Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 15:53 
SupaMod
User avatar
"Praisebot"

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17019
Location: Parts unknown
Christine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 15:54 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
markg wrote:
If only had to design them for that scenario then it would have been way easier as they could just all talk to each other or at least know with a high degree of certainty what the other cars are going to do.


As an IT security bod, *shudder*

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 16:01 
Awesome
User avatar
Yes

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 12243
Cras wrote:
markg wrote:
If only had to design them for that scenario then it would have been way easier as they could just all talk to each other or at least know with a high degree of certainty what the other cars are going to do.


As an IT security bod, *shudder*

Rather than use the wireless networks, they could communicate car to car using some kind of flashing light system.

Put one on the corner of each car, and have the light flash when you intend to move or turn in roughly that direction.

_________________
Always proof read carefully in case you any words out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 16:02 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Mr Russell wrote:
Cras wrote:
markg wrote:
If only had to design them for that scenario then it would have been way easier as they could just all talk to each other or at least know with a high degree of certainty what the other cars are going to do.


As an IT security bod, *shudder*

Rather than use the wireless networks, they could communicate car to car using some kind of flashing light system.

Put one on the corner of each car, and have the light flash when you intend to move or turn in roughly that direction.

Sounds dumb

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 16:08 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49136
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
And a light for when they're slowing down maybe.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 16:11 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10927
Location: Devon
Zardoz wrote:
And a light for when they're slowing down maybe.


Make that a different colour, so as not to confuse anything, red perhaps?

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 16:14 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
What about when you're turning onto a main road in traffic? Normally some kind soul lets you out eventually - won't driverless cars sit there forever until the end of rush hour?

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 16:29 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Hearthly wrote:

I think for a lot of people it'll be even simpler than that, if the sales pitch for a driverless car isn't just 'Get in and tell it where you want to go, then do something else for however long it takes to get there', a lot of folks will lose interest.

If only we'd talked about how different companies have different sales pitches for driverless cars already and how there is no one approach.

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Hearthly wrote:
(As I understand it the current thinking is that you'll have to be fit to drive in case you need to take over from the computer, which sounds like the worst of both worlds.)

Opinions differ. That's one idea. The other idea is that the moment of transfer of control from computer to human is so perilous that it's best avoided entirely; hence driverless cars should have no manual controls at all beyond a hidden override joystick for service mode. The humans are only ever passengers in this scenario.


Oh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 16:31 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49136
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
Lonewolves wrote:
What about when you're turning onto a main road in traffic? Normally some kind soul lets you out eventually - won't driverless cars sit there forever until the end of rush hour?

Yes.

Best to get a driverless motorbike if you live in a built up area.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 16:53 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
TheVision wrote:
Christine.


:D

*applause*

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 13:34 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
The Uber driverless cars situation is quite interesting, by all accounts they seem to be making multiple mistakes and Uber are just like, 'Whatever, we're carrying on anyway.'

Surely that's into 'breaking the law' territory and people can simply be arrested?

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... -francisco

Quote:
Uber has admitted that there is a “problem” with the way autonomous vehicles cross bike lanes, raising serious questions about the safety of cyclists days after the company announced it would openly defy California regulators over self-driving vehicles.

An Uber spokeswoman said on Monday that engineers were working to fix a flaw in the programming that advocates feared could have deadly consequences for cyclists.

Uber began piloting its self-driving vehicles in its home town of San Francisco last week, despite state officials’ declaration that the ride-share company needed special permits to test its technology. On day one, numerous autonomous vehicles – which have a driver in the front seat who can take control – were caught running red lights and committing a range of traffic violations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 14:24 
User avatar
Heavy Metal Tough Guy

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 6507
Seems to me that there are plenty of places where driverless cars would work better than on public roads. Endless cars and minibuses and weird trucks hooning around at the airport - you could make them driverless and have a lot less worry about pedestrians, unexpected road works, that sort of thing and you could make all vehicles have beacons or trackers or what ever on them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 16:44 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619


Watch this video with sound; it's a dashcam vid from a Tesla. Watch for when the Tesla starts making the warning beep and when it starts automatically emergency braking. It's a solid 1--1.5 seconds before you can see anything is wrong from the driver's perspective. Very impressive.

Why this works: the Tesla forward radar can now scan two cars ahead, so it detects the braking being done by the black SUV even though the red car obscures it from the driver's perspective.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 16:57 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22543
Location: shropshire, uk
wow, that is impresive

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 16:57 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
John Finnemore this week had a very good skit on autonomous safety operation in cars.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 14:58 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
https://medium.com/waymo/a-note-on-our- ... f4f98902a1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 15:21 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
Cor.

You've got to imagine high-ups at Uber knew about that, although it's possible they didn't, I guess.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 16:01 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Uber as a company is basically scum

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 16:11 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Lonewolves wrote:
Uber as a company is basically scum


I know, but so useful.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 16:12 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48641
Location: Cheshire
Lonewolves wrote:
Uber as a company is basically scum


Is tbus to do with surge pricing, NYC taxi strike or employment status of drivers?

