Celebs hacked

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

zaphod79 wrote:

Dr Zoidberg wrote:

It's a commonly reported tale that the Sun also used to do countdowns to their page 3 girl's 16th birthday - whether that's true or not....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linsey_Dawn_McKenzie

Quote:

In early 1994 when McKenzie was 15, she sent sample glamour photographs to local modelling agencies. She began her modelling career glamour modeling and swimsuit work, intending to progress to topless modelling when she turned 16 later that year.[2][4]

As McKenzie approached her 16th birthday, The Sunday Sport tabloid newspaper expressed an interest in turning her topless debut into a media event. Throughout June and July 1994, it published provocative pictures of McKenzie, touting her 34GG bra size and counting down the days until it could legally show her topless.[5]

After she turned 16, McKenzie continued to model topless for The Daily Sport and The Sunday Sport. She also made Page 3 girl appearances in tabloid newspapers The Sun and The Daily Star; posed topless in lads' mags such as Loaded; appeared fully nude in British softcore magazines such as Mayfair[6] and Men Only;[7] and performed in a variety of low-budget softcore videos.

She has had a lot of plastic surgery looking at that 2011 picture

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49232

Charlotte Church was the other famous one, if I recall.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Cras wrote:

Charlotte Church was the other famous one, if I recall.

The "Voice of an Angel" Charlotte, she did page 3??

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49232

No, but the Sun were slavering about how she would shortly be old enough for them to legitimately perv over her.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Cras wrote:

No, but the Sun were slavering about how she would shortly be old enough for them to legitimately perv over her.

No wonder they changed the law, those papers were really pushing the limits of underage

ElephantBanjoGnome · **Joined:** 22nd Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 8175

asfish wrote:

McKenzie

I'd never of this person before, but if she was naked on a picture, my eyes would be immediately drawn to her most sizeable asset. That massive conk.

GazChap · **Posted:** Wed Sep 03, 2014 11:50

Cras wrote:

No, but the Sun were slavering about how she would shortly be old enough for them to legitimately perv over her.

Indeed, most famously directly opposite an article slamming the Paedogeddon episode of Brass Eye.

ApplePieOfDestiny · **Joined:** 17th Dec, 2008 **Posts:** 8293

Cras wrote:

No, but the Sun were slavering about how she would shortly be old enough for them to legitimately perv over her.

Billie piper too. She had a 7 day countdown.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... anity.html

This is from a women as well..!

KovacsC · **Posted:** Wed Sep 03, 2014 15:27

asfish wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2741420/SARAH-VINE-What-naked-pics-truly-expose-vanity.html

This is from a women as well..!

Yes but it is the Mail, it is written to have a shock reaction, and no I won't read the article.

ElephantBanjoGnome · **Joined:** 22nd Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 8175

I can spare you. It's a really badly written load of shit, that mostly talks about how difficult it used to be to take photographs, with a long-winded and laboured point that they probably shouldn't have taken them in the first place.

KovacsC · **Posted:** Wed Sep 03, 2014 15:37

Ah so itis the victims fault for taking the pics.. :roll:

Doctor Glyndwr · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 32619

Oh look, asfish is citing the a Daily Mail as if it's a reputable source of information. Quelle surprise.

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49232

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:

Oh look, asfish is citing the a Daily Mail as if it's a reputable source of information. Quelle surprise.

Even worse, citing the Daily Mail as if it's a worthwhile source of opinion.

Mr Dave · **Posted:** Wed Sep 03, 2014 16:03

To be fair, his "This from a woman" comment could be taken in more than one way.

MaliA · **Posted:** Wed Sep 03, 2014 16:04

Cras wrote:

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:

Oh look, asfish is citing the a Daily Mail as if it's a reputable source of information. Quelle surprise.

Even worse, citing the Daily Mail as if it's a worthwhile source of opinion.

It's a fucking great source of my uni mate's* photos, they are superb.

*I had friends.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:

Oh look, asfish is citing the a Daily Mail as if it's a reputable source of information. Quelle surprise.

Again were did I say it's a reputable source of information? its an opinion, of course as it differs from yours then its instant shite.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Cras wrote:

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:

Oh look, asfish is citing the a Daily Mail as if it's a reputable source of information. Quelle surprise.

Even worse, citing the Daily Mail as if it's a worthwhile source of opinion.

Really I just posted a link and said it was from a women, where did I say its worthwhile or otherwise

Try separating fact from fiction now and again

GazChap · **Posted:** Wed Sep 03, 2014 17:25

asfish wrote:

of course as it differs from yours then its instant shite.

Not quite. It's the Daily Mail, so it's instant shite.

ElephantBanjoGnome · **Joined:** 22nd Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 8175

I never agree with Gaywood, and yet I agree with him here. It's quite the paradox.

