AceAceBaby wrote:
The point is that if you eat meat in a modern industrialized nation, you are likely part of a system that causes more uneccessary slaughter than all the Great White Hunters in the world, due to pure wastage and profit chasing.
The "debate" is really just about wanting to feel morally superior to rednecks in combat fatigues. We are not better than they. I don't see how allowing animals to die for no good reason, because it's convenient to buy inexpensive packaged meat is morally superior to personally killing them for fun.
If you want to follow this point to its natural conclusion:
If you buy just about anything in a modern industrialised nation, you are likely part of a system that causes more
unnecessary suffering and slaughter of innocent families/children/nations than any given war, due to greed, corruption and man's inhumanity to man.
If having animals die for my dinner is no better than shooting them so I can jerk off about it later, then really in the grand scheme of things, vegetarianism isn't better either given the amount of needless suffering in the world.
But that's all just a little depressing, isn't it?