Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

Bits & Bobs 45
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10486
Page 24 of 60

Author:  Mimi [ Tue Sep 01, 2015 16:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Grim... wrote:
Oh right - "few" == 3 in my head.

84,000ish, then.

Is that like my "several" == 7 in my head?

(Because they begin with the same four letters, obviously).

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Tue Sep 01, 2015 16:39 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Saturnalian wrote:
I'm trying to get an accountant today.

"Do you do solicitors accounts?" I ask. "Yes" they reply. "Oh joy, because I need an audited set of accounts because I hold client monies" I exclaim. "We don't do those" is the reply from at least four accountants.

Scumbags.

Also: hnnnngh.

Its an increasing problem. SAR accounts (and others) require accountants to be registered auditors, but the increasingly low numbers of statutory audits means that a lot of small accountants have dropped their audit registration as the potential income doesn't cover the cost (and associated risk). Even when I was doing audit SARs were a pain in the tits.

We can do them, but we'll be too expensive (Canary Wharf innit) and I can't do mates rates on audit. Where are you based, I may have some contacts?

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Tue Sep 01, 2015 16:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Saturnalian wrote:
The number of wasps I have killed today has just doubled. It's now 2.

In the event that this was the post that I was asked to help Saturnalian on, I've got no wasp guilt tips.

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Sep 01, 2015 16:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Saturnalian wrote:
I'm trying to get an accountant today.

"Do you do solicitors accounts?" I ask. "Yes" they reply. "Oh joy, because I need an audited set of accounts because I hold client monies" I exclaim. "We don't do those" is the reply from at least four accountants.

Scumbags.

Also: hnnnngh.

Its an increasing problem. SAR accounts (and others) require accountants to be registered auditors, but the increasingly low numbers of statutory audits means that a lot of small accountants have dropped their audit registration as the potential income doesn't cover the cost (and associated risk). Even when I was doing audit SARs were a pain in the tits.

We can do them, but we'll be too expensive (Canary Wharf innit) and I can't do mates rates on audit. Where are you based, I may have some contacts?


Just outside someplace, Leicestershire, if you know anyone who might assist.

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Tue Sep 01, 2015 16:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Attachment:
sense_bin_red_lb7.jpg

No idea why the dimensions of this bin are best understood by positioning it next to a drawn naked eunuch,

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Sep 01, 2015 16:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Quite a tall one too.

Author:  Mimi [ Tue Sep 01, 2015 17:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Russell?

Author:  Kern [ Tue Sep 01, 2015 17:28 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Trusted the forecast and didn't pack a coat. It's now raining. Joy.

Author:  myp [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 8:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Curiosity wrote:
Quite a tall one too.

It's just a short bin, isn't it? I assume that's what the crudely drawn lower half of naked Slender Man is meant to illustrate.

Author:  Mimi [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 8:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Future Warrior wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
Quite a tall one too.

It's just a short bin, isn't it? I assume that's what the crudely drawn lower half of naked Slender Man is meant to illustrate.

85cm is about 34". Looking at the scale of that drawing, he must have about an extra 6" of inner seam measurement, barefoot, to go. So he must have an inseam of about 40"+, which is massively tall.

Author:  Curiosity [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 8:28 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Mimi wrote:
Future Warrior wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
Quite a tall one too.

It's just a short bin, isn't it? I assume that's what the crudely drawn lower half of naked Slender Man is meant to illustrate.

85cm is about 34". Looking at the axle if that drawing, he must have about an extra 6" of inner seam measurement, barefoot to go. So he must have an inseam of about 40"+, which is massively tall.


:this:

Author:  Kern [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

What is it with this forum and bins?

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:25 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Kern wrote:
What is it with this forum and bins?


I emailed my MP about it this morning, too.

Author:  myp [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Kern wrote:
What is it with this forum and bins?

One should go in the other.

Author:  Curiosity [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

IT'S NOT EVEN BIN TALKING DAY!

