Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 121 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:10 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
The UK DOES have a growing population, by a full 350,000 people a year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:12 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
richardgaywood wrote:
Craster wrote:
Increased birthrates is so far from a sustainable solution to that problem that it's not funny.
My point is, the UK, in common with the US and most of continental Europe, does not have a growing population and hence is not going to suffer from any sort of overcrowding issue in the foreseeable future.


Except it already is. There isn't enough available social housing, there isn't enough private housing. School class sizes are way up on what they were 20 years ago.

We're not in danger of outgrowing our available land, but we have already outgrown our available infrastructure. Lots of this is down to investment in infrastructure not matching growth in population (which, accepted, is not just from childbirth), but we're certainly not in a situation where we are short of young people and therefore need to subsidise them.

Hence the earlier car analogy. We don't need your kids, people. If you can't afford one, don't get one.

Of course, the welfare state absolutely should kick in where unforseen circumstances lead to a child not being able to be supported by its parents - illness, divorce, loss of work etc.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:15 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
myoptika wrote:
Mr Russ wrote:
That's why the retirement age isn't now compulsory though, yes?


Except that a lot of firms are forcing people to retire at 65, and the courts have not yet said that that is illegal.

Indeed the opposite, I thought? I thought the courts had recently upheld companies' rights to do this, specifically ruling that it's not age discrimination. Yay. Foresight.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:17 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Mr Chris wrote:
I thought the courts had recently upheld companies' rights to do this, specifically ruling that it's not age discrimination. Yay. Foresight.


Wow. Not sure how they arrive at that conclusion.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:18 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Craster wrote:
Mr Chris wrote:
I thought the courts had recently upheld companies' rights to do this, specifically ruling that it's not age discrimination. Yay. Foresight.


Wow. Not sure how they arrive at that conclusion.

God only knows. From the little I heard on the radio it was something to do with companies needing the right to plan their workforce arrangements or something. Bonkers stuff.

To google!

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:19 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Bizarre. Surely if the only criteria you are using to decide who should be forced to retire is their age, it is pretty much by definition age discrimination.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:21 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Craster wrote:
Bizarre. Surely if the only criteria you are using to decide who should be forced to retire is their age, it is pretty much by definition age discrimination.

In which case setting *any* retirement age would be age discrimination, which clearly makes no sense either, though.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:25 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Mr Chris wrote:
Craster wrote:
Bizarre. Surely if the only criteria you are using to decide who should be forced to retire is their age, it is pretty much by definition age discrimination.

In which case setting *any* retirement age would be age discrimination, which clearly makes no sense either, though.


I thought you could claim it wasn't descriminating if you could clearly show that at that age rampant decrepitude made it impossible for them to do their job to an acceptable level, which is clearly nonsense at 65 for most non-manual jobs? The same legislation that lets Diamond sell cheaper insurance to women without falling foul of sex discrimination laws.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:27 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Setting it at 70 would be more sensible, these days. However, I somehow suspect a lot of us will be working until we drop. :(

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:39 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
myoptika wrote:
Setting it at 70 would be more sensible, these days. However, I somehow suspect that Grim...s butler will be working until he drops, as which point he'll get someone else in.


FTFY.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:43 
User avatar
Not to be confused with elbow

Joined: 20th Aug, 2008
Posts: 4517
Location: Wales, boyo!
It should be based upon what type of work you do and how long you've been doing it. Maybe a health test should be required when you go into a new job, then one when you get older to see if you have 'worn out' or something? Then they can decide whether you should retire

Just bouncing things around my brain today

_________________
Decaf metal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 14:57 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Mr Chris wrote:
In which case setting *any* retirement age would be age discrimination, which clearly makes no sense either, though.
The justification given in the EU recommendation on this the other day was that they do not want individual employers to be able to ask people to retire when the employer decides they are too old to fulfill their role. They feel allowing employers to make judgement calls on this could lead to huge legalised age discrimination, which would have to be fought on a case-by-case basis. Therefore they recommended a blanket retirement age as the lesser of two evils.

However, this is a recommendation from some sort of panel of experts, to be taking into consideration by judges who will make the decision sometime next year. So it's a report, not a ruling.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 15:05 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
richardgaywood wrote:
Mr Chris wrote:
In which case setting *any* retirement age would be age discrimination, which clearly makes no sense either, though.
The justification given in the EU recommendation on this the other day was that they do not want individual employers to be able to ask people to retire when the employer decides they are too old to fulfill their role. They feel allowing employers to make judgement calls on this could lead to huge legalised age discrimination, which would have to be fought on a case-by-case basis. Therefore they recommended a blanket retirement age as the lesser of two evils.

However, this is a recommendation from some sort of panel of experts, to be taking into consideration by judges who will make the decision sometime next year. So it's a report, not a ruling.

Ah, that would have been in the first part of the radio story, that I didn't hear. The latter part which I did catch made it sound like a UK court ruling. Fucking Today, honestly. Cretins.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 21:06 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 26th May, 2008
Posts: 3333
Doesn't everyone in the UK get child benefit? Chavs....

I had an unplanned pregnancy at 16. I was too young to know how hard it would be and I certainly couldn't afford it, I was still at school. Abortion was an option but I didn't want one, my rebellious teenage side decided I could raise a baby no matter what! It was way too hard and we did everything the wrong way round but we are now both qualified professionals and in a few years I anticipate Grim...esque levels of wealth!

I don't understand why anyone would want so many children, I think more than 2 is too many personally. I don't like seeing people with 4 or 5 children squeezed into a small council house with non working parents but that's just because I don't understand that mentality. Why would you be satisfied with that life? I think that is more tragic but you have to hope that the children in that situation would want to better themselves and escape it.

_________________
NOTHING TO SEE HERE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 23:00 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
It's a shame they didn't choose 'B' instead of 'J' for their kids' names... we'd have at least three Borts by now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:26 
User avatar
Lurker

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 993
Location: Wigan
Mr Russ wrote:
Your only problem would then be who gets to be on the judging panel for who is allowed to have children.


:attitude:

_________________
Splendid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:43 
Excellent Member. Haha! Member

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 116
MetalAngel wrote:
It's a shame they didn't choose 'B' instead of 'J' for their kids' names... we'd have at least three Borts by now.

This would be cruel. Those personalized license plates are in such short supply already :(

_________________
Image
<shin> we've got some pegging to do


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:12 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
MetalAngel wrote:
It's a shame they didn't choose 'B' instead of 'J' for their kids' names... we'd have at least three Borts by now.


.. and if they'd chosen BJs they wouldn't have had so many damn kids.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:14 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48658
Location: Cheshire
devilman wrote:
MetalAngel wrote:
It's a shame they didn't choose 'B' instead of 'J' for their kids' names... we'd have at least three Borts by now.


.. and if they'd chosen BJs they wouldn't have had so many damn kids.


That is one of my favorite insults:

"Why could you have just not been a blowjob?"

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:29 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
Can I interest you in a free upgrade to the more vulgar version, 'You're the load your mom should have swallowed'?

Much more rude, doesn't work with Vista or PPC Macs, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Children
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 15:16 
User avatar
Not to be confused with elbow

Joined: 20th Aug, 2008
Posts: 4517
Location: Wales, boyo!
My favourite one is:

'You're a wanker, pity your father wasn't'

_________________
Decaf metal


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 121 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.