Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 5933 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 ... 119  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 11:21 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22256
Screen tearing is when everything looks really sad, as if you are looking through a salty sheen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 11:24 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
Thanks to Mr Dave, I'm always looking through a salty sheen.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 11:26 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17154
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
What did I do this time?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 11:53 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 1883
Saturnalian wrote:
I don't know what screen tearing is but I'm going to troll AE about it now.

:kiss:


In case you are interested (I know you aren't, but just in case):

Example image: http://zoneitastuces.com/wp-content/upl ... earing.png

It happens if drawing buffers are switched while the monitor is still painting the current buffer, instead of at the bottom of the screen (waiting for the monitor to "reach the bottom" before switching is what is known as vsync).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:13 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
Sorry to change the subject a bit but is anyone else eyeing up a 4K gaming PC?

For starters 4K is a bit of a misnomer as the monitors actually display 3840x2160 pixels, so not even quite 4K on the x-axis, let alone the y-axis which is how we generally understand 720, 1080 etc.

That aside though, it's a monstrously gorgeous resolution and decent 4K monitors are now down in the £500-£600 range, whereas they debuted last year at £3000!

The major problem is getting a graphics card that can shift that many pixels around, and there aren't really any single GPU cards on the market at the moment that can consistently handle top settings on modern games and sustain 60FPS or close to it. The Radeon 290X and GeForce 780Ti are within shouting distance though.

I thinking early next year, Intel's next generation CPU architecture should be out, Nvidia should have their next line of graphics cards on the loose, and the monitors are only going to get cheaper (although I'm amazed they're down at £500 already).

Obviously games are going to be irresistibly gorgeous at that resolution, but you also get a load of extra screen real estate just in Windows as well (which never goes amiss).

Make no mistake it'll be a substantial cash investment, I'm thinking probably in the region of £2000-£2500 for the full setup (PC and monitor), but my current PC really is cracking on a bit now (the mobo/CPU/RAM I bought second hand and they're pushing up towards six years old!) and I've had a very good run out of it.

I'd be looking at the new PC lasting me 3-4 years at least, which makes the cost reasonable if you think about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:22 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16552
Hearthly wrote:
I'm thinking probably in the region of £2000-£2500...

I'd be looking at the new PC lasting me 3-4 years at least, which makes the cost reasonable if you think about it.

*thinks about it*

Nope.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 13:00 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
Yeah, the whole thing would still be far too rich for my blood; maybe on the upgrade after my next upgrade; which puts it at something like seven years in the future given current Bamba-trends. So probably around the time they stop making games for the last gen consoles and start properly taking advantage of the PS4 hardware. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 13:24 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22256
Yeah, too rich for my blood, and I buy any old shit.

Oculus Rift (and the required graphics card to drive it) will be my next serious outlay I expect


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 13:27 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 1883
Trooper wrote:
Yeah, too rich for my blood, and I buy any old shit.

Oculus Rift (and the required graphics card to drive it) will be my next serious outlay I expect

I would have to try it first, because I don't always respond well to stereoscopic 3D, but I am also thinking along these lines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 13:32 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22256
lasermink wrote:
Trooper wrote:
Yeah, too rich for my blood, and I buy any old shit.

Oculus Rift (and the required graphics card to drive it) will be my next serious outlay I expect

I would have to try it first, because I don't always respond well to stereoscopic 3D, but I am also thinking along these lines.


You could do what I did. Buy a DK1 on ebay, try it for a couple of weeks, sell it on ebay for the same price you bought it for.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 19:00 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
Fine I'll go 4K all by myself and screw you guys! :hat:

Yes it's a lot of cash but then again I basically live on my PC (and Wii U) so I may as well have a nice one.

Oculus Rift I'm a lot less convinced by.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 17:35 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10065
The cheap monitors are well under £500 now. The reason they're cheap is that they're TN panels instead of newer IPS or DGZA things - the expensive Dell ones are much better monitors.

I want one pretty bad, but have to save up. For a graphics card too, but just SLIGHTLY different priorities - I need a low-profile, low-power, single slot one to go in my HP Microserver. I just want a 4k desktop because 1080p isnt enough. I've got a pair of 1080p screens at work and that's not enough either.

