Cras wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
You'd think so, wouldn't you? But you just keep on beatin' those odds.
Can't believe I missed this. Superb work, Doc!
| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| Wearable Tech https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10003 |
Page 5 of 7 |
| Author: | myp [ Sun Nov 02, 2014 17:12 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Cras wrote: Doctor Glyndwr wrote: You'd think so, wouldn't you? But you just keep on beatin' those odds. Can't believe I missed this. Superb work, Doc! |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Ooh! |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Charge, rubbish tech, charge! |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
(In before comments of "that's where it will spend 90% of it's life") |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:09 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Has it charged yet? |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:11 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Also, does the battery last as long as your train journey to work? |
|
| Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Bobbyaro wrote: Has it charged yet? Possibly. One benefit to tiny batteries is fast charge times! |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:35 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Mine is charging! |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:54 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Bobbyaro wrote: Has it charged yet? Yes! Bobbyaro wrote: Also, does the battery last as long as your train journey to work? I don't know! |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Now it's doing a firmware update, which is an odd thing to see happening on your wrist. |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:13 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Grim... later ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 13:43 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Seems to be working fine, no dodgy pixels or anything  I've installed Wear Mini Launcher, which is the only addon necessary at the moment. Might play around with some custom faces later.
|
|
| Author: | myp [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 13:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Trooper wrote: Might play around with some custom faces later. I always knew you'd have to go down the plastic surgery route. |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 13:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
American Nervoso wrote: Doctor Glyndwr wrote: You'd think so, wouldn't you? But you just keep on beatin' those odds. Can't believe I missed this. Superb work, Doc! Good lord, you even quoted it on this page! 
|
|
| Author: | myp [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 13:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Bobbyaro wrote: American Nervoso wrote: Doctor Glyndwr wrote: You'd think so, wouldn't you? But you just keep on beatin' those odds. Can't believe I missed this. Superb work, Doc! Good lord, you even quoted it on this page! Only to Craster's reply. I missed it first time. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 15:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
How responsive to a wrist flick when typing is yours Grim...? Mine is basically unresponsive, it only turns on automatically if you raise your arm and twist, which is a bit shit. Not sure if that is just the way it is, or mine is faulty. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 15:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
It seems okay. I've not been annoyed by it yet, at any rate. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Hmmm.... Not sure if it's just me or a dodgy accelerometer then. I don't know how it should be acting though. Should turning your wrist when typing turn on the watch face? I would have expected so. I might send it back and see what the replacement is like, but that runs the risk of dead pixels again... |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:09 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Are you at the quiz on Wednesday? We could compare them. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Depends on how the root canal goes tomorrow! |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Moto 360 get! Does anyone want it before I send it back? |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Apparently the watch face turn on algorithm needs tilt + up, not just tilt. That'll explain it then. That's also a bit shit. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
If you have a Samsung device and still use the default Samsung SMS app, then SMS messages won't get pushed through to the 360. Swap to using SMS via Hangouts and it works fine though. Edit: actually it seems they may get pushed, but you can't reply. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:53 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Yeah, I use MySMS and you can't reply. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Hangouts lets you reply apparently, haven't tested it yet though. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 16:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Yeah, but unless I can send SMS through my browser Hangouts can go jump. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 17:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Grim... wrote: Yeah, but unless I can send SMS through my browser Hangouts can go jump. Not without a google voice account. How often are you going to reply via your watch though, really. The only time I would ever do that via the watch was if I was driving. |
|
| Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 17:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Grim... wrote: Yeah, I use MySMS and you can't reply. MySMS can fix this with a patch. The actions you can take on a notification are an open API (and indeed, are used elsewhere in Android, they define the actions you can take when looking at a notification on the phone itself.) So it might get added at some point. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 18:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
The navigation is pretty dreadful. I gave up after it had been "calculating route" for 5 minutes. |
|
| Author: | markg [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 18:38 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
To be honest though I've never once used a sat nav and thought it could be improved if it was shrunk until it was just a bit bigger than a postage stamp. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 18:46 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Trooper wrote: Apparently the watch face turn on algorithm needs tilt + up, not just tilt. That'll explain it then. That's also a bit shit. Switched to my left wrist and it is exponentially better. Guess I'll have to stop being a freak! The music control function is lovely and simple. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 18:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
markg wrote: To be honest though I've never once used a sat nav and thought it could be improved if it was shrunk until it was just a bit bigger than a postage stamp. It's supposed to be reasonably useful if you are walking around, just keep walking and it vibrates if you need to turn at a junction. Apparently. I wouldn't know as it doesn't work... After playing with it for a day, the device itself is really nice, android wear though, that has quite a long way to go. Version 2 is due "real soon now", so let's see what that brings. |
|
| Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 19:55 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Yes, walking directions are a natural fit for a wearable. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 21:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Interestingly, the accelerometer seems to be fine. If I have it on ambient mode it responds perfectly even on my right wrist. Looks like it's a software issue, and looking online a couple of people are complaining about the same issue since the last update happened. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 03, 2014 23:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Battery wise, i've just put it on to charge with 11% left, after taking it off charge at around 10am. 12 hours including software updates, setting up (twice), downlaoding apps, playing with it all day, and a few hours in ambient mode. Not too bad really, see what happens tomorrow when I should be arseing around with it a lot less. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Tue Nov 04, 2014 22:20 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Used it normally today, a few timers for cooking, heartbeat a couple of times, a fair few notifications (hi DavPaz!) and I had it on ambient mode so the screen is on almost constantly, but in dim mode. Took it off the charger at 8:30am,battery is currently showing 48% at 9:20pm. That's actually pretty good I think! |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Tue Nov 04, 2014 23:06 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
You actually think a watch which loses half its battery in a day is pretty good?
|
|
| Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Tue Nov 04, 2014 23:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
It's no more a watch than your smartphone is a phone, of course. |
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Tue Nov 04, 2014 23:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
You're welcome, Troops |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Tue Nov 04, 2014 23:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
I agree about the battery life being better than expected. I took mine off charge at 8am,and right now it has 52% left (ambient mode is off). I really like it! |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Wed Nov 05, 2014 17:46 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
I've been playing around with Facer today, to see what watch faces I can get on it. Some are nice, but i'm not sure any of them are nice enough to warrant the battery hit. This one might appeal to a certain Moto360 owner though... http://facerepo.com/app/faces/details/f ... 48a2b1c0f6 I'm currently swapping between the standard minimal and digital faces, and trying to decide which I like best. I've ordered a new strap, just to see how it looks with something a bit more traditional, and to see how easy it is to swap straps. I shall post pics when it arrives. Also, I've installed "find my phone" which is an app I can run from my watch, which will start an alarm on the phone if I can't find it. More importantly than that though, the watch warns me if I have left my phone behind. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Wed Nov 05, 2014 18:38 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Trooper wrote: I've ordered a new strap, just to see how it looks with something a bit more traditional Reddit thinks non-standard straps lead to the back cracking. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Wed Nov 05, 2014 18:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Grim... wrote: Trooper wrote: I've ordered a new strap, just to see how it looks with something a bit more traditional Reddit thinks non-standard straps lead to the back cracking. I saw that, it's related to the new strap being thicker than the old one so putting more pressure on the back. I've made sure the strap I ordered was the same thickness, so it should be OK... |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Thu Nov 06, 2014 19:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
If you start navigation from your phone rather than the watch it works, and it's actually really useful. I've just had a 3 mile walk across London, turning when my watch buzzed at me and showed me what road I needed just before I got to the junction. Much more convenient than using your phone for walking directions. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Fri Nov 07, 2014 14:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
... and today hangouts has stopped notifying on my watch, it was working fine yesterday. Yeah, Android Wear still needs a lot of work
|
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Fri Nov 07, 2014 14:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
http://motorola-blog.blogspot.co.uk/201 ... -your.html New stuff coming "real soon now" |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
http://facerepo.com/app/faces/search?qu ... ron&page=1 This may be of interest to a certain Mr Grim... |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Sat Nov 29, 2014 12:18 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
Sony e-ink watch http://www.kitguru.net/channel/generalt ... f-e-paper/ looks quite nice. 
|
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Wed Dec 31, 2014 13:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
My new Moto360 strap Attachment: 1nT0yjf.jpg
|
|
| Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:04 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wearable Tech |
John Gruber on speculation about pricing for the Apple Watch Edition (the one made out of solid 18K gold): Quote: The more I think about it, and the more I learn about the watch industry, the world of luxury goods, and the booming upper class of China, the better I feel about that bet. I don’t think I was wrong to place a friendly late night bar bet on a $9,999 starting price. I think I was wrong to guess just $4,999 in my ostensibly sober published analysis.
I can see which way the wind is blowing. For months I’ve been asking friends who might know — or know someone else who might know, or even know someone who knows someone who might know — whether my guess of $5,000 is too high for the Edition starting price. The answer has always been “No”. But the way I’ve been told “No” has given me the uneasy feeling that I’ve been asking the wrong question. I should have been asking if $5,000 is too low. I now think Edition models will start around $10,000 — and, if my hunch is right about bands and bracelets, the upper range could go to $20,000. I was off by a factor of two, and my friend Vincent, I think, nailed it back on the day Apple Watch was introduced. ... Apple Watch Edition is not a tech product, so don’t try to price it like one. |
|
| Page 5 of 7 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
