Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:07 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
iTunes does seem better in OS X, to be fair.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:09 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69511
Location: Your Mum
http://www.macworld.com/article/1163242 ... a_nas.html

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:26 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Good find! I shall save that for later.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:29 
User avatar
Excellently Membered

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 1268
Location: Behind you!
I haz a Netgear NAS Duo thingy. It's quite good but a little under powered by modern standards. It runs some sort of music sharing thing (bonjour) that allows it to be included in your iTunes or Media Player library. Don't actually use it daily but it's been pretty handy on the odd occasion. It also uses that UDPUUDOUUOU(DLNA/UPnP) thing that allows you to watch all the downloaded mooviiieees and music on your TV or on other stuff that supports the UPDUDUDU(DLNA/UPnP) ting. INIT!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:37 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69511
Location: Your Mum
Yeah, my (full) Buffalo Linkstation has all that stuff, but the TV won't pause when playing directly from it (but will if I play the same file via the PC, which is why I'm thinking about a server).
It's fairly quite to read and write, but deleting takes ages. It also has a built-in uTorrent client, which is the best bit.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:42 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22549
Location: shropshire, uk
The DNS232 I bought off the Doc is still running fine..

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:48 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22549
Location: shropshire, uk
or is it a 323... :)

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:58 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
KovacsC wrote:
or is it a 323... :)

Hah! Yeah, it's a 323. Glad it's still chugging along. One of my better bits of kit, that was.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:00 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22549
Location: shropshire, uk
had problems with the itunes server but I think that is an itunes issue not an NAS issue..

Torrent client is brill.

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:00 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10079
I've got a 323 going spare you can have, Grim...

Alternatively, buy a HP Microserver if they're still running the cashback (Yup, £100 cashback).

4 drive bays, and the BIOS can be hacked to treat the optical and esata connectors as normal drives - 24TB should be enough for anybody (though it only comes with a single 250GB drive). I'm waiting delivery on a 240GB SSD and cable to turn into a new "wedged between the bluray and hard drive bays" boot drive.

And you can put a £20 graphics card in it to get realtime video decoding/transcoding.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:05 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69511
Location: Your Mum
So that's £110 total?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:12 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10079
Very naughtily, they show the ex-VAT price without clarification, so it's more like £150, and you have to apply for the cashback post-sale (they're pretty quick about it, but not instant).

Plus £20 for the graphics card, if you want that (the onboard one isn't good enough for realtime decoding and the CPU is "challenged", though much better than one you'll get in a NAS)

Plus upgrading the RAM if you want that (apparently non-ECC works, so £30 for 8GB. I paid £30 for a 2GB ECC stick. Yay!)

Plus a buttload of disk (shitloads).

Oh, and a legitimate OS licence, unless you want Lunix.

So yeah, £150 for a functional machine, but more to make it properly good. I've not got realtime transcoded streaming quite working yet, because software authors are cunts, but it's still worth it. Playing the waiting game on drive prices though...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:32 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22277
The Microservers are excellent value for money, but I couldn't find an OS that is as good for raiding as either the Drobo or Readynas.
Windows home server doesn't do raid-5, freenas does a version of raid-5 that isn't as flexible as the Drobo or even the Readynas XRaid.

Great little boxes if that sort of thing doesn't bother you though, I keep thinking I should get one and move all my overnight stuff and services off the iMac so I can sleep that overnight, but looking at the power figures an iMac with screen off is pretty similar to the Microserver, so it isn't really worth the hassle for me :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:35 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10079
There's a soft-RAID thing, I dunno if that does 5 though (the webpage says 0/1 but I'm sure there were more options than 0, 1 and JBOD). I'm RAID0-ing (in Win7 Home Premium) because fuck it.

Edit: The manual says RAID5 is possible. Editit: Oh, but the chipset may not support it.

I do intend to have an off-site backup of important stuff, but the machine is primarily for music and streaming of video ripped from my DVD and BD collections; iCloud is already there for music and most photos are in SkyDrive, for which I'll probably just spring the few quid for space >25GB.