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49232

asfish wrote:

Cras wrote:

Doctor Glyndwr wrote:

Oh look, asfish is citing the a Daily Mail as if it's a reputable source of information. Quelle surprise.

Even worse, citing the Daily Mail as if it's a worthwhile source of opinion.

Really I just posted a link and said it was from a women, where did I say its worthwhile or otherwise

Try separating fact from fiction now and again

Backpedal all you like, you clearly posted that as if it somehow justified your deluded attitude to this whole thing.

ElephantBanjoGnome · **Joined:** 22nd Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 8175

Cras wrote:

Backpedal all you like, you clearly posted that as if it somehow justified your deluded attitude to this whole thing.

Dude, if just one woman agrees with him, that invalidates the viewpoint of all other women everywhere, especially those that are hiding nakedness under their clothes. That's, like, totally obvious.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Quote:

Backpedal all you like, you clearly posted that as if it somehow justified your deluded attitude to this whole thing.

I don't need to justify anything on an internet forum!

How may links have we had today with the opposite of what this women said? That's right a women not a rapist fancy that!

As for backpedalling I'll follow you.

myp · **Posted:** Wed Sep 03, 2014 17:40

Just because one woman says something, it doesn't mean they speak for all womanhood. Otherwise if we went by that logic then all black men think rape only happens when a woman is conscious.

Jem · **Posted:** Wed Sep 03, 2014 19:17

asfish wrote:

Quote:

Backpedal all you like, you clearly posted that as if it somehow justified your deluded attitude to this whole thing.

I don't need to justify anything on an internet forum!

How may links have we had today with the opposite of what this women said? That's right a women not a rapist fancy that!

As for backpedalling I'll follow you.

You say that like... because it's a woman it's somehow more valid?

This woman thinks you're full of shit, if that helps.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Jem wrote:

asfish wrote:

Quote:

Backpedal all you like, you clearly posted that as if it somehow justified your deluded attitude to this whole thing.

I don't need to justify anything on an internet forum!

How may links have we had today with the opposite of what this women said? That's right a women not a rapist fancy that!

As for backpedalling I'll follow you.

You say that like... because it's a woman it's somehow more valid?

This woman thinks you're full of shit, if that helps.

You shouldn't really be interrupting the men's conversations.

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49232

I'm sure you think you're being funny, but really not so much. Dress it up how you like, there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself and there's a whole lot wrong with stealing them and putting them in the public domain.

DavPaz · **Joined:** 27th Jun, 2008 **Posts:** 38458

Wait... Some women are naked UNDER their clothes?!

Disgraceful

myp · **Posted:** Thu Sep 04, 2014 8:17

Cras wrote:

Dress it up how you like

You're a genius.

Jem · **Posted:** Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:28

Cras wrote:

I'm sure you think you're being funny, but really not so much. Dress it up how you like, there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself and there's a whole lot wrong with stealing them and putting them in the public domain.

MrChris · **Joined:** 1st Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 30498

Cras wrote:

I'm sure you think you're being funny, but really not so much. Dress it up how you like, there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself and there's a whole lot wrong with stealing them and putting them in the public domain.

I agree with you there, with one caveat. If you take naked photos of yourself and they get stolen and plastered all over the internet, I'm totally blaming you for making my eyes bleed.

Grim... · **Posted:** Thu Sep 04, 2014 11:11

Cras wrote:

Dress it up how you like, there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself

Unless you're under 16.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Grim... wrote:

Cras wrote:

Dress it up how you like, there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself

Unless you're under 16.

Under 18 no?

Bobbyaro · **Joined:** 18th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 11843

Thanks, Daily Mail:

Satsuma · **Joined:** 20th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 14356

Uploaded to a bank, aye? So they're keeping my money and my photos? Scumbags.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Bobbyaro wrote:

Thanks, Daily Mail:

Well along with CNN's excellent password advice I think we can all agree this will never happen again

Mimi · **Joined:** 27th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 25585

Grim... wrote:

Cras wrote:

Dress it up how you like, there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself

Unless you're under 16.

It's not against the law to take a photo of yourself naked if you're under 16 though, is there?

DavPaz · **Joined:** 27th Jun, 2008 **Posts:** 38458

Mimi wrote:

Grim... wrote:

Cras wrote:

Dress it up how you like, there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself

Unless you're under 16.

It's not against the law to take a photo of yourself naked if you're under 16 though, is there?

Yep

Dr Zoidberg · **Joined:** 15th Oct, 2010 **Posts:** 5146

Mimi wrote:

Grim... wrote:

Cras wrote:

Dress it up how you like, there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself

Unless you're under 16.

