Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
Better Call Saul https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10350 |
Page 3 of 7 |
Author: | TheVision [ Thu Mar 03, 2016 0:34 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I've just caught up with episodes 2 and 3 and my word, it's brilliant. Can't wait for next week! |
Author: | Hearthly [ Tue Mar 08, 2016 22:14 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Episode 4 another absolute cracker, the last ten minutes in particular were grippingly exciting - the only downer with this is they just can't make them fast enough. As myp noted a couple of posts back, Jonathon Banks is visibly older than he was in Breaking Bad (and he doesn't look particularly well either), but I'm cool with that as we know what character he's supposed to be playing, even if he 'looks' wrong compared to how he looked in BB. |
Author: | TheVision [ Tue Mar 08, 2016 23:37 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I've just finished watching episode 4 and yes, I agree. It was cracking! It's really interesting knowing where the characters end up, but it's fascinating seeing how they get there. We knew that Mike wouldn't do what he was hired to do, but how he got round it was ace. |
Author: | Zardoz [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 10:59 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I love Mike. ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
Author: | Hearthly [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 22:07 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
More quality from Episode 5, and a decent splash of humour in there too. I'm inspired to go back and watch all of Breaking Bad again, you can feel its DNA running right through Better Call Saul. Splendid telly, love it to pieces. |
Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Tue Mar 15, 2016 23:17 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Renewed for a third season. On top of Hearthly's praise, I'd add this continues to be one of the most beautifully shot shows since, well, Breaking Bad. The very, very wide shot in the car park in Ep5 was just gorgeous. |
Author: | LewieP [ Wed Mar 16, 2016 4:00 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Pretty cool to see ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
Author: | Zardoz [ Wed Mar 16, 2016 13:41 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
Author: | Hearthly [ Wed Mar 16, 2016 21:28 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I've resubscribed to Netflix, it just feels wrong to be *cough* acquiring Season Two of Better Call Saul when it's so damn good, you need to be paying for the good stuff. EDIT - Ooohhh, Jessica Jones, I could watch that as well. |
Author: | Bamba [ Wed Mar 16, 2016 21:35 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Hearthly wrote: Ooohhh, Jessica Jones, I could watch that as well. You totally should. Also the new season of Daredevil is released this Friday. |
Author: | Cras [ Wed Mar 16, 2016 22:22 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Hearthly wrote: I've resubscribed to Netflix, it just feels wrong to be *cough* acquiring Season Two of Better Call Saul when it's so damn good, you need to be paying for the good stuff. EDIT - Ooohhh, Jessica Jones, I could watch that as well. God yes, JJ is amazing |
Author: | The Great Tyrant [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 13:16 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Is everyone caught up? Astounding cinematography in the latest episode, Inflatable. ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! This has probably been my favourite episode of Season 2, which I've found a little slow tbh. |
Author: | myp [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 13:21 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I'm not caught up yet. But the cinematography is incredible. There is something in every episode that makes my jaw drop. |
Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 15:24 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Re: Kim's awesomeness, let's talk about how both this and Breaking Bad have had flawless casting. Except for the people cast against type (ex-comedians Bryan Cranston and Bob Odenkirk), I don't think I'd seen any of the major characters from either show anywhere else. Yet so many of the actors were cast perfectly; from Tuco's barely contained psychosis, to Mike's world-weary professionalism, to Jesse's puppy-like excitability and eventual evolution into Walt's conscience, and now to Rhea Seaborn who is just enthralling as Kim Wexler. |
Author: | Grim... [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 16:36 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Doctor Glyndwr wrote: I don't think I'd seen any of the major characters from either show anywhere else. You'll have seen Hank in movies: T2, The One, Starship Troopers. He cropped up in The West Wing a few times, too. |
Author: | DBSnappa [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 16:55 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Grim... wrote: Doctor Glyndwr wrote: I don't think I'd seen any of the major characters from either show anywhere else. You'll have seen Hank in movies: T2, The One, Starship Troopers. He cropped up in The West Wing a few times, too. And if I recall correctly, Mike was Steven Berkoff's henchman in Beverly Hills Cop. |
Author: | Satsuma [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 17:12 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