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 16:49 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
MaliA wrote:
Lonewolves wrote:
Uber as a company is basically scum


Is tbus to do with surge pricing, NYC taxi strike or employment status of drivers?

All of it and more

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 16:50 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Why Uber is terrible:

https://youtu.be/Og3PjvcR1Pc



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 23:28 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
A former vice chairman of GM:

http://www.autonews.com/article/2017110 ... serAgent=1
Quote:
It saddens me to say it, but we are approaching the end of the automotive era.

The auto industry is on an accelerating change curve. For hundreds of years, the horse was the prime mover of humans and for the past 120 years it has been the automobile.

Now we are approaching the end of the line for the automobile because travel will be in standardized modules.

The end state will be the fully autonomous module with no capability for the driver to exercise command. You will call for it, it will arrive at your location, you'll get in, input your destination and go to the freeway.

...

The vehicles, however, will no longer be driven by humans because in 15 to 20 years — at the latest — human-driven vehicles will be legislated off the highways.

The tipping point will come when 20 to 30 percent of vehicles are fully autonomous. Countries will look at the accident statistics and figure out that human drivers are causing 99.9 percent of the accidents.


...

These transportation companies will be able to order modules of various sizes — short ones, medium ones, long ones, even pickup modules. But the performance will be the same for all because nobody will be passing anybody else on the highway. That is the death knell for companies such as BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Audi. That kind of performance is not going to count anymore.

...

think probably everybody sees it coming, but no one wants to talk about it. They know they will be OK for a few years if they keep providing superior technology, superior design and have good software for autonomous driving.

So for a while, the autonomous thing will be captured by the automobile companies. But then it's going to flip, and the value will be captured by the big fleets.

This transition will be largely complete in 20 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 23:38 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Yep, and we'll have jetpacks and flying cars and a cure for cancer.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 23:57 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
MrChris wrote:
Yep, and we'll have jetpacks and flying cars and a cure for cancer.


Except none of those things are actually on the horizon; this absolutely is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:02 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16557
There's absolutely no fucking way that human driven cars will be legislated off the road in 15-20 years. I reckon it'll be at least that long before driverless cars are even a significant proportion of new cars. And then you have to effectively replace every existing car. It's going to take twice that long at the earliest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:07 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
I think it's going to happen way, way faster than the world is ready for.

This is going to be a massive deal and we're not preparing for it at all.

For instance: what are all the truck drivers going to do for a living?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:15 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Bamba wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Yep, and we'll have jetpacks and flying cars and a cure for cancer.


Except none of those things are actually on the horizon; this absolutely is.
people have been saying they're just a matter of years off for decades, man.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:16 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
markg wrote:
There's absolutely no fucking way that human driven cars will be legislated off the road in 15-20 years. I reckon it'll be at least that long before driverless cars are even a significant proportion of new cars. And then you have to effectively replace every existing car. It's going to take twice that long at the earliest.


As soon as the software reaches a certain level of competency it'll be the death knell for human driven cars. Right now, fucking shitloads of people die every year because letting fallible meat bags pilot lethally speeding chunks of metal is basically metal, but it's the only option we have. That's just not going to be true for long.

Note: except in America, where being able to stupidly drive a stupid car seems to be as ingrained as the ability to carry around a gun for no real reason. I predict that manual driving will be A Thing there for years after everyone else has got over the entire thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:19 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
MrChris wrote:
Bamba wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Yep, and we'll have jetpacks and flying cars and a cure for cancer.


Except none of those things are actually on the horizon; this absolutely is.
people have been saying they're just a matter of years off for decades, man.


No, they really haven't. They have however been saying it in the last part of this specific decade because they're actually here, now, driving on actual roads. You can't not have noticed that?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:22 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
I think maybe you don't realise how far along this stuff is, Chris. Or how fast it got there.

https://www.recode.net/2017/2/2/1447480 ... ngagements

Quote:
Waymo’s cars drove more than 635,000 miles just in California [in 2016], and only had to have a human take back control 124 times.

This is a substantial improvement for the company, which drove 424,000 miles in 2015 and had to disengage the system 341 times that year.


That's eight years after Google started working on autonomous vehicle technology.

These systems are routinely driving tens of thousands of miles with full autonomy after less than ten years of R&D. I wouldn't bet any of your body parts on this rate of progress suddenly slowing down. 20 years is a long time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:26 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
Grim... wrote:
For instance: what are all the truck drivers going to do for a living?


The same as everyone else who's job is being automated out from under them: die in poverty after bitterly voting for some right-wing monster who couldn't actually give a fuck about them! Yay!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:35 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Bamba wrote:

The same as everyone else who's job is being automated out from under them: die in poverty after bitterly voting for some right-wing monster who couldn't actually give a fuck about them! Yay!

