Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 0:38 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
Despite the reaction being horrific, I would suggest that an already controversial person commenting on a tragedy so soon after it happened and trying to put a feminist spin on it was a deliberate attempt to draw more heat and publicity for her cause.

Trolling, if you will


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:19 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
I loled.



These are two guys running a Patreon (with a target of £15k/mo) to shoot a series of videos that will allegedly counter the Tropes vs Women In Videogames ones. And they are such charming fellers!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 18:17 
User avatar
Caution Live Bear.

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 447
Location: Lun Dun


A pro piece on gamergate, arguing about what is harassment and what isn't.

_________________
My ''Bearly'' updated Youtube channel Sad Cloud Home


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 19:00 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17154
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
DavPaz wrote:
Despite the reaction being horrific, I would suggest that an already controversial person commenting on a tragedy so soon after it happened and trying to put a feminist spin on it was a deliberate attempt to draw more heat and publicity for her cause.

Trolling, if you will


You do know that expressing a negative view of her automatically makes you think that she deserves death and rape threats, don't you? You scum*.

* - Of course, by saying this, and omitting to say that I don't think DavPaz should be raped...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:43 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
This subreddit that dissects GamerGate whinging is fantastic: http://www.reddit.com/r/BestOfOutrageCulture/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 13:47 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22544
Location: shropshire, uk
It is quite a sad state of affairs..

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 14:23 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48646
Location: Cheshire
KovacsC wrote:
It is quite a sad state of affairs..


No, it's about ethics in video games journalism.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 14:28 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16559
It's certainly a very important issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 14:38 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
DavPaz wrote:
Despite the reaction being horrific, I would suggest that an already controversial person commenting on a tragedy so soon after it happened and trying to put a feminist spin on it was a deliberate attempt to draw more heat and publicity for her cause.

Trolling, if you will

And why exactly is she controversial? Genuinely interested to hear your answer here.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 14:40 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
Because she causes controversy.

Ipso Facto*

*Man I hope I used that right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 14:43 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
I'll ipso your facto, son.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:41 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2046


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:51 
User avatar
EvilTrousers

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3073
There was a piece on the Today Programme this morning about it. Did as good a job as it could have in the time allowed and pointed out the initial allegations regarding Zoe Quinn had been completely disproved.

Surprisingly enough they spoke to Zoe Quinn rather than any frothing idiots from the other side.

_________________
Everyone but Zardoz is better than me at videogames.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:18 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14489
Poor quality (someone recorded the TV screen) -

Better quality- Anita Sarkeesian Interview on Colbert Report last night



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:23 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Cripss, the high quality one is all over the web on various sites.

Either way, some LOLs to be had.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:28 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14489
Curiosity wrote:
Cripss, the high quality one is all over the web on various sites.


I grabbed the only link I found last night - have swapped it for one of the higher quality ones


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:41 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
I find Zoe Quinn rather attractive, in an emo gothy sort of way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:54 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14489
BBC article

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-29821050

Quote:
Zoe Quinn: GamerGate must be condemned

Games publishers and industry figures must "stand-up and condemn" the movement referred to as "GamerGate", developer Zoe Quinn has told the BBC.

Ms Quinn has been at the centre of a furore which some argue is about ethics in journalism, but others consider to be a largely misogynist hate campaign.

The 27-year-old was forced to leave her home after receiving death threats.

She said publishers must "say GamerGate, and what it's been doing, is wrong".

"The fact that so much of the responsibility is offloaded to the people most harmed by it, when somebody in a much safer position than I am can stand up and condemn it... it's frustrating."
Intimate details

In a highly-emotional interview, Ms Quinn told the BBC how her life had "completely changed" after she had become embroiled in the row.

In August, an ex-boyfriend of Ms Quinn published a blog post, that ran to thousands of words, detailing intimate details about their relationship.

The posts included an accusation that Ms Quinn had had a relationship with a journalist at prominent games site Kotaku in an attempt to get positive reviews for her game, Depression Quest.

The allegation proved untrue - but the debate continued, and is now approaching its third month.

Ms Quinn, who has not returned home since the initial threats, had been speaking at the annual Gamecity event in Nottingham - despite a previous threat she would suffer a "crippling injury" the next time she went to a games conference.

"I used to go to games events and feel like I was going home," Ms Quinn said.

"Now it's just like... are any of the people I'm currently in the room with ones that said they wanted to beat me to death?