Author:  Kern [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Curiosity wrote:
IT'S NOT EVEN BIN TALKING DAY!


It was a bank holiday this week, so different schedules apply.

Author:  GazChap [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:55 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Curiosity wrote:
IT'S NOT EVEN BIN TALKING DAY!

Obligatory

Author:  lasermink [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 10:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

The forum is running rather slow for me since last night.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 10:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

I noticed that too.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 10:54 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

It's something to do with the "who is online" box. I'll fix it!

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

There we go.

Zoom!

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:48 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

All that discussion about the bin diagram and I forgot to order it. Tits.

Author:  Bobbyaro [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

The tits would be really big as well!

Author:  Cras [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Grim... wrote:
It's something to do with the "who is online" box. I'll fix it!


Goodness, maybe the fact that it appears to have 55 guests. Huh.

(52 of those are probably spiders, of course)

Author:  Cras [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:54 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Cras wrote:
(52 of those are probably spiders, of course)


Huh, apparently not.

Author:  Cavey [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:56 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Attachment:
sense_bin_red_lb7.jpg

No idea why the dimensions of this bin are best understood by positioning it next to a drawn naked eunuch,


...Geeky dimensions, risqué nudity and above all BINS - this post has it all, in the very finest Beex traditions. :D
/doffs cap to APOD

Author:  DavPaz [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Kern wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
IT'S NOT EVEN BIN TALKING DAY!


It was a bank holiday this week, so different schedules apply.

Not in my burg, apparently. As I was away on Monday, I now have to deal with up to 4 weeks worth of recycling waste.

I'll cope.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:01 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Cras wrote:
Grim... wrote:
It's something to do with the "who is online" box. I'll fix it!


Goodness, maybe the fact that it appears to have 55 guests. Huh.

(52 of those are probably spiders, of course)

It should zoom even more now.

Author:  Bamba [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Why all the guests, what've we done?

Author:  Curiosity [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Bamba wrote:
Why all the guests, what've we done?


We so pretty.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

/flashes eyelashes

Author:  Dr Zoidberg [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Bamba wrote:
Why all the guests, what've we done?


Nobody saw me do it, you can't prove anything.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

It turns out we're getting somewhat hammered by an IP that originates from this server host: https://www.linkedin.com/company/b2-net-solutions

We may be under a really, really crappy DDOS attack. Or it may be like that time the Google robot went insane and started trying to cache the entire site once every second.

Author:  Cras [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:33 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Grim... wrote:
It turns out we're getting somewhat hammered by an IP that originates from this server host: https://www.linkedin.com/company/b2-net-solutions

We may be under a really, really crappy DDOS attack. Or it may be like that time the Google robot went insane and started trying to cache the entire site once every second.


Lulz. It looks like they're a hosting company, so who they are doesn't tell us a lot.

Author:  DBSnappa [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Grim... wrote:
It turns out we're getting somewhat hammered by an IP that originates from this server host: https://www.linkedin.com/company/b2-net-solutions

We may be under a really, really crappy DDOS attack. Or it may be like that time the Google robot went insane and started trying to cache the entire site once every second.



Hmm, my missus checked her junk mail box last night and she'd received over 30 spoofed emails from LinkedIn yesterday evening. Not saying there's a connection or anything, just an observation.

[edit] just checked mine and apart from the usual suspects I got one from thefirefaerie spamming me a link to a site telling me I could be earning $8k Pcm or something. No wonder she can afford to keep Cras' in the champagne and cheese he's accustomed to...

Author:  Cras [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:38 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

I think Grim... was just using the linkedin site to point to the company, b2netsolutions (or ServerMania) rather than suggesting it was a linkedin host.

Author:  GazChap [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:47 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

I mentioned us on the twitters yesterday in conversation with a local radio DJ, but I doubt his followers would continue to be interested this long after.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Cras wrote:
I think Grim... was just using the linkedin site to point to the company, b2netsolutions (or ServerMania) rather than suggesting it was a linkedin host.

