Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 14362 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155 ... 288  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 11:49 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Trousers wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
Cras wrote:
How can people agree with one of those questions and disagree with the other without comprehending their own naked self-interest?


We had an empire!


MAKE BRITAIN GREAT AGAIN


TAKE BACK CONTROL!!(tm)


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:32 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17782
Location: Oxford
VACUOUS SLOGAN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:37 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
19/03/2011



NEVER FORGET


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:50 
Awesome
User avatar
Yes

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 12244
We all like Harambe now.

_________________
Always proof read carefully in case you any words out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 13:47 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
MaliA wrote:
19/03/2011



NEVER FORGET

I love you

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 14:21 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
MrChris wrote:
MaliA wrote:
19/03/2011



NEVER FORGET

I love you


I know

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:16 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Wow at the Richmond result! Goldsmith out, LibDems won, and Labour lost their deposit.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... dApp_Tweet


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:23 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
That's spectacular. Mostly due to Goldsmith being for a hard Brexit in a place that voted 70+% to Remain, I expect.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:40 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Richmond Park result:
LDEM: 49.7% (+30.4)
ZAC: 45.2% (-13.1)
LAB: 3.7% (-8.7)

Very happy Labour didn't split the vote to the point where Goldsmith got in.

Also, how small is May's majority in the Commons, now?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:47 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
She's down to 9 or 10 now I believe, which isn't danger territory insofar as the Tories are pretty good at whipping, but also in the zone whereby concessions may have to be given to the more extreme MPs to help keep them orderly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:25 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
Listened to Farron's chuckle in tbe background on R4 just now as Rees Mogg is reminded that 9 libdem MPs is the same number as Tory majority. Made me laugh.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:29 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17782
Location: Oxford
The Lib Dem fightback begins. Hooray!

The Labour candidate, Wolmar, writes very interesting and readable books on railways.

Regarding Tory MPs, arch-Eurosceptic Peter Bone lost his rag slightly with Eddie Mair on 'PM' yesterday, preferring to repeatedly complain about 'BBC Bias' rather than answer a question about Brexit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:38 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
Kern wrote:

Regarding Tory MPs, arch-Eurosceptic Peter Bone lost his rag slightly with Eddie Mair on 'PM' yesterday, preferring to repeatedly complain about 'BBC Bias' rather than answer a question about Brexit.


Yes, that was quite amusing.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:02 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
MaliA wrote:
Listened to Farron's chuckle in tbe background on R4 just now as Rees Mogg is reminded that 9 libdem MPs is the same number as Tory majority. Made me laugh.

That's including the DUP, right? Because the Conservatives won 330 seats in 2015, which is a majority of five, and it's at least one less now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:04 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Listened to Farron's chuckle in tbe background on R4 just now as Rees Mogg is reminded that 9 libdem MPs is the same number as Tory majority. Made me laugh.

That's including the DUP, right? Because the Conservatives won 330 seats in 2015, which is a majority of five, and it's at least one less now.


Dunno, it was Farron's snigger in tbe background that amused me.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:10 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17782
Location: Oxford
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Listened to Farron's chuckle in tbe background on R4 just now as Rees Mogg is reminded that 9 libdem MPs is the same number as Tory majority. Made me laugh.

That's including the DUP, right? Because the Conservatives won 330 seats in 2015, which is a majority of five, and it's at least one less now.


I think the figure of 9 comes from ignoring the seats held by Sinn Fein.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:21 
User avatar
Soopah red DS

Joined: 2nd Jun, 2008
Posts: 3219
It's a marker for previously Lib Dem seats that went blue - talking to friends in Kingston and they seem very annoyed to have been conned (as they feel) into voting Tory. Strongly suspect that seat will be yellow at the election, no matter what.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:55 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Bone was a bit of a twat on PM yesterday. I also thought Rees-Mogg was somewhat ungracious this morning.

Yay for lib dems!

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:39 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Boooo! Hiss! *blows raspberries at MrChris*

/whispers in ear 'it's Zac Goldsmith you daft old twat'

er, hooray! Yay, go Lib Dems! :D


Seriously though, this is good news. :)
One in the eye for the so-called 'radical' (read: xenophobic) Right is alright with me. It's all good.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:50 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
I don't feel it will be any more than that, Though
.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:46 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
JBR wrote:
It's a marker for previously Lib Dem seats that went blue - talking to friends in Kingston and they seem very annoyed to have been conned (as they feel) into voting Tory. Strongly suspect that seat will be yellow at the election, no matter what.

By far the biggest contributor of the 2015 result was a LibDem swing to Conservative, particularly in a large number of marginal seats. The Labour-Conservative swings, on a seat by seat basis, where minimal. Viewed through that lens, it's interesting to wonder how the thinking about possible early general elections has moved in the Cabinet this morning.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:47 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
On that note, from Twitter, analysis of how many seats might swing based on tactical voting for Not-Brexit:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 13:12 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38467
Give us the non-genius version of that graph please Doc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 13:21 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10940
Location: Devon
The further to the right your dot is, the more safe Tory the seat is, the higher up, the more the people voted to stay in the summer. So if you are above the line, and you care more about staying in the Euro than voting Tory, and you do it to the same level as in Richmond, the to rise may lose the seat in a general election

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 13:26 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Of course, there is a similar effect that may be seen in other seats that voted to Leave, and there are more of those than there are that voted to Remain.

Which is why May is treading a fine line. Any significant loss puts them out of direct power and into a coalition at best. Go too pro-Europe and UKIP can take seats in a backlash, go too anti-Europe and there are enough potential LD seats to remove the majority.

If Labour had any form of coherence right now they would be trying to make May fuck this up, and to look to take seats based on the clear lack of vision on Brexit. But they don't, so May is handling it okay so far despite not really doing anything (which is how she became PM, so fair play).

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 13:33 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38467
Malc wrote:
The further to the right your dot is, the more safe Tory the seat is, the higher up, the more the people voted to stay in the summer. So if you are above the line, and you care more about staying in the Euro than voting Tory, and you do it to the same level as in Richmond, the to rise may lose the seat in a general election

Thanks, man. Needed that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 13:53 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Why on Earth would the Tories want to call an early election? They have Corbyn, don't they?

Teresa May could come noisily marching into Parliament every day complete with one-woman oompah band get up - hand cymbals, harmonica, B-flat tuba, vintage car horn, the works - it would make no difference. Her relative credibility would still be light years ahead of Corbyn and his strabismus- and tropia- afflicted (half empty) Shadow Cabinet.

Corbyn: he's the gift that just keeps on giving. Long may he reign.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 14:10 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
Shame to waste a Corbyn

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 14:18 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
:DD

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 14:31 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
On that note, from Twitter, analysis of how many seats might swing based on tactical voting for Not-Brexit:

Image


I think that to draw such (or pretty much any) conclusions from a by-election (as so often the vehicle for the protest/'fuck you' vote) is a little silly.
I say that as someone who's glad Goldsmith lost.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 16:15 
User avatar
Heavy Metal Tough Guy

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 6516
I didn't think Governments can "call an early election" any more - I think they need either a 2/3 majority or to fail vote of No Confidence. It's not something a PM can call tactically anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 16:31 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Squirt wrote:
I didn't think Governments can "call an early election" any more - I think they need either a 2/3 majority or to fail vote of No Confidence. It's not something a PM can call tactically anymore.


Unless the PM tactically calls a vote of no confidence and asks her side to vote against her.

But I don't see it happening.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 18:58 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Squirt wrote:
I didn't think Governments can "call an early election" any more - I think they need either a 2/3 majority or to fail vote of No Confidence. It's not something a PM can call tactically anymore.

She can repeal the Fixed Term Parliaments Act.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:40 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
So, Italy then. The delamination of the EU continues apace.

Why couldn't they have just stuck with the EEC and a common trading area, which was working just fine, instead of, like, really bad ideas like the Euro and political union. :facepalm: Whirlwind being reaped?

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:10 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Cavey wrote:
So, Italy then. The delamination of the EU continues apace.

I have read a fair bit about the details of the constitutional reform the Italians were voting on and it appears to have very little bearing on Italy's relationship with the EU, being instead focused -- as far as I can see -- on restructuring the role of central vs regional governance within the country. Can you explain why this is "delamination of the EU", please?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:14 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16560
Listening to the radio this morning they made that point but also seemed to be saying that it was another vote against an established party of government with eurosceptic far right populists as the cheerleaders.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:16 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
markg wrote:
Listening to the radio this morning they made that point but also seemed to be saying that it was another vote against an established party of government with eurosceptic far right populists as the cheerleaders.


Exactly this. That's politics.
I would say that Doc is ignoring the concept of the protest vote, and I certainly think that's true - but there's more to it than even that. The zeitgeist across Europe is very rapidly changing, and not for the better, either.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:24 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Cavey wrote:
So, Italy then. The delamination of the EU continues apace.

I have read a fair bit about the details of the constitutional reform the Italians were voting on and it appears to have very little bearing on Italy's relationship with the EU, being instead focused -- as far as I can see -- on restructuring the role of central vs regional governance within the country. Can you explain why this is "delamination of the EU", please?


It's being reported as that, for some bizarre region. Mainly by people disappointed they can't write about the election of a far-right loon in Austria, I suspect.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:30 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
What, the Austrian election where said far right loon won only 47% of the vote you mean? The country who actually gave us Hitler, well within living memory?

This complacency has much to answer for IMO, though I fell into the same trap with Brexit to be fair.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:51 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Cavey wrote:
What, the Austrian election where said far right loon won only 47% of the vote you mean? The country who actually gave us Hitler, well within living memory?

This complacency has much to answer for IMO, though I fell into the same trap with Brexit to be fair.