Cheapest I've found so far is an amd R5 250 eyefinity for about £90.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 16:54 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
TheVision wrote:
This reminds me.. I have a PC hardware question. I'm out of touch so bear with me.

I have a drive bay on the front of my PC that has numerous card reader slots, a mic input, headphone socket, 2x USB ports and a couple of data ports (I think, I've never used them)

The SD card slot has stopped working so I need to replace it. Where would be the best place to go and do you reckon it'll be hard to swap out? I haven't looked but I imagine there's a ton of cables. I'd have a look myself but a)I've only just thought of it and b)I'm not sure what the thing is called to look for it.

Just get something like this: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Icy-Box-IB-864- ... 405&sr=8-1

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 18:54 
SupaMod
User avatar
"Praisebot"

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17013
Location: Parts unknown
Thanks Grim.. But there's no headphone socket on that. That is kind of a deal breaker for the thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 20:21 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
Allow me to add that to the search term for you.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B00CEPB ... 38&sr=8-1#

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 19:58 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 1883
So this does appear to be the graphics card I have been waiting for...
Eurogamer wrote:
The GeForce GTX 970 is that rarest of things in the graphics card market - a genuine game-changer. In fact, it's actually more like a cooked hand grenade strategically lobbed into the high-end GPU market, designed to cause maximum damage to the competition - but in the process impacting just as many Nvidia cards too. It costs £260, which is a lot of money, but its performance per pound ratio is so strong that some might say there's little point considering any other high-end GPU currnetly available - and that includes Nvidia's own flagship GTX 980.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 20:19 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
It's a stunning card, the bangs per buck are off the scale, although it doesn't represent any sort of substantial improvement over the performance of the current high-end cards, it does make them completely redundant at their price point and power consumption.

Do bear in mind though that unless you actually desired GTX780/780Ti/R290/R290X performance to start with, £260 may still well be more than you need to spend.

You could even argue that the 970 is overkill for 1920x1080, 2560x1440 would be a far better resolution match for it, unless you really do want to run Crysis3 ultra-ed out at 1080p.

I've certainly got my eye on it, but even a rabid PC cock-stroker such as myself can't justify it when all I really play in anger is Hearthstone and a weekly session on BF3 which my venerable 670 can handle at 2560x1440 at juicy detail settings across the board.

The PC release of GTAV may change things a bit though....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 20:34 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 1883
Actually, what I have really been waiting for is a £150 GTX 960 to replace my trusty GTX 460, but such a card could still be half a year away or more, and this does tempt me something awful. I don't need a new card right this instant, though, so I can still wait a bit and see what else is coming.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 20:57 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
Well you can get a 760 for £145 or a 770 for about £185, both of these are very capable cards, are a perfect match for 1080p, and even 1440p except in the more demanding titles at very high detail settings. (And either would be a massive upgrade from a 460.)

I mean, what do you actually need a new card to do?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 21:13 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
I read that article on the 970, but I couldn't find out how many heads it could drive. Anyone know?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 21:19 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
Grim... wrote:
I read that article on the 970, but I couldn't find out how many heads it could drive. Anyone know?


Is a 'head' a screen? If so that'll be four, I believe.

Quote:
Support for four concurrent displays including: Two dual-link DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort 1.2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 21:21 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 1883
Hearthly wrote:
Well you can get a 760 for £145 or a 770 for about £185, both of these are very capable cards, are a perfect match for 1080p, and even 1440p except in the more demanding titles at very high detail settings. (And either would be a massive upgrade from a 460.)

I mean, what do you actually need a new card to do?

Being able to do Elite: Dangerous with an Oculus Rift might come in handy. Also just generally being able to last me a long time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:01 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
Current thinking is to get a 970 and keep one of the 250's to use as a physics card.

This one: http://www.ebuyer.com/663848-msi-gtx-97 ... -gaming-4g

Although I still can't quite get why there are so many different types.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 13:39 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
Grim... wrote:
Although I still can't quite get why there are so many different types.


I don't think there's a reference design for the 970 (there is for the 980) so each card producer is left to choose their own cooling solution, which leads to five million variations on the same basic card.