"It's terrifying. It sucks to not have any privacy. This has all been so public. It's more scrutiny than a politician faces - it's living with constant fear in a place I called home."
'Horrible misrepresentation'

Some firms - such as Ubisoft - have come forward and said they were strongly against "harassment, bullying and threats".

The Entertainment Software Association, a trade group for US developers, released a statement saying: "Threats of violence and harassment are wrong."

But Ms Quinn said she did not feel it went far enough.
Depression Quest screenshot Zoe Quinn's game is based on her own experiences with depression

"We need everybody to stand-up and condemn it - and not in this milquetoast 'harassment is bad you guys' way - because they don't think that what they're doing is harassment."

She added: "When people that are prominent in the industry can stand up and say 'I'm part of games, I love games, this hate mob doesn't speak for me, this is not welcome in games', it has the two-fold effect of making it less damaging to those that this can hurt, and it does something repair this horrible misrepresentation of this medium that so many of us love.

"Condemning them and say they do no speak for games - it's so fundamental, otherwise this is going to keep happening."
'Pure toxicity'

Analysis of discussion about GamerGate has indicated that misogynist abuse - and vitriolic messages in general - is not limited to either "side" of the argument.

Journalist Allum Bokhari, a writer for TechCrunch, has said there was credible evidence that at least one well-known trolling group was "working to provoke both sides against each other".

Meanwhile, some people previously offering highly vocal support of GamerGate have backed off.
Brianna Wu tweet Brianna Wu is another developer targeted by online abuse

"Through a snowball effect of misinformation, trolling, and ideological/emotional bias on both sides, the issue is quickly descending into a quagmire attracting trolls, extremists, and opportunists needlessly stirring the pot of controversy," said one prominent figure who backed GamerGate, but wished to remain anonymous in this article.

"The harassment is ultimately an unfortunate variable affecting both sides of this situation, and it distresses me to see anyone live in fear.

"Dismissing GamerGate as a misogynist hate movement is not going to make it go away, because it just simply is not that - it's a consumer boycott.

"Until we act like adults and come together to have a conversation on the ethics of games journalism, it's only going to get worse and worse - that's why I'm now choosing to distance myself from the issue."

Ms Quinn herself suggested that the gaming ethics argument could progress - but only if it distanced itself fully from GamerGate tag.

"If you have any care for this industry, if you have any care for the future of games, you need to leave.

"If you have actual concerns, start over without [GamerGate]. If your concerns can't exist on their own, if they have to be supported off the backs of ruining lives, then how legitimate are your concerns?"
'Maybe they'll be back'

As well as Ms Quinn, other women in the games industry have had to leave home due to threats to their safety, including Brianna Wu, a developer in Boston, and Anita Sarkeesian, a feminist writer and commentator.

Ms Sarkeesian had published a series of YouTube videos criticising the depiction of women in many popular games. Some felt it was applying a level of political correctness not needed in gaming.
Anita Sarkeesian Feminist video blogger Anita Sarkeesian also said she had fled her home after receiving death threats

Ms Quinn said it was important to keep talking about the issue openly.

"I don't want to set an example that you can do this and get what you want.

"I have a folder on my desktop called 'those who left' - every time somebody sends me a message saying 'hey, I really admire your strength, but it's not worth it for me, I'm leaving', I save these.

"I'm going to hopefully go back through it in a few years, and maybe they'll be back."

As for whether she would be able to continue her own career, she said: "I love games more than they hate me."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:15 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
An excellent video by TotalBiscuit interviewing the man behind Kotaku. Tackles the various accusation one by one and the responses are comprehensive.

Imagine, an actual discussion about ethics in 'games media' with a key industry figure, rather than posting childish memes that don't contribute to the debate.


_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:20 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
So, Zoe Quinn is doing a talk in Nottingham today and I find out through a BBC article - good going Nottingham.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:22 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14489
American Nervoso wrote:
So, Zoe Quinn is doing a talk in Nottingham today and I find out through a BBC article - good going Nottingham.


She's been in Nottingham for the last week or so and has already done a number of panels :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:24 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
zaphod79 wrote:
American Nervoso wrote:
So, Zoe Quinn is doing a talk in Nottingham today and I find out through a BBC article - good going Nottingham.


She's been in Nottingham for the last week or so and has already done a number of panels :-)

Yeah, I'd never even heard of Game City and I usually stay up to date on what's going on locally. It's passed under my radar for the last nine years!

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 13:28 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
Total Biscuit is an idiot, and he pretty clearly reveals it during that discussion. I disagree with plenty of Totilo's opinions and actions, but he has the patience of a saint.

