Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 21125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213 ... 423  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:22 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
AtrocityExhibition wrote:
Rewatched 'Event Horizon' last night, and it's still a tight, effective, pretty gruesome haunted house in space flick. (The CGI holds up reasonably well too.)

The CGI scene at the beginning with the rotating space station took up a third of the film's budget. TRUFAX!

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:28 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
Grim... wrote:
AtrocityExhibition wrote:
Rewatched 'Event Horizon' last night, and it's still a tight, effective, pretty gruesome haunted house in space flick. (The CGI holds up reasonably well too.)

The CGI scene at the beginning with the rotating space station took up a third of the film's budget. TRUFAX!

And when I saw it at the cinema, I nearly puked my guts out! TRUFAX.

Also, I swear I remember the film being gorier at the movies. False memories, or SINISTER HOLLYWOOD CONSPIRACY?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 13:14 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Event Horizon is bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 13:26 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
LewieP wrote:
Event Horizon is bad.

No! Well, it wasn't when I snuck into the cinema aged 15 to watch it with some mates.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 13:47 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Event Horizon is great. LewieP is bad. Joely Richardson is lush.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 14:06 

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 6093
AtrocityExhibition wrote:
In Event Horizon the premise is that the ship has travelled to hell and back, and then torments the rescue crew with visions of hell through the prism of their own fears and guilt until they go kill-crazy and start wanting to gouge their own eyes out.


Ironically, Event Horizon is pretty much the only film directed by Paul W.S. Anderson that hasn't made me want to gouge my eyes out. The man's fucking terrible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 21:17 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Feb, 2009
Posts: 244
Zio wrote:

Ironically, Event Horizon is pretty much the only film directed by Paul W.S. Anderson that hasn't made me want to gouge my eyes out. The man's fucking terrible.


He directed Soldier. I love that.

_________________
Flickr!||Fuckedbook||UGF||DVDs/HD-DVDs/Blu-Rays
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 21:53 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
TK-421 wrote:
Zio wrote:

Ironically, Event Horizon is pretty much the only film directed by Paul W.S. Anderson that hasn't made me want to gouge my eyes out. The man's fucking terrible.


He directed Soldier. I love that.

Same universe as... Alien, I think


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 22:51 

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 6093
DavPaz wrote:
TK-421 wrote:
Zio wrote:

Ironically, Event Horizon is pretty much the only film directed by Paul W.S. Anderson that hasn't made me want to gouge my eyes out. The man's fucking terrible.


He directed Soldier. I love that.

Same universe as... Alien, I think


Blade Runner, apparently.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 22:52 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
That's the fella


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:16 
Excellent Member

Joined: 10th Mar, 2014
Posts: 8
So who else is looking forward to the James Brown biopic? :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:21 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17154
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Crobert Chubz wrote:
So who else is looking forward to the James Brown biopic? :D

While I'd probably recognise some James Brown songs,I wouldn't know the artist.

Why we excel at the music quiz, right there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:28 
User avatar
Goth

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 3742
I went to see Grand Budapest Hotel yesterday. Didn't really care for it.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:30 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:33 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17154
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
British Nervoso wrote:
What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.

Ever the diplomat ;)

Want a trip to Ukraine?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:05 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
British Nervoso wrote:
What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.


It is stupidly large and bright, but turning off signatures entirely is a wise move in general.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:10 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
Bamba wrote:
British Nervoso wrote:
What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.


It is stupidly large and bright, but turning off signatures entirely is a wise move in general.


Don't do that. Check my signature instead.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:11 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Bamba wrote:
British Nervoso wrote:
What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.


It is stupidly large and bright, but turning off signatures entirely is a wise move in general.

I don't mind small ones, or something to do with gaming on a gaming site, but not a big fan of massive neon adverts, especially when it's accompanied by a one line post.

The rules state this:
Quote:
Keep signatures, images and avatars to a sensible size

I would argue that it's not sensible, but as it's not defined I guess it's up to the mods.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:20 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
I think we need a massive argument about it, at least one flounce, then a poll, then everyone can just carry on and ignore it.

Myp in particular as he has everyone on super ignore anyway.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:21 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
British Nervoso wrote:
What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.

It's about a new event promoting electronic music and restoring South Yorkshire's electro reputation.

Can't you read?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:25 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
I think we need a massive argument about it, at least one flounce, then a poll, then everyone can just carry on and ignore it.

Myp in particular as he has everyone on super ignore anyway.

I would never stoop so low as to flounce. That involves making sure all and sundry know you're leaving. Whenever I leave, I just slip out of the back entrance with the minimum of fuss.

Like a slippery turd.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 13:28 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
British Nervoso wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
I think we need a massive argument about it, at least one flounce, then a poll, then everyone can just carry on and ignore it.

Myp in particular as he has everyone on super ignore anyway.

I would never stoop so low as to flounce. That involves making sure all and sundry know you're leaving. Whenever I leave, I just slip out of the back entrance with the minimum of fuss.

Like a slippery turd.

The "myp in particular" was in reference to ignoring it, rather than flouncing, btw, but neat mental image. :)

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 13:30 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Oh yeah, sorry, I had you on ignore for that part of the post.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 13:32 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
Pathetic


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 13:33 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Wish I'd gone with "like the slippery turd I am" now. :(

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 13:45 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
You two need to have a fight or something.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 13:53 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
You two need to have a fight or something.

Who, me and DavPaz?

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:28 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
British Nervoso wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
You two need to have a fight or something.

Who, me and DavPaz?

Your team can't even score past Middlesbrough. Ha!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:29 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
DavPaz wrote:
British Nervoso wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
You two need to have a fight or something.

Who, me and DavPaz?

My team can't even score past Bournemouth. Ha!

:DD

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:30 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22270
I didn't realise both of you were professional footballers?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:31 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
Trooper wrote:
I didn't realise both of you were professional footballers?

You know nothing Jon Snow, Troo Per.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:34 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Trooper wrote:
I didn't realise both of you were professional footballers?

Trooper, Trooper, Trooper. You seem to not understand the tribalism of football. Fans, players and staff are a gestalt entity. Imagine siamese twins but on a grand scale. Joined at the ball of the foot.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:45 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22270
So when you say "my' you actually mean "the team that I support".

Consider this my fewer ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:48 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
Trooper wrote:
So when you say "my' you actually mean "the team that I support".

Consider this my fewer ;)

Well, 'support' is a strong word...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:50 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10939
Location: Devon
I think you can say "my team" in the same way that you can say "my school" or "my street" or "my company"

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:52 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Trooper wrote:
So when you say "my' you actually mean "the team that I support".

Yes, it's a shortening of that form. Because saying 'the team that I support' all the time would be fucking tedious. Like this conversation.

People who say 'less' incorrectly when it's meant to be fewer are just plain wrong.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 14:52 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Malc

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:17 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22270
British Nervoso wrote:
Trooper wrote:
So when you say "my' you actually mean "the team that I support".

Yes, it's a shortening of that form. Because saying 'the team that I support' all the time would be fucking tedious. Like this conversation.

People who say 'less' incorrectly when it's meant to be fewer are just plain wrong.


The thing that really boils my piss is using "we" when talking about a football match that they weren't even at, let alone played in the team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:19 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Trooper wrote:
British Nervoso wrote:
Trooper wrote:
So when you say "my' you actually mean "the team that I support".

Yes, it's a shortening of that form. Because saying 'the team that I support' all the time would be fucking tedious. Like this conversation.

People who say 'less' incorrectly when it's meant to be fewer are just plain wrong.


The thing that really boils my piss is using "we" when talking about a football match that they weren't even at, let alone played in the team.

Or football in general.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:22 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Trooper wrote:
The thing that really boils my piss is using "we" when talking about a football match that they weren't even at, let alone played in the team.

That's fair enough. I would probably feel the same if I hadn't been conditioned not to mind it by being indoctrinated into the cult of football from a young age.

Over the last few years I have found going to football matches a bit of a chore though, mainly because of the clientele they seem to attract (or at least a vocal minority). I think I'm properly falling out of love with the game.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:25 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
British Nervoso wrote:
Over the last few years I have found going to football matches a bit of a chore though, mainly because of the clientele they seem to attract (or at least a vocal minority).


As someone who's always hated football that was one of the major reasons why. The idea that it's actually got worse recently boggles my mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:25 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Bamba wrote:
British Nervoso wrote:
Over the last few years I have found going to football matches a bit of a chore though, mainly because of the clientele they seem to attract (or at least a vocal minority).


As someone who's always hated football that was one of the major reasons why. The idea that it's actually got worse recently boggles my mind.

I don't think it has - I think I've changed more than football itself.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:26 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
I hate the way Americans refer to sports teams as individuals. An example? Why, of course! In the Olympic Ice Hockey, the US guys would say things like "Finland needs to play better to overturn that deficit" instead of "Finland need to play better...". It just bugs me, m'kay


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:28 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
DavPaz wrote:
I hate the way Americans refer to sports teams as individuals. An example? Why, of course! In the Olympic Ice Hockey, the US guys would say things like "Finland needs to play better to overturn that deficit" instead of "Finland need to play better...". It just bugs me, m'kay

Yes, that annoys me too. They do it with any kind of organisation, like bands too. "Nickelback has announced a new tour" :spew:

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:28 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
That vomit was both for the grammar and the fact I used Nickelback in an example.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:37 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Referring to collectives as singulars for that purpose is not American, and also not incorrect.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:37 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38464
Curiosity wrote:
Referring to collectives as singulars for that purpose is not American, and also not incorrect.

COLONIAL APOLOGIST!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:39 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Curiosity wrote:
Referring to collectives as singulars for that purpose is not American, and also not incorrect.

It's horrible.

Also Collins thinks you're wrong:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ ... e+noun?s=t

Quote:
In British usage, however, plural verbs are sometimes employed in this context, esp when reference is being made to a collection of individual objects or people rather than to the group as a unit: the family are all on holiday.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:44 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
FWIW, companies should always be referred to in the singular. Perhaps sports teams are analagous, as they're a club as well as a team made up of individuals.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Movie topic
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 15:50 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
British Nervoso wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
Referring to collectives as singulars for that purpose is not American, and also not incorrect.

It's horrible.

Also Collins thinks you're wrong:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ ... e+noun?s=t

Quote:
In British usage, however, plural verbs are sometimes employed in this context, esp when reference is being made to a collection of individual objects or people rather than to the group as a unit: the family are all on holiday.


Your link goes nowhere and your quote supports me by saying your usage is done only sometimes.

So, between that and MrKissyfur LAWYERING you, yay!

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 21125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213 ... 423  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
cron
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.