Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 21124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297 ... 423  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:16 
User avatar
Rude Belittler

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5016
To the point that Marvel Comics refuse to create new X-men, or mutant characters in general, and aren't really doing much at all with the Fantastic 4.

Squirrel Girl has been revealed to not be a mutant recently, so Fox can't have her.

It's even possible that the next big crossover event will do away with the X-men... Replacing them with the Inhumans.

I'm guessing the feeling within Marvel is 'we can't use them in our movies, what's the point?'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:30 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22545
Location: shropshire, uk
Curiosity wrote:
KovacsC wrote:
Watched X-Men: Apocalypse.

I got bored. How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong. Where does it fit in to the time line, have they rebooted x-men again?


It fits in after the last one.

And it's not made by Marvel; they just sold the licensing to it years ago and can't get it back.


That makes sense. ish

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 15:58 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Dunno what's going to happen to the X-Men film series, given that McAvoy, Fassbender, Lawrence and that guy who plays beast all signed a (now completed) three film contact.

Obviously we've got Logan and Deadpool 2 on the horizon, but I think the main series is really losing steam, and if they can't at least get McAvoy and Fassbender back, they'll be in trouble.

Jennifer Lawrence isn't a bad actor, but they keep giving her rubbish material, and don't really have a clue what to do with Mystique. I can't see her doing another one, but who knows.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 16:05 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48650
Location: Cheshire
Kelsey grammar

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 16:38 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14359
I don't think I've watched many of the old Bond films as a yoof so I watched Gold Finger for the first time. I mostly just enjoyed how Bond saves the day by shagging one of the villains at the end.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 18:40 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
MaliA wrote:
Kelsey grammar

I meant to include a joke about this but it slipped my mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 19:17 
User avatar
Decapodian

Joined: 15th Oct, 2010
Posts: 5155
Dr Lave wrote:
Arrival is so very, very good.

Actual Science Fiction rather than 'an Action film in space'.

Thoughtful, beautiful, elegant.

Deserves a cinema viewing.

(But a dark cinema, it has lots of great low light scenes, that a shitty cinema might take the edge off.)


It is indeed great, but I came out wanting to rewatch Close Encounters.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 19:59 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14359
Dr Zoidberg wrote:
Dr Lave wrote:
Arrival is so very, very good.

Actual Science Fiction rather than 'an Action film in space'.

Thoughtful, beautiful, elegant.

Deserves a cinema viewing.

(But a dark cinema, it has lots of great low light scenes, that a shitty cinema might take the edge off.)


It is indeed great, but I came out wanting to rewatch Close Encounters.....


It's not that great nor could I romanticise about it being thoughtful, beautiful and elegant.

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Ultimately, the main star acquires magical powers from out of nowhere. Or maybe she always had magic powers. Maybe we all have magic powers when we learn the space alien language. It was a bit daft.

Notwithstanding the silly premise, it has greater problems. It fails to explore the motivations of the rogue army folk who decide to explode the spaceship because, well, who knows because it doesn't, y'know... Not does it mention the attack after it happens. It's just an artificial action sequence in a film that's otherwise quite slow paced. The pacing was fine for me so why even include it.

And how come each-and-every-discovery made by the scientist woman is mirrored almost immediately by the Chinese government. The film sets her up as being super great and developing an understanding of the alien language when the rest of world is making no headway but, lo and behold, she's making identical progress with the Chinese. "I've just learned that this symbol meaning 'weapon.'" "Excuse me ma'am the Chinese scientist has been shot after this tape was leaked revealing that this symbol means weapon." "Oh noes!"

And whilst she's working on a program to decipher the alien language (which is said to be, like, several words, sentences and meanings in a ring pattern) she's suddenly fluent in alien ring language without the aid of her computer when she's sucked into the alien ship not long after, and all of a sudden alien language can be distilled into very short subtitles for the audience. I suppose the problem was that the timeline over which the film ran was unclear but it was never made clear whether they had been in contact with the aliens for weeks or months. Had they cut out the solider crap and given a realistic timeline for the contact I would have been assuaged but as it stands the last encounter with the aliens was deeply unsatisfying.

And some of the shots at the end of the film were insulting to the audience. In a reveal that lasts some 10 long minutes, miss scientist discovers she can see into the future and was married to...to...this blurry mess in the background, who only the most insipid among the audience hasn't already worked out is hawkeye. The shot lasts so long I was figgiting in my seat screaming "It's FUCKING hawkeye, just show FUCKING hawkeye." They really dragged it out beyond all comprehension.

And Amy Adams felt like she was a carbon copy of the Jodie Forster scientist from Contact. And hawkeye and substitute Matthew McWhatshisface, for better or worse. Hawkeye is the physicist but apparently does very little science when he's not acting as Amy Adams lapdog.

And Forest Whittaker? Man alive, this guy is a genius but he's given this godawful angry colonel role which requires him to be an arsehole to key science personnel. He rocks up in the dead of night in a helicopter to surprise lady science woman into offering her a job and gives her 10 minutes to get in the chopper for no reason than just to act like a cunt for the audience to think he's a hardass.

And some of the dialogue was trash. "Ask Dr Weneversee what the meaning of blah blah is?" It was yawnsome.

But anyway, it was ok but don't pretend it was a great film about what might happen if we really do meet aliens because the answer will probably not be "because Amy Adams has magic powers."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 20:13 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
I enjoyed it, but yes Contact is the far better film.

How bloody good is Contact?

They are pretty different, but there's enough overlap to invite the comparison.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 20:19 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48650
Location: Cheshire
LewieP wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Kelsey grammar

I meant to include a joke about this but it slipped my mind.


It was an answer in Curio's Less Than Completely Honest Cottage Quiz

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 22:04 
User avatar
Soopah red DS

Joined: 2nd Jun, 2008
Posts: 3214
Suicide Squad. Um - very pretty use of colours? Made a good trailer? Film: utter gash.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:31 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
Stand by for a fucking surprise, chums...





The Poltergeist remake is dogshit.





I know, right?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:41 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
Okay, the bit where not-Caroline gets dragged up the stairs is pretty cool. But it is 80 minutes in.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:24 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
I watched THE NICE GUYS a couple of evenings ago, which I know was favourably mentioned in this thread a few months ago.

It was very good I thought, also very 'Shane Blackey' so if you didn't like KISS KISS BANG BANG this won't change your mind.

Gosling and Crowe have great onscreen chemistry, and I love Keith David too.

Not sure if I'd say it was better or worse than KKBB (which I haven't watched for quite some time, maybe I need to rewatch it first), but it was a splendid watch and made me LOL several times.

Really good work on making everything very 70s-esque too. Cars were very cool in this time period.

ALSO FAT RUSSELL CROWE he won't be Gladiatroring anything any time soon that's for sure. Unless there are some pies that need taking care of with extreme prejudice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:03 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
I would note that if you don't like Kiss Kiss Bang Bang you're broken and wrong.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:23 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Cras wrote:
I would note that if you don't like Kiss Kiss Bang Bang you're broken and wrong.


Well yes but there are people who still think The Walking Dead is good, so y'know, some folks are BONKERS.

CRAZY BONKERS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:00 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Hearthly wrote:
Not sure if I'd say it was better or worse than KKBB (which I haven't watched for quite some time, maybe I need to rewatch it first), but it was a splendid watch and made me LOL several times.

The Nice Guys is excellent but I don't think it's quite as good as Kiss Kiss Bang Bang; then again I think Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is a fucking masterpiece. (I love Shane Black. I love Downey Jr. I love Raymond Chandler. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang could have been made for me.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:16 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Yeah Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is on another level.

The Nice Guys is great though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 23:24 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48650
Location: Cheshire
Would You Rather: Have a potato for a hand, or a crisp for a nose? Only worse.

Fairly entertaining. Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 23:31 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14359
MaliA wrote:
Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.


She's been in much better "films."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 23:50 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48650
Location: Cheshire
Saturnalian wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.


She's been in much better "films."


{Googles}

Oh. My.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 13:11 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
Saturnalian wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.


She's been in much better "films."

And Entourage!

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 17:32 
User avatar
Goth

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 3742
Response to some of the issues raised about Arrival

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Quote:
Ultimately, the main star acquires magical powers from out of nowhere. Or maybe she always had magic powers. Maybe we all have magic powers when we learn the space alien language. It was a bit daft.


She supposedly gained this power of seeing time in a non linear fashion due to study of the alien language. The language allows you to look at whatever time you like, a rather Kurt Vonnegut like thing. Tralfamadorians.


Quote:
It fails to explore the motivations of the rogue army folk who decide to explode the spaceship because, well, who knows because it doesn't, y'know... Not does it mention the attack after it happens. It's just an artificial action sequence in a film that's otherwise quite slow paced. The pacing was fine for me so why even include it.


It was showing how the media influence people in a negative way. And the fragility of human peace among humans. Right wing shock jocks are remarkably good at influencing people.


Quote:
And whilst she's working on a program to decipher the alien language (which is said to be, like, several words, sentences and meanings in a ring pattern) she's suddenly fluent in alien ring language without the aid of her computer when she's sucked into the alien ship not long after, and all of a sudden alien language can be distilled into very short subtitles for the audience. I suppose the problem was that the timeline over which the film ran was unclear but it was never made clear whether they had been in contact with the aliens for weeks or months. Had they cut out the solider crap and given a realistic timeline for the contact I would have been assuaged but as it stands the last encounter with the aliens was deeply unsatisfying.


She seemed to get more fluent in the language after meeting directly with the aliens.

Quote:
And some of the shots at the end of the film were insulting to the audience. In a reveal that lasts some 10 long minutes, miss scientist discovers she can see into the future and was married to...to...this blurry mess in the background, who only the most insipid among the audience hasn't already worked out is hawkeye. The shot lasts so long I was figgiting in my seat screaming "It's FUCKING hawkeye, just show FUCKING hawkeye." They really dragged it out beyond all comprehension.


Yeah I'll give you that. Of course she gets married to him.


Quote:
And Amy Adams felt like she was a carbon copy of the Jodie Forster scientist from Contact. And hawkeye and substitute Matthew McWhatshisface, for better or worse. Hawkeye is the physicist but apparently does very little science when he's not acting as Amy Adams lapdog.


Yep I wondered what physics he was up to and what role he could possibly have in helping translate the language. And I'll delete the rest as I largely agree with you.
[/quote]

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 22:58 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14359
I love Studio Ghibli films.

The Red Turtle however is not great and I wasn't particularly happy with it at all. I'm sure it has a hidden meaning or something or it could be the entire story is:

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
The man sexed up a turtle and had a hybrid turtle man baby that went to live with his turtle relatives. The man died.


Still, better than My Neighbors the Yamadas, aye? Amirite? Y'know I am.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 23:23 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
I watched Spirited Away at the weekend. The imagination of the things is amazing.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 14:15 
User avatar
sneering elitist

Joined: 25th May, 2014
Posts: 4001
Location: Broseley
Took kids to see Moana on Saturday. It was nice. Cried a lot.

_________________
i make websites


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 15:41 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
Films I've watched recently ...

Deadpool - Very good dialogue but suffers a bit like Man of Steel in that watching near-invincible characters fighting is boring.

Guardians of the Galaxy - Everyone seems to love it but I didn't think much of the trailer so I've been putting it off for ages. Now I've finally seen it, I thought it was ok, but nothing more

Nineteen Eighty-Four - Interesting rather than entertaining. John Hurt is very good though, particularly during the torture scenes.

Last night I put Hitman:Agent 47 on for a bit, but switched it off after ten minutes. I thought Timothy Olyphant made a better Agent 47, so I'll just stick with that version.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 15:59 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
devilman wrote:
Deadpool - Very good dialogue but suffers a bit like Man of Steel in that watching near-invincible characters fighting is boring.

Mate.

devilman wrote:
Guardians of the Galaxy - Everyone seems to love it but I didn't think much of the trailer so I've been putting it off for ages. Now I've finally seen it, I thought it was ok, but nothing more

Mate.

devilman wrote:
Last night I put Hitman:Agent 47 on for a bit, but switched it off after ten minutes. I thought Timothy Olyphant made a better Agent 47, so I'll just stick with that version.

Ma... Yeah, actually.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:37 
User avatar
Excellent Painter

Joined: 30th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7315
Location: Behind you
Tried to watch ID Resurgence the other night. It's crap, found it so enengaging I fell asleep before the end.
Did watch Star Trek: Beyond, which I enjoyed. Feels like it was made with proper love for the universe.

_________________
twitter || website
Malibu Stacy. Everybody's favourite back seat driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:13 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
DBSnappa wrote:
Did watch Star Trek: Beyond, which I enjoyed. Feels like it was made with proper love for the universe.

Classical music!

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:25 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22545
Location: shropshire, uk
Brilliant, i quite enjoyed ST:B

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:10 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
I've not seen Beyond yet. Is it better than the last one?

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:15 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
I still haven't seen the second one. Just can't summon the will.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:22 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
DavPaz wrote:
I still haven't seen the second one. Just can't summon the will.

Yeah don't bother.

I liked the first one.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:28 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Lonewolves wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
I still haven't seen the second one. Just can't summon the will.

Yeah don't bother.

I liked the first one.


Apparently the third one is better, following the longstanding tradition of every other Star Trek film being good (subs please check).

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:38 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
I thought the first one was a decent reboot if a little lightweight. Didn't really have much in the way of substance, but nailed the aesthetic, and did a decent enough job of doing the central Kirk/Spock relationship, and convincingly portrayed them learning to respect each other, and that they can work better together. Plays a bit fast and loose with the details of Star Trek (there's no way Kirk would have been made a captain that quickly within the bureaucracy of Starfleet, the timings of the turbolift was totally inconsistent), but it worked on an emotional level.

The second one was a total car crash that entirely squandered anything good the first one had done. They basically just did the same character dynamics as the previous film (despite the conclusions met by the end of previous film), and the script was just a load of nonsense to get between overblown CGI setpieces.

The third one at least had a comprehensible plot but was pretty much forgettable apart from that Sabotage scene.

It's kind of amazing to me that they did such a good job of casting, spunk so much money at the production of these films, but they don't seem to want to build them around what Star Trek is at it's best: An interesting exploration of hard sci-fi/philosophical issues through an accessible pulpy lens.

Oh god they are probably going to do a TNG reboot film series when this lot start to lose steam, aren't they? I guess it could work if they get Jason Stathem to pay Picard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:39 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16560
Yeah, I really couldn't say if it was better or worse than the second one because most traces of that have now gone from my memory. This one is fading fast too, I thought it was pretty fucking stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:49 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14359
LewieP wrote:
The third one at least had a comprehensible plot but was pretty much forgettable apart from that Sabotage scene.


I can't stand it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:54 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4299
Saturnalian wrote:
LewieP wrote:
The third one at least had a comprehensible plot but was pretty much forgettable apart from that Sabotage scene.


I can't stand it.


I know you planned that little exchange.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 14:49 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Fucking spoilers, people!

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 15:03 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
nutters. The second one was great. The third one dragged a bit but was watchable.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 15:13 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
MrChris wrote:
The second one was great.
jesus christ

Edit -- I mean, just look at this shite.

Edit 2 -- or this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 15:25 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
MrChris wrote:
The second one was great

no

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 15:27 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
MrChris wrote:
The second one was great.
jesus christ

Edit -- I mean, just look at this shite.

Edit 2 -- or this.

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Major Plot hole: Admiral Marcus wants to create military weapons because of his raging hard-on for war. Problem is – Star Fleet is more about peace and discovery than intergalactic conflicts so he decides to bring someone frozen from the past to lend his nasty mind to the plan. His choice? Khan – a super-human frozen for more than 300 years. But wait, if the movie takes place around 2260, that means Khan was frozen in the 1960s. What the fuck would this guy know about phasers and warp-drives and spaceships if he got frozen right around the time humanity sent its first human in space? One other thing: did I miss something or cryogenic technology doesn't exist right now and even less so in the 1960s? How could Khan be successfully frozen in an era where refrigerators were not always successful at keeping Cheez Whiz cold for more than a week?
Crying

I'm not someone who usually cares about plot holes and am very good at casting an uncritical eye on films (at least the first time I see them), but this film was ridiculous.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 15:29 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48650
Location: Cheshire
Which one was the one that staryed with red indiand tbrowung soears and then Sherlock Holmes turned up and they had a fight because Sherlick was a Space Pirate and akien snot made it all OK?

And Captain FancyPants drove a car in Iowa.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 15:36 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
MaliA wrote:
Which one was the one that staryed with red indiand tbrowung soears and then Sherlock Holmes turned up and they had a fight because Sherlick was a Space Pirate and akien snot made it all OK?

And Captain FancyPants drove a car in Iowa.


I think that was just a fever dream brought on by too much Netrunner and homemade cider

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 15:38 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
MrChris wrote:
The second one was great.
jesus christ

Edit -- I mean, just look at this shite.

Edit 2 -- or this.

It's a Star Trek film FFS.

I enjoyed it, that's what matters.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 17:51 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22545
Location: shropshire, uk
MrChris wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
MrChris wrote:
The second one was great.
jesus christ

Edit -- I mean, just look at this shite.

Edit 2 -- or this.

It's a Star Trek film FFS.

I enjoyed it, that's what matters.


Oh Arse, I actually agree with Mr Chris.

I enjoyed all 3 of the films. Order of enjoyment, 1, 3, 2

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 17:54 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
KovacsC wrote:
Oh Arse, I actually agree with Mr Chris.

I enjoyed all 3 of the films. Order of enjoyment, 1, 3, 2


Then you don't agree with Mr Chris:

"The second one was great. The third one dragged a bit but was watchable."

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 18:09 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
I thought it was okay. Horrifically, I found myself annoyed by the "let's show the pretty girl in her underwear" scene.

Damn yous, Myp.

Also, note that she just vanished somewhere between the second and third film, never to be mentioned again.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 21124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297 ... 423  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kern and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.