Total Biscuit has no idea what "censorship" is. A website declining to let you post something in the comments is not censorship. It would only be censorship if someone tried to prevent you from posting something *anywhere*. No owner of any website is under any obligation to host any and all contributions from the public.

This bit in particular astonished me.

Even if consumer advocacy was the only desired function of games media (it's not), there exist consumers with a wide range of perspectives. Brenna's piece was entertaining, and it resonated with a whole bunch of people. He's not explicitly stating it, but TB's position comes from an assumption that consumers are straight white able bodied men, and thus he is tone policing someone who is speaking to other consumers with righteous anger.

The latter stuff about Bayonetta 2 reviews is fucking bonkers. He says that reviewers should keep their opinions on matters that the majority of readers don't care about to a minimum. Who the fuck is he to tell Polygon or anyone else what their readers want? Why can't certain publications try to stand out from the crowd by having a different focus in reviews than others? Why can't consumers have the choice of a broad range of approaches to reviews to pick from?

I have no idea why TB is somehow considered an authority on games journalism. I can't think of any credible games journalists who takes under the table payments off publishers to promote their games. That sounds closer to marketing or PR than journalism to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 15:02 
User avatar
Rude Belittler

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5016
The last word in ethics:

Roger Ebert

Note: he doesn't mentio not reviewing a friend's work, just that you should be prepared to review it honestly.

Investagative journalism often depends on friendships, music journos make friends with musicians, political journos make friends with politicians, sports jounos make friends with footballers etc. Then when a big story breaks, their friends are more likely to give them the inside scoop.

Watergate only came to light because the guy who broke it was friends with people in the know.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 19:30 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8019
Location: Cardiff
Good lord, I've been totally ignorant about all this until about a half hour ago.

How can you clean up favouritism on a review website? Surely in every review media ever, arts, film, music and so on there have been critics who have championed creators and artists. Humphrey Bogart was the darling of French critics. (Much to his bemusement.) John Peel had his own stable of beloved indie types such as The Fall. It's every reviewer's right to preach their own gospel, just as its every artists right to completely bring the existing edifice of critical consensus crumbling to the ground with daring new work - such as the Angry Young Men movement did to the ossified world of thespians before the 1950's. (Though Shelagh Delaney was way, way better at kitchen sink drama than the over-rated Look Back in Anger John Osbourne. Yeah, take that wimmin-haters.)

My point? Critical journalism is subjective. You read the reviewers, gradually work out who you agree with and those you don't you can decide to ignore. I honestly don't get what GamersGate are on about. I'll read more into it, but if their argument is that it's a sin for reviewers to opine that there should be more normal women and fewer big-titted twigs in games then that's frankly insane. Surely more variety is good? And if games that meet their demand for sexy women dry up... wait. They wouldn't. Because capitalism. As long as they want those things, they'll be there.

So basically they're hateful and angry because they feel that stating that you want games with normalish women in them is in fact hidden code for secretly pointing and laughing at men who want big tits in games.

Alert. These are thoughts formulated on information gleaned over a mere half hour. Also, I have no idea what that 'It's about ethics in journalism' line is about, but I can guess, and that photo meme is hilarious.

Also also - death threats? WTF? What did she do, fucking put on a performance of The Rite of Spring in Paris, 1913?

_________________
"Peter you've lost the NEWS!"

Bored? Why not look at some pretty pictures on my photography blog? Here: http://petetakespictures.com

Come & See My Flickery Pics Here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nervouspete/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 22:07 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
NervousPete wrote:
Also also - death threats? WTF? What did she do, fucking put on a performance of The Rite of Spring in Paris, 1913?

She voiced an opinion on the Internet and had the misfortune of also being female.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 22:42 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Grim... wrote:
NervousPete wrote:
Also also - death threats? WTF? What did she do, fucking put on a performance of The Rite of Spring in Paris, 1913?

She voiced an opinion on the Internet and had the misfortune of also being female.

I find this opinion controversial, ergo it is controversial.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 23:08 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
Well, yes.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 23:21 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Grim... wrote:
Well, yes.

No. If you liked oranges and I found that controversial, it doesn't make it so. It just means I have a problem with people eating fruit.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 23:55 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
If you found it controversial, how could it not be controversial?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 0:19 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Grim... wrote:
If you found it controversial, how could it not be controversial?

I don't think you understand what controversy is.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 0:43 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8019
Location: Cardiff
Ooh! Ooh! Wait, can I do one? I've never tried making a meme image before!

(Invasion Bodysnatchers 1974 spoiler alert)

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Attachment:
invasionethics.jpg


Have I got it right, kids?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
"Peter you've lost the NEWS!"