This is literally America's coal industry right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:41 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Freely available driverless cars in 20 years? Absolutely. Banning manual cars? We've not banned smoking, don't forget.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:41 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Bamba wrote:

The same as everyone else who's job is being automated out from under them: die in poverty after bitterly voting for some right-wing monster who couldn't actually give a fuck about them! Yay!

This is literally America right now.


Depressing feex.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:44 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 25th Jul, 2010
Posts: 11128
Cras wrote:
Freely available driverless cars in 20 years? Absolutely. Banning manual cars? We've not banned smoking, don't forget.


Except we have, in situations where it affects other people's health, which manually driving will as soon as the algorithms are safer. You'll almost always be able to drive a car on a private track/road; but publicly? Nope. It'll become even more anti social than smoking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:48 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
I believe it'll happen, but not in 20 years.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:50 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16557
Eventually probably. In twenty years? Not a chance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:54 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69507
Location: Your Mum
£200 says it does.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:56 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16557
In twenty years it will be illegal for a human to drive a car on our roads? I'll take that bet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:58 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
What exactly are we betting here? That driverless cars that need no manual intervention (so the "passenger" can get pissed or whatever) will be mixed on the road with manually-driven cars? In 20 years?

If so, probably. Might even be ten.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:58 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
markg wrote:
I reckon it'll be at least that long before driverless cars are even a significant proportion of new cars. And then you have to effectively replace every existing car
You didn't read the article, did you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 0:59 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Lonewolves wrote:
What exactly are we betting here? That driverless cars that need no manual intervention (so the "passenger" can get pissed or whatever) will be mixed on the road with manually-driven cars? In 20 years?

If so, probably. Might even be ten.


No, the article said that human driven cars would be illegal in 15-20.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:13 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16557
There would need to be the costliest scrappage scheme ever conceived or it won't get anywhere in that timescale. And the value? 2000 deaths or whatever it is a year is quite a few but suddenly scrapping the entire national fleet of manual cars and dealing with the attendant uproar vs banning new ones and waiting while that number comes down even quicker than it already has? Nah, not happening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:03 
Awesome
User avatar
Yes

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 12243
The only thing that will see driverless cars overtake 'normal' cars is the cost.

Same as with any technology, like blu-ray players, or home computers, the take up will increase as the cost becomes closer to an acceptable level to the average consumer.

_________________
Always proof read carefully in case you any words out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:11 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Bamba wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Bamba wrote:
MrChris wrote:
Yep, and we'll have jetpacks and flying cars and a cure for cancer.


Except none of those things are actually on the horizon; this absolutely is.
people have been saying they're just a matter of years off for decades, man.


No, they really haven't. They have however been saying it in the last part of this specific decade because they're actually here, now, driving on actual roads. You can't not have noticed that?
No, I meant they've been saying that about jet packs and flying cars for decades. Just around the corner!

Also I wasn't being entirely serious. However, there has been a tendency to over predict the next big thing so I'll take with a pinch of salt predictions on driverless cars. Aside from the technological difficulties (which I'm sure will be overcome at some point) the mental hurdle everyone will have to get over to allow this (particularly governments) is quite big and the task of regulating it and making sure its safe is fairly fraught with difficulties.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:13 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Mr Russell wrote:
The only thing that will see driverless cars overtake 'normal' cars is the cost.

Same as with any technology, like blu-ray players, or home computers, the take up will increase as the cost becomes closer to an acceptable level to the average consumer.


For a while, but the future is likely most people not owning a car and calling on the enormous fleet of Ubers.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:32 
Awesome
User avatar
Yes

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 12243
Driverlerss cars is definitely one of the things I think we'll see become the norm in our lifetime, but not in the next 20 years.

_________________
Always proof read carefully in case you any words out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:55 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16557
Curiosity wrote:
Mr Russell wrote:
The only thing that will see driverless cars overtake 'normal' cars is the cost.

Same as with any technology, like blu-ray players, or home computers, the take up will increase as the cost becomes closer to an acceptable level to the average consumer.


For a while, but the future is likely most people not owning a car and calling on the enormous fleet of Ubers.

Yeah once it's cheap enough it'll surely gain traction but running a small car is fairly cheap and very convenient. Also a lot of the ways that people currently use their cars just doesn't really fit with this travel pod vision. Families use them to go out for the day and the car serves as a sort of base for them while they're out. There's countless other examples of how actually having the car there supports people's activities, sports and suchlike. I dunno perhaps people could get given little trailers or something.

There's also the fact that once you get away from more densely populated areas the costs of running this travel pod service will rise and the convenience will diminish. The pods will have to travel larger distances unoccupied and there won't usually be a pod within minutes of your location. Of course people might adjust to this new regime over time but it will be a lot of time, I think people are underestimating how interwoven cars are with current society or seeing it only from the perspective of their own situations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Driverless Cars
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:56 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Mr Russell wrote:
Driverlerss cars is definitely one of the things I think we'll see become the norm in our lifetime, but not in the next 20 years.


Lulz

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
cron
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.