He did, but most were expecting and gleefully forecasting a win.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:54 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55716
Location: California
Wow, we're setting the bar really low these days.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:57 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
:shrug:

Not sure of the point you're making. If it's "the tabloid press are twats", well, yeah. ;)

Personally I'm totally appalled and mortified at 47% and feel the situation is beyond critical... What, so if Nick Griffin secured 47% of the national vote, you'd all be saying 'phew... crisis, what crisis, at least he was 3% shy of a majority everyone!' ..? :facepalm:

... A plague on all the houses of those who devised self evidently fatally flawed vanity projects such as the Euro, open and unfettered borders and political union. As ever, the end game will be the very opposite! Such irony, then... even as people like you guys refuse (still) to even believe it's happening at all.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 12:57 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
I don't refuse to believe what is happening; I just don't see that there's a lot I can do to stop it.

If Murdoch prints "Muslims are my baby and the EU is to blame" and disseminates that viewpoint on a daily basis to millions and millions of people, there's not a lot I can do to stop the madness than ensues.

Look at the States. A website made up that a particular pizza restaurant was being used by Hillary as a child abuse den. One of Trump's cabinet endorsed the fake news and now a nutter with several guns went in and fired shots there, surrounded by families, because he believed it.

Not sure where all of this can lead, but it is unlikely to be a good place.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 14:15 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17782
Location: Oxford
Well, regardless of the outcome of this week's hijinks at the Supreme Court, hopefully it'll remind people that not only do we have a constitution but that it matters.

I had an amble round the building last year when killing time in London. Not normally a fan of mock gothic but it was quite charming in its way (and kept me out of the rain for an hour or so). The gift shop wasn't very good, however.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 14:17 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
Yeah, i know a bloke who wasn't very impressed with the shop. He showed his displeasure by nicking a calendar. He got twelve months.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 14:55 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
MaliA wrote:
Yeah, i know a bloke who wasn't very impressed with the shop. He showed his displeasure by nicking a calendar. He got twelve months.


Get out.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 14:56 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
By the way, the nasty Austrian Nazi chap did get around 46.7%, but this was a re-run of the past election that was annulled. In the original he got 49.7%. So his vote share decreased, which is a good thing.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:07 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48655
Location: Cheshire
Interesting article in light of the Casey report.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:49 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Curiosity wrote:
By the way, the nasty Austrian Nazi chap did get around 46.7%, but this was a re-run of the past election that was annulled. In the original he got 49.7%. So his vote share decreased, which is a good thing.


See, this is the thing I just don't get.

On the one hand, people can get very hot under the collar at times over, say, very mildly inappropriate and even wholly inadvertent use of mere language here (say, some unintended mildly sexist faux pas or other; a 1980s anachronism perhaps), with all sorts of ensuing "twit-storms" or whatever....... yet some fucking Neo Nazi *just* misses being elected head of state, right on our doorstep in *Austria* of all places, and Italy's government falls on the same day, and the response is pretty much "meh"...?

I suppose it's an overload/this does not compute moment. Me? I can't see the first thing "good" about it, and just because I personally can't do much about it as an individual surely does not mean it's not even worth discussing? I pretty much can't influence anything at all in politics, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about this stuff.

You reap what you sow. Note that I will never, ever, EVER excuse anyone for using their democratic, hard fought for and hard won vote to vote for an extreme Right (or Left) candidate, regardless of perceived or actual provocation. But it surely *is* clear that the terrible backlash is coming from years of quite ordinary people being force-fed bullshit - that they're damn well going to like things they never wanted or asked for like the Euro, full political union, open borders, unfettered immigration - and if they don't, well, they're somehow evil fascists or whatever. So yeah, under the circumstances, somewhat ironic, huh...

So in short, I very much blame the utterly perverse, clueless political vanity of the Europhile Left for this dangerous situation whose tipping point is surely now well exceeded. :( People are angry.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 13:04 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16560
Cavey wrote:
You reap what you sow. Note that I will never, ever, EVER excuse anyone for using their democratic, hard fought for and hard one vote to vote for an extreme Right (or Left) candidate, regardless of perceived or actual provocation. But it surely *is* clear that the terrible backlash is coming from years of quite ordinary people being force-fed bullshit - that they're damn well going to like things they never wanted or asked for like the Euro, full political union, open borders, unfettered immigration - and if they don't, well, they're somehow fascists or whatever. Ironic, huh.

So in short, I very much blame the utterly perverse, clueless political vanity of the Europhile Left for this dangerous situation whose tipping point is surely now well exceeded. :(

I think it's come about largely by people being force fed bullshit by the overwhelmingly right wing media. People are pissed off about a situation that is, in many respects, a work of fiction. Mainstream right wing parties spent decades playing up to that and then when the far right seized the initiative they lost control of what they had created. Reap what you sow indeed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 14362 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155 ... 288  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], MaliA, Vogons and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.