Bored? Why not look at some pretty pictures on my photography blog? Here: http://petetakespictures.com

Come & See My Flickery Pics Here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nervouspete/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 0:44 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
I'm putting that on my Tumblr were I collect these things. So, yes!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:01 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8019
Location: Cardiff
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
I'm putting that on my Tumblr were I collect these things. So, yes!


Ooh, linky!

_________________
"Peter you've lost the NEWS!"

Bored? Why not look at some pretty pictures on my photography blog? Here: http://petetakespictures.com

Come & See My Flickery Pics Here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nervouspete/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:51 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22270
That "walking round new York for 10 hours" video. We've all seen it, yes?

One on hand there are some seriously creepy guys in it, on the other hand she mentions over 100 incidents, so I expect the video to highlight the worst of them. A couple of them are guys who say "hi"...
It's a tragedy that in this day and age, saying hello is harassment.

On one hand she dresses normal so as to not attract attention, on the other hand her idea of normal and unattractive is skin tight clothing.
I think that says a lot about societal norms and expectations regardless of gender.

I don't think her video is as powerful as it could have been if she had done it differently. I'd like to see her doing the same video again, but with all the interactions shown and her wearing actual unattractive clothing, and see what the results are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:54 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
NervousPete wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
I'm putting that on my Tumblr were I collect these things. So, yes!


Ooh, linky!


http://itsaboutethicsingamesjournalism.tumblr.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:55 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Trooper wrote:
That "walking round new York for 10 hours" video. We've all seen it, yes?

One on hand there are some seriously creepy guys in it, on the other hand she mentions over 100 incidents, so I expect the video to highlight the worst of them. A couple of them are guys who say "hi"...
It's a tragedy that in this day and age, saying hello is harassment.

On one hand she dresses normal so as to not attract attention, on the other hand her idea of normal and unattractive is skin tight clothing.
I think that says a lot about societal norms and expectations regardless of gender.

I don't think her video is as powerful as it could have been if she had done it differently. I'd like to see her doing the same video again, but with all the interactions shown and her wearing actual unattractive clothing, and see what the results are.


Surely it shouldn't even matter what she's wearing?

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:02 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22270
Curiosity wrote:
Trooper wrote:
That "walking round new York for 10 hours" video. We've all seen it, yes?

One on hand there are some seriously creepy guys in it, on the other hand she mentions over 100 incidents, so I expect the video to highlight the worst of them. A couple of them are guys who say "hi"...
It's a tragedy that in this day and age, saying hello is harassment.

On one hand she dresses normal so as to not attract attention, on the other hand her idea of normal and unattractive is skin tight clothing.
I think that says a lot about societal norms and expectations regardless of gender.

I don't think her video is as powerful as it could have been if she had done it differently. I'd like to see her doing the same video again, but with all the interactions shown and her wearing actual unattractive clothing, and see what the results are.


Surely it shouldn't even matter what she's wearing?


In day to day life I agree. If you are making a video to prove that harassment happens if you wear unattractive clothing, then you should probably wear unattractive clothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:22 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Trooper wrote:
It's a tragedy that in this day and age, saying hello is harassment.

Yep, my advice is not to talk to strange women at all in the street. If you're walking close behind someone at night, either cross the road or slow down so you're further away. You might not think you're threatening at all, but street harassment is so endemic that women basically have to on the defensive all the time. Imagine you've been attacked by a homeless guy before - not all homeless guys who come up and ask for money are going to do that, but you'll put your guard up as that's an experience you've had before.

This video was shot for nefarious reasons anyway and should be ignored. The director cut out all the white men so he could push his agenda of gentrification for the area.

https://storify.com/Aut_Omnia/why-you-s ... re-the-nyc

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:26 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22270
American Nervoso wrote:
Trooper wrote:
It's a tragedy that in this day and age, saying hello is harassment.

Yep, my advice is not to talk to strange women at all in the street. If you're walking close behind someone at night, either cross the road or slow down so you're further away.


I do that anyway, and always have done. More out of a sense of awkwardness than thinking i'm threatening :D

Interesting background on the video, I hadn't seen that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:34 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16559
American Nervoso wrote:
Grim... wrote:
If you found it controversial, how could it not be controversial?

I don't think you understand what controversy is.

Assuming you're referring to a comment earlier in the thread then what do you understand it to be? Just because something shouldn't be controversial doesn't mean that it isn't. Like for instance global warming or evolution. If something causes widespread debate then it's controversial isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:43 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
markg wrote:
American Nervoso wrote:
Grim... wrote:
If you found it controversial, how could it not be controversial?