And Tuco in My Name is Earl. |
Author: | LewieP [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 17:21 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Hank was also in Total Recall, and amusingly Cranston was in the remake. |
Author: | myp [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 17:24 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Doctor Glyndwr wrote: Except for the people cast against type (ex-comedians Bryan Cranston and Bob Odenkirk) And Michael McKean. |
Author: | LewieP [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 17:27 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
And Bill Burr. |
Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 18:20 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Grim... wrote: Doctor Glyndwr wrote: I don't think I'd seen any of the major characters from either show anywhere else. You'll have seen Hank in movies: T2, The One, Starship Troopers. He cropped up in The West Wing a few times, too. OK, I revise my initial statement to: although not unknowns, they had previously only done minor roles, and you probably wouldn't remember them from anywhere else. |
Author: | Hearthly [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 19:28 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Doctor Glyndwr wrote: OK, I revise my initial statement to: although not unknowns, they had previously only done minor roles, and you probably wouldn't remember them from anywhere else. I saw a 'TEN CHARACTERS FROM BREAKING BAD YOU'VE SEEN IN EVERY MOVIE EVER' fluff piece on a website somewhere a few months ago, and for every single entry, even the most ubiquitous one (Hank, apparently) - I (a) Needed the benefit of pictorial evidence and (b) Was like, 'Oh right, really, I'd never have known.' IIRC they were almost all very minor roles too. |
Author: | LewieP [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 19:40 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Mark Margolis is getting a lot of TV work these days, presumably off the back of Breaking Bad. Although I've loved him in pretty much every Arronofsky movie for years. He's Ace Ventura's landlord, too. Edit: Although some of heavy references to Scarface in Breaking Bad are a little cheeky given that Margolis was in it. |
Author: | TheVision [ Tue Apr 05, 2016 0:28 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I agree and it's a very good point. There isn't a single actor or actress that I can think of in both Breaking Bad and Better call Saul that isn't perfect for the role. |
Author: | The Great Tyrant [ Tue Apr 05, 2016 10:30 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Doctor Glyndwr wrote: Re: Kim's awesomeness, let's talk about how both this and Breaking Bad have had flawless casting. Except for the people cast against type (ex-comedians Bryan Cranston and Bob Odenkirk), I don't think I'd seen any of the major characters from either show anywhere else. Yet so many of the actors were cast perfectly; from Tuco's barely contained psychosis, to Mike's world-weary professionalism, to Jesse's puppy-like excitability and eventual evolution into Walt's conscience, and now to Rhea Seaborn who is just enthralling as Kim Wexler. Rhea Seaborn's excellent! |
Author: | LewieP [ Tue Apr 05, 2016 10:55 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Edit: wrong thread |
Author: | markg [ Tue Apr 05, 2016 10:56 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
and I replied to it |
Author: | Hearthly [ Tue Apr 12, 2016 21:33 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
S02E09 is barnstormingly brilliant, kind of like Breaking Bad before it, Better Call Saul makes everything else look a bit rubbish. Properly fab telly. |
Author: | TheVision [ Tue Apr 12, 2016 22:37 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I agree. Brilliant throughout but, I have an issue... ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! And not an issue but something I'd like to talk about... ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
Author: | Hearthly [ Wed Apr 13, 2016 8:01 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Spoilertastic: ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! I don't know how people get all excited about twaddle like TWD when there's infinitely better telly being produced such as BCS. |
Author: | Bamba [ Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:00 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Hearthly wrote: I don't know how people get all excited about twaddle like TWD when there's infinitely better telly being produced such as BCS. It's almost as if different people like different things for different reasons, and sometimes those reasons may seem illogical to others, or weird, even. Also: it's possible to watch and enjoy more than one TV show. I know, shocking isn't it? |
Author: | Hearthly [ Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:33 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
BCS is objectively better than TWD though, on all key performance indicators it wins. Except zombie count. |
Author: | Bamba [ Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:46 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Hearthly wrote: BCS is objectively better than TWD though, on all key performance indicators it wins. Except zombie count. Bamba wrote: Also: it's possible to watch and enjoy more than one TV show. I know, shocking isn't it?