It's not against the law to take a photo of yourself naked if you're under 16 though, is there?

Theoretically if it's indecent, yep.

zaphod79 · **Joined:** 16th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 14487

http://mashable.com/2014/09/04/i-hacked ... -main-link

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

That's pretty shocking that for £250 you can get a tool that does that.

I remember looking at this tool a few years ago. At the time you had to email the company and demonstrate you were law enforcement etc before they would sell it to you. Now anyone with £1500 can buy it.

http://www.elcomsoft.co.uk/eift.html

Trooper · **Joined:** 4th Mar, 2010 **Posts:** 22266

The most shocking thing for me is how poor the security of the system is, not that you can buy a tool for so cheap to do it. I expect there are opensource versions out there that may not be as swish, but can do the job.

If you have two factor authentication switched on, it just shouldn't be possible to access any information on your account at all, with just an email and password. That's kinda the point!

This should be a serious issue for Apple to respond to, but unfortunately it's likely to be too techy for the average person, so won't get the attention it deserves, I expect.

Cavey · **Posted:** Fri Sep 05, 2014 15:59

Cras wrote:

there's not a damned thing wrong with taking naked photos of yourself .

What?
For pity's sake man, there's a whole lot wrong with it. We're British.

Cavey · **Posted:** Fri Sep 05, 2014 16:00

As a complete aside, Mrs C would, I am sure, think I'd taken complete leave of my senses if I photographed myself naked and posted such pictures anywhere, private or public, and least of all for her personal delectation/review.

Must be an age thing.

MaliA · **Posted:** Fri Sep 05, 2014 16:02

I'm really, really, really hoping that you havent been drinking, Big C. As I fear that it could lead to something the world isn't quite ready for.

Cavey · **Posted:** Fri Sep 05, 2014 16:09

MaliA wrote:

I'm really, really, really hoping that you havent been drinking, Big C. As I fear that it could lead to something the world isn't quite ready for.

Don't worry mate, I've never been a nasty drunk!

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Trooper wrote:

The most shocking thing for me is how poor the security of the system is, not that you can buy a tool for so cheap to do it. I expect there are opensource versions out there that may not be as swish, but can do the job.

If you have two factor authentication switched on, it just shouldn't be possible to access any information on your account at all, with just an email and password. That's kinda the point!

This should be a serious issue for Apple to respond to, but unfortunately it's likely to be too techy for the average person, so won't get the attention it deserves, I expect.

That tool can do the same thing for Blackberry and OneDrive as well although I don't this the author tried those.

At work I've not been involved with the projects we have globally to look at moving data to the cloud, they have been pissing around with it for 2 years, I can sort of see why if they keep finding holes like this.

MaliA · **Posted:** Fri Sep 05, 2014 16:11

Cavey wrote:

MaliA wrote:

I'm really, really, really hoping that you havent been drinking, Big C. As I fear that it could lead to something the world isn't quite ready for.

Don't worry mate, I've never been a nasty drunk!

Trooper · **Joined:** 4th Mar, 2010 **Posts:** 22266

asfish wrote:

Trooper wrote:

The most shocking thing for me is how poor the security of the system is, not that you can buy a tool for so cheap to do it. I expect there are opensource versions out there that may not be as swish, but can do the job.

If you have two factor authentication switched on, it just shouldn't be possible to access any information on your account at all, with just an email and password. That's kinda the point!

This should be a serious issue for Apple to respond to, but unfortunately it's likely to be too techy for the average person, so won't get the attention it deserves, I expect.

That tool can do the same thing for Blackberry and OneDrive as well although I don't this the author tried those.

Not if you have two factor turned on though

http://www.elcomsoft.co.uk/eppb.html

Quote:

The given feature is confirmed to work even for acconts with Apple's two-step verification enabled, but does NOT work for Microsoft Live! accounts that use 2FA.

asfish · **Joined:** 5th Dec, 2010 **Posts:** 3353

Quote:

Not if you have two factor turned on though

I just turned that on for my OneDrive as all Apple pictures get sent there, I don't use anything from Apple as OneDrive is cheaper and in some ways better to share pictures with.

So now on every device I log in and am asked to get a code from an app MS told me to install on my IPhone which is made by Google?!

Its all good, but I have an issue straight away as my wife uses the same account to send her pictures up there, so I think I will need to scan a QR code from within my OneDrive settings page using her phone so that she can get access codes.

You can see why people don't bother as for many this would be either too complex or take too long.

EDIT: You to enter the same code for Skype as well after enabling this but only once by the looks of things

Be Excellent To Each Other

Celebs hacked
Run along, iCloud

Who is online

Be Excellent To Each Other

Celebs hacked Run along, iCloud

Who is online

Celebs hacked
Run along, iCloud