I don't think you understand what controversy is.

Assuming you're referring to a comment earlier in the thread then what do you understand it to be? Just because something shouldn't be controversial doesn't mean that it isn't. Like for instance global warming or evolution. If something causes widespread debate then it's controversial isn't it?
Yep, completely agree. However, I'm not sure how widespread the GG position is on inclusive gaming, is my point.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:45 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10933
Location: Devon
Isn't it a bit like finding something rude or offensive?

If one person finds something rude, but a million other people don't think it's rude, then is it rude? What about if 10 people find it rude? 100? 1,000? etc.

How many people have to think something is controversial before it is? Or maybe a better thing to ask would be how many people have to disagree to make the "contra" bit true?

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:49 
Awesome
User avatar
Yes

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 12243
American Nervoso wrote:
Trooper wrote:
It's a tragedy that in this day and age, saying hello is harassment.

Yep, my advice is not to talk to strange women at all in the street. If you're walking close behind someone at night, either cross the road or slow down so you're further away. You might not think you're threatening at all, but street harassment is so endemic that women basically have to on the defensive all the time.


Or... speed up to keep pace with them, then they break into a run, and so do you, running faster and faster behind them keeping up, never overtaking until it's a full sprint to their door and they're screaming and fumbling for their keys and then you say "Wait, what are we running from?"

_________________
Always proof read carefully in case you any words out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:08 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38460
Hang on Myp, are you trying to imply that Sarkeesian *isn't* controversial?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:16 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 1883
Malc wrote:
Isn't it a bit like finding something rude or offensive?

If one person finds something rude, but a million other people don't think it's rude, then is it rude? What about if 10 people find it rude? 100? 1,000? etc.

How many people have to think something is controversial before it is? Or maybe a better thing to ask would be how many people have to disagree to make the "contra" bit true?

Malc

The point is, you can't "find something controversial", it is not a matter of opinion. Either a significant number of people disagree about something (creating a controversy), or they don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:17 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16559
American Nervoso wrote:
markg wrote:
American Nervoso wrote:
Grim... wrote:
If you found it controversial, how could it not be controversial?

I don't think you understand what controversy is.

Assuming you're referring to a comment earlier in the thread then what do you understand it to be? Just because something shouldn't be controversial doesn't mean that it isn't. Like for instance global warming or evolution. If something causes widespread debate then it's controversial isn't it?
Yep, completely agree. However, I'm not sure how widespread the GG position is on inclusive gaming, is my point.

Well I suppose the controversial opinion is the one that goes against the mainstream. In this case I'd have thought that the feminist writers were the ones who have somewhat found themselves pissing in the wind within the "gaming community".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:19 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69509
Location: Your Mum
There doesn't have to be a large number of people - one will do it.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:24 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 1883
Grim... wrote:
There doesn't have to be a large number of people - one will do it.

I suppose I could say a "significant number of people, or a number of significant people".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamersgate
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:40 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 26th May, 2008
Posts: 3333
Trooper wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
Trooper wrote:
That "walking round new York for 10 hours" video. We've all seen it, yes?

One on hand there are some seriously creepy guys in it, on the other hand she mentions over 100 incidents, so I expect the video to highlight the worst of them. A couple of them are guys who say "hi"...
It's a tragedy that in this day and age, saying hello is harassment.

On one hand she dresses normal so as to not attract attention, on the other hand her idea of normal and unattractive is skin tight clothing.
I think that says a lot about societal norms and expectations regardless of gender.

I don't think her video is as powerful as it could have been if she had done it differently. I'd like to see her doing the same video again, but with all the interactions shown and her wearing actual unattractive clothing, and see what the results are.


Surely it shouldn't even matter what she's wearing?


In day to day life I agree. If you are making a video to prove that harassment happens if you wear unattractive clothing, then you should probably wear unattractive clothing.


Did she say she was wearing unattractive clothing? She just said jeans and t-shirt didn't she? Which is what she is wearing. It's completely androgynous; black skinny jeans and a black t-shirt is basically what anyone wears. She's all in black too, and a crew neck, so isn't drawing attention to or highlighting her boobs.

You shouldn't have to dress purposefully unattractive just to walk down the street without being harassed. She isn't looking anywhere except the ground a few metres ahead of her. Even if a you made eye contact with someone in a city, you'd think it was weird if they said hi.

_________________
NOTHING TO SEE HERE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.