Surely a goatboy is a kid

Worse is, it used to be webcast before the iPod generation rebranded it. Cunts.

Weren't webcasts streamed, at least making the "-cast" bit somewhat more accurate?

A webcast is a media file distributed over the Internet using streaming media technology. As a broadcast may either be live or recorded, similarly, a webcast may either be distributed live or recorded. Essentially, webcasting is “broadcasting” over the Internet.

The generally accepted use of the term webcast is the "transmission of linear audio or video content over the Internet".

"Addicting". Typical moron web usage - "this song is really addicting".

The way in which "photoshop" has become a by-word not just for any form of image editing, but now just any form of editing at all. Such as the banned racist Bugs Bunny cartoon I was watching on youtube the other day to which some cretin had added the comment "This isn't real, it's probably photoshopped or something." I hope that person was later killed in a horrible mining accident.

CORRECT: The image was enhanced with Adobe® Photoshop® Elements software.
INCORRECT: The image was photoshopped.
INCORRECT: The image was Photoshopped.
INCORRECT: The image was Adobe® Photoshopped.

Also: "signal-to-noise". If you don't mean the excellent album by The Rise, shurrup.
.

"I could care less". It's "I couldn't care less", you fucking retarded (and almost certainly American, as it's them that seem to use the phrase) cunt. If you "could care less", than that means that you do care, on account of the fact you're saying that the potential exists for you to care an amount less than you currently do.

1. Lacking education or knowledge.
2. Showing or arising from a lack of education or knowledge: an ignorant mistake.
3. Unaware or uninformed.

My personal bug-bear are horrid abbreviations; especially when used when talking.

1)Obv. - Should only be used in jest.
2)Natch - this shouldn't even be used in text, you twat!

My personal bug-bear are horrid abbreviations; especially when used when talking.

1)Obv. - Should only be used in jest.
2)Natch - this shouldn't even be used in text, you twat!
3)Ples. *shudder* Oh fuck off, you utter wanker, that is the single most annoying abbreviation in the world! Except for, that is, ....
4)Imposso. Look, I know you are a teenage girl with more thumbs than brain cells, but please try and use English.

Especially when preceded by "massive".

'Toddler'

Man, you FAIL.

"I could care less" when people actually mean "I couldn't care less"

I don't care if I know what you mean, I am not going to stand idly by and let something that is the exact opposite of what you mean be an acceptable substitute.

Not on my watch.

You're silly: 'kid' is fine.

Ignorant, on the other hand, is the word that keeps on giving.

American Heritage Dictionaries defines ignorant as:


But, of course, there's no reason why it can't mean 'STUPID OLOLOL' as well!!

Brilliantly, where I come from, everyone seems to use it to mean "to ignore".

I'd ban certain people from speaking.

Brilliantly, where I come from, everyone seems to use it to mean "to ignore". As is, you ignore someone and they shout at you "don't be so ignorant".

Well yes, speaking would be using words, I guess. I'd allow the odd gutteral grunt, however.

"Randoms" to mean people. As in "It was us on the ride with a few randoms".

It's cunt garglingly cretinous to use it.

"Randoms" to mean people. As in "It was us on the ride with a few randoms".

It's cunt garglingly cretinous to use it.

I also really dislike words of the form 'double(blank)', especially if the result is a verb. If you think you're 'double(blank)ing', please rethink your word choice.

You may wish to have a quiet word with America, then...

Well, if somebody was using two objects at once, or twice as much of an object as they normally would, they'd be double(object)ing.

If they're baking a cake, they might be 'doubleicing', or 'doublejamming'. ('Doubling up ingredients' is what they probably meant to say, but I don't like the sound of that either and I don't know why. I'd say 'using twice as much'.)

That's a bad example.

I'd like to ban words created from a joining of two existing words if there's ...