As a general rule of thumb you're usually safe just picking the cheapest one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 13:48 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22256
I expect the 970 will be the "oculus rift" card of choice next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 15:18 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 1883
Bethesda warns: You should have 4GB of VRAM to play The Evil Within on PC.
Eurogamer wrote:
If you want to play Shinji Mikami's new horror game The Evil Within on PC, you should have 4GB of VRAM, publisher Bethesda has warned.

Overnight Bethesda published the recommended PC specifications to its BethBlog. They're listed as recommended - there is no list of minimum requirements for the game - because, according to Bethesda, they are the settings that ensure the gameplay experience "intended by the development team".

"If you're trying to play with a rig with settings below these requirements (you should plan to have 4GB of VRAM regardless), we cannot guarantee optimal performance," Bethesda added.

So, here we go:

Recommended PC System Specifications

64-bit Windows 7 / Windows 8
i7 with four plus cores
4GB RAM
50GB of hard drive space
GeForce GTX 670 or equivalent with 4GB of VRAM
High speed internet connection
Steam account and activation
It's worth noting that the 50GB of space required is for the PC install. When the installation is complete, the game will take up ~41GB of HDD space.

Jeepers, this is a bit mad. They recommend an i7 as well. I really don't think it brings much over an i5 with 4 cores, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm glad I waited and didn't buy a GTX 760 or 770 with 2GB, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:52 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10065
Not gaming still, but there are low profile single slot gtx 630s and gtx 640s with displayport for under £80, and they support 4k@60 in either stream mode. Hurrah!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:10 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
lasermink wrote:
Jeepers, this is a bit mad. They recommend an i7 as well. I really don't think it brings much over an i5 with 4 cores, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm glad I waited and didn't buy a GTX 760 or 770 with 2GB, though.


I have no idea what the crack is there. For starters an i5 is basically an i7 without hyper-threading, unless they're trying to say they need the extra hyper-threaded 'cores'?

I think the 4GB of VRAM is bollocks too, especially at 1080p. There's probably some MEGA HYPER ULTRA texture setting that will eat that much VRAM, (and wouldn't even be discernible at 1080p), but you just turn it down a notch and it'll be fine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:14 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10065
do i7s have more cache as well? mostly they're saying 'we haven't optimised this because if the rush' though aren't they?

Stuff like avx2 is a generation thing rather than tier, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:34 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
BikNorton wrote:
do i7s have more cache as well? mostly they're saying 'we haven't optimised this because if the rush' though aren't they?

Stuff like avx2 is a generation thing rather than tier, right?


There are a few differences between i7s and i5s but if you look at their performance in games there's really nothing in it. A higher-clocked i5 will usually outpace a slower-clocked i7 in games, and the general consensus seems to be that i7 is overkill for games. (The tweak guide for BF4 actually recommends turning off hyper-threading in your BIOS to prevent judders ingame.)

AVX2 as I understand it right across the Intel range, from Celerons upwards, and has been for years. So yes it's a processor generation addition rather than a tier.

Bethesda have historically been pretty shit at PC ports so yes, it's probably a rush job....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:44 
User avatar
La Bamba

Joined: 27th May, 2012
Posts: 251
Hearthly wrote:
Sorry to change the subject a bit but is anyone else eyeing up a 4K gaming PC?


Just built mine.

Intel 3970x @ 4.7ghz
16gb Corsair Dominator Platinum @ 1866
Nvidia GTX Titan Black SLI
MSI Big Bang Xpower II
Corsair H110
Cooler Master Cosmos II
Intel 320 80GB
Corsair Nova 60gb SSD X 4 RAID 0
EVGA G1000
Soundblaster XFI Pro 5.1 (USB)

Image

Image

AKA "The Big Purple Monster".

It replaced (this now belongs to my fiancée) The Dark Carnival.

Image

Image

Which is...

AMD FX 8320 @ 4.9ghz
Mushkin Blackline 2x4gb @ 1600mhz
Asus Crosshair V Formula Z
AMD Radeon 7990
Bitfenix Colossus
Corsair RM 750
OCZ Revodrive 120gb
Corsair H100

I've not bought a 4k screen yet (though have the money set to one side) because they're either arse TN or crap refresh rate (30hz... yeah right !) or they're honkingly expensive. So I'll just play the waiting game for now and see what Hannspree and so on do into the future. Gotta say it is quite hilarious watching games eating on that 6gb frame buffer. Good old console ports eh?

