Be Excellent To Each Other :: View topic

I am no Rugby expert, but I think the jist was by failing to engage with the England players, no ruck was formed, so there was no offside line or anything like that, so the Italian players could get behind the ball and disrupt and confuse the English players.

.green-btn, .red-btn {
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.15);
border: 1px solid #FFDD00 !important;
}

.green-btn:hover, .red-btn:hover {
background: #FFDD00;
border: 1px solid #FFDD00 !important;
color: #303030 !important;
}

.custom-button {
display: inline-block !important;
text-align: center;
text-transform: uppercase;
padding: 13px 35px;
border-radius: 3px;
margin: 10px;
border: medium none;
}
.section-header h2 {
padding-bottom: 0px;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.section-header h2:after {
content: '';
display: block;
height: 3px;
width: 40px;
background: #FD0;
margin: 8px 0 20px 0;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;

Is that a problem sometimes? I'm doing it in Chrome but Edge is always pestering me to use it, so I'll have a go in that.

If someone pronounces URL as "earl" is it ok to hit them?

A Google search threw up someone else having a similar problem and it turned out their host was caching some files at their end and the user had to get that cache refreshed somehow. No idea if that's even at all likely in this case though.

If someone pronounces URL as "earl" is it ok to hit them?

markg wrote:

If someone pronounces URL as "earl" is it ok to hit them?

Are they Irish or Merkin?

On the subject of websites, adamrobertwebdesign.com popped up as a facebook ad. "We produce beautiful, SEO optimised websites". No, no you don't.

Oh, and by the way, it's nice to see you back. :luv:

"An exceptionally well resourced dark arts operation"

I'm pretty sure Storm Doris has ever-so-slightly moved my satellite dish away from the correct angle, or at the very least dislodged one of the cables running down from it. For the past few days I've had no trouble watching in standard definition but high definition broadcasts keep on breaking up. I might get a ladder just to check that the cables are secure, otherwise I might need to decide if watching in HD is more important than calling out an expert.

It could just be atmospherics and will soon pass.

Cras wrote:

"An exceptionally well resourced dark arts operation"

Best Tripadvisor review ever.

Sky boxes have a signal strength output buried in the settings menu somewhere; check that.

Author:	Satsuma [ Sun Feb 26, 2017 22:51 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Seems to now. Only problem is, absolutely everything I did with the theme has been ditched so I've got to (virtually) do the whole fecking customization thing again. I can't be arsed. Thanks for your kindly assistance mind.

Author:	Bamba [ Sun Feb 26, 2017 22:52 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
If PHP 7 is the current release then isn't running PHP 5.6 hilariously unsecure? I have no PHP knowledge, I'm honestly just asking.

Author:	Satsuma [ Sun Feb 26, 2017 22:55 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
No, is the answer.

Author:	Grim... [ Sun Feb 26, 2017 23:00 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
PHP 5 still gets bugfixes and security updates. PHP 6 doesn't really exist.

Author:	GazChap [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:29 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Was it the anonymous functions that made you think that required PHP 7, Grim...? I think they came in with 5.6.

Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

Bits and Bobs 48 https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10936	Page 13 of 60

Author:	Grim... [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:36 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Aye. I've not used them (that I can remember), so I'm not sure which version they work in. I'm looking into moving our work prod up to 7. What do you use?

Author:	Kern [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:59 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
England v Italy yesterday. I got home in time to catch the final 15 minutes or so of the first half (starting with that impressive drop goal) and the whole of the second. Would someone up to speed with the game's laws explain the loophole Italy were exploiting that was upsetting England?

Author:	Malc [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:03 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
I am no Rugby expert, but I think the jist was by failing to engage with the England players, no ruck was formed, so there was no offside line or anything like that, so the Italian players could get behind the ball and disrupt and confuse the English players.

Author:	GazChap [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:03 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Still 5.6, but only because I've not really had enough time to properly research migration to 7.

Author:	DavPaz [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:21 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Malc wrote: I am no Rugby expert, but I think the jist was by failing to engage with the England players, no ruck was formed, so there was no offside line or anything like that, so the Italian players could get behind the ball and disrupt and confuse the English players. basically. It's legal, but it's dodgy. It's been likened to Bodyline in the cricket

Author:	KovacsC [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:38 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
It is allowed and in line outs too. It is hardly used, because as England showed you are not held, so can just pick the ball up and go.

Author:	Kern [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:46 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Thanks for those answers. Very much an unexpected tactic, then. At least once you try something like that you only really get an advantage the first time as in future games the teams should be more prepared to know how to respond. Or just rewrite the laws. Anyway, about Elliot Daly....

Author:	KovacsC [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:50 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
The laws don't need re-writing. it just showed England's weakness at not adapting to the tactic

Author:	Grim... [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:55 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Yeah, there was nothing dodgy about what they did, it was just so easy to exploit that no-one has done it for decades, and forgotten how to exploit it. As soon as England went in for half time and were (presumably) told "run through the bloody great big gap it creates" it soon became clear why. It made for some damned entertaining exchanges with the ref, though.