Yes indeed.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

52,660 requests since midnight. Huh.

Author:  Satsuma [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 13:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

You don't think achilles has launched a DDOS attack on us!? Oh noes! And so on.

Author:  DavPaz [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 13:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Grim... wrote:
52,660 requests since midnight. Huh.

GazChap wrote:
I mentioned us on the twitters yesterday in conversation with a local radio DJ, but I doubt his followers would continue to be interested this long after.


"Local celeb drone pilot Gazchap (7' 9'') downs website for idiots. Yesterday"

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 15:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

:DD

Author:  Dr Zoidberg [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 15:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

While I was on holiday last week, I noticed that someone in a Tesco Express had accidentally saved some scanned copies of employee paperwork in the "Photos to be used for a screensaver" directory on one of their PCs, so this and others were on display for everyone queueing.

I've just let their customer services team know, and they are quite rightly horrified. Had I been more evil I could have sent it to the information commissioner's office, or a national newspaper.

Attachment:
Whoops!.jpg

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 16:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Superb.

This morning the WHSmith Magazines "contact us" web page sent anything submitted on it to their entire contacts database, which is pretty good going.

Author:  TheVision [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 16:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Another Tesco cock up!

Yesterday our shopping was delivered but it was a couple of minutes late. Turns out the van had broken down so the freezer wasn't working properly. The delivery driver apologized and promptly refunded half of the goods in our shopping!

They're all still fine and only as defrosted as they would have been if we'd actually visited the store.

Author:  Mimi [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 18:56 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

TheVision wrote:
Another Tesco cock up!

Yesterday our shopping was delivered but it was a couple of minutes late. Turns out the van had broken down so the freezer wasn't working properly. The delivery driver apologized and promptly refunded half of the goods in our shopping!

They're all still fine and only as defrosted as they would have been if we'd actually visited the store.

They wouldn't be able to guarantee the van temperature of the chilled delivery, which is a health and safety issue. It will be very much part of the trading law standards that they acted in the way they did. Buying from the store, you are in charge of ensuring that the food stays within safe temperature bounds on the way home, if Tesco can't assure this with the van print outs then they can't sell it.

We have the same with many deliveries to stores: there has to be a constant temperature read to prove that the food was kept within bounds at all times.

Author:  TheVision [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 19:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Mimi wrote:
TheVision wrote:
Another Tesco cock up!

Yesterday our shopping was delivered but it was a couple of minutes late. Turns out the van had broken down so the freezer wasn't working properly. The delivery driver apologized and promptly refunded half of the goods in our shopping!

They're all still fine and only as defrosted as they would have been if we'd actually visited the store.

They wouldn't be able to guarantee the van temperature of the chilled delivery, which is a health and safety issue. It will be very much part of the trading law standards that they acted in the way they did. Buying from the store, you are in charge of ensuring that the food stays within safe temperature bounds on the way home, if Tesco can't assure this with the van print outs then they can't sell it.

We have the same with many deliveries to stores: there has to be a constant temperature read to prove that the food was kept within bounds at all times.


That's pretty much what the van driver said, except you made more sense. He wittered on about Tesco making millions in profits so they could afford it. He also left us the receipt of his next delivery too. That lady spent £125 on her shopping.

Author:  myp [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 19:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Except aren't they actually doing very badly at the moment? :D

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 20:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

Future Warrior wrote:
Except aren't they actually doing very badly at the moment? :D

They're still making a metric fuckton of trading profits. Its just a fuckton less than they werr and that requires them to make a fuckton of non trading write downs in the short term. "badly" is relative.

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Sep 02, 2015 20:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: Bits & Bobs 45

'Kin 'ell. Went to read the Fiver on Big Paper and was confronted with the image of a policeman carrying a drowed 3 year old from the sea in Turkey after yet another boat went down. And then read 20 dead after blasts in The Yemen where I think my doctor ex is.

Page 24 of 60 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/