_________________
Para bailar la bamba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:51 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
Hi JC!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:25 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10910
Location: Devon
That's not JC, it's Marzsyndrome (or whatever he used to be called)

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:30 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
Malc wrote:
That's not JC, it's Marzsyndrome (or whatever he used to be called)


It is JC.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:32 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
That's some full on disco PC.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:42 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16552
Sticking with the Blackpool theme, it was trams but now it's the illuminations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:47 
User avatar
La Bamba

Joined: 27th May, 2012
Posts: 251
RE - VRAM.

4gb is barely enough now. Watchdogs eats closing in on 4gb on my cards and that's 1080p (I bought a 27" 3D thing as a stop gap). Middle earth will use over 4gb with the texture pack installed and adding 8XMSAA to any recent title (I'm using it to offset the fact I'm at 1080p) will see them all use in excess of 3GB.

IIRC the consoles have 8GB, 2GB of which is "system reserved" the other 6GB appears to be fair game. That is why I bought Titan Blacks. I was going to get 6GB 780s but Nvidia made sure no one made them with the stock Titan coolers on, meaning lots of heat circulating in the case. My last GPU subsystem (670s) caused me all sorts of issues. The top card used to hit 96c which for a Kepler was madness.

Nvidia have always been really tight with VRAM, so the new Maxwell cards have 4gb which is just about enough for now. They want you coming back, and if you want more you gotta pay for it. IIRC I paid £690 each for my TBs about three months back.

Also, the 970 and 980 have a crippled memory bus, so when you reach 4k cards such as AMD's 290 series come out the victor. I don't quite get this release tbh. They're fast enough to be 4k cards, yet Nvidia have crippled the memory pipeline so they don't quite cut it at 4k. Sadly the 780 and 780ti (which are now tumbling in price) only have 3gb which is already being over ran.

Take a look over this, paying close attention to the 4k scores. The 295x2 comes out the victor in pretty much everything.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVID ... X_970_SLI/

And these are now dropping like stones.

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showprodu ... ubcat=1515

So I would wait until they drop another £100 and use that for 4k.

_________________
Para bailar la bamba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:52 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22256
Oh, and congrats on the fiancee dude :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:53 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22256
Oh, and...

MaysLanding wrote:
IIRC I paid £690 each for my TBs about three months back.


Fucking hell! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:54 
User avatar
La Bamba

Joined: 27th May, 2012
Posts: 251
Trooper wrote:
Oh, and congrats on the fiancee dude :)


Thanks.

_________________
Para bailar la bamba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 13:57 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10910
Location: Devon
Bamba wrote:
Malc wrote:
That's not JC, it's Marzsyndrome (or whatever he used to be called)


It is JC.


Was that JC too then?

I'm confused...

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 14:02 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
No.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 14:18 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
Malc wrote:
Bamba wrote:
Malc wrote:
That's not JC, it's Marzsyndrome (or whatever he used to be called)


It is JC.


Was that JC too then?

I'm confused...

Malc


JC was JC and is MaysLanding. No one else is any of those things. It's pretty straight forward really. :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 14:31 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
But not Gryzor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 14:38 
User avatar
La Bamba

Joined: 27th May, 2012
Posts: 251
Mayslanding is JC. JC forgot his password and the email address linked to JC was no longer active so I couldn't change my password.

So think of me as JC 2.0. JC broke, but the doctors rebuilt him...

BTW if any of you like your MACs take a look at this...

http://midlifegamers.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=1102

Should be finished within the week hopefully, and will become my server :)

_________________
Para bailar la bamba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 14:51 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
I'm not JC, if that helps.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 16:32 
SupaMod
User avatar
"Praisebot"

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17013
Location: Parts unknown
American Nervoso wrote:
I'm not JC, if that helps.


It does. Thanks. I often got you two confused.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:25 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
Happy birthday, me!


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:57 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14353
Pfffttt. My phone gets 4G.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PC gaming hardware thread.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 13:42 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
Yeah, right? I dislike that.

It should be "4GB", but they're trying to be down with the kids, I think.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 5933 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 ... 119  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.