Author:	devilman [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 13:44 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Assuming you're still using Zerif Lite, is this the place where you're changing it? Attachment: zerif.PNG (I must remember to remove the template from Under Logic when I'm done )

Author:	KovacsC [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:57 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Yes 'I am not a coach, I am a referee' had be chuckling. I think once, England realised they would not get pinged for going (took 30 mins), the game changed.

Author:	Satsuma [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 13:30 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Jesus Christ, can someone help me again with this bloody website. There's a Big Title section which just has one big bit of text and then two buttons. When I change the text in the customise option during the live preview and then publish and save everything is fine. Then when I refresh the text goes back to the fucking default as if it hasn't saved at all. I think this is the bit. Green Button and Red Button. Quote: .green-btn, .red-btn { background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.15); border: 1px solid #FFDD00 !important; } .green-btn:hover, .red-btn:hover { background: #FFDD00; border: 1px solid #FFDD00 !important; color: #303030 !important; } .custom-button { display: inline-block !important; text-align: center; text-transform: uppercase; padding: 13px 35px; border-radius: 3px; margin: 10px; border: medium none; } .section-header h2 { padding-bottom: 0px; text-transform: uppercase; } .section-header h2:after { content: ''; display: block; height: 3px; width: 40px; background: #FD0; margin: 8px 0 20px 0; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; Anyone have any ideas, again? I will wubs you forever.

Author:	devilman [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 13:35 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
If the text within the buttons/title is reverting back to the default, the CSS won't be at fault, but the theme itself. Have you tried making the amends in a different browser?

Author:	Satsuma [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 13:37 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Is that a problem sometimes? I'm doing it in Chrome but Edge is always pestering me to use it, so I'll have a go in that.

Author:	devilman [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 13:39 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Satsuma wrote: Is that a problem sometimes? I'm doing it in Chrome but Edge is always pestering me to use it, so I'll have a go in that. It shouldn't be, but it's worth a try. I've seen some templates asking the user to clear browser caches following an update too in the past.

Author:	GazChap [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 13:39 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Is this WordPress? Changing things in the Customise section rarely changes the actual website content, as far as I'm aware - you probably need to find the page/post that's got that title on it and edit it directly.

Author:	Satsuma [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 13:58 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
That's the one. You can't change Big Title elsewhere without dipping into the code I don't reckon.

Author:	devilman [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 14:02 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Attachment: test.PNG Hmm. It works ok for me. I installed the template, customised the settings as you did, created a new page, set the template for that page to 'Frontpage' and it worked.

Author:	Satsuma [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 14:09 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
I know. It's never been a problem before. Anyway, I've kinda sorted it now by downloading another child version of the theme which seems to be working instead. Seriously though, fuck the internet. It's proper shit. Apart from the pictures of sexy ladies.

Author:	Bamba [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 14:41 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
A Google search threw up someone else having a similar problem and it turned out their host was caching some files at their end and the user had to get that cache refreshed somehow. No idea if that's even at all likely in this case though.

Author:	myp [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 14:48 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
I read that as "catching some flies" and thought that was a fun turn of phrase for DNS issues

Author:	markg [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 14:50 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
If someone pronounces URL as "earl" is it ok to hit them?

Author:	myp [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 14:54 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
markg wrote: If someone pronounces URL as "earl" is it ok to hit them? Same rules apply as "dubdubdub" I guess

Author:	markg [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 14:57 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Got it. I'll murder them for the good of all humanity then.

Author:	Grim... [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 15:00 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Good man.

Author:	Cras [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 15:08 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
markg wrote: If someone pronounces URL as "earl" is it ok to hit them? It's an obligation

Author:	Satsuma [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 15:17 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
Bamba wrote: A Google search threw up someone else having a similar problem and it turned out their host was caching some files at their end and the user had to get that cache refreshed somehow. No idea if that's even at all likely in this case though. Thank god I didn't have to do anything like that. It's taken a few hours yesterday and until now to sort the fecking thing out (minus 45 minutes to watch The Walking Dead so I didn't murder anyone). My site never gets any usage anyway so it's all a rather pointless waste of time that I could do without. Oh, and by the way, it's nice to see you back.

Author:	DavPaz [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 15:24 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
markg wrote: If someone pronounces URL as "earl" is it ok to hit them? Are they Irish or Merkin?

Author:	devilman [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 15:30 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
On the subject of websites, adamrobertwebdesign.com popped up as a facebook ad. "We produce beautiful, SEO optimised websites". No, no you don't.

Author:	markg [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 15:42 ]
Post subject:	Re: Bits and Bobs 48
DavPaz wrote: markg wrote: If someone pronounces URL as "earl" is it ok to hit them? Are they Irish or Merkin? Neither. I honestly didn't know what the fuck they were on about when they asked if I could update an earl.