|
Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:50 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Hearthly wrote: BCS is objectively better than TWD though, on all key performance indicators it wins. Except zombie count.
|
Author: | Zardoz [ Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:15 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
This show gets better and better. Mike is fucking badass. |
Author: | Hearthly [ Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:27 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
A panel of experts would say BCS is better than Ali, anti-lock brakes, and TWD. PUT TOGETHER. |
Author: | Hearthly [ Tue Apr 19, 2016 21:27 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
ZOMG SEASON TWO FINALE. Literally the only thing wrong with Better Call Saul is how bloody long we're now going to have to wait for the next season, other than that it's effectively perfect telly. ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! Curse waiting months for Season Three. |
Author: | myp [ Wed Apr 20, 2016 1:48 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Kim is in an episode of Dollhouse I've just watched. |
Author: | LewieP [ Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:25 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Wait that's the end of season 2? It's gone so quickly. |
Author: | The Great Tyrant [ Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:20 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Oh man. That was the finale? It can't end there! ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
Author: | Morte [ Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:22 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Agreed, It's flown by...but it has been brilliant. |
Author: | Hearthly [ Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:54 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
On some levels I think it's better than Breaking Bad, and that really is saying something. BB\BCS best telly ever IMO. |
Author: | Zardoz [ Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:16 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I was dubious about the spin off at first but so pleased that it's turned out far better than I expected. Bloody brilliant. ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
Author: | Hearthly [ Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:31 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Zardoz wrote: ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! It was so tense I almost forgot to breathe. They've invested so much in these characters, given us so much history, so much motivation, we're so 'with' them as it were, you're willing things to go right for them on such a fundamental level. ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! It's almost impossible to pick out the good bits, because it's all fantastic, I don't think I've ever watched a programme that does everything so absolutely resolutely on its own terms - and it's all the better for it. |
Author: | LewieP [ Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:32 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I had a degree of trepidation at the notion of not only a spin off, but a prequel spin off. There was a lot of scope for it going horribly wrong. But the resulting show really is fantastic. I still think the moments that I least like are when they try to tie it into the Breaking Bad story too much, in ways that stretch believablity. Yes the cheeky nods and winks are amusing, and it's nice to see a few familiar faces in somewhat different circumstances, but I think it's good enough to stand alone, and it's at it's best when it's trying to do that. Presumably they are building to the next season detailing with: ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! Edit: Further potential spoilers for the future of the show. |
Author: | asfish [ Thu Apr 21, 2016 20:48 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
This was a very good season, as you start to see characters from Breaking Bad show up its sort of making me want to watch that again! |
Author: | TheVision [ Thu Apr 21, 2016 20:51 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
asfish wrote: This was a very good season, as you start to see characters from Breaking Bad show up its sort of making me want to watch that again! I've got a great excuse as my wife hasn't seen it yet. |
Author: | Dr Lave [ Thu Apr 21, 2016 21:19 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
I think I prefer it to Breaking Bad. I love it's glacial pace. And I want nothing to speed it up. But at the same time, without meaning to be cruel, Mike's and Salamanca's age (69 and 76 respectively) has to mean it can't just run and run. I think Season 3 has to be the last before they have to jump forward. (although, I would prefer it if they had a timeline split where a sliding doors-esque choice happens one towards BB and one towards new pastures.) |
Author: | lasermink [ Thu Apr 21, 2016 22:40 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
Funnily enough, I haven't been at all perturbed by the aging of the actors. I guess it has something to do with my bad memory for faces. |
Author: | TheVision [ Thu Apr 21, 2016 22:51 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Better Call Saul |
We never did find out what that switch did in his old office, did we? |
Page 3 of 7 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |