Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 14415 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182 ... 289  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:32 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Lonewolves wrote:
Jem wrote:
:o

A strong left-leaning opposition would be rather helpful right now.


Well, there is Ga... Oh, sorry, you said "strong". :D

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:34 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16575
Cavey wrote:
I can't even begin to express my objection to the premise that uneducated working class = Trump-supporting, racist bellend.
I agree too, surveys etc. might point to a greater tendency for poor, uneducated people to hold horrible views but in my own personal experience I've seen it coming from all walks of life. I think there's a big extent to which wealthier educated people might think better of espousing what they actually believe out of social niceties. But it feels like some of those are falling away.

My wife said to me the other day that it's as though people are losing their humanity, after seeing some shit on Facebook. This was about the NHS health tourism thing. We actually caught the program that kicked it all off, the poor lady who ended up all over the tabloids lost two children giving birth and the only response from so many was that it was disgraceful that they had to pay for it. Seriously what the fuck is wrong with people these days?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:37 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
I think much of it might be due to people seeing these things on TV or in the press, then looking at their own circumstances and feeling that they are not getting 'special treatment' as they see their home towns crumble, services be consistently underfunded and withdrawn, and 'outsiders' move in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:37 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14203
Location: Shropshire, UK
markg wrote:
My wife said to me the other day that it's as though people are losing their humanity, after seeing some shit on Facebook. This was about the NHS health tourism thing. We actually caught the program that kicked it all off, the poor lady who ended up all over the tabloids lost two children giving birth and the only response from so many was that it was disgraceful that they had to pay for it. Seriously what the fuck is wrong with people these days?

This really pissed me off. In any decent civilised the world the headlines about that would have been celebrating the fact that the NHS managed to save two of the woman's four children, and highlighting how great the NHS is.

Can't have civility in the press though, eh? No-one ever bought a paper because it had puppies and rainbows on the front cover.

>:(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:38 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
GazChap wrote:
This really pissed me off. In any decent civilised the world the headlines about that would have been celebrating the fact that the NHS managed to save two of the woman's four children, and highlighting how great the NHS is.


This.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:46 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16575
Kern wrote:
I think much of it might be due to people seeing these things on TV or in the press, then looking at their own circumstances and feeling that they are not getting 'special treatment' as they see their home towns crumble, services be consistently underfunded and withdrawn, and 'outsiders' move in.

No, the comments on Facebook were from people no worse off than us. And no offence but I'm getting a bit fed up of hearing this excuse/explanation or whatever you want to call it. They just need to have a look around the world and give themselves a fucking slap if that's what they think. My friend at work has lived on Central Drive in Blackpool for thirty odd years, two people got stabbed outside his flat at 11am the other morning, that sort of place, as deprived as anywhere. Yet he somehow remains thoroughly decent and kind as do many other people in those sorts of circumstance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:47 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48705
Location: Cheshire
Kern wrote:
I think much of it might be due to people seeing these things on TV or in the press, then looking at their own circumstances and feeling that they are not getting 'special treatment' as they see their home towns crumble, services be consistently underfunded and withdrawn, and 'outsiders' move in.


It's certainly a feeling in Bradford.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:50 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69614
Location: Your Mum
Cavey wrote:
the Columns of Grim...

Sounds rude.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:51 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Cavey wrote:
I can't even begin to express my objection to the premise that uneducated working class = Trump-supporting, racist bellend.

Just goes to show what your average Labour supporter/member knows about the working class (just ask Emily Thornberry, eh). With sentiments and prejudices such as these, no wonder they're being wiped out politically - good fucking riddance, too.

Sure. So what is your explanation for this:


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:52 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55717
Location: California
Maybe they wanted £350m a week to go to the NHS

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:53 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38492
Kern wrote:
I think much of it might be due to people seeing these things on TV or in the press, then looking at their own circumstances and feeling that they are not getting 'special treatment' as they see their home towns crumble, services be consistently underfunded and withdrawn, and 'outsiders' move in.

That seems to be the root of the issue in my hometown, Middlesbrough. Rapid, devastating decline in heavy industry with nothing to replace the jobs. Huge unemployment and disaffected youth. Localised Brain drain as practically everyone in my generation who could move away, did. Combine this with the heavy influx of immigrants and asylum seekers (the largest number in any town in England I believe) and I can understand why the Leave vote got such traction there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:03 
User avatar
Beloved member

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 674
Cavey wrote:
I can't even begin to express my objection to the premise that uneducated working class = Trump-supporting, racist bellend.

Just goes to show what your average Labour supporter/member knows about the working class (just ask Emily Thornberry, eh). With sentiments and prejudices such as these, no wonder they're being wiped out politically - good fucking riddance, too.

I'm not a Labour "supporter/member". I gave that up when they morphed into Red UKIP, and should have earlier when they adopted an antisemite terrorist apologist as leader. (Oh and I find the Tories' post-Cameron degeneration into Blue UKIP just as disturbing and negative. Why aren't Conservatives showing respect for the entrepreneurial energy of EU migrants, and celebrating their contributions to society?)

Basically, i have more respect for a worker from Poland or Latvia or Spain (or wherever) who have took on great personal risks to come here, and are likely have a university level education and be functionally multilingual, than some bitter native who complains about EU citizens taking "their" jobs which they aren't qualified to do anyway. I don't see the indigenous working class as some inherently and immutably virtuous group of people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:06 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Cavey wrote:
I can't even begin to express my objection to the premise that uneducated working class = Trump-supporting, racist bellend.

Just goes to show what your average Labour supporter/member knows about the working class (just ask Emily Thornberry, eh). With sentiments and prejudices such as these, no wonder they're being wiped out politically - good fucking riddance, too.

Sure. So what is your explanation for this:


No, fair enough, I must partially concede here (very reluctantly - not for reasons of saving my ego but because of the very uncomfortable, unavoidable implication of those cold, hard facts - I could weep)

That said, though, having a greater propensity to be a Leave voter, as according to education and class != everyone of the (so-called) "uneducated" (non graduate) working class is a Leave voter (and most certainly != a racist Trump supporter)

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:06 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Hero of Excellence wrote:
I don't see the indigenous working class as some inherently and immutably virtuous group of people.


Well no - but there's a middle ground between 'inherently and immutably virtuous' and 'Trump-supporting racist bellend', no? Like, an entire planet of middle ground?

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:06 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
DavPaz wrote:
That seems to be the root of the issue in my hometown, Middlesbrough. Rapid, devastating decline in heavy industry with nothing to replace the jobs. Huge unemployment and disaffected youth. Localised Brain drain as practically everyone in my generation who could move away, did. Combine this with the heavy influx of immigrants and asylum seekers (the largest number in any town in England I believe) and I can understand why the Leave vote got such traction there.


The problem is how to reach out to these people, especially when only nasty types appear to be listening to their concerns.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:07 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Grim... wrote:
Cavey wrote:
the Columns of Grim...

Sounds rude.


:D

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:09 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55717
Location: California
Hero of Excellence wrote:
they adopted an antisemite terrorist apologist as leader

Are you Anon X in disguise?

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:10 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
DavPaz wrote:
That seems to be the root of the issue in my hometown, Middlesbrough. Rapid, devastating decline in heavy industry with nothing to replace the jobs. Huge unemployment and disaffected youth. Localised Brain drain as practically everyone in my generation who could move away, did. Combine this with the heavy influx of immigrants and asylum seekers (the largest number in any town in England I believe) and I can understand why the Leave vote got such traction there.


I am increasingly convinced that a programme of extensive and meaningful devolution of powers and money to city, regions, or whatever natural grouping of territory makes sense is the only way to reverse the sense of disaffection with politics and the system. If people feel that their area's needs are being met, if politicians identify themselves with tangible successes, if they feel their voices are being heard, they are more likely to support the system and not be led astray. After all, if Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland (sometimes), are considered capable of forms of self-government, why not the north east?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:13 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38492
Kern wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
That seems to be the root of the issue in my hometown, Middlesbrough. Rapid, devastating decline in heavy industry with nothing to replace the jobs. Huge unemployment and disaffected youth. Localised Brain drain as practically everyone in my generation who could move away, did. Combine this with the heavy influx of immigrants and asylum seekers (the largest number in any town in England I believe) and I can understand why the Leave vote got such traction there.


I am increasingly convinced that a programme of extensive and meaningful devolution of powers and money to city, regions, or whatever natural grouping of territory makes sense is the only way to reverse the sense of disaffection with politics and the system. If people feel that their area's needs are being met, if politicians identify themselves with tangible successes, if they feel their voices are being heard, they are more likely to support the system and not be led astray. After all, if Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland (sometimes), are considered capable of forms of self-government, why not the north east?

I have to agree. There was for a while the TDC (Teesside Development CorporationTeesside Development Corporation) which did some good things for the region, but it's power was split up into smaller unitary authorities and pretty much squandered.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:29 
User avatar
Bad Girl

Joined: 20th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14373
Lonewolves wrote:
Hero of Excellence wrote:
they adopted an antisemite terrorist apologist as leader

Are you Anon X in disguise?


*Please be ComicalGnomes, please be ComicalGnomes*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:31 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
It ain't Gnomes, that's for sure.
I miss Gnomes. :(

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:33 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38492
DavPaz wrote:
Teesside Development Corporation


How could I have forgotten this awesome tune?



Skip about 30 secs for the good bit


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:51 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Cavey wrote:
That said, though, having a greater propensity to be a Leave voter, as according to education and class != everyone of the (so-called) "uneducated" (non graduate) working class is a Leave voter (and most certainly != a racist Trump supporter)

Agreed. So why does this very real and strong correlation exist, do you think?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 13:57 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Cavey wrote:
That said, though, having a greater propensity to be a Leave voter, as according to education and class != everyone of the (so-called) "uneducated" (non graduate) working class is a Leave voter (and most certainly != a racist Trump supporter)

Agreed. So why does this very real and strong correlation exist, do you think?


Is this a rhetorical question Doc? I think you know why, as I do: in statistical terms, the less educated an entire, large population of people is, the less well informed they're likely to be, and also likely to be less able to possess all or some sufficient critical, intellectual faculties to be able to form educated, reasonable judgements in such matters. Sad, yet true (IMO), and as much as I, as a *passionate* believer in grammar schools and meritocracy et al, loathe this reality. Realities must be faced, though, however unpalatable: this lies at the very heart of all that I believe in political terms. Only then can we address and fix problems; no-one ever did any good with their head buried in the sands of wishful thinking and political correctness.

This, of course, is worlds apart from the ludicrous (IMO) sweeping statements being hitherto made, as both I, and subsequently Cras explain in our posts above, and as you, as the intelligent man you are (despite our differences), appreciate of course.

(For the record, I have neither a degree or even a single A-level to my name, so I guess I should declare an interest here as a racist Trump-adoring thicko. :D )

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:03 
User avatar
Prince of Fops

Joined: 14th May, 2009
Posts: 4305
Lonewolves wrote:
Hero of Excellence wrote:
they adopted an antisemite terrorist apologist as leader

Are you Anon X in disguise?


Anonymous X deserves props for choosing a username that you only have to add 1 letter to before logging in.

Which is neat.

Semi-relatedly, I really must work out why the forum won't remember my password.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:07 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55717
Location: California
Cavey wrote:
For the record, I have neither a degree or even a single A-level to my name

This explains everything!!!

Me neither, actually.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:08 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Quote:
Labour MPs will be asked to vote through the Brexit bill at its last stage in the House of Commons regardless of whether any amendments are passed, raising the possibility of further frontbench resignations.

The shadow cabinet agreed that Jeremy Corbyn should impose a three-line whip on the bill at third reading on Wednesday, even if opposition parties do not manage to make any changes to the legislation over the next two days.
Oh dear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:11 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55717
Location: California
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Quote:
Labour MPs will be asked to vote through the Brexit bill at its last stage in the House of Commons regardless of whether any amendments are passed, raising the possibility of further frontbench resignations.

The shadow cabinet agreed that Jeremy Corbyn should impose a three-line whip on the bill at third reading on Wednesday, even if opposition parties do not manage to make any changes to the legislation over the next two days.
Oh dear.

Wow! I mean, I can understand three-lining it to make sure you get your amendments through, but pushing it through unamended? I just can't even start to understand the reasoning behind that.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:14 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
I cannot fathom why you'd whip the unamended bill. Just baffling.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:15 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Lonewolves wrote:
Cavey wrote:
For the record, I have neither a degree or even a single A-level to my name

This explains everything!!!

Me neither, actually.


Getting expelled probably didn't help matters.

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:16 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Lonewolves wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Quote:
Labour MPs will be asked to vote through the Brexit bill at its last stage in the House of Commons regardless of whether any amendments are passed, raising the possibility of further frontbench resignations.

The shadow cabinet agreed that Jeremy Corbyn should impose a three-line whip on the bill at third reading on Wednesday, even if opposition parties do not manage to make any changes to the legislation over the next two days.
Oh dear.

Wow! I mean, I can understand three-lining it to make sure you get your amendments through, but pushing it through unamended? I just can't even start to understand the reasoning behind that.


It's because Corbyn is an absolute fuckwit.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:17 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55717
Location: California
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
I cannot fathom why you'd whip the unamended bill. Just baffling.

Even if you allowed a free vote it'd still go through, but you'd prevent the mass-sacking of most of your front bench in the process...

Corbyn has entirely lost the plot.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:18 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Lonewolves wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
I cannot fathom why you'd whip the unamended bill. Just baffling.

Even if you allowed a free vote it'd still go through, but you'd prevent the mass-sacking of most of your front bench in the process...

Corbyn has entirely lost the plot.


He also doesn't understand the whipping process, which is understandable since he ignored it his entire career. It appears that he won't actually take any action on those who defy the three line whip, which is the entire point of the whip.

Just so incompetent. It boggles the mind.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:20 
User avatar

Joined: 23rd Nov, 2008
Posts: 9521
Location: The Golden Country
Curiosity wrote:
Just so incompetent. It boggles the mind.


Yes, one struggles to find the words to describe such abject, fuck-witted, misplaced ideology-fuelled rank stupidity.

How about "swivel-eyed loon", or S.E.L. for short?

_________________
Beware of gavia articulata oculos...

Dr Lave wrote:
Of course, he's normally wrong but interestingly wrong :p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:29 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
I recently saw him walking on his hind legs too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:31 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Cavey wrote:
ideology-fuelled rank stupidity.


What ideology is fuelling Corbyn's decision to enforce a whip on the A50 bill?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:34 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48705
Location: Cheshire
MaliA wrote:


Popping this here, again.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:34 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
I'd actually have more respect for him if he enforced a whip on a mass-abstention. At least that way they could keep the high ground and say 'we didn't oppose A50, we just opposed this approach to A50'. But right now, it seems only a handful of Labour MPs, most of the Lib Dems, and (annoyingly) the SNP are representing my views in the House. And Ken Clarke, natch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:40 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Cavey wrote:
Is this a rhetorical question Doc?
No. Genuine question.

Quote:
This, of course, is worlds apart from the ludicrous (IMO) sweeping statements being hitherto made, as both I, and subsequently Cras explain in our posts above, and as you, as the intelligent man you are (despite our differences), appreciate of course.
I'm not convinced I do. This:

Quote:
I think you know why, as I do: in statistical terms, the less educated an entire, large population of people is, the less well informed they're likely to be, and also likely to be less able to possess all or some sufficient critical, intellectual faculties to be able to form educated, reasonable judgements in such matters. Sad, yet true (IMO), and as much as I, as a *passionate* believer in grammar schools and meritocracy et al, loathe this reality.
...reads (IMO) as "they're too thick to vote Remain." It's dressed up in pretty words but that doesn't alter the substance. I don't see that as any less patronising, any less sweeping, or any less offensive than "they're too racist to vote Remain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:41 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55717
Location: California
MaliA wrote:
MaliA wrote:


Popping this here, again.

That's like saying Hitler isn't convinced of Stalin. I'm not sure what the point is.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:43 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48705
Location: Cheshire
Lonewolves wrote:
MaliA wrote:
MaliA wrote:


Popping this here, again.

That's like saying Hitler isn't convinced of Stalin. I'm not sure what the point is.


A lot of the reservations AC had about JC have come to pass. I thought it worth a reread. Othets might, or might not do.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:48 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
As an aside, it's a testament to how well-disciplined the Tories can be at times that all the fuss and debate is about Labour, and not the bill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:49 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Kern wrote:
As an aside, it's a testament to how well-disciplined the Tories can be at times that all the fuss and debate is about Labour, and not the bill.

I tried to search earlier to see if there's a Conservative whip on the bill. I couldn't find any information at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:52 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Kern wrote:
As an aside, it's a testament to how well-disciplined the Tories can be at times that all the fuss and debate is about Labour, and not the bill.

I tried to search earlier to see if there's a Conservative whip on the bill. I couldn't find any information at all.


Officially, the whip paper is an internal party document. When I worked for a week in Westminster for an MP back in the late 1990s, the Labour whip for that week happened to end up in the hands of my A-level politics lecturer to use in class.

A major government bill would be a three-liner, except on rare matters of conscience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:54 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Truly amazing piece about the Trump administration: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/05/u ... hlRTSMmJXs

Quote:
WASHINGTON — President Trump loves to set the day’s narrative at dawn, but the deeper story of his White House is best told at night.

Aides confer in the dark because they cannot figure out how to operate the light switches in the cabinet room. Visitors conclude their meetings and then wander around, testing doorknobs until finding one that leads to an exit. In a darkened, mostly empty West Wing, Mr. Trump’s provocative chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, finishes another 16-hour day planning new lines of attack.

Usually around 6:30 p.m., or sometimes later, Mr. Trump retires upstairs to the residence to recharge, vent and intermittently use Twitter. With his wife, Melania, and young son, Barron, staying in New York, he is almost always by himself, sometimes in the protective presence of his imposing longtime aide and former security chief, Keith Schiller. When Mr. Trump is not watching television in his bathrobe or on his phone reaching out to old campaign hands and advisers, he will sometimes set off to explore the unfamiliar surroundings of his new home.


Quote:
This account of the early days of the Trump White House is based on interviews with dozens of government officials, congressional aides, former staff members and other observers of the new administration, many of whom requested anonymity. At the center of the story, according to these sources, is a president determined to go big but increasingly frustrated by the efforts of his small team to contain the backlash.


Quote:
Cloistered in the White House, he now has little access to his fans and supporters — an important source of feedback and validation — and feels increasingly pinched by the pressures of the job and the constant presence of protests, one of the reasons he was forced to scrap a planned trip to Milwaukee last week. For a sense of what is happening outside, he watches cable, both at night and during the day — too much in the eyes of some aides — often offering a bitter play-by-play of critics like CNN’s Don Lemon.

Until the past few days, Mr. Trump was telling his friends and advisers that he believed the opening stages of his presidency were going well. “Did you hear that, this guy thinks it’s been terrible!” Mr. Trump said mockingly to other aides when one dissenting view was voiced last week during a West Wing meeting.

But his opinion has begun to change with a relentless parade of bad headlines.


Quote:
Mr. Priebus bristles at the perception that he occupies a diminished perch in the West Wing pecking order compared with previous chiefs. But for the moment, Mr. Bannon remains the president’s dominant adviser, despite Mr. Trump’s anger that he was not fully briefed on details of the executive order he signed giving his chief strategist a seat on the National Security Council, a greater source of frustration to the president than the fallout from the travel ban.


Quote:
Visitors to the Oval Office say Mr. Trump is obsessed with the décor — it is both a totem of a victory that validates him as a serious person and an image-burnishing backdrop — so he has told his staff to schedule as many televised events in the room as possible.

To pass the time between meetings, Mr. Trump gives quick tours to visitors, highlighting little tweaks he has made after initially expecting he would have to pay for them himself.

Flanking his desk are portraits of Presidents Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. He will linger on the opulence of the newly hung golden drapes, which he told a recent visitor were once used by Franklin D. Roosevelt but in fact were patterned for Bill Clinton. For a man who sometimes has trouble concentrating on policy memos, Mr. Trump was delighted to page through a book that offered him 17 window covering options.

Ultimately, this is very much the White House that Mr. Trump wanted to build. But while the world reckons with the effect he is having on the presidency, he is adjusting to the effect of the presidency on him. He is now a public employee. And the only boss Mr. Trump ever had in his life was his father, a hard-driving developer the president still treats with deep reverence.

With most of his belongings in New York, the only family picture on the shelf behind Mr. Trump’s desk is a small black-and-white photograph of that boss, Frederick Christ Trump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 14:58 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
In other news happening right now (I long for the days that political news wasn't being fired at our faces in an endless gooey torrent), the government's housing white paper (entitled, punchily, "Fixing Our Broken Housing Market") has been published and is being debated in Parliament right now. The PDF is 110-ish pages so I haven't read it, and there's no good summaries going around (yet.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 15:03 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69614
Location: Your Mum
"Build more houses, make getting planning permission quicker and easier, and help out with a deposit for first-time buyers" is what the news said this morning.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 15:03 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
Quote:
I long for the days that political news wasn't being fired at our faces in an endless gooey torrent


Turn off Twitter, and just read the papers in your club each evening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 15:04 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32619
Kern wrote:
Quote:
I long for the days that political news wasn't being fired at our faces in an endless gooey torrent


Turn off Twitter, and just read the papers in your club each evening.

I got FOMO by the acre, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Political Banter and Debate Thread
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 15:05 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17856
Location: Oxford
Grim... wrote:
"Build more houses, make getting planning permission quicker and easier, and help out with a deposit for first-time buyers" is what the news said this morning.


We're not building on the green belt, just relocating it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 14415 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182 ... 289  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PRISM and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.