorcee? I'm not sure that turned out so well last time. Charles was technically a widower when he married Camelia, so if the future King can do it, then so can Harry I guess? Nice to see he can marry someone he loves and who isn’t a first cousin Wonder which Dukedom Harry will get? Also will she be still working on Suits? That "technically" is worrying. |
Author: | TheVision [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:15 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Donna Air, surely? |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:17 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
asfish wrote: Wonder which Dukedom Harry will get? Aquitaine. |
Author: | Cras [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:19 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Spectator waffling about the Royal Marriage being bad because she's a divorcee. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/p ... d-showbiz/ Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the entire existence of the Church of England based on the desire for divorcees to get married, and Royals in particular? |
Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:22 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Cras wrote: Spectator waffling about the Royal Marriage being bad because she's a divorcee. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/p ... d-showbiz/ Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the entire existence of the Church of England based on the desire for divorcees to get married, and Royals in particular? He liked to chop and change! |
Author: | devilman [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:22 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Cras wrote: Spectator waffling about the Royal Marriage being bad because she's a divorcee. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/p ... d-showbiz/ Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the entire existence of the Church of England based on the desire for divorcees to get married, and Royals in particular? For terrible opinion pieces on the engagement, I think Tatler is winning so far. Quote: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle?! It's simple, really: Your average English girl rarely brushes her hair and never cleans behind her ears, so it's no wonder that Britain's bachelors are falling for spruce all-American charms.
|
Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:26 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Yeah! British women, up your game! |
Author: | Bamba [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:41 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
devilman wrote: Cras wrote: Spectator waffling about the Royal Marriage being bad because she's a divorcee. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/p ... d-showbiz/ Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the entire existence of the Church of England based on the desire for divorcees to get married, and Royals in particular? For terrible opinion pieces on the engagement, I think Tatler is winning so far. Quote: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle?! It's simple, really: Your average English girl rarely brushes her hair and never cleans behind her ears, so it's no wonder that Britain's bachelors are falling for spruce all-American charms. Holy shit, that's surely got to be some kind of incredible satire? The entire article is just mind-boggling. |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:43 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
MaliA wrote: Yeah! British women, up your game! Ed Sheeran? |
Author: | Kern [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:26 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
It was very courteous of Prince Harry to announce his wedding within the publishing schedule for 'Private Eye'. |
Author: | MaliA [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:30 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
ROYAL BABY INCOMING |
Author: | markg [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:50 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Author: | Grim... [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:12 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
PUSH KATE PUSH! PUSH KATE PUSH! |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:49 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
So kind of Will to further reduce Harry's chances of ever becoming king. Could at least have waited until after his wedding. |
Author: | Squirt [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:59 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Clearly a Royal Baby being born on St George's Day is a clear Symbol of BRITAIN GOING FORWARD and SUNLIT UPLANDS and if they had any decency they'd call it Nigel after the man who freed us forever from BRUSSELS. |
Author: | Warhead [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:13 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
FFS. WGASA. Also BBC news at its best. |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:26 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Squirt wrote: Clearly a Royal Baby being born on St George's Day is a clear Symbol of BRITAIN GOING FORWARD and SUNLIT UPLANDS. In honour of OPEN GLOBAL BRITAIN we should the royal sprog after someone from Turkey who died in Palestine for his beliefs. |
Author: | Warhead [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:28 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Kern wrote: Squirt wrote: Clearly a Royal Baby being born on St George's Day is a clear Symbol of BRITAIN GOING FORWARD and SUNLIT UPLANDS. In honour of OPEN GLOBAL BRITAIN we should the royal sprog after someone from Turkey who died in Palestine for his beliefs. Find the missing word. |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:30 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Four letters. |
Author: | Cras [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:31 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Cook |
Author: | Mimi [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:31 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Sell? |
Author: | Cras [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:45 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Skin |
Author: | Mimi [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:52 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Dark, Craster. Dark. |
Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:37 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
We should Dark the royal baby? Controversial, but it might help with Windrush... |
Author: | Satsuma [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:42 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
I didn’t know she had a second sprog. They’re knocking em out, ain’t they. Jesus. |
Author: | Kern [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:49 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Satsuma wrote: I didn’t know she had a second sprog. They’re knocking em out, ain’t they. Jesus. We need all the alliances we can get these days. Fucking Brexit. |
Author: | MaliA [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:59 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
In Asimov's Foundation, whenever a crisis emerged, Harry Seldon's wisdom would guide the planet through. We have Kate's uterus |
Author: | DBSnappa [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:00 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
MaliA wrote: In Asimov's Foundation, whenever a crisis emerged, Harry Seldon's wisdom would guide the planet through. We have Kate's uterus Well, for most of it we had Danieel |
Author: | Zardoz [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 12:44 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Welcome to ingerlund, baby Enoch. |
Author: | myp [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 13:11 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
DBSnappa wrote: MaliA wrote: In Asimov's Foundation, whenever a crisis emerged, Harry Seldon's wisdom would guide the planet through. We have Kate's uterus Well, for most of it we had Danieel Huge spoilers! |
Author: | Squirt [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 13:27 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Well, the little 'un is born! Another throat Harry will have to slit when he seizes the throne in a brutal palace coup. Hopefully all involved are well. |
Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 13:38 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Giphy "salute": https://media3.giphy.com/media/B2pYWvuAH2cnu/giphy-loop.mp4 |
Author: | Trooper [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 13:48 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
I'm putting my money on Arthur. Well, if I had any money I would. |
Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 13:51 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
BBc reckons Phillip. |
Author: | Trooper [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 13:52 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Prince Phillip? Nah, sounds stupid. |
Author: | Squirt [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 13:54 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
STORMHAMMER |
Author: | Zardoz [ Mon Apr 23, 2018 14:17 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Nicky Santoro |
Page 13 of 21 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |