Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 21087 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 ... 422  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 15:05 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
LewieP wrote:
I can't listen to her voice for an entire film.

Shouldn't she be Greek?

Anyway... Very strong Captain America: First Avenger feel to that. Which is a good thing. You don't see many action films based on WWI, do you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 15:24 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
I don't actually care what nationality the character/actor is, but I'd prefer subtitles to someone who speaks English that badly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 15:26 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
LewieP wrote:
I don't actually care what nationality the character/actor is, but I'd prefer subtitles to someone who speaks English that badly.

For someone who lives abroad, that's amazingly narrow minded.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 15:31 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Is it? I think being able to convincingly act and speak English at the same time should be a requirement for an English speaking acting role.

Edit: Less of a big deal in a supporting role, or someone without much dialogue, but she's the star here.

Obviously there was a long list of bigger problems with BvS, but her performance wasn't great there either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 15:44 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
Did it bother you that Arnie could barely speak English in the 80s? Van Damme? Jason Statham?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 16:23 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22533
Location: shropshire, uk
wow... just wow.

She is not meant to be English, she is greek (I think)

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 16:31 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49105
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
Brexit means Brexit.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 17:06 
User avatar
sneering elitist

Joined: 25th May, 2014
Posts: 3991
Location: Broseley
LewieP wrote:
I don't actually care what nationality the character/actor is, but I'd prefer subtitles to someone who speaks English that badly.


:blown:

Had no idea you were such a prick.

_________________
i make websites


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 17:08 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
KovacsC wrote:
wow... just wow.

She is not meant to be English, she is greek (I think)

She's Israeli, which brings it's own problems, natch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 17:53 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22533
Location: shropshire, uk
DavPaz wrote:
KovacsC wrote:
wow... just wow.

She is not meant to be English, she is greek (I think)

She's Israeli, which brings it's own problems, natch.


I meant Wonder Woman, any way I am looking forward to the film

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 21:04 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Not really sure what the problem is with what I said.

I feel the same way about British actors doing bad American accents in films. Either cast an American, or let them speak in their own accent. Or hire an actor that can do a good job of the accent required.

Or are we just pretending that vocal performance isn't a component of acting?

As I said, I'd probably prefer her to be speaking in her native tongue (presumably Hebrew?) with subtitles, or hire another actor who can convincingly act and speak in English (or Greek with subtitles).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 22:07 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38439
Bah, you're just trolling now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 22:16 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Image

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:54 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10910
Location: Devon
LewieP wrote:
Not really sure what the problem is with what I said.

I feel the same way about British actors doing bad American accents in films. Either cast an American, or let them speak in their own accent. Or hire an actor that can do a good job of the accent required.

Or are we just pretending that vocal performance isn't a component of acting?

As I said, I'd probably prefer her to be speaking in her native tongue (presumably Hebrew?) with subtitles, or hire another actor who can convincingly act and speak in English (or Greek with subtitles).


But she's not trying to do an American accent, she's speaking English in her own (I presume) accent, I assume she was cast to show that she's not American, English, Australian whatever, to show she's from somewhere else, you can perfectly understand what she's saying so I don't really see a problem with it.

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 12:49 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Oh shit yes.


_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 13:27 
User avatar
Rude Belittler

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5016
That looks amazing. Batman was the best bit of the Lego Movie...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 13:34 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
That does look superb! Yay.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 21:38 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22533
Location: shropshire, uk
That looks awesome.

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:13 
SupaMod
User avatar
"Praisebot"

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17013
Location: Parts unknown
I watched the Lego movie last night. Needless to say, it was absolutely brilliant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 22:57 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48607
Location: Cheshire
Circle (2015, on Netflix): 15 to 1 with a twist because there are 50 people. But, no questions. Or William G. Stewart. It is nothing like 15 to 1. I really liked it. Unlike 15 to 1, that's shit.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 23:13 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
MaliA wrote:
Circle (2015, on Netflix): 15 to 1 with a twist because there are 50 people. But, no questions. Or William G. Stewart. It is nothing like 15 to 1. I really liked it. Unlike 15 to 1, that's shit.


I like films that just get straight to it, and Circle is one of those. Watched it a few times on Netflix and love it.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 23:47 
Best
User avatar
Board Mother

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 11354
Location: Mount Olympus
Mechanic: Resurrection

It's a Statham film with added amazing locations. That's all you need to know.

_________________
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
GJ is right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 23:59 
User avatar
Soopah red DS

Joined: 2nd Jun, 2008
Posts: 3209
Race. Jesse Owens. The running bits are good. It makes a few very simple wider points. The Nazis are cardboard cut-out bad guys. S'alright.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 0:12 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48607
Location: Cheshire
devilman wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Circle (2015, on Netflix): 15 to 1 with a twist because there are 50 people. But, no questions. Or William G. Stewart. It is nothing like 15 to 1. I really liked it. Unlike 15 to 1, that's shit.


I like films that just get straight to it, and Circle is one of those. Watched it a few times on Netflix and love it.


ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
had it been twins at the end, EPIC!

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 0:07 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22533
Location: shropshire, uk
Dr Strange, is really enjoyable.

A bit different from the rest of the marvel universe.
Hope they do another.

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 0:40 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5979
Arrival is so very, very good.

Actual Science Fiction rather than 'an Action film in space'.

Thoughtful, beautiful, elegant.

Deserves a cinema viewing.

(But a dark cinema, it has lots of great low light scenes, that a shitty cinema might take the edge off.)

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:03 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22533
Location: shropshire, uk
Watched X-Men: Apocalypse.

I got bored. How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong. Where does it fit in to the time line, have they rebooted x-men again?

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:09 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32618
KovacsC wrote:
How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong.

Because the X-Men movies aren't Marvel, they are made by Fox.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:10 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
KovacsC wrote:
Watched X-Men: Apocalypse.

I got bored. How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong. Where does it fit in to the time line, have they rebooted x-men again?


It fits in after the last one.

And it's not made by Marvel; they just sold the licensing to it years ago and can't get it back.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:11 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55715
Location: California
See also Spider-Man (until recently) and the Fantastic Four.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:16 
User avatar
Rude Belittler

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5016
To the point that Marvel Comics refuse to create new X-men, or mutant characters in general, and aren't really doing much at all with the Fantastic 4.

Squirrel Girl has been revealed to not be a mutant recently, so Fox can't have her.

It's even possible that the next big crossover event will do away with the X-men... Replacing them with the Inhumans.

I'm guessing the feeling within Marvel is 'we can't use them in our movies, what's the point?'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:30 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22533
Location: shropshire, uk
Curiosity wrote:
KovacsC wrote:
Watched X-Men: Apocalypse.

I got bored. How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong. Where does it fit in to the time line, have they rebooted x-men again?


It fits in after the last one.

And it's not made by Marvel; they just sold the licensing to it years ago and can't get it back.


That makes sense. ish

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 15:58 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Dunno what's going to happen to the X-Men film series, given that McAvoy, Fassbender, Lawrence and that guy who plays beast all signed a (now completed) three film contact.

Obviously we've got Logan and Deadpool 2 on the horizon, but I think the main series is really losing steam, and if they can't at least get McAvoy and Fassbender back, they'll be in trouble.

Jennifer Lawrence isn't a bad actor, but they keep giving her rubbish material, and don't really have a clue what to do with Mystique. I can't see her doing another one, but who knows.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 16:05 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48607
Location: Cheshire
Kelsey grammar

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 16:38 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14353
I don't think I've watched many of the old Bond films as a yoof so I watched Gold Finger for the first time. I mostly just enjoyed how Bond saves the day by shagging one of the villains at the end.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 18:40 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
MaliA wrote:
Kelsey grammar

I meant to include a joke about this but it slipped my mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 19:17 
User avatar
Decapodian

Joined: 15th Oct, 2010
Posts: 5134
Dr Lave wrote:
Arrival is so very, very good.

Actual Science Fiction rather than 'an Action film in space'.

Thoughtful, beautiful, elegant.

Deserves a cinema viewing.

(But a dark cinema, it has lots of great low light scenes, that a shitty cinema might take the edge off.)


It is indeed great, but I came out wanting to rewatch Close Encounters.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 19:59 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14353
Dr Zoidberg wrote:
Dr Lave wrote:
Arrival is so very, very good.

Actual Science Fiction rather than 'an Action film in space'.

Thoughtful, beautiful, elegant.

Deserves a cinema viewing.

(But a dark cinema, it has lots of great low light scenes, that a shitty cinema might take the edge off.)


It is indeed great, but I came out wanting to rewatch Close Encounters.....


It's not that great nor could I romanticise about it being thoughtful, beautiful and elegant.

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Ultimately, the main star acquires magical powers from out of nowhere. Or maybe she always had magic powers. Maybe we all have magic powers when we learn the space alien language. It was a bit daft.

Notwithstanding the silly premise, it has greater problems. It fails to explore the motivations of the rogue army folk who decide to explode the spaceship because, well, who knows because it doesn't, y'know... Not does it mention the attack after it happens. It's just an artificial action sequence in a film that's otherwise quite slow paced. The pacing was fine for me so why even include it.

And how come each-and-every-discovery made by the scientist woman is mirrored almost immediately by the Chinese government. The film sets her up as being super great and developing an understanding of the alien language when the rest of world is making no headway but, lo and behold, she's making identical progress with the Chinese. "I've just learned that this symbol meaning 'weapon.'" "Excuse me ma'am the Chinese scientist has been shot after this tape was leaked revealing that this symbol means weapon." "Oh noes!"

And whilst she's working on a program to decipher the alien language (which is said to be, like, several words, sentences and meanings in a ring pattern) she's suddenly fluent in alien ring language without the aid of her computer when she's sucked into the alien ship not long after, and all of a sudden alien language can be distilled into very short subtitles for the audience. I suppose the problem was that the timeline over which the film ran was unclear but it was never made clear whether they had been in contact with the aliens for weeks or months. Had they cut out the solider crap and given a realistic timeline for the contact I would have been assuaged but as it stands the last encounter with the aliens was deeply unsatisfying.

And some of the shots at the end of the film were insulting to the audience. In a reveal that lasts some 10 long minutes, miss scientist discovers she can see into the future and was married to...to...this blurry mess in the background, who only the most insipid among the audience hasn't already worked out is hawkeye. The shot lasts so long I was figgiting in my seat screaming "It's FUCKING hawkeye, just show FUCKING hawkeye." They really dragged it out beyond all comprehension.

And Amy Adams felt like she was a carbon copy of the Jodie Forster scientist from Contact. And hawkeye and substitute Matthew McWhatshisface, for better or worse. Hawkeye is the physicist but apparently does very little science when he's not acting as Amy Adams lapdog.

And Forest Whittaker? Man alive, this guy is a genius but he's given this godawful angry colonel role which requires him to be an arsehole to key science personnel. He rocks up in the dead of night in a helicopter to surprise lady science woman into offering her a job and gives her 10 minutes to get in the chopper for no reason than just to act like a cunt for the audience to think he's a hardass.

And some of the dialogue was trash. "Ask Dr Weneversee what the meaning of blah blah is?" It was yawnsome.

But anyway, it was ok but don't pretend it was a great film about what might happen if we really do meet aliens because the answer will probably not be "because Amy Adams has magic powers."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 20:13 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
I enjoyed it, but yes Contact is the far better film.

How bloody good is Contact?

They are pretty different, but there's enough overlap to invite the comparison.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 20:19 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48607
Location: Cheshire
LewieP wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Kelsey grammar

I meant to include a joke about this but it slipped my mind.


It was an answer in Curio's Less Than Completely Honest Cottage Quiz

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 22:04 
User avatar
Soopah red DS

Joined: 2nd Jun, 2008
Posts: 3209
Suicide Squad. Um - very pretty use of colours? Made a good trailer? Film: utter gash.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:31 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
Stand by for a fucking surprise, chums...





The Poltergeist remake is dogshit.





I know, right?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:41 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69502
Location: Your Mum
Okay, the bit where not-Caroline gets dragged up the stairs is pretty cool. But it is 80 minutes in.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:24 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
I watched THE NICE GUYS a couple of evenings ago, which I know was favourably mentioned in this thread a few months ago.

It was very good I thought, also very 'Shane Blackey' so if you didn't like KISS KISS BANG BANG this won't change your mind.

Gosling and Crowe have great onscreen chemistry, and I love Keith David too.

Not sure if I'd say it was better or worse than KKBB (which I haven't watched for quite some time, maybe I need to rewatch it first), but it was a splendid watch and made me LOL several times.

Really good work on making everything very 70s-esque too. Cars were very cool in this time period.

ALSO FAT RUSSELL CROWE he won't be Gladiatroring anything any time soon that's for sure. Unless there are some pies that need taking care of with extreme prejudice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:03 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
I would note that if you don't like Kiss Kiss Bang Bang you're broken and wrong.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:23 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13381
Cras wrote:
I would note that if you don't like Kiss Kiss Bang Bang you're broken and wrong.


Well yes but there are people who still think The Walking Dead is good, so y'know, some folks are BONKERS.

CRAZY BONKERS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:00 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32618
Hearthly wrote:
Not sure if I'd say it was better or worse than KKBB (which I haven't watched for quite some time, maybe I need to rewatch it first), but it was a splendid watch and made me LOL several times.

The Nice Guys is excellent but I don't think it's quite as good as Kiss Kiss Bang Bang; then again I think Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is a fucking masterpiece. (I love Shane Black. I love Downey Jr. I love Raymond Chandler. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang could have been made for me.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:16 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Yeah Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is on another level.

The Nice Guys is great though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 23:24 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48607
Location: Cheshire
Would You Rather: Have a potato for a hand, or a crisp for a nose? Only worse.

Fairly entertaining. Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 23:31 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14353
MaliA wrote:
Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.


She's been in much better "films."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 21087 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 ... 422  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.