Oh, and apparently the CPU has the right bits for Windows 8 Hyper-V virtualisation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:47 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22277
I'm sure when I looked into it further, the soft raid-5 had some limitations which put me off. Mostly likely around drive size matching IIRC. The soft raid-5 will only match the size of the smallest disk for each of the other volumes, so you can't just buy a couple of 3TB drives to increase capacity, you have to replace all the drives. The drobo and readynas are much more clever, as long as there is one other drive that is of equal size, any added drives will increase capacity, regardless of the size of the other drives in the array.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:50 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10079
That's how RAID is supposed to work; in an array the smallest drive sets the limit. I don't see how it can work any other way (except JBOD, but like RAID0 that's not fault tolerant).

What you're talking about is something like JBOD-ing of multiple 2-drive RAID0/1 arrays. I suppose you could then have a parity drive for the JBOD array.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:59 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10079
Also woohoo, my SSDs are here! Now I just the need the eSATA+USB => SATA adaptor and I can start thinking about installing the hacked BIOS for super-fast goodness.

Oh, the main fan is a constant-RPM quite-noisy thing, but a temperature-controlled one can be installed with an "easy" hack of the connector (because HP deliberately wired up the motherboard end wrong).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:00 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22277
BikNorton wrote:
That's how RAID is supposed to work; in an array the smallest drive sets the limit. I don't see how it can work any other way (except JBOD, but like RAID0 that's not fault tolerant).



That's how RAID-5 works, but the Drobo and Netgear go further than that. I don't know how it works either. :)
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/datace ... ogies/2286

In my drobo at the moment, I have:

3TB + 3TB + 2TB + 2TB which gives me 7TB for data with disk failure redundancy.

If I had the same in a RAID-5 array on the Microserver, I would only have 6TB for data.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:06 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Raid 5 can use your largest drive as a parity drive, so you'd still get 7gb, IIRC.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:07 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
No, wait, that's totally wrong, you stripe across all drives.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:40 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10079
That article makes no sense; if it's keeping 3TB of space so it can rebuild a failed 3TB drive to usability but you also have 7TB available, where's it putting all the parity?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:42 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Yeah, I've been struggling with that. I'm kind of working on the assumption that it's striping 2TB of the data across all the drives, then striping the extra TB across just the 3TB drives. But that wouldn't give you 7GB either.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:47 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22277
Magic, I tell you.

I've had a failed 3TB drive, which I replaced and I lost no data.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 14:06 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
http://www.amazon.co.uk/D-Link-ShareCen ... 742&sr=8-4

This is pretty good £60 (with no drives)

Will take 2 drives so you could have 4TB in a mirror or 8TB in a stripe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 14:12 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
Trooper wrote:
Magic, I tell you.

I've had a failed 3TB drive, which I replaced and I lost no data.


Drobo is very clever but you need more tha 2 disks for the benifits, with 2 it just forces a mirror along the lines of RAID, so a 2TB and a 4TB=2TB Mirror

Always been put off a bit as there RAID is hard to understand and they are not great over the network, at least the one my mate has isn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 15:01 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22277
asfish wrote:
Trooper wrote:
Magic, I tell you.

I've had a failed 3TB drive, which I replaced and I lost no data.


Drobo is very clever but you need more tha 2 disks for the benifits, with 2 it just forces a mirror along the lines of RAID, so a 2TB and a 4TB=2TB Mirror

Always been put off a bit as there RAID is hard to understand and they are not great over the network, at least the one my mate has isn't.


Well, yes, you need more than 2 disks, same as in any Raid-5 :) They all use one of the largest disks as redundancy.

And yes, network performance is pretty poor, I use mine connected directly to the iMac for that reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 15:23 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
Sorry what I mean is that with 2 drives it forces a mirror there is no option for JBOD etc

Hung over today :)

Do these come with a USB 3 now? Or E-Sata?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 15:29 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10079
Trooper wrote:
They all use one of the largest disks as redundancy.
It can't do that, because that disk might fail.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 15:39 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69511
Location: Your Mum
BikNorton wrote:
Trooper wrote:
They all use one of the largest disks as redundancy.
It can't do that, because that disk might fail.

So you replace it and rebuild the RAID. That's why it's redundant.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NAS boxes RMD
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 16:05 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22277
asfish wrote:
Sorry what I mean is that with 2 drives it forces a mirror there is no option for JBOD etc

Hung over today :)

Do these come with a USB 3 now? Or E-Sata?


Oh right! I get you :)

Yeah, no JBOD option, this is a good thing ;)

I think the latest one is USB3 now.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Vogons and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.