| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and Royal Babies thread https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6919 |
Page 12 of 21 |
| Author: | Cras [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 13:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Mine is my grandmother's family name. |
|
| Author: | Mr Dave [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 13:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
MaliA wrote: I don't have a middle name as David from the Archers didn't. Fixed. Meanwhile, I'm the only one of my family barring my younger cousin to have a middle name. |
|
| Author: | Bluecup [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 13:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
I have no middle name because my dad had to ask how to spell his middle name when signing the marriage certificate and my mum decided against them. |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 14:06 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Bluecup wrote: because my dad had to ask how to spell his middle name when signing the marriage certificate Was your Dad 4 years old when he got married or something? |
|
| Author: | Bluecup [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 14:13 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
GazChap wrote: Bluecup wrote: because my dad had to ask how to spell his middle name when signing the marriage certificate Was your Dad 4 years old when he got married or something? He comes from the countryside. |
|
| Author: | myp [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 14:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Bluecup wrote: GazChap wrote: Bluecup wrote: because my dad had to ask how to spell his middle name when signing the marriage certificate Was your Dad 4 years old when he got married or something? He comes from the countryside. I can't work out if that's a justification or an alternative reason. |
|
| Author: | Bluecup [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 14:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
SilentElk wrote: Bluecup wrote: GazChap wrote: Bluecup wrote: because my dad had to ask how to spell his middle name when signing the marriage certificate Was your Dad 4 years old when he got married or something? He comes from the countryside. I can't work out if that's a justification or an alternative reason. I think his excuse was he never used it much before. Add in some wedding nerves, probably lead him to ask. But still... |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 14:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Bluecup wrote: I think his excuse was he never used it much before. Add in some wedding nerves, probably lead him to ask. But still... I'm guessing his middle name isn't 'Tom' |
|
| Author: | Zardoz [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 14:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Mr Dave wrote: MaliA wrote: I don't have a middle name as David from the Archers didn't. Fixed. Meanwhile, I'm the only one of my family barring my younger cousin to have a middle name. Is it Dimrill? |
|
| Author: | Bluecup [ Thu Jul 25, 2013 14:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
DavPaz wrote: Bluecup wrote: I think his excuse was he never used it much before. Add in some wedding nerves, probably lead him to ask. But still... I'm guessing his middle name isn't 'Tom' Funny enough, it's George. Parents are so embarrassing. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:55 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
ROYAL BABY THE SEQUEL!!!!!!!!! HOW GOOD IS THIS, EH? I BET SCOTLAND WILL MISS A ROYAL BABY! |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
MaliA wrote: ROYAL BABY THE SEQUEL!!!!!!!!! HOW GOOD IS THIS, EH? I BET SCOTLAND WILL MISS A ROYAL BABY! Wish I'd put some money on something like this. Prince Harry is probably irritated at another demotion. Must be fun to ruin your younger brother's career chances with each successive child. |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Sep 08, 2014 13:35 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Think I just saw Prince William's motorcade go past Carfax. |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Tue Apr 21, 2015 15:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Lordy, I was so worked up about the General Election I'd forgotten about the more important matter of a spare-to-the-heir. Some pretty odd pictures in the Evening Standard. Happy Commoner wrote: “I was nine when the Queen was crowned and I’ve met her on three occasions. She must be fed up with the sight of me!” Indeed dear. She loathes you. Avoid Paris. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Tue Apr 21, 2015 15:27 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
|
|
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:27 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Number Three on its way (BBC) In the post-Brexit world, we need all the royal children we can get for diplomatic marriages. Taking back control. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
ROYAL BABY |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
We're going to call it Prince Nigel Michael Boris Aaron, in honour of our national liberators. |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Charmingly, this is the second item on the BBC website, after North Korea's missiles. Bairns not bombs, Mr Kim. |
|
| Author: | devilman [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
I'd rather forgotten they'd had a second child, so a third was a bit of a surprise. I'll cope though. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABY thread |
Kern wrote: We're going to call it Prince Nigel Michael Boris Aaron, in honour of our national liberators. Superb. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:19 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
ROYAL BABY |
|
| Author: | Squirt [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
William is realising he blew his chances at a decent Battleyness score by being a Search and Rescue pilot, and his Scandal by not kidnapping any Nuns before getting married or murdering his brother, so he's doubling down on the Dynasty score. Wise move. |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Sep 04, 2017 12:26 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Squirt wrote: William is realising he blew his chances at a decent Battleyness score by being a Search and Rescue pilot, and his Scandal by not kidnapping any Nuns before getting married or murdering his brother, so he's doubling down on the Dynasty score. Wise move. 
|
|
| Author: | zaphod79 [ Tue Oct 17, 2017 15:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41655914 |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Tue Oct 17, 2017 15:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Hurrah! |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Harry to marry colonial! |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Yay@ ROYAL WEDDING! !!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
I bet we don't get a day off for this one. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:12 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
STRONG AND STABLE THANK GOD FOR THAT BREXIT DOES NOT MATTER AS NEW HEIR AND ROYAL WEDDING PARTY |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Brexit brings the Anglosphere closer! |
|
| Author: | Squirt [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:27 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Marrying an American divorcee? I'm not sure that turned out so well last time. |
|
| Author: | Squirt [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Squirt wrote: Marrying an American divorcee? I'm not sure that turned out so well last time. And he had dubious Nazi connections...
|
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Grim... wrote: Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. Disagree. Donna from 2 Pints of Lager and a packet of crisps. |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
I'm looking forward to Mr Trump posting a message on Twitter claiming to have declined an invite. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
MaliA wrote: Grim... wrote: Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. Disagree. Donna from 2 Pints of Lager and a packet of crisps. She's Donna, she's not a Donna. Plus I was more of a fan of Janet. |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Grim... wrote: MaliA wrote: Grim... wrote: Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. Disagree. Donna from 2 Pints of Lager and a packet of crisps. She's Donna, she's not a Donna. Plus I was more of a fan of Janet. Louise. Janet just looked filthy all the time. Smith nailed that part. |
|
| Author: | asfish [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:03 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Squirt wrote: Marrying an American divorcee? I'm not sure that turned out so well last time. Charles was technically a widower when he married Camelia, so if the future King can do it, then so can Harry I guess? Nice to see he can marry someone he loves and who isn’t a first cousin Wonder which Dukedom Harry will get? Also will she be still working on Suits? |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:06 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
asfish wrote: Charles was technically a widower when he married Camelia, so if the future King can do it, then so can Harry I guess? Charlie married Camilla in a civil ceremony and had it blessed at a church. Not sure how far things have changed since then, but I guess it wasn't a problem for one of his more notable namesakes. The only other thing I remember from that time was a Youtube parody called 'Camilla Queen', which still makes me smile. |
|
| Author: | devilman [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:09 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
MaliA wrote: Grim... wrote: MaliA wrote: Grim... wrote: Squirt wrote: Although if you're going to marry someone from Suits, it clearly should be Donna. And if you're going to marry a Donna, it should be Donna Actual from The West Wing. Disagree. Donna from 2 Pints of Lager and a packet of crisps. She's Donna, she's not a Donna. Plus I was more of a fan of Janet. Louise. Janet just looked filthy all the time. Smith nailed that part. I like how we've effortlessly moved from a royal engagement to 2 Pints.  I went out with someone who used to get compared to Donna a lot, which she hated, although I think it was more down to snobbery than anything else - she didn't like The Royle Family (almost back on thread track) because she didn't like to think people like that actually existed |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
devilman wrote: (almost back on thread track) What are her thoughts on proportional representation? |
|
| Author: | Squirt [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:13 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
asfish wrote: Squirt wrote: Marrying an American divorcee? I'm not sure that turned out so well last time. Charles was technically a widower when he married Camelia, so if the future King can do it, then so can Harry I guess? Nice to see he can marry someone he loves and who isn’t a first cousin Wonder which Dukedom Harry will get? Also will she be still working on Suits? That "technically" is worrying. |
|
| Author: | TheVision [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Donna Air, surely? |
|
| Author: | Kern [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
asfish wrote: Wonder which Dukedom Harry will get? Aquitaine. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:19 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Spectator waffling about the Royal Marriage being bad because she's a divorcee. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/p ... d-showbiz/ Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the entire existence of the Church of England based on the desire for divorcees to get married, and Royals in particular? |
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Cras wrote: Spectator waffling about the Royal Marriage being bad because she's a divorcee. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/p ... d-showbiz/ Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the entire existence of the Church of England based on the desire for divorcees to get married, and Royals in particular? He liked to chop and change! |
|
| Author: | devilman [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Cras wrote: Spectator waffling about the Royal Marriage being bad because she's a divorcee. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/11/p ... d-showbiz/ Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the entire existence of the Church of England based on the desire for divorcees to get married, and Royals in particular? For terrible opinion pieces on the engagement, I think Tatler is winning so far. Quote: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle?! It's simple, really: Your average English girl rarely brushes her hair and never cleans behind her ears, so it's no wonder that Britain's bachelors are falling for spruce all-American charms.
|
|
| Author: | MaliA [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 15:26 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Royal Wedding, Electoral Reform, and ROYAL BABIES thread |
Yeah! British women, up your game! |
|
| Page